Re: [Freesurfer] WM or Pial edits to correct surfaces

2021-08-31 Thread Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
External Email - Use Caution

Thx Doug, much appreciated.

Jim

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 On Behalf Of Douglas N. Greve
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2021 12:00 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM or Pial edits to correct surfaces

* External Email - Caution *
Hi Jim, I know it has been a while, but I have tracked down the source of the 
problem with the pial surface.  I can go into detail if you want, but the fix 
is to add -no-numakeuchar to recon-all. I noticed that there are some places 
where the white surface does not extend far enough. This is due to the WM 
strands being very thin and partial voluming with GM. The fix for this is to 
edit the wm.mgz and rerun recon-all with -autorecon-wm -autorecon3.
doug

On 5/27/2021 2:19 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote:

External Email - Use Caution

External Email - Use Caution


Hi users,

We're having some issues with running some of our 2-3yo data (0.8mm isotropic)  
through FS7 with and without the -hires  flag.

There are persistent issues with the frontal lobe regions where the pial has 
not extended to outer surface as illustrated below.
The WM surface contour look reasonable but the pial has underestimated the 
outer cortex resulting in an incorrect surface (below).

I don't think control points will work (low intensity values in the 50-60s), 
and no WM to add to the WM.mgz.
Any suggestion on how to push the pial surface out to capture the cortical 
surface??

Thx.
Jim

[cid:image001.png@01D79E6C.D1C47A10] [cid:image002.jpg@01D79E6C.D1C47A10] 
[cid:image003.png@01D79E6C.D1C47A10] [cid:image004.png@01D79E6C.D1C47A10]   

sp;
[cid:image005.png@01D79E6C.D1C47A10][cid:image006.jpg@01D79E6C.D1C47A10]


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.



___

Freesurfer mailing list

Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>

https://secure-web.cisco.com/1YPN3hs4SyjZclyss7RMMOissR1aZ8Uwn4a_0Jq5vYrfci6A59120SXSb0sKe_KiChRMyqT03GrtjEpvMXK-ID5_mFZyeiQW6IG4tERBD-TqUOpRAGbH-1tIOXEjrDmjPZYO8KFRoKksLscaqeKhf8kwlTdmb9durYYaCWLRq0NN_oIT4bj7kKl_ewjL6zWkMJu06W9cB4RqOf7el-gq6aPYY2ymbPYfSb4euBdJd-oi8BCKHdsWPI0QIbfan138P5vOHDmVV_iX0y5a0q2olUg/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer



The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] WM or Pial edits to correct surfaces

2021-08-31 Thread Douglas N. Greve
Hi Jim, I know it has been a while, but I have tracked down the source 
of the problem with the pial surface.  I can go into detail if you want, 
but the fix is to add -no-numakeuchar to recon-all. I noticed that there 
are some places where the white surface does not extend far enough. This 
is due to the WM strands being very thin and partial voluming with GM. 
The fix for this is to edit the wm.mgz and rerun recon-all with 
-autorecon-wm -autorecon3.

doug


On 5/27/2021 2:19 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote:


External Email - Use Caution

External Email - Use Caution

Hi users,

We’re having some issues with running some of our 2-3yo data (0.8mm 
isotropic)  through FS7 with and without the -hires  flag.


There are persistent issues with the frontal lobe regions where the 
pial has not extended to outer surface as illustrated below.


The WM surface contour look reasonable but the pial has underestimated 
the outer cortex resulting in an incorrect surface (below).


I don’t think control points will work (low intensity values in the 
50-60s), and no WM to add to the WM.mgz.


Any suggestion on how to push the pial surface out to capture the 
cortical surface??


Thx.

Jim



The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected 
Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If 
you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized 
use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on 
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via 
telephone or return mail.



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1YPN3hs4SyjZclyss7RMMOissR1aZ8Uwn4a_0Jq5vYrfci6A59120SXSb0sKe_KiChRMyqT03GrtjEpvMXK-ID5_mFZyeiQW6IG4tERBD-TqUOpRAGbH-1tIOXEjrDmjPZYO8KFRoKksLscaqeKhf8kwlTdmb9durYYaCWLRq0NN_oIT4bj7kKl_ewjL6zWkMJu06W9cB4RqOf7el-gq6aPYY2ymbPYfSb4euBdJd-oi8BCKHdsWPI0QIbfan138P5vOHDmVV_iX0y5a0q2olUg/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If 
the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, 
please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 


Re: [Freesurfer] WM or Pial edits to correct surfaces

2021-05-28 Thread Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
External Email - Use Caution

Thanks Doug. Will try with difference distances. Where is the expert file 
placed?

