Happy New Year!

2010-01-01 Thread Dan
Happy New Year, etc etc ! ! ! !

Now get a move on!  Suck down that hangover cure then

BACK UP YOUR DATA 

Do it TODAY.
Don't Delay!
JUST DO IT.

CarbonCopyCloner
http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html

SuperDuper!
http://www.shirt-pocket.com/

The preceding has been brought to you by the brain cramps caused by 
watching too much Twilight Zone.  Time to switch to Dr Who.  Or maybe 
Buffy.  Or maybe 

- Dan.
-- 
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Happy New Year!

2010-01-01 Thread John Carmonne

On Jan 1, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Dana Collins wrote:

 On 1/1/10 11:26 AM, Dan of dantear...@gmail.com sent
 
 Happy New Year, etc etc ! ! ! !
 
 Now get a move on!  Suck down that hangover cure then
 
 BACK UP YOUR DATA 
 
 Do it TODAY.
 Don't Delay!
 JUST DO IT.
 
 CarbonCopyCloner
 http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html
 
 SuperDuper!
 http://www.shirt-pocket.com/
 
 The preceding has been brought to you by the brain cramps caused by
 watching too much Twilight Zone.  Time to switch to Dr Who.  Or maybe
 Buffy.  Or maybe 
 
 - Dan.
 
 Dr. Who, Season 3 highly recommended - avoid Buffy (after all, one wants two
 steps forward without the one step back ;-) esp. today.
 Happy New Year,
 Dana
 
 

Happy New Year All
 
I  recommend starting the year with  a review of the Tarantino flicks and Queen 
on fire.:-)

John Carmonne
Yorba Linda USA



-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Happy New Year!

2010-01-01 Thread John Martz
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Dana Collins dlcatft...@verizon.net wrote:
 Dr. Who, Season 3 highly recommended

I'm one of those who is waiting to see David Tennant's last appearance
as the Doctor. Hopefully sometime later today or tomorrow ...

Other than that ... guess I'll go walk some dogs and hopefully eat
some free food at a party I've been invited to crash later tonight. On
the whole a better New Years day than some I've spent. :-)

-irrational john

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Dan's suggestion on backing up-Time Machine Query

2010-01-01 Thread DLC
...which is a good one, but I started a new thread just to keep things
clean.
I like to BK my working OS (on my G5) using SuperDuper, which I've
done. However, I had a spare external FW drive that I tried Time
Machine on. It's been a little while, so tonight I may do it again.
However... the drive is only 200 Gig in size (remember the days when
that spec was regarded as incredible?), so I am wondering what to
expect, i.e.

* does TM make a completely new duplicate image of your drive, or
* does it make refresher tags, updating the prior image to a more
contemporaneous state, and marking the changes?

Thanks in advance for any illumination.
Regards, and Happy New Year,
Dana

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Happy New Year!

2010-01-01 Thread Mel
Here is my contribution for all to have a happier New Year.  It is the 
procedure I have used to ensure management of decent back up of an active 
master file. 

I'm using a DP 533 MHz G4 DA  with 1.5 MB RAM and currently with a 40 GB 
internal HD  installed as a boot drive.  

 I am a retired IBM Main Frame programmer/systems analyst from 1960 to 1991.  
During that time I was responsible for data base creation and maintenance, data 
and software management, development and design for many systems.  It was 
axiomatic that we seldom used the word if but used the word when hard 
drives would crash or tapes would fail.  Part of every production cycle 
included performance backups on a daily or multi-daily schedule.

This what I have done and do to keep myself in
 an even keel as regards to losing data and software on an online Mac using OS 
10.4.11. 

Processing in one's home is certainly less stringent as hard drives have long 
since replaced tapes and the quality and longevity of hard drives today is like 
the improvement of a superbly running four cylinder engine in a 2009 car as 
compared to the four cylinder installed in a Model A Ford circa 1929.  

Nevertheless, the word if should never replace the word when when 
contemplating the possibility of a hard drive failure when that hard drive is 
one's master hard drive.  Accordingly this is what I do:

1- I have several external HDs mounted in external cases with their own power 
supply. They are connected via One of those HDs is partitioned while the others 
are not

2- At least once a week I use the 'backing up everything' option in CCC to back 
up my internal master HD to the external HD.  

