Re: [Freeswitch-users] Remote-Party-ID issue and call pickup information
If the patch is not received today it will not make it into 1.0.5 On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Kristian Kielhofner < kristian.kielhof...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is for outbound calls, calling party name. The OP is talking > about called party name, which is the neat feature of being able to > update the display of the calling user with the name of the called > user (instead of just displaying their numeric extension for the > duration of the call). > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 9:26 PM, SP wrote: > > before playing with mod_sofia, did you try the sip_cid_type variable? > > > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Variable_sip_cid_type > > > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 02:46, Yehavi Bourvine > wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> While trying to display the called party name on SNOM phones I've > found > >> that the field sent to the phone needs to be changed slightly in order > to > >> make SNOM work: Insetad of sending P-Assterted-Identity SNOM expects > >> Remote-Party-ID. I changed it in mod_sofia and now SNOM, Polycom and > Cisco > >> work ok. Just wanted to let the developers know... > >> > >> And now a question: We have SNOM phones monitoring other extensions > (BLF > >> feature). When a call comes in, the monitoring phones get notification, > but > >> the name field (identity display) contains the calling extension number > and > >> not its display name. Can this be fixed? > >> > >> Thanks! __Yehavi: > >> ___ > >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > >> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > >> UNSUBSCRIBE: > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > >> http://www.freeswitch.org > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Shannon > > > > ___ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > -- > Kristian Kielhofner > http://www.astlinux.org > http://blog.krisk.org > http://www.star2star.com > http://www.submityoursip.com > http://www.voalte.com > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888 googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.org pstn:213-799-1400 ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Remote-Party-ID issue and call pickup information
This is for outbound calls, calling party name. The OP is talking about called party name, which is the neat feature of being able to update the display of the calling user with the name of the called user (instead of just displaying their numeric extension for the duration of the call). On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 9:26 PM, SP wrote: > before playing with mod_sofia, did you try the sip_cid_type variable? > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Variable_sip_cid_type > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 02:46, Yehavi Bourvine > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> While trying to display the called party name on SNOM phones I've found >> that the field sent to the phone needs to be changed slightly in order to >> make SNOM work: Insetad of sending P-Assterted-Identity SNOM expects >> Remote-Party-ID. I changed it in mod_sofia and now SNOM, Polycom and Cisco >> work ok. Just wanted to let the developers know... >> >> And now a question: We have SNOM phones monitoring other extensions (BLF >> feature). When a call comes in, the monitoring phones get notification, but >> the name field (identity display) contains the calling extension number and >> not its display name. Can this be fixed? >> >> Thanks! __Yehavi: >> ___ >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > > -- > Shannon > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > -- Kristian Kielhofner http://www.astlinux.org http://blog.krisk.org http://www.star2star.com http://www.submityoursip.com http://www.voalte.com ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Remote-Party-ID issue and call pickup information
I was not aware of this variable; I will take a look on it tomorrow. However, when looking in the code I did not find something which looks like "Remote-Party-ID'". Thanks! __Yehavi: 2009/11/9 SP > before playing with mod_sofia, did you try the sip_cid_type variable? > > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Variable_sip_cid_type > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 02:46, Yehavi Bourvine > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > While trying to display the called party name on SNOM phones I've > found > > that the field sent to the phone needs to be changed slightly in order to > > make SNOM work: Insetad of sending P-Assterted-Identity SNOM expects > > Remote-Party-ID. I changed it in mod_sofia and now SNOM, Polycom and > Cisco > > work ok. Just wanted to let the developers know... > > > > And now a question: We have SNOM phones monitoring other extensions > (BLF > > feature). When a call comes in, the monitoring phones get notification, > but > > the name field (identity display) contains the calling extension number > and > > not its display name. Can this be fixed? > > > > Thanks! __Yehavi: > > ___ > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > > http://www.freeswitch.org > > > > > > > > -- > Shannon > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Remote-Party-ID issue and call pickup information
before playing with mod_sofia, did you try the sip_cid_type variable? http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Variable_sip_cid_type On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 02:46, Yehavi Bourvine wrote: > Hello, > > While trying to display the called party name on SNOM phones I've found > that the field sent to the phone needs to be changed slightly in order to > make SNOM work: Insetad of sending P-Assterted-Identity SNOM expects > Remote-Party-ID. I changed it in mod_sofia and now SNOM, Polycom and Cisco > work ok. Just wanted to let the developers know... > > And now a question: We have SNOM phones monitoring other extensions (BLF > feature). When a call comes in, the monitoring phones get notification, but > the name field (identity display) contains the calling extension number and > not its display name. Can this be fixed? > > Thanks! __Yehavi: > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- Shannon ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] Remote-Party-ID issue and call pickup information
Can you elaborate on this and provide a patch on jira? /b On Nov 8, 2009, at 2:46 AM, Yehavi Bourvine wrote: > Hello, > > While trying to display the called party name on SNOM phones I've > found that the field sent to the phone needs to be changed slightly > in order to make SNOM work: Insetad of sending P-Assterted-Identity > SNOM expects Remote-Party-ID. I changed it in mod_sofia and now > SNOM, Polycom and Cisco work ok. Just wanted to let the developers > know... > > And now a question: We have SNOM phones monitoring other > extensions (BLF feature). When a call comes in, the monitoring > phones get notification, but the name field (identity display) > contains the calling extension number and not its display name. Can > this be fixed? > > Thanks! __Yehavi: ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
[Freeswitch-users] Remote-Party-ID issue and call pickup information
Hello, While trying to display the *called party *name on SNOM phones I've found that the field sent to the phone needs to be changed slightly in order to make SNOM work: Insetad of sending P-Assterted-Identity SNOM expects Remote-Party-ID. I changed it in mod_sofia and now SNOM, Polycom and Cisco work ok. Just wanted to let the developers know... And now a question: We have SNOM phones monitoring other extensions (BLF feature). When a call comes in, the monitoring phones get notification, but the name field (identity display) contains the calling extension number and not its display name. Can this be fixed? Thanks! __Yehavi: ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
