Re: [Freedos-user] Dillo web browser for DOS - beta2
> Honestly, I wanted one of these days to start a thread here about > Arachne. Last I heard, Glenn had (mostly) stopped working on it completely in 2008-Dec, 3 years ago, R.I.P. :-( > but there's at least one other fork (EDIT: rayandrews ??) that has > some updates and rewrites most is from BEFORE 2008-Dec ... -- 10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation Server virtualization is being driven by many needs. But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity while improving strategic productivity. Learn More! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/ ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] Dillo web browser for DOS - beta2
> does this DOS port of DILLO make Arachne obsolete? NO. Arachne supports 8086, Dillo never will. Arachne has bugs and Dillo has bugs, but they have DIFFERENT code origins and different WATT code, so they have DIFFERENT bugs ... so if one doesn't work just try the other one (and some more). > Also would using UPX (best mode) on the executable have any advantage? This dilemma is impossible to resolve finally. > upx --8086 --lzma --ultra-brute dillo.exe No point to use "--8086" - should get rejected for COFF anyway ;-) -- 10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation Server virtualization is being driven by many needs. But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity while improving strategic productivity. Learn More! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/ ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] ew lynx for dos.
> ew lynx for dos. where ? > But will pick a few people who write me privately for this goal. > If you are running freedos only, not under a windows structure I do. > use ms dos 7.1. Doug has tested it already under Windows 7 did it successfully wipe C: partition ??? > almost forgot, here's some screenshots I took: > http://imageshack.us/homepage/?user=rugxulo I can't find any. > Doug has contacted me about testing the > new package before he releases it. > This page last updated 2 November 2006. Please let me know when it's out :-) -- 10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation Server virtualization is being driven by many needs. But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity while improving strategic productivity. Learn More! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/ ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] Dillo, interesting...
> It is interesting that Arachne isn't the only option anymore NO : http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0503736/php/drdoswiki/index.php?n=Main.Browsers > On the other hand, DOS isn't security friendly so supporting > an advanced web browser probably doesn't make sense anyways Good, change forum, problem gone : http://www.msfn.org/board/forum/133-microsoft-beta-discussion/ > With no sand boxing because there is no user concept, DOS and > networking is a pretty risky combination Cut the network cable, problem gone : http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3144/3087822258_0329ceb458.jpg > I suppose DOS running under DOSBOX or a virtual PC is a sandbox though. Bill cares about your security. > As for other news, how is Freedos 1.1 coming along? Do you need it badly? -- 10 Tips for Better Server Consolidation Server virtualization is being driven by many needs. But none more important than the need to reduce IT complexity while improving strategic productivity. Learn More! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51507609/ ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