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 On Behalf Of Douglas N. Greve
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 5:25 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM or Pial edits to correct surfaces

* External Email - Caution *
There might be a couple things happening. First, I would try adding a few 
control points in that area; make sure they are in true WM in voxels that have 
a value less than 110 on the brain.mgz file. This might help push the white 
surface further out (the WM in that gyrus is very thin). It might also help 
push the pial surface out. The next thing you can try is to increase the 
maximum distance over which the edge is searched for. These young subjects have 
very plump/thick cortices. You can do that with an expert options file. Create 
a text file with the following content:

   PlaceT1PialSurf --max-cbv-dist 6

Where "6" tells it to search 6 mm rather than the default 5. You may need to 
play with the number

You can then run recon-all with

recon-all -s subject -expert yourexpertoptions.txt -pial -lh

The above command will run just the pial of just the lh hemi, so you should 
have your answer in a few minutes


On 5/27/2021 2:19 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote:

External Email - Use Caution

External Email - Use Caution


Hi users,

We're having some issues with running some of our 2-3yo data (0.8mm isotropic)  
through FS7 with and without the -hires  flag.

There are persistent issues with the frontal lobe regions where the pial has 
not extended to outer surface as illustrated below.
The WM surface contour look reasonable but the pial has underestimated the 
outer cortex resulting in an incorrect surface (below).

I don't think control points will work (low intensity values in the 50-60s), 
and no WM to add to the WM.mgz.
Any suggestion on how to push the pial surface out to capture the cortical 
surface??

Thx.
Jim

[cid:image001.png@01D753C2.9A297CD0] [cid:image002.jpg@01D753C2.9A297CD0] 
[cid:image003.png@01D753C2.9A297CD0] [cid:image004.png@01D753C2.9A297CD0]   

sp;
[cid:image005.png@01D753C2.9A297CD0][cid:image006.jpg@01D753C2.9A297CD0]


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.



___

Freesurfer mailing list

Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>

https://secure-web.cisco.com/1YPN3hs4SyjZclyss7RMMOissR1aZ8Uwn4a_0Jq5vYrfci6A59120SXSb0sKe_KiChRMyqT03GrtjEpvMXK-ID5_mFZyeiQW6IG4tERBD-TqUOpRAGbH-1tIOXEjrDmjPZYO8KFRoKksLscaqeKhf8kwlTdmb9durYYaCWLRq0NN_oIT4bj7kKl_ewjL6zWkMJu06W9cB4RqOf7el-gq6aPYY2ymbPYfSb4euBdJd-oi8BCKHdsWPI0QIbfan138P5vOHDmVV_iX0y5a0q2olUg/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer



The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] WM or Pial edits to correct surfaces

2021-05-27 Thread Douglas N. Greve
There might be a couple things happening. First, I would try adding a 
few control points in that area; make sure they are in true WM in voxels 
that have a value less than 110 on the brain.mgz file. This might help 
push the white surface further out (the WM in that gyrus is very thin). 
It might also help push the pial surface out. The next thing you can try 
is to increase the maximum distance over which the edge is searched for. 
These young subjects have very plump/thick cortices. You can do that 
with an expert options file. Create a text file with the following content:


   PlaceT1PialSurf --max-cbv-dist 6

Where "6" tells it to search 6 mm rather than the default 5. You may 
need to play with the number


You can then run recon-all with

recon-all -s subject -expert yourexpertoptions.txt -pial -lh

The above command will run just the pial of just the lh hemi, so you 
should have your answer in a few minutes




On 5/27/2021 2:19 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote:


External Email - Use Caution

External Email - Use Caution

Hi users,

We’re having some issues with running some of our 2-3yo data (0.8mm 
isotropic)  through FS7 with and without the -hires  flag.


There are persistent issues with the frontal lobe regions where the 
pial has not extended to outer surface as illustrated below.


The WM surface contour look reasonable but the pial has underestimated 
the outer cortex resulting in an incorrect surface (below).


I don’t think control points will work (low intensity values in the 
50-60s), and no WM to add to the WM.mgz.


Any suggestion on how to push the pial surface out to capture the 
cortical surface??


Thx.

Jim



The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected 
Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If 
you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized 
use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on 
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via 
telephone or return mail.



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1YPN3hs4SyjZclyss7RMMOissR1aZ8Uwn4a_0Jq5vYrfci6A59120SXSb0sKe_KiChRMyqT03GrtjEpvMXK-ID5_mFZyeiQW6IG4tERBD-TqUOpRAGbH-1tIOXEjrDmjPZYO8KFRoKksLscaqeKhf8kwlTdmb9durYYaCWLRq0NN_oIT4bj7kKl_ewjL6zWkMJu06W9cB4RqOf7el-gq6aPYY2ymbPYfSb4euBdJd-oi8BCKHdsWPI0QIbfan138P5vOHDmVV_iX0y5a0q2olUg/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If 
the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, 
please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.