Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-11-05 Thread Humberto Quintana

 -You could check the sofia debug for r15332 here:
http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/11008

Phone/Devices: 
The caller is the DID provider's Switch. The callee (which also sends the 
REFER) is Asterisk 1.4.26.

Testing with other devices(linksys SPA962,Grandstream GXV3000) gathers the same 
results.



 I did not ask you to send me a ladder diagram.
 I asked you to send me a console trace from FreeSWITCH using latest trunk
 (1.0.4 does not help me)

 1) start FreeSWITCH
 2) run the cli command: console loglevel debug
 3) run the cli command: sofia profile internal siptrace on
 4) reproduce your issue and put the trace on freeswitch pastebin
 http://pastebin.freeswitch.org (login and pass are stated in the auth
 dialog)

 Also please answer brian's question. What phones and/or sip devices are
 involved in this call.



 On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Humberto Quintana wrote:


 Thanks for your time,

 -The scenario is still the same:

 Always bypass media.
 Environment 100% NAT free :-)
 Call established from A to B through FS. Then...
 Blind transfer from B to C (Refer-to: C)
 RTP should go directly between A and C.


 -With 1.0.4 and 1.0.5pre3, FS actually INVITEs C after receiving the
 REFER-to:C, BUT there is no 2-way audio. Only RTP from C to A (due to the
 lack of reINVITE to A, after C answers).

 Please check SIP diagram here:

 http://provision.netcelerate.net/ngrep/blindxfer2009-11-04-v1.0.5pre3.html


 -What it's wrong with r15332 is there is not such call to C. For sure I
 know SIP is a protocol, may be my description was not clear but this SIP
 diagram speaks by itself ;-)

 http://provision.netcelerate.net/ngrep/blindxfer2009-11-04rev15332.html


 -You could check the sofia debug for r15332 here:
 http://pastebin.com/m6f2b3836


 Best regards,

 Humberto


 I don't know what you are talking about anymore.

 The scenario I had tested is when a call is bridged in bypass_media=true
 bridge
 and you blind transfer that call back to the dialplan

 as soon as it hits the routing state it will resume media.


 it has been confirmed to not work and confirmed to have been fixed
 several
 time and if you are still having a problem you must have something
 blocking
 some of your packets or something .

 You have to understand that sip is a protocol and your description is
 completely non-standard.
 Perhaps you should get a console trace and attach it to a jira. The trace
 probably makes more sense to me.

 sofia profile internal siptrace on
 console loglevel debug

 reproduce and attach the whole capture.



 On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Humberto Quintana wrote:


 Hi,

 I tried r15332 and set in the sofia profile:

 a) bypass_media_after_bridge=true only
 b) bypass_media_after_bridge=true, param name=media-option
 value=resume-media-on-hold/


 In both cases FS is hanging up the initial call (A to FS) after
 accepting
 the REFER to C:

 A - reINVITE with FS' SDP - FS
 A - 200 - FS
 A - ACK - FS
 A - BYE - FS

 The call to C is not even tried.

 I found this line is the logs that could give some idea:

 2009-11-03 18:29:41.280707 [NOTICE] mod_sofia.c:733 Hangup
 sofia/external/514xx at a.b.c.d [CS_ROUTING]
 [RECOVERY_ON_TIMER_EXPIRE]
 after sending the ACK for the reINVITE


 Regards,


 Humberto

please try r15326
I think i have it working.

I recommend for optimal results you set bypass_media_after_bridge=true
either as a global or in your DP in place of bypass_media=true


On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Humberto Quintana
 hotmail.comwrote:

 Hi Mike,

 I re-tried with trunk rev 15319 but I got almost the same behavior:
 There
 is now a reINVITE (with FS' SDP) going to A when the REFER is
 accepted.
 But
 still there is no reINVITE for A (with C's SDP) after the call from FS
 to C
 is established.

 Anyway, we decided for now to do a different implementation but if you
 want
 to explore more in this issue count me in ;-)


 Thank you very much!

