Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-24 Thread Rogelio Perez 

Hi Raymond,

I'm not planning to have more than 10 concurrent calls on this  
devices, but I'm also curious as you about how many calls can it handle.

When I get to that point I will post the test results on this list.

Regards,
Rogelio


On Aug 23, 2009, at 8:23 PM, Raymond Chandler wrote:

Could you load freeswitch with a couple hundred calls then run the  
test again.. and do the same to asterisk and see how the numbers  
stack up then? I'm just curious to see what happens at that point.


-Ray

On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Rogelio Perez wrote:


Hi Everyone,

I'm working on a PBX project for the Sheevaplug ARM based computer,  
with the following specs: CPU 1.2 GHz, 512MB DDR2, no FPU.
So far I've found a big difference between Freeswitch and Asterisk  
performance times.
This is a comparison of the time it takes them to perform different  
actions:


startup Freeswitch: 3 min.
startup Asterisk:   2 sec.

call extension Freeswitch:  6 sec.
call extension Asterisk:0 sec.

shutdown Freeswitch:6.5 sec
shutdown Asterisk:  0 sec.

reload config Freeswitch:   1 sec.
reload config Asterisk: 1 sec.

Both were built from sources natively (no cross-compiling), and  
they use the default startup configurations.
I have managed to lower the Freeswitch times by disabling most of  
the modules and recompiling, but it is still far away from Asterisk  
(i.e. FS startup time 2.5 min).


1. Is there any way to further improve Freeswitch performance for  
the ARM architecture?
2. Can this be related to the lack of a FPU (the Sheevalug emulates  
the floating point operations).
3. On the startup I see this error repeated many times: [ERR]  
switch_core_sqldb.c:95 SQL ERR [database is locked]. Can this be  
related?


Thanks,
Rogelio Perez

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-23 Thread Rogelio Perez 
Thanks Brian, now the startup time is 3 sec.

On Aug 24, 2009, at 1:52 AM, Brian West wrote:

> freeswitch -nonat
>
> /b
>
> On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:45 PM, Rogelio Perez wrote:
>
>> 2009-08-24 04:39:29.910459 [ERR] switch_nat.c:183 Error checking for
>> PMP [general error]
>> 2009-08-24 04:39:29.910694 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:397 Checking for UPnP
>> 2009-08-24 04:39:41.906029 [INFO] switch_nat.c:411 No PMP or UPnP
>> NAT detected!
>
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-23 Thread Brian West 
freeswitch -nonat

/b

On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:45 PM, Rogelio Perez wrote:

> 2009-08-24 04:39:29.910459 [ERR] switch_nat.c:183 Error checking for  
> PMP [general error]
> 2009-08-24 04:39:29.910694 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:397 Checking for UPnP
> 2009-08-24 04:39:41.906029 [INFO] switch_nat.c:411 No PMP or UPnP  
> NAT detected!


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-23 Thread Rogelio Perez 

Thanks Andrew and Anthony,

I created a ramdisk for the db and log directories using tmpfs and now  
I see better performance times:


startup:15.6 sec.
call extension: 0 sec.
shutdown:   7.5 sec
reload config:  0 sec.

I have noticed that during the startup there is a 12 sec. pause while  
checking for UPnP:


2009-08-24 04:39:29.910459 [ERR] switch_nat.c:183 Error checking for  
PMP [general error]

2009-08-24 04:39:29.910694 [DEBUG] switch_nat.c:397 Checking for UPnP
2009-08-24 04:39:41.906029 [INFO] switch_nat.c:411 No PMP or UPnP NAT  
detected!


Is there any way to lower this time? Maybe disabling the check?

Thanks,
Rogelio

On Aug 21, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Anthony Minessale wrote:


probably disk i/o.

Is it some kind of flash drive?

make a ramdisk and simlink in /usr/local/freeswitch/db and /usr/ 
local/freeswitch/log to it
the default configuration uses a lot of high level features that use  
the sqlite db on the disk.


We also offer commercial support where we could dig deeper into the  
problem if you can't figure it out

consult...@freeswitch.org



On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Rogelio Perez > wrote:

Hi Everyone,

I'm working on a PBX project for the Sheevaplug ARM based computer,  
with the following specs: CPU 1.2 GHz, 512MB DDR2, no FPU.
So far I've found a big difference between Freeswitch and Asterisk  
performance times.
This is a comparison of the time it takes them to perform different  
actions:


startup Freeswitch: 3 min.
startup Asterisk:   2 sec.

call extension Freeswitch:  6 sec.
call extension Asterisk:0 sec.

shutdown Freeswitch:6.5 sec
shutdown Asterisk:  0 sec.

reload config Freeswitch:   1 sec.
reload config Asterisk: 1 sec.

