Re: PositionPlacement UnderMouse to force window on-screen?

2009-02-17 Thread Bob Woodside
On Tuesday 17 February 2009, Dominik Vogt wrote:
 Yes.  I just don't have enough time to take care of all the
 patches.  I think you should have commit privileges for CVS to
 speed things up.  Changes in behaviour should be discussed in
 advance anyway.

 Any other opinions?

Agreed.



Re: Windows unmapped with desktop switch?

2005-06-07 Thread Bob Woodside
On Monday 06 June 2005 08:22, Nick Johnson wrote:
 ...AFAIK, unmapping windows upon desk
 change is a peculiarity of fvwm.
 
 So then, the question becomes, how can an X client (not an fvwm
 module) look at an unmapped window and tell whether it is (A)
 unmapped due to client behavior, or (B) unmapped by fvwm?

It's been a while since I've been active here, but I'll jump in and 
give it a try, absent any input from Dominik.

First, for a little background, I took Mikhael's hint, and a little 
Googling turned up this link to some WM Spec discussion that gives a 
bit of background on large and virtual desktops, and some of the 
rationale behind different ways of implementing them. (caveat: I'm not 
so sure I agree with the writer's conclusion that unmapping is not 
ICCCM-compliant.)

http://roguelife.org/~fujita/www.freedesktop.org/standards/wm-spec/x23.html

FVWM, of course, supports both large and virtual desktops, and the 
map/unmap technique for handling virtual desks goes way back to the 
original author, Rob Nation, before most of us had ever heard of FVWM.

The alternative approach of using virtual root windows (for either 
multiple viewports or multiple desktops) was used, if I recall, by the 
VTWM/TVTWM family of WM's. I can't recall who else used them - 
Enlightenment, maybe. I think Rob shied away from the virtual root 
technique because of some undesirable side effects, such as confusing 
programs that try to locate the root window (to set images on the root, 
or to locate their client windows' WM decorations).

So, on to your real questions...

I don't know whether there are currently any other WM's (other than 
FVWM descendants) that use the map/unmap technique. Most don't try to 
implement both large and virtual desktops, and so probably don't worry 
about using different techniques.

I agree with Dan, I can't think of any way you could know for sure 
whether a window had been unmapped by the client or by FVWM. In any 
case, you'd have to determine what WM was running, and then have 
special case knowledge for the case of FVWM. Even then, short of 
running as an FVWM module and being able to look at the various window 
flags, I'm not sure you could deduce everything you'd need to know.

What would you want to do differently in the cases of an unmapped 
window that just happens to be on a different desk, and one that has 
been iconified by the app...and also just happens to be on a different 
desktop?


Cheers,
Bob






Re: Birthday decorations and announcement?

2003-05-27 Thread Bob Woodside
On Tue, 27 May 2003 22:05:40 +0200
Uwe Pross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I made a couple of banners for the web page. Maybe we can
 use one of them:
 
 http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm-web/birthday/

I would vote for either logo2 or logo4. I think these will stand out
best against the current background. I wonder if we should add an
exclamation mark at the end (Happy Birthday FVWM!).

 We could include one of these banners on sunday
 automatically by the php scripts.

Perhaps we should have it (and whatever extra birthday verbiage we
add...FVWM turns 10 this month, blah, blah, blah) included for all of
the month of June...or do you think it should remain for a longer
period, like, say, till after the close of the logo contest?


Cheers,
Bob

--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/.
To unsubscribe from the list, send unsubscribe fvwm-workers in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]