 Humberto


 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
 http://mail.yahoo.com
  
_
Ready. Set. Get a great deal on Windows 7. See fantastic deals on Windows 7 now
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691818
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-11-04 Thread Humberto Quintana

Thanks for your time,

-The scenario is still the same: 

Always bypass media. 
Environment 100% NAT free :-)
Call established from A to B through FS. Then...  
Blind transfer from B to C (Refer-to: C)
RTP should go directly between A and C.


-With 1.0.4 and 1.0.5pre3, FS actually INVITEs C after receiving the 
REFER-to:C, BUT there is no 2-way audio.  Only RTP from C to A (due to the lack 
of reINVITE to A, after C answers). 

Please check SIP diagram here:

http://provision.netcelerate.net/ngrep/blindxfer2009-11-04-v1.0.5pre3.html


-What it's wrong with r15332 is there is not such call to C. For sure I know 
SIP is a protocol, may be my description was not clear but this SIP diagram 
speaks by itself ;-)

http://provision.netcelerate.net/ngrep/blindxfer2009-11-04rev15332.html


-You could check the sofia debug for r15332 here:
http://pastebin.com/m6f2b3836


Best regards,

Humberto


 I don't know what you are talking about anymore.

 The scenario I had tested is when a call is bridged in bypass_media=true
 bridge
 and you blind transfer that call back to the dialplan

 as soon as it hits the routing state it will resume media.


 it has been confirmed to not work and confirmed to have been fixed several
 time and if you are still having a problem you must have something blocking
 some of your packets or something .

 You have to understand that sip is a protocol and your description is
 completely non-standard.
 Perhaps you should get a console trace and attach it to a jira. The trace
 probably makes more sense to me.

 sofia profile internal siptrace on
 console loglevel debug

 reproduce and attach the whole capture.



 On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Humberto Quintana wrote:


 Hi,

 I tried r15332 and set in the sofia profile:

 a) bypass_media_after_bridge=true only
 b) bypass_media_after_bridge=true, param name=media-option
 value=resume-media-on-hold/
 

 In both cases FS is hanging up the initial call (A to FS) after accepting
 the REFER to C:

 A - reINVITE with FS' SDP - FS
 A - 200 - FS
 A - ACK - FS
 A - BYE - FS

 The call to C is not even tried.

 I found this line is the logs that could give some idea:

 2009-11-03 18:29:41.280707 [NOTICE] mod_sofia.c:733 Hangup
 sofia/external/514xx at a.b.c.d [CS_ROUTING] [RECOVERY_ON_TIMER_EXPIRE]
 after sending the ACK for the reINVITE


 Regards,


 Humberto

please try r15326
I think i have it working.

I recommend for optimal results you set bypass_media_after_bridge=true
either as a global or in your DP in place of bypass_media=true


On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Humberto Quintana 
 hotmail.comwrote:

 Hi Mike,

 I re-tried with trunk rev 15319 but I got almost the same behavior:
 There
 is now a reINVITE (with FS' SDP) going to A when the REFER is accepted.
 But
 still there is no reINVITE for A (with C's SDP) after the call from FS
 to C
 is established.

 Anyway, we decided for now to do a different implementation but if you
 want
 to explore more in this issue count me in ;-)


 Thank you very much!

 Humberto


 _
 Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they
 e-mail you.
 http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691817
 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org




 --
 Anthony Minessale II

 _
 Ready. Set. Get a great deal on Windows 7. See fantastic deals on Windows 7 
 now
 http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691818
  
_
Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on 
Facebook.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691816
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-11-04 Thread Brian West
What phones are you using?  I do this exact same scenario without a  
problem over and over testing with anthm.  So I would like to know  
what phones you're using.

/b

On Nov 4, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Humberto Quintana wrote:


 Thanks for your time,

 -The scenario is still the same:

 Always bypass media.
 Environment 100% NAT free :-)
 Call established from A to B through FS. Then...
 Blind transfer from B to C (Refer-to: C)
 RTP should go directly between A and C.


