Re: Pial surface

2004-02-06 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Graham,

sorry, I don't have that info any more. Are you seeing this behavior? It 
was pretty obvious - the pial surface barely moved away from the white  at 
all.

Bruce

On 
Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Graham Wideman wrote:

 Bruce:
 
 there was a version of mris_make_surfaces that had a bug resulting in this 
 behavior.
 
 Oh-oh... could you let us know which version that was (ie: what was the
 date of the executable perhaps)? Or maybe there's a release note on this
 somewhere?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Graham
 
 ---
 Graham Wideman
 Author of: Visio 2003 Developer's Survival Pack
 Microsoft MVP for Visio
 Resources for programmable diagramming at:
 http://www.diagramantics.com
 http://www.wideman-one.com
 



Re: Pial surface

2004-02-03 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Jeremy,

there was a version of mris_make_surfaces that had a bug resulting in this 
behavior. Try updating to the latest version and see if that helps.

cheers,
Bruce


On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, jskipper wrote:

 Howdy,
 
 Sorry if this is a repost.
 
 I have a set of subjects whose pial surfaces are poorly reconstructed 
 because of bad gray/csf contrast.  Specifically, the pial surface 
 doesn't seem to deviate from the white matter surface by much more than 
 .5-1 mm.  Is it possible to artificially grow the pial surface or 
 create an artificial pial surface that is a set distance from the white 
 matter surface (say 2.7 mm).
 
 Thanks for the help!
 Jeremy Skipper