Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-17 Thread Blair Campbell
You may have to request that UPX binary; the file I send you contains
a patch for the latest source code.

On 6/15/06, Michael Devore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At 08:26 AM 6/15/2006 -0500, jp_freedos wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:44:08AM -0500, Jim Hall wrote:
   I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him.
 
 Clinton is not President anymore.

 Clinton was, among other things, a Rhodes Scholar, and generally conceded
 as brilliant by his peers including those who hated him for political or
 ethical reasons.  Not that my remark is on-topic either, but it's nice to
 occasionally repair a few holes in the historical record wreaked by the
 radical right.

 Dragging matters back to FreeDOS, there should a new version HIMEM and
 EMM386 released by the end of July, although the end of June is an
 optimistic target if work clears up within the next week.  So far no major
 bugfixes, but two or three compatibility fixes and modifications that may
 affect some users.  Clearing misbehavior with a couple of DOS extenders
 under large free extended memory  (512M-2G) conditions is a focus.  I also
 anticipate smaller executables if the new UPX works as it should --
 assuming the official UPX release has better (i.e. not open-source)
 compression techniques built-in, as it did in past releases.



 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user



-- 
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
   David Letterman (1947 - )

See ya


___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-17 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi!

16-Июн-2006 18:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (chris evans) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:

 NNTP is only one protocol to distribute lists. And distribution over
email has its own advantages (for example, no depends from TCP/IP).
ce Eh?  email use 110/25 pop/smtp and AFIAK those use tcp/udp.

 Not necessary. I myself use uupc.


___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-17 Thread chris evans
Hmm, what does the transport mechanism do with message sorting?

Arkady V.Belousov wrote:

Hi!

16-Июн-2006 18:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (chris evans) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:

  

NNTP is only one protocol to distribute lists. And distribution over
email has its own advantages (for example, no depends from TCP/IP).
  

ce Eh?  email use 110/25 pop/smtp and AFIAK those use tcp/udp.

 Not necessary. I myself use uupc.
  





___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-17 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi!

17-Июн-2006 19:09 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (chris evans) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:

ce Hmm, what does the transport mechanism do with message sorting?

 Nothing. Sorting is function of mail client.


___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-16 Thread chris evans
Arkady V.Belousov wrote:

 NNTP is only one protocol to distribute lists. And distribution over
email has its own advantages (for example, no depends from TCP/IP).

  


Eh?  email use 110/25 pop/smtp and AFIAK those use tcp/udp.




___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-15 Thread Jim Hall
Wesley Parish wrote:
 On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:00, Adam Peart wrote:
   
 With Thunderbird, you can also have it sort email by threads, which is
 how I have it set for this mailing list  another mailing list.
 

 Take it from me, sorting by threads is the only way to handle seriously large 
 mailing lists.  And making mailing list folders/directories so you don't have 
 eveything piled on top of everything else.


Yup, that's how I read the lists ... threads, and filtering mailing list 
stuff into a separate folder.

-jh


-- 
I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him.



___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-15 Thread jp_freedos
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:44:08AM -0500, Jim Hall wrote:
 I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him.

Clinton is not President anymore.

-- 
I bought a house, on a one-way dead-end road; I don't know
how I got there.

Have a great day and don't forget to laugh!

http://www.gcfl.net (The Good, Clean Funnies List): Good,
clean daily funnies you can safely tell your Mom!


___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-15 Thread Eric Auer

Hi!

jp_freedos / gcfl.net wrote:
 ... Jim Hall wrote:
  I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him.
 Clinton is not President anymore.

I think it is obvious that this signature line was not
about Clinton but about a certain cowboy. While there
are urban myths about the IQ of those two guys, it seems
that Clinton has around 133 and that there is no data
known about the other, but it is assumed that he is not
really dumb either. Still his politics show little under-
standing of how the world does and should work in 2006.

Clinton focused on health insurance, drug abuse, weapon
abuse and poverty problems, as well as on being more
careful with state money. I recently read a news article
that the whole world has spent 890 000 000 000 bucks on
weapons and war last year, half of which were spent by
the USA (considerably less than 10pc of the number of
people on earth). That is considerably LESS wise in my
opinion than, for example, joining the Kyoto treaties.

But of course all of this is not DOS-related. Sorry for
being off-topic.

Eric




___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-15 Thread Mark Bailey


Eric Auer wrote:
 Hi!
 
 jp_freedos / gcfl.net wrote:
 ... Jim Hall wrote:
 I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him.
 Clinton is not President anymore.
 
 I think it is obvious that this signature line was not
 about Clinton but about a certain cowboy. 

[...]

 But of course all of this is not DOS-related. Sorry for
 being off-topic.
 
 Eric
 

ENOUGH! Please stop now!  NO MORE! :-)

Mark

 
 
 



___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-15 Thread Michael Devore
At 08:26 AM 6/15/2006 -0500, jp_freedos wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:44:08AM -0500, Jim Hall wrote:
  I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him.