 -With 1.0.4 and 1.0.5pre3, FS actually INVITEs C after receiving the  
 REFER-to:C, BUT there is no 2-way audio.  Only RTP from C to A (due  
 to the lack of reINVITE to A, after C answers).

 Please check SIP diagram here:

 http://provision.netcelerate.net/ngrep/blindxfer2009-11-04-v1.0.5pre3.html


 -What it's wrong with r15332 is there is not such call to C. For  
 sure I know SIP is a protocol, may be my description was not clear  
 but this SIP diagram speaks by itself ;-)

 http://provision.netcelerate.net/ngrep/ 
 blindxfer2009-11-04rev15332.html


 -You could check the sofia debug for r15332 here:
 http://pastebin.com/m6f2b3836


 Best regards,

 Humberto


 I don't know what you are talking about anymore.

 The scenario I had tested is when a call is bridged in  
 bypass_media=true
 bridge
 and you blind transfer that call back to the dialplan

 as soon as it hits the routing state it will resume media.


 it has been confirmed to not work and confirmed to have been fixed  
 several
 time and if you are still having a problem you must have something  
 blocking
 some of your packets or something .

 You have to understand that sip is a protocol and your description is
 completely non-standard.
 Perhaps you should get a console trace and attach it to a jira. The  
 trace
 probably makes more sense to me.

 sofia profile internal siptrace on
 console loglevel debug

 reproduce and attach the whole capture.



 On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Humberto Quintana wrote:


 Hi,

 I tried r15332 and set in the sofia profile:

 a) bypass_media_after_bridge=true only
 b) bypass_media_after_bridge=true, param name=media-option
 value=resume-media-on-hold/


 In both cases FS is hanging up the initial call (A to FS) after  
 accepting
 the REFER to C:

 A - reINVITE with FS' SDP - FS
 A - 200 - FS
 A - ACK - FS
 A - BYE - FS

 The call to C is not even tried.

 I found this line is the logs that could give some idea:

 2009-11-03 18:29:41.280707 [NOTICE] mod_sofia.c:733 Hangup
 sofia/external/514xx at a.b.c.d [CS_ROUTING]  
 [RECOVERY_ON_TIMER_EXPIRE]
 after sending the ACK for the reINVITE


 Regards,


 Humberto

 please try r15326
 I think i have it working.

 I recommend for optimal results you set  
 bypass_media_after_bridge=true
 either as a global or in your DP in place of bypass_media=true


 On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Humberto Quintana
 hotmail.comwrote:

 Hi Mike,

 I re-tried with trunk rev 15319 but I got almost the same  
 behavior:
 There
 is now a reINVITE (with FS' SDP) going to A when the REFER is  
 accepted.
 But
 still there is no reINVITE for A (with C's SDP) after the call  
 from FS
 to C
 is established.

 Anyway, we decided for now to do a different implementation but  
 if you
 want
 to explore more in this issue count me in ;-)


 Thank you very much!

 Humberto


 _
 Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when  
 they
 e-mail you.
 http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691817
 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- 
 users
 http://www.freeswitch.org




 --
 Anthony Minessale II

 _
 Ready. Set. Get a great deal on Windows 7. See fantastic deals on  
 Windows 7 now
 http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691818
   
 _
 Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up  
 to on Facebook.
 http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691816
 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- 
 users
 http://www.freeswitch.org


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-11-03 Thread Brian West
Do you have ANY nat involved?

/b

On Nov 3, 2009, at 6:05 PM, Humberto Quintana wrote:

 2009-11-03 18:29:41.280707 [NOTICE] mod_sofia.c:733 Hangup sofia/ 
 external/514xxx...@a.b.c.d [CS_ROUTING] [RECOVERY_ON_TIMER_EXPIRE]
 after sending the ACK for the reINVITE


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-11-03 Thread Anthony Minessale
I don't know what you are talking about anymore.

