Re: [Freesurfer] design specification with 3 categorical predictors

2017-02-02 Thread Douglas N Greve
The second design is fine if there is no significant interaction between 
1 or 2 and 3. You'll have to create the design matrix yourself or you 
can create an fsgd file with 7 classes


On 02/02/2017 11:38 AM, Tim Reess wrote:
>
> Dear Freesurfer experts,
>
> I would like to set up a design matrix for a design that is not 
> QDEC-able. I have three categorical factors:
>
> 1.disease status: 2 levels
>
> 2.gender: 2 levels
>
> 3.scan site: 4 levels
>
> The first design I set up was the following (the rows are just for 
> illustration and don’t reflect the number of subjects that will enter 
> the analysis):
>
> designs4_fs_mailinglist.png
>
> However, I have my doubts as to the “efficiency” of the design (in 
> terms of number of regressors / DOF). Therefore, here is my second design:
>
> Would this design be correct for assessing the group differences for 
> disease status while regressing out gender and scanner site? My 
> understanding is, that in this design I can’t assess the effects of 
> interactions regarding scanner site. However, I think it is fair to 
> assume that the scanner site doesn’t have a differential effect on 
> either gender or disease status. Any feedback is highly appreciated. 
> Thanks a lot. Best regards,
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



[Freesurfer] design specification with 3 categorical predictors

2017-02-02 Thread Tim Reess

Dear Freesurfer experts,

I would like to set up a design matrix for a design that is not 
QDEC-able. I have three categorical factors:


1.disease status: 2 levels

2.gender: 2 levels

3.scan site: 4 levels

The first design I set up was the following (the rows are just for 
illustration and don’t reflect the number of subjects that will enter 
the analysis):


designs4_fs_mailinglist.png

However, I have my doubts as to the “efficiency” of the design (in terms 
of number of regressors / DOF). Therefore, here is my second design:


Would this design be correct for assessing the group differences for 
disease status while regressing out gender and scanner site? My 
understanding is, that in this design I can’t assess the effects of 
interactions regarding scanner site. However, I think it is fair to 
assume that the scanner site doesn’t have a differential effect on 
either gender or disease status. Any feedback is highly appreciated. 
Thanks a lot. Best regards,


Tim

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.