Re: [Freeipmi-users] possible causes for ipmi_ctx_open_outofband: BMC busy

2011-04-22 Thread Werner Fischer
Hi Al,

thanks for this info.
I now got the info that this user is using FreeIPMI only for Nagios, but
is using ipmitool for his cacti monitoring. I assume that he does not
use the SDR cache function of ipmitool, as it has to be used manually
and that this is the root cause.

I told him to use ipmitool sdr dump and then ipmitool -S - I think
this will solve his problem.

Thanks for your help,
Werner

On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 10:00 -0700, Albert Chu wrote:
 Hi Werner,
 
 The BMC Busy error code comes directly from the remote system.  As you
 might imagine, it's typically when the BMC has too many IPMI requests to
 handle and can't handle all of them.  That's the scenario I've
 personally seen them the most on.
 
 Al
 
 On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 02:15 -0700, Werner Fischer wrote:
  Hi Al,
  
  one of our customers monitors his Supermicro servers with FreeIPMI (with
  both Nagios using the plugin, and also using cacti). As both Nagios and
  cacti are monitoring the machines, it could be that two IPMI requests
  reach the BMC at the same time.
  
  For two systems (with X8DT3-LN4F and X8DTL-3F mainboards) he gets many
  times the following error:
  ipmi_ctx_open_outofband: BMC busy
  
  As it works for other systems, I assume that this could be a hardware
  problem.
  
  But I just wanted to know what the possibles reasons could be for such
  an error (BMC busy)
  
  Best regards,
  Werner
  
  PS: for the SR1625 question I got know feedback yet. I assume that the
  new beta works, but this customer can tell me for sure in about two
  weeks (than he can test the current beta)
  

-- 
: Werner Fischer
: Technology Specialist
: Thomas-Krenn.AG | The server-experts
: http://www.thomas-krenn.com | http://www.thomas-krenn.com/wiki


___
Freeipmi-users mailing list
Freeipmi-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users


[Freeipmi-users] possible causes for ipmi_ctx_open_outofband: BMC busy

2011-04-21 Thread Werner Fischer
Hi Al,

one of our customers monitors his Supermicro servers with FreeIPMI (with
both Nagios using the plugin, and also using cacti). As both Nagios and
cacti are monitoring the machines, it could be that two IPMI requests
reach the BMC at the same time.

For two systems (with X8DT3-LN4F and X8DTL-3F mainboards) he gets many
times the following error:
ipmi_ctx_open_outofband: BMC busy

As it works for other systems, I assume that this could be a hardware
problem.

But I just wanted to know what the possibles reasons could be for such
an error (BMC busy)

Best regards,
Werner

PS: for the SR1625 question I got know feedback yet. I assume that the
new beta works, but this customer can tell me for sure in about two
weeks (than he can test the current beta)

-- 
: Werner Fischer
: Technology Specialist
: Thomas-Krenn.AG | The server-experts
: http://www.thomas-krenn.com | http://www.thomas-krenn.com/wiki


___
Freeipmi-users mailing list
Freeipmi-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users


Re: [Freeipmi-users] possible causes for ipmi_ctx_open_outofband: BMC busy

2011-04-21 Thread Albert Chu
Hi Werner,

The BMC Busy error code comes directly from the remote system.  As you
might imagine, it's typically when the BMC has too many IPMI requests to
handle and can't handle all of them.  That's the scenario I've
personally seen them the most on.

Al

On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 02:15 -0700, Werner Fischer wrote:
 Hi Al,
 
 one of our customers monitors his Supermicro servers with FreeIPMI (with
 both Nagios using the plugin, and also using cacti). As both Nagios and
 cacti are monitoring the machines, it could be that two IPMI requests
 reach the BMC at the same time.
 
 For two systems (with X8DT3-LN4F and X8DTL-3F mainboards) he gets many
 times the following error:
   ipmi_ctx_open_outofband: BMC busy
 
 As it works for other systems, I assume that this could be a hardware
 problem.
 
 But I just wanted to know what the possibles reasons could be for such
 an error (BMC busy)
 
 Best regards,
 Werner
 
 PS: for the SR1625 question I got know feedback yet. I assume that the
 new beta works, but this customer can tell me for sure in about two
 weeks (than he can test the current beta)
 
-- 
Albert Chu
ch...@llnl.gov
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory


___
Freeipmi-users mailing list
Freeipmi-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users