The scenario I had tested is when a call is bridged in bypass_media=true
bridge
and you blind transfer that call back to the dialplan

as soon as it hits the routing state it will resume media.


it has been confirmed to not work and confirmed to have been fixed several
time and if you are still having a problem you must have something blocking
some of your packets or something .

You have to understand that sip is a protocol and your description is
completely non-standard.
Perhaps you should get a console trace and attach it to a jira.  The trace
probably makes more sense to me.

sofia profile internal siptrace on
console loglevel debug

reproduce and attach the whole capture.



On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Humberto Quintana hjqlo...@hotmail.comwrote:


 Hi,

 I tried r15332 and set in the sofia profile:

 a) bypass_media_after_bridge=true only
 b) bypass_media_after_bridge=true, param name=media-option
 value=resume-media-on-hold/
 param name=media-option value=bypass-media-after-att-xfer/

 In both cases FS is hanging up the initial call (A to FS) after accepting
 the REFER to C:

 A - reINVITE with FS' SDP - FS
 A - 200 - FS
 A - ACK - FS
 A - BYE - FS

 The call to C is not even tried.

 I found this line is the logs that could give some idea:

 2009-11-03 18:29:41.280707 [NOTICE] mod_sofia.c:733 Hangup
 sofia/external/514xxx...@a.b.c.d [CS_ROUTING] [RECOVERY_ON_TIMER_EXPIRE]
 after sending the ACK for the reINVITE


 Regards,


 Humberto

 please try r15326
 I think i have it working.
 
 I recommend for optimal results you set bypass_media_after_bridge=true
 either as a global or in your DP in place of bypass_media=true
 
 
 On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Humberto Quintana hjqlopez at
 hotmail.comwrote:
 
   Hi Mike,
 
  I re-tried with trunk rev 15319 but I got almost the same behavior:
 There
  is now a reINVITE (with FS' SDP) going to A when the REFER is accepted.
  But
  still there is no reINVITE for A (with C's SDP) after the call from FS
 to C
  is established.
 
  Anyway, we decided for now to do a different implementation but if you
 want
  to explore more in this issue count me in ;-)
 
 
  Thank you very much!
 
  Humberto


 _
 Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they
 e-mail you.
 http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691817
 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org




-- 
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com msn%3aanthony_miness...@hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.compaypal%3aanthony.miness...@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org sip%3a...@conference.freeswitch.org
iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.orggoogletalk%3aconf%2b...@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:213-799-1400
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-11-03 Thread Humberto Quintana

Hi,

I tried r15332 and set in the sofia profile:

a) bypass_media_after_bridge=true only
b) bypass_media_after_bridge=true, param name=media-option 
value=resume-media-on-hold/
param name=media-option value=bypass-media-after-att-xfer/

In both cases FS is hanging up the initial call (A to FS) after accepting the 
REFER to C:

A - reINVITE with FS' SDP - FS
A - 200 - FS
A - ACK - FS
A - BYE - FS

The call to C is not even tried.

I found this line is the logs that could give some idea:

2009-11-03 18:29:41.280707 [NOTICE] mod_sofia.c:733 Hangup 
sofia/external/514xxx...@a.b.c.d [CS_ROUTING] [RECOVERY_ON_TIMER_EXPIRE]  
after sending the ACK for the reINVITE


Regards,


Humberto

please try r15326
I think i have it working.

I recommend for optimal results you set bypass_media_after_bridge=true
either as a global or in your DP in place of bypass_media=true


On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Humberto Quintana hjqlopez at 
hotmail.comwrote:

  Hi Mike,

 I re-tried with trunk rev 15319 but I got almost the same behavior: There
 is now a reINVITE (with FS' SDP) going to A when the REFER is accepted.  But
 still there is no reINVITE for A (with C's SDP) after the call from FS to C
 is established.

 Anyway, we decided for now to do a different implementation but if you want
 to explore more in this issue count me in ;-)


 Thank you very much!

 Humberto

  
_
Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they e-mail 
you.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691817
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-11-02 Thread Humberto Quintana

Thanks for you answers guys,

I test the parameters you suggested
but still no audio due to the lack of reINVITE.  By the way I'm using
1.0.4 but I also tried 1.0.5pre3.

