Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba
Just thought that I would let you know that I truly despise your signature. Lol @dave From: mich...@robinson-west.com Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2019 1:57 PM To: Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS. Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba October 13, 2019 9:23 AM, "Jon Brase" wrote: SMB1 has known vulnerabilities, so Windows has had the option to disable SMB 1 entirely for a while and on the Linux side, upstream SAMBA recently changed to disabling it by default. It is possible that various distros may already have disabled it in their default SAMBA configurations. Original message From: David Griffith Date: 10/13/2019 08:23 (GMT-06:00) To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba What am I doing wrong with FreeDOS and mounting a Samba file share? I have a Virtualbox image I found at https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/?page_id=33 which seems to have everything ready for networking. I have Samba installed on the host Linux machine. From the host I can mount the share, but not entirely on FreeDOS. The best I can manage is read-only access if the "valid users" parameter (below) is removed. I managed to get this to work a few years ago and recall that the solution has something to do with using SMB protocol 1. None of the guides I find now for mounting a share from FreeDOS mention this and Samba now seems unwilling to admit it knows anything about SMB1. Here's what I have for the share in /etc/smb.conf: [Dave] comment = Dave's stuff path = /home/dave/foobar read only = no guest ok = yes browsable = yes writable = yes valid users = dave -- David Griffith d...@661.org A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user Known vulnerabilities or not, SMB1 is used by OPL for loading PS1/PS2 games over network from a SMB1 server. I'd like to know how to support SMB1 protocol or at least how to substitute SMB2 or later whether the environment be Dos or OPL. -- Michael C. Robinson ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 1:57 PM wrote: > October 13, 2019 9:23 AM, "Jon Brase" wrote: > > SMB1 has known vulnerabilities, so Windows has had the option to disable SMB > 1 entirely for a while and on the Linux side, upstream SAMBA recently changed > to disabling it by default. It is possible that various distros may already > have disabled it in their default SAMBA configurations. > > Known vulnerabilities or not, SMB1 is used by OPL for loading PS1/PS2 games > over network from a SMB1 server. I'd like to know how to support SMB1 > protocol or at least how to substitute SMB2 or later whether the environment > be Dos or OPL. If I understand what OPL is trying to do correctly, this isn't a FreeDOS problem. FreeDOS will be a client accessing a Linux host using SMB1. The host needs to be configured to support that. Configuration happens in the smb.conf file on the host. See https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/smb.conf.5.htm, and look at the client max protocol(G) and client min protocol(G) sections. CORE looks like the protocol version needed to support the desired access.. > -- Michael C. Robinson __ Dennis ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba
October 13, 2019 9:23 AM, "Jon Brase" mailto:jon.br...@gmail.com?to=%22Jon%20Brase%22%20)> wrote: SMB1 has known vulnerabilities, so Windows has had the option to disable SMB 1 entirely for a while and on the Linux side, upstream SAMBA recently changed to disabling it by default. It is possible that various distros may already have disabled it in their default SAMBA configurations. Original message From: David Griffith mailto:d...@661.org)> Date: 10/13/2019 08:23 (GMT-06:00) To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net (mailto:freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net) Subject: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba What am I doing wrong with FreeDOS and mounting a Samba file share? I have a Virtualbox image I found at https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/?page_id=33 (https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/?page_id=33) which seems to have everything ready for networking. I have Samba installed on the host Linux machine. From the host I can mount the share, but not entirely on FreeDOS. The best I can manage is read-only access if the "valid users" parameter (below) is removed. I managed to get this to work a few years ago and recall that the solution has something to do with using SMB protocol 1. None of the guides I find now for mounting a share from FreeDOS mention this and Samba now seems unwilling to admit it knows anything about SMB1. Here's what I have for the share in /etc/smb.conf: [Dave] comment = Dave's stuff path = /home/dave/foobar read only = no guest ok = yes browsable = yes writable = yes valid users = dave -- David Griffith d...@661.org (mailto:d...@661.org) A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net (mailto:Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user (https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user) Known vulnerabilities or not, SMB1 is used by OPL for loading PS1/PS2 games over network from a SMB1 server. I'd like to know how to support SMB1 protocol or at least how to substitute SMB2 or later whether the environment be Dos or OPL. -- Michael C. Robinson ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba
SMB1 has known vulnerabilities, so Windows has had the option to disable SMB 1 entirely for a while and on the Linux side, upstream SAMBA recently changed to disabling it by default. It is possible that various distros may already have disabled it in their default SAMBA configurations. Original message From: David Griffith Date: 10/13/2019 08:23 (GMT-06:00) To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba What am I doing wrong with FreeDOS and mounting a Samba file share? I have a Virtualbox image I found at https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/?page_id=33 which seems to have everything ready for networking. I have Samba installed on the host Linux machine. From the host I can mount the share, but not entirely on FreeDOS. The best I can manage is read-only access if the "valid users" parameter (below) is removed. I managed to get this to work a few years ago and recall that the solution has something to do with using SMB protocol 1. None of the guides I find now for mounting a share from FreeDOS mention this and Samba now seems unwilling to admit it knows anything about SMB1. Here's what I have for the share in /etc/smb.conf: [Dave] comment = Dave's stuff path = /home/dave/foobar read only = no guest ok = yes browsable = yes writable = yes valid users = dave -- David Griffith d...@661.org A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
[Freedos-user] FreeDOS and Samba
What am I doing wrong with FreeDOS and mounting a Samba file share? I have a Virtualbox image I found at https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/?page_id=33 which seems to have everything ready for networking. I have Samba installed on the host Linux machine. From the host I can mount the share, but not entirely on FreeDOS. The best I can manage is read-only access if the "valid users" parameter (below) is removed. I managed to get this to work a few years ago and recall that the solution has something to do with using SMB protocol 1. None of the guides I find now for mounting a share from FreeDOS mention this and Samba now seems unwilling to admit it knows anything about SMB1. Here's what I have for the share in /etc/smb.conf: [Dave] comment = Dave's stuff path = /home/dave/foobar read only = no guest ok = yes browsable = yes writable = yes valid users = dave -- David Griffith d...@661.org A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Re: [Freedos-user] Tinyasm vs. NASM
Hi, (BTW, thanks for the binary, I'll test it out.) On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:03 PM Rugxulo wrote: > > >>> I still want to get PSR Invaders working with it > > I've done it! :-) (No, I haven't updated the FD Package yet.) If you're super bored, check it out: * https://pastebin.com/vj0FTvqy * http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/games/invaders/invadr11.zip ___ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