Clinton is not President anymore.

Clinton was, among other things, a Rhodes Scholar, and generally conceded 
as brilliant by his peers including those who hated him for political or 
ethical reasons.  Not that my remark is on-topic either, but it's nice to 
occasionally repair a few holes in the historical record wreaked by the 
radical right.

Dragging matters back to FreeDOS, there should a new version HIMEM and 
EMM386 released by the end of July, although the end of June is an 
optimistic target if work clears up within the next week.  So far no major 
bugfixes, but two or three compatibility fixes and modifications that may 
affect some users.  Clearing misbehavior with a couple of DOS extenders 
under large free extended memory  (512M-2G) conditions is a focus.  I also 
anticipate smaller executables if the new UPX works as it should -- 
assuming the official UPX release has better (i.e. not open-source) 
compression techniques built-in, as it did in past releases.



___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-15 Thread Gerry Hickman
Hi,

I've never understood why mailing lists are so popular; surely NNTP is a 
far better and more efficient way to discuss things, plus it has the 
advantage of being able to manage archives and reduce bandwidth? Why 
would anyone want to send out and receive 100s of emails when you could 
simply view headers on a server and choose the ones of interest?

Jim Hall wrote:
 Wesley Parish wrote:
 On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:00, Adam Peart wrote:
   
 With Thunderbird, you can also have it sort email by threads, which is
 how I have it set for this mailing list  another mailing list.
 
 Take it from me, sorting by threads is the only way to handle seriously 
 large 
 mailing lists.  And making mailing list folders/directories so you don't 
 have 
 eveything piled on top of everything else.
 
 
 Yup, that's how I read the lists ... threads, and filtering mailing list 
 stuff into a separate folder.
 
 -jh
 
 


-- 
Gerry Hickman (London UK)


___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-15 Thread Jim Hall
USENET is also pretty stuffed with spam.  At least on the mailing lists, 
we have spam filtering to keep the noise down.

Unfortunately, off-topic threads still make it through.  ;-)

-jh



Gerry Hickman wrote:
 Hi,

 I've never understood why mailing lists are so popular; surely NNTP is a 
 far better and more efficient way to discuss things, plus it has the 
 advantage of being able to manage archives and reduce bandwidth? Why 
 would anyone want to send out and receive 100s of emails when you could 
 simply view headers on a server and choose the ones of interest?

 Jim Hall wrote:
   
 Wesley Parish wrote:
 
 On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:00, Adam Peart wrote:
   
   
 With Thunderbird, you can also have it sort email by threads, which is
 how I have it set for this mailing list  another mailing list.
 
 
 Take it from me, sorting by threads is the only way to handle seriously 
 large 
 mailing lists.  And making mailing list folders/directories so you don't 
 have 
 eveything piled on top of everything else.
   
 Yup, that's how I read the lists ... threads, and filtering mailing list 
 stuff into a separate folder.

 -jh


 


   


-- 
I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him.



___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-15 Thread Ce
If they (T.H.E.M.)  wish for my vote then I want universal healthcare and pls 
give break to 6.75/hr employees on taxation  Geez 70 bucks in taxes is 
. Ow.

--chris 
http://nxdos.sourceforge.net/ 




___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-14 Thread Adam Peart
With Thunderbird, you can also have it sort email by threads, which is
how I have it set for this mailing list  another mailing list.

Jim Hall wrote:
 BA HCL wrote:
   
 Hello,

 It is painful to read mails in random order!
 Can the mails be sent according to GMT order?
 Is there a way to recieve threaded mails from the lists I subscribed?
 And can I select not to receive mail at all, but the mailing lists
 still accessible?
 Perhaps there are ways to do it but I don't know, enlighten me please.
 

 Unfortunately, there isn't a way that I can see in the SF mail list
 manager (Mailman) to re-encode all date/time as GMT.

 However, I also can't recall ever reading email messages on the list
 out of order due to dates. Maybe that's because Thunderbird happens to
 sort them, or maybe it's because I never noticed. I don't know.

 -jh
   



___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-14 Thread Arkady V.Belousov
Hi!

14-Июн-2006 11:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Hall) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:

JH out of order due to dates. Maybe that's because Thunderbird happens to
JH sort them, or maybe it's because I never noticed. I don't know.

 Jim, you use Thunderbird? May be, you answer for me some questions
about it?


___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


[Freedos-user] Want to read FreeDOS mails in a sensible order

2006-06-13 Thread BA HCL

Hello,

It is painful to read mails in random order!
Can the mails be sent according to GMT order?
Is there a way to recieve threaded mails from the lists I subscribed?
And can I select not to receive mail at all, but  the mailing lists still 
accessible?

Perhaps there are ways to do it but I don't know, enlighten me please.


BAHCL

_
立即行動: 下載 Windows 重大資訊安全更新檔 
http://www.msn.com.hk/infozone/default.asp 



___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user