One particular condition is that there is no on-hold before the Blind Transfer.

Regards,

Humberto

  param name=media-option value=resume-media-on-hold/
  param name=media-option value=bypass-media-after-att-xfer/

 My scenario is as follows:

 inbound-bypass-media is set in the profile because we dont want FS handling
 the media.

 1. A calls B
 2. FS sends to B the A's SDP
 3. B answers
 4. FS sends to A the B's SDP
 5. Media going directly between A and B
 6. B REFERs the call to C (blind transfer with no reINVITE for Hold)
 7. FS accepts(202) the REFER and sends the NOTIFY
 7a. B and FS send the BYE
 8. FS sends an INVITE  to C with A's SDP
 9. C answers
 10. FS doesn't send a reINVITE to A to let it know about C's SDP


 Is that the expected FS behavior or is this a bug?   
   
_
Ready for a deal-of-a-lifetime? See fantastic offers on Windows 7, in one 
convenient place.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691634
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-11-02 Thread Michael Jerris
Please re-try with latest svn trunk.

Mike

On Nov 2, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Humberto Quintana wrote:


 Thanks for you answers guys,

 I test the parameters you suggested
 but still no audio due to the lack of reINVITE.  By the way I'm using
 1.0.4 but I also tried 1.0.5pre3.

 One particular condition is that there is no on-hold before the  
 Blind Transfer.

 Regards,

 Humberto

   param name=media-option value=resume-media-on-hold/
   param name=media-option value=bypass-media-after-att-xfer/


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-11-02 Thread Humberto Quintana

Hi Mike,

I re-tried with trunk rev 15319 but I got almost the same behavior: There is 
now a reINVITE (with FS' SDP) going to A when the REFER is accepted.  But still 
there is no reINVITE for A (with C's SDP) after the call from FS to C is 
established.

Anyway, we decided for now to do a different implementation but if you want to 
explore more in this issue count me in ;-)


Thank you very much!

Humberto



Please re-try with latest svn trunk.

Mike

On Nov 2, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Humberto Quintana wrote:


 Thanks for you answers guys,

 I test the parameters you suggested
 but still no audio due to the lack of reINVITE.  By the way I'm using
 1.0.4 but I also tried 1.0.5pre3.

 One particular condition is that there is no on-hold before the  
 Blind Transfer.

 Regards,

 Humberto

   param name=media-option value=resume-media-on-hold/
   param name=media-option value=bypass-media-after-att-xfer/
  
_
Lots of fantastic Windows 7 offers, in one convenient place. Get the perfect 
deal for you now.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691633___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-11-02 Thread Anthony Minessale
please try r15326
I think i have it working.

I recommend for optimal results you set bypass_media_after_bridge=true
either as a global or in your DP in place of bypass_media=true



On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Humberto Quintana hjqlo...@hotmail.comwrote:

  Hi Mike,

 I re-tried with trunk rev 15319 but I got almost the same behavior: There
 is now a reINVITE (with FS' SDP) going to A when the REFER is accepted.  But
 still there is no reINVITE for A (with C's SDP) after the call from FS to C
 is established.

 Anyway, we decided for now to do a different implementation but if you want
 to explore more in this issue count me in ;-)


 Thank you very much!

 Humberto




 Please re-try with latest svn trunk.
 
 Mike
 
 On Nov 2, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Humberto Quintana wrote:
 
 
  Thanks for you answers guys,
 
  I test the parameters you suggested
  but still no audio due to the lack of reINVITE. By the way I'm using
  1.0.4 but I also tried 1.0.5pre3.
 
  One particular condition is that there is no on-hold before the
  Blind Transfer.
 
