Re: [Freesurfer] Delay

2013-01-30 Thread Bruce Fischl

oh, that's way too big a difference. Something is wrong
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 
Varghese Chikku wrote:



SubCortGrayVol  on Mac is 208022 and 296990 on VM, for the  same patient.Does 
the processing time  have 
something to with the  results,it varies  a  lot.

On 29 January 2013 19:33, Nick Schmansky  wrote:
  Chikku,

  Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files?  I'd like to
  investigate why it ran so slowly.

  Nick


  On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote:
  > Dear All,
  > I  ran a test subject on VM and the  process took 20 hrs to
  > complete.But the  same  images  on Mc pro took 58  hours.VM is  8GB
  > and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed  this  delay happening in the  past
  > as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a  single  patient and Mc  takes
  > 24-30 for the  same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this
  > happening?.Which would be more  accurate,and does it mean  that more
  > time FS take,the better the results?
  > Many thanks
  > Chikku
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Delay

2013-01-30 Thread Varghese Chikku
SubCortGrayVol  on Mac is 208022 and 296990 on VM, for the  same
patient.Does the processing time  have  something to with the  results,it
varies  a  lot.

On 29 January 2013 19:33, Nick Schmansky  wrote:

> Chikku,
>
> Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files?  I'd like to
> investigate why it ran so slowly.
>
> Nick
>
>
> On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote:
> > Dear All,
> > I  ran a test subject on VM and the  process took 20 hrs to
> > complete.But the  same  images  on Mc pro took 58  hours.VM is  8GB
> > and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed  this  delay happening in the  past
> > as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a  single  patient and Mc  takes
> > 24-30 for the  same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this
> > happening?.Which would be more  accurate,and does it mean  that more
> > time FS take,the better the results?
> > Many thanks
> > Chikku
> > ___
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Delay

2013-01-29 Thread Varghese Chikku
Thanks Nick,
Please find the attached.


On 29 January 2013 19:33, Nick Schmansky  wrote:

> Chikku,
>
> Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files?  I'd like to
> investigate why it ran so slowly.
>
> Nick
>
>
> On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote:
> > Dear All,
> > I  ran a test subject on VM and the  process took 20 hrs to
> > complete.But the  same  images  on Mc pro took 58  hours.VM is  8GB
> > and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed  this  delay happening in the  past
> > as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a  single  patient and Mc  takes
> > 24-30 for the  same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this
> > happening?.Which would be more  accurate,and does it mean  that more
> > time FS take,the better the results?
> > Many thanks
> > Chikku
> > ___
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>


recon-all-status.log
Description: Binary data
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Delay

2013-01-29 Thread Nick Schmansky
Chikku,

Can you send us your recon-all.log and recon-all.cmd files?  I'd like to
investigate why it ran so slowly.

Nick


On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 06:53 +0100, Varghese Chikku wrote:
> Dear All,
> I  ran a test subject on VM and the  process took 20 hrs to
> complete.But the  same  images  on Mc pro took 58  hours.VM is  8GB
> and Mpro is 16 GB.I have noticed  this  delay happening in the  past
> as well,where VM takes 20-24 for a  single  patient and Mc  takes
> 24-30 for the  same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this
> happening?.Which would be more  accurate,and does it mean  that more
> time FS take,the better the results?
> Many thanks
> Chikku
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Delay

2013-01-29 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Chikku

note that because you have a 64 bit mac doesn't mean you are running 64 
bit software. Until pretty recently we didn't have a 64 bit mac version, 
so unless you downloaded a beta in the last month or so, you are likely 
running a 32 bit version


cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote:


Thanks  Bruce,Its  64  bit.

On 29 January 2013 15:12, Bruce Fischl  wrote:
  no, the longer time is probably because the mac version you are using is 
32 bit.

  cheers
  Bruce


  On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote:

Dear All,I  ran a test subject on VM and the  process took 20 hrs 
to complete.But the  same  images  on Mc pro took 58
 hours.VM is  8GB and Mpro
is 16 GB.I have noticed  this  delay happening in the  past as 
well,where VM takes 20-24 for a  single  patient and Mc
 takes 24-30 for the
 same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this 
happening?.Which would be more  accurate,and does it mean  that
more time FS take,the
better the results?
Many thanks
Chikku




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Delay

2013-01-29 Thread Varghese Chikku
Thanks  Bruce,Its  64  bit.

On 29 January 2013 15:12, Bruce Fischl  wrote:

> no, the longer time is probably because the mac version you are using is
> 32 bit.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote:
>
> Dear All,I  ran a test subject on VM and the  process took 20 hrs to
>> complete.But the  same  images  on Mc pro took 58  hours.VM is  8GB and
>> Mpro
>>
>> is 16 GB.I have noticed  this  delay happening in the  past as well,where
>> VM takes 20-24 for a  single  patient and Mc  takes 24-30 for the
>>  same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which
>> would be more  accurate,and does it mean  that more time FS take,the
>> better the results?
>> Many thanks
>> Chikku
>>
>>
>>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/**complianceline.
>  If the e-mail was sent to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Delay

2013-01-29 Thread Bruce Fischl
no, the longer time is probably because the mac version you are using is 32 
bit.


cheers
Bruce


On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote:


Dear All,I  ran a test subject on VM and the  process took 20 hrs to 
complete.But the  same  images  on Mc pro took 58  hours.VM is  8GB and Mpro
is 16 GB.I have noticed  this  delay happening in the  past as well,where VM 
takes 20-24 for a  single  patient and Mc  takes 24-30 for the
 same.But,this time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would 
be more  accurate,and does it mean  that more time FS take,the
better the results?
Many thanks
Chikku

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] Delay

2013-01-28 Thread Varghese Chikku
Dear All,
I  ran a test subject on VM and the  process took 20 hrs to complete.But
the  same  images  on Mc pro took 58  hours.VM is  8GB and Mpro is 16 GB.I
have noticed  this  delay happening in the  past as well,where VM takes
20-24 for a  single  patient and Mc  takes 24-30 for the  same.But,this
time ,its was so unexpected.Why is this happening?.Which would be more
 accurate,and does it mean  that more time FS take,the better the results?
Many thanks
Chikku
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.