3- After CCC completes, I use the disk utility to repair the external
 HD and then Repair Disk Permissions on the external HD.

4- Then I use System Preference to select the external HD as the start up HD 
and restart.

5- After a successful boot using the back up external hard drive, I use the 
disk utility to repair the internal HD and then Repair Disk Permissions in the 
internal
 HD.

6- Then I date stamp the external hard drive with the date of the back up.

7- I then move the external HD icon to trash and shut it down.

I do these chores while doing other things such as mail or making input to an 
ancient IIci which I've used off line since late 1989 or early 1990.  [Note: I 
use similar procedures for backing up the internal hard drive on the IIci to 
one or more external hard drives.

I also use SMART utility to monitor my internal master hard drive.

Once every quarter, I rotate my external hard drive with another mounted in its 
own external case and replace it.

Once a year (or sooner) I replace my master internal HD with another and date 
stamp the replaced hard drive.

The above might sound like a lot of extra work but it is like a scheduled 
brushing and flossing of one's electronic teeth, in the one instance tending to 
preserve one's teeth and in the other instance actually preserving ones data 
and software and thereafter resting more easily.

Mel

--- On Fri, 1/1/10, Dana Collins
 dlcatft...@verizon.net wrote:

From: Dana Collins dlcatft...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: Happy New Year!
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Date: Friday, January 1, 2010, 10:00 AM

On 1/1/10 11:26 AM, Dan of dantear...@gmail.com sent

 Happy New Year, etc etc ! ! ! !
 
 Now get a move on!  Suck down that hangover cure then
 
 BACK UP YOUR DATA 
 
 Do it TODAY.
 Don't Delay!
 JUST DO IT.
 
 CarbonCopyCloner
 http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html
 

 SuperDuper!
 http://www.shirt-pocket.com/
 
 The preceding has been brought to you by the brain cramps caused by
 watching too much Twilight Zone.  Time to switch to Dr Who.  Or maybe
 Buffy.  Or maybe 
 
 - Dan.

Dr. Who, Season 3 highly recommended - avoid Buffy (after all, one wants two
steps forward without the one step back ;-) esp. today.
Happy New Year,
Dana


-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Re: Dan's suggestion on backing up-Time Machine Query

2010-01-01 Thread John Carmonne

On Jan 1, 2010, at 11:42 AM, DLC wrote:

 ...which is a good one, but I started a new thread just to keep things
 clean.
 I like to BK my working OS (on my G5) using SuperDuper, which I've
 done. However, I had a spare external FW drive that I tried Time
 Machine on. It's been a little while, so tonight I may do it again.
 However... the drive is only 200 Gig in size (remember the days when
 that spec was regarded as incredible?), so I am wondering what to
 expect, i.e.
 
 * does TM make a completely new duplicate image of your drive, or
 * does it make refresher tags, updating the prior image to a more
 contemporaneous state, and marking the changes?
 
 Thanks in advance for any illumination.
 Regards, and Happy New Year,
 Dana
 
 -- 


 Complete copy and incremental there after, Very nice tool to have.


John Carmonne
Yorba Linda USA




-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Dan's suggestion on backing up-Time Machine Query

2010-01-01 Thread Dan
At 11:42 AM -0800 1/1/2010, DLC wrote:
I like to BK my working OS (on my G5) using SuperDuper, which I've
done. However, I had a spare external FW drive that I tried Time
Machine on. It's been a little while, so tonight I may do it again.
However... the drive is only 200 Gig in size

* does TM make a completely new duplicate image of your drive, or
* does it make refresher tags, updating the prior image to a more
contemporaneous state, and marking the changes?

Time Machine adds your changed files to its database on that drive, 
and makes note of which files you've deleted; essentially an 
incremental save set.  It does not update the previously stored 
data directly, like SuperDuper or CCC would.  Remember - TM does NOT 
produce a bootable system (clone).

(remember the days when that spec was regarded as incredible?)

$999 for a 200 MB HD for my Mac IIci.