Both were built from sources natively (no cross-compiling), and they  
use the default startup configurations.
I have managed to lower the Freeswitch times by disabling most of  
the modules and recompiling, but it is still far away from Asterisk  
(i.e. FS startup time 2.5 min).


1. Is there any way to further improve Freeswitch performance for  
the ARM architecture?
2. Can this be related to the lack of a FPU (the Sheevalug emulates  
the floating point operations).
3. On the startup I see this error repeated many times: [ERR]  
switch_core_sqldb.c:95 SQL ERR [database is locked]. Can this be  
related?


Thanks,
Rogelio Perez


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org




--
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org
iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:213-799-1400
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-23 Thread SP 
Don't forget to press tab at the asterisk console!  :)

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 18:23, Raymond Chandler
wrote:

> Could you load freeswitch with a couple hundred calls then run the test
> again.. and do the same to asterisk and see how the numbers stack up then?
> I'm just curious to see what happens at that point.
> -Ray
>
> On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Rogelio Perez wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm working on a PBX project for the 
> Sheevaplug
>  ARM
> based computer, with the following specs: CPU 1.2 GHz, 512MB DDR2, no FPU.
> So far I've found a big difference between Freeswitch and Asterisk
> performance times.
> This is a comparison of the time it takes them to perform different
> actions:
>
> startup Freeswitch: 3 min.
> startup Asterisk: 2 sec.
>
> call extension Freeswitch: 6 sec.
> call extension Asterisk: 0 sec.
>
> shutdown Freeswitch: 6.5 sec
>
> shutdown Asterisk: 0 sec.
>
>
> reload config Freeswitch: 1 sec.
> reload config Asterisk: 1 sec.
>
>
> Both were built from sources natively (no cross-compiling), and they use
> the default startup configurations.
> I have managed to lower the Freeswitch times by disabling most of the
> modules and recompiling, but it is still far away from Asterisk (i.e. FS
> startup time 2.5 min).
>
> 1. Is there any way to further improve Freeswitch performance for the ARM
> architecture?
> 2. Can this be related to the lack of a FPU (the Sheevalug emulates the
> floating point operations).
> 3. On the startup I see this error repeated many times: [ERR]
> switch_core_sqldb.c:95 SQL ERR [database is locked]. Can this be related?
>
> Thanks,
> Rogelio Perez
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>


-- 
Shannon
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-23 Thread Raymond Chandler 
Could you load freeswitch with a couple hundred calls then run the  
test again.. and do the same to asterisk and see how the numbers stack  
up then? I'm just curious to see what happens at that point.


-Ray

On Aug 21, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Rogelio Perez wrote:


Hi Everyone,

I'm working on a PBX project for the Sheevaplug ARM based computer,  
with the following specs: CPU 1.2 GHz, 512MB DDR2, no FPU.
So far I've found a big difference between Freeswitch and Asterisk  
performance times.
This is a comparison of the time it takes them to perform different  
actions:


startup Freeswitch: 3 min.
startup Asterisk:   2 sec.

call extension Freeswitch:  6 sec.
call extension Asterisk:0 sec.

shutdown Freeswitch:6.5 sec
shutdown Asterisk:  0 sec.

reload config Freeswitch:   1 sec.
reload config Asterisk: 1 sec.

Both were built from sources natively (no cross-compiling), and they  
use the default startup configurations.
I have managed to lower the Freeswitch times by disabling most of  
the modules and recompiling, but it is still far away from Asterisk  
(i.e. FS startup time 2.5 min).


1. Is there any way to further improve Freeswitch performance for  
the ARM architecture?
2. Can this be related to the lack of a FPU (the Sheevalug emulates  
the floating point operations).
3. On the startup I see this error repeated many times: [ERR]  
switch_core_sqldb.c:95 SQL ERR [database is locked]. Can this be  
related?


Thanks,
Rogelio Perez

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-21 Thread Anthony Minessale 
probably disk i/o.

Is it some kind of flash drive?

make a ramdisk and simlink in /usr/local/freeswitch/db and
/usr/local/freeswitch/log to it
the default configuration uses a lot of high level features that use the
sqlite db on the disk.