  Regards,
 
  Humberto
 
  param name=media-option value=resume-media-on-hold/
  param name=media-option value=bypass-media-after-att-xfer/

 --
 Lots of fantastic offers on Windows 7, in one convenient place. Get a deal
 on Windows 7 now http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691628

 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org




-- 
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com msn%3aanthony_miness...@hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.compaypal%3aanthony.miness...@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org sip%3a...@conference.freeswitch.org
iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.orggoogletalk%3aconf%2b...@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:213-799-1400
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


[Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-10-30 Thread Humberto Quintana

Hi everybody,

I'd like some help with this situation that is 'haunting' me :-) 

My scenario is as follows:

inbound-bypass-media is set in the profile because we dont want FS handling the 
media.

1. A calls B
2. FS sends to B the A's SDP
3. B answers
4. FS sends to A the B's SDP
5. Media going directly between A and B
6. B REFERs the call to C (blind transfer with no reINVITE for Hold)
7. FS accepts(202) the REFER and sends the NOTIFY
7a. B and FS send the BYE
8. FS sends an INVITE  to C with A's SDP
9. C answers
10. FS doesn't send a reINVITE to A to let it know about C's SDP


Is that the expected FS behavior or is this a bug?


I'd appreciate any hints. Thanks,


Humberto


  
_
Lots of fantastic Windows 7 offers, in one convenient place. Get the perfect 
deal for you now.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691633___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-10-30 Thread Brian West

First you forgot to mention what SVN rev you're on...

/b

On Oct 30, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Humberto Quintana wrote:


Hi everybody,

I'd like some help with this situation that is 'haunting' me :-)

My scenario is as follows:

inbound-bypass-media is set in the profile because we dont want FS  
handling the media.


1. A calls B
2. FS sends to B the A's SDP
3. B answers
4. FS sends to A the B's SDP
5. Media going directly between A and B
6. B REFERs the call to C (blind transfer with no reINVITE for Hold)
7. FS accepts(202) the REFER and sends the NOTIFY
7a. B and FS send the BYE
8. FS sends an INVITE  to C with A's SDP
9. C answers
10. FS doesn't send a reINVITE to A to let it know about C's SDP


Is that the expected FS behavior or is this a bug?


I'd appreciate any hints. Thanks,


Humberto



Lots of fantastic offers on Windows 7, in one convenient place. Get  
a deal on Windows 7 now  
___

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch- 
users

http://www.freeswitch.org


___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org


Re: [Freeswitch-users] no REINVITE on Blind Transfer with bypass_media

2009-10-30 Thread Anthony Minessale
profile options

param name=media-option value=resume-media-on-hold/
param name=media-option value=bypass-media-after-att-xfer/


On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Humberto Quintana hjqlo...@hotmail.comwrote:

  Hi everybody,

 I'd like some help with this situation that is 'haunting' me :-)

 My scenario is as follows:

 inbound-bypass-media is set in the profile because we dont want FS handling
 the media.

 1. A calls B
 2. FS sends to B the A's SDP
 3. B answers
 4. FS sends to A the B's SDP
 5. Media going directly between A and B
 6. B REFERs the call to C (blind transfer with no reINVITE for Hold)
 7. FS accepts(202) the REFER and sends the NOTIFY
 7a. B and FS send the BYE
 8. FS sends an INVITE  to C with A's SDP
 9. C answers
 10. FS doesn't send a reINVITE to A to let it know about C's SDP


 Is that the expected FS behavior or is this a bug?


 I'd appreciate any hints. Thanks,


 Humberto



 --
 Lots of fantastic offers on Windows 7, in one convenient place. Get a deal
 on Windows 7 now http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691628

 ___
 FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
 FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
 http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
 UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
 http://www.freeswitch.org




-- 
Anthony Minessale II

FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/
ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire

AIM: anthm
MSN:anthony_miness...@hotmail.com msn%3aanthony_miness...@hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.miness...@gmail.compaypal%3aanthony.miness...@gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch

FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:8...@conference.freeswitch.org sip%3a...@conference.freeswitch.org
iax:gu...@conference.freeswitch.org/888
googletalk:conf+...@conference.freeswitch.orggoogletalk%3aconf%2b...@conference.freeswitch.org
pstn:213-799-1400
___
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org