We also offer commercial support where we could dig deeper into the problem
if you can't figure it out
consult...@freeswitch.org



On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Rogelio Perez wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm working on a PBX project for the 
> Sheevaplug
>  ARM
> based computer, with the following specs: CPU 1.2 GHz, 512MB DDR2, no FPU.
> So far I've found a big difference between Freeswitch and Asterisk
> performance times.
> This is a comparison of the time it takes them to perform different
> actions:
>
> startup Freeswitch: 3 min.
> startup Asterisk: 2 sec.
>
> call extension Freeswitch: 6 sec.
> call extension Asterisk: 0 sec.
>
> shutdown Freeswitch: 6.5 sec
>
> shutdown Asterisk: 0 sec.
>
>
> reload config Freeswitch: 1 sec.
> reload config Asterisk: 1 sec.
>
>
> Both were built from sources natively (no cross-compiling), and they use
> the default startup configurations.
> I have managed to lower the Freeswitch times by disabling most of the
> modules and recompiling, but it is still far away from Asterisk (i.e. FS
> startup time 2.5 min).
>
> 1. Is there any way to further improve Freeswitch performance for the ARM
> architecture?
> 2. Can this be related to the lack of a FPU (the Sheevalug emulates the
> floating point operations).
> 3. On the startup I see this error repeated many times: [ERR]
> switch_core_sqldb.c:95 SQL ERR [database is locked]. Can this be related?
>
> Thanks,
> Rogelio Perez
>
>
> ___
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>


-- 
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com 
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org 
iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:213-799-1400
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

Re: [Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-21 Thread Andrew Thompson 
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:15:13PM -0300, Rogelio Perez wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> I'm working on a PBX project for the Sheevaplug ARM based computer,  
> with the following specs: CPU 1.2 GHz, 512MB DDR2, no FPU.
> So far I've found a big difference between Freeswitch and Asterisk  
> performance times.
> This is a comparison of the time it takes them to perform different  
> actions:
> 
> startup Freeswitch:   3 min.
> startup Asterisk: 2 sec.
> 
> call extension Freeswitch:6 sec.
> call extension Asterisk:  0 sec.
> 
> shutdown Freeswitch:  6.5 sec
> shutdown Asterisk:0 sec.
> 
> reload config Freeswitch: 1 sec.
> reload config Asterisk:   1 sec.
> 
> Both were built from sources natively (no cross-compiling), and they  
> use the default startup configurations.
> I have managed to lower the Freeswitch times by disabling most of the  
> modules and recompiling, but it is still far away from Asterisk (i.e.  
> FS startup time 2.5 min).
> 
> 1. Is there any way to further improve Freeswitch performance for the  
> ARM architecture?
> 2. Can this be related to the lack of a FPU (the Sheevalug emulates  
> the floating point operations).
> 3. On the startup I see this error repeated many times: [ERR]  
> switch_core_sqldb.c:95 SQL ERR [database is locked]. Can this be  
> related?
>

Try making where freeswitch stores it's sqlite databases
/usr/local/freeswitch/db (by default) a ramdisk. I've had this vastly
improve FS performance on embedded devices.

Andrew

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

[Freeswitch-users] Freeswitch vs. Asterisk speed on ARM

2009-08-21 Thread Rogelio Perez 

Hi Everyone,

I'm working on a PBX project for the Sheevaplug ARM based computer,  
with the following specs: CPU 1.2 GHz, 512MB DDR2, no FPU.
So far I've found a big difference between Freeswitch and Asterisk  
performance times.
This is a comparison of the time it takes them to perform different  
actions:


startup Freeswitch: 3 min.
startup Asterisk:   2 sec.

call extension Freeswitch:  6 sec.
call extension Asterisk:0 sec.

shutdown Freeswitch:6.5 sec
shutdown Asterisk:  0 sec.

reload config Freeswitch:   1 sec.
reload config Asterisk: 1 sec.

Both were built from sources natively (no cross-compiling), and they  
use the default startup configurations.
I have managed to lower the Freeswitch times by disabling most of the  
modules and recompiling, but it is still far away from Asterisk (i.e.  
FS startup time 2.5 min).


1. Is there any way to further improve Freeswitch performance for the  
ARM architecture?
2. Can this be related to the lack of a FPU (the Sheevalug emulates  
the floating point operations).
3. On the startup I see this error repeated many times: [ERR]  
switch_core_sqldb.c:95 SQL ERR [database is locked]. Can this be  
related?


Thanks,
Rogelio Perez

___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org