And a few years later, $550 for a 2 GB HD.

- Dan.
-- 
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Dan's suggestion on backing up-Time Machine Query

2010-01-01 Thread John Carmonne

On Jan 1, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Dan wrote:

 At 11:42 AM -0800 1/1/2010, DLC wrote:
 I like to BK my working OS (on my G5) using SuperDuper, which I've
 done. However, I had a spare external FW drive that I tried Time
 Machine on. It's been a little while, so tonight I may do it again.
 However... the drive is only 200 Gig in size
 
 * does TM make a completely new duplicate image of your drive, or
 * does it make refresher tags, updating the prior image to a more
 contemporaneous state, and marking the changes?
 
 Time Machine adds your changed files to its database on that drive, 
 and makes note of which files you've deleted; essentially an 
 incremental save set.  It does not update the previously stored 
 data directly, like SuperDuper or CCC would.  Remember - TM does NOT 
 produce a bootable system (clone).
 
 (remember the days when that spec was regarded as incredible?)
 
 $999 for a 200 MB HD for my Mac IIci.
 
 And a few years later, $550 for a 2 GB HD.
 
 - Dan.
 -- 
 - Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.
 
$400. for 32 MB Ram for my Quadra 650. That was on sale at Fry's.$49.00 for 
4 GBs on my MBP.

John Carmonne
Yorba Linda USA



-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Dan's suggestion on backing up-Time Machine Query

2010-01-01 Thread Jeffrey Engle

On Jan 1, 2010, at 12:10 PM, John Carmonne wrote:


 On Jan 1, 2010, at 11:42 AM, DLC wrote:

 ...which is a good one, but I started a new thread just to keep  
 things
 clean.
 I like to BK my working OS (on my G5) using SuperDuper, which I've
 done. However, I had a spare external FW drive that I tried Time
 Machine on. It's been a little while, so tonight I may do it again.
 However... the drive is only 200 Gig in size (remember the days when
 that spec was regarded as incredible?), so I am wondering what to
 expect, i.e.

 * does TM make a completely new duplicate image of your drive, or
 * does it make refresher tags, updating the prior image to a more
 contemporaneous state, and marking the changes?

 Thanks in advance for any illumination.
 Regards, and Happy New Year,
 Dana

 -- 


 Complete copy and incremental there after, Very nice tool to have.


 John Carmonne
 Yorba Linda USA

My backup scenario is as follows:
Powermac G5 2.3 dual, 5gb ram w/Seritek1V4  G5 Jive and  Leopard.
Main boot drive in the 'built-in drive bay (A) 500gb
Misc. storage in built-in drive bay (B) 500gb
Boot drive clone in G5 Jive 500gb (seperate drive)
Time machine volume in G5 Jive 500gb (seperate drive)
Misc. storage clone in G5 Jive 500gb (Seperate drive)

I know there are downsides to this setup, but can't really think of  
any at the moment. Jeff


  

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Re: Happy New Year!

2010-01-01 Thread Michael Koch

On Jan 1, 2010, at 11:26, Dan wrote:

 Happy New Year, etc etc ! ! ! !

 Now get a move on!  Suck down that hangover cure then

 BACK UP YOUR DATA 

 Do it TODAY.
 Don't Delay!
 JUST DO IT.

 CarbonCopyCloner
 http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html

 SuperDuper!
 http://www.shirt-pocket.com/

 The preceding has been brought to you by the brain cramps caused by
 watching too much Twilight Zone.  Time to switch to Dr Who.  Or maybe
 Buffy.  Or maybe 

 - Dan.
 --  
 - Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth.

 --  
 You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a  
 group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a  
 particular focus on Power Macs.
 The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our  
 netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
 To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

What are you happy about ? YOUR TAX'S are due; you have until APRIL 15  
to PAY
Enjoy

have a nice day
Michael Koch
mk...@ncwcom.com



-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Dan's suggestion on backing up-Time Machine Query

2010-01-01 Thread John Carmonne

On Jan 1, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Jeffrey Engle wrote:

 
 On Jan 1, 2010, at 12:10 PM, John Carmonne wrote:
 
 
 On Jan 1, 2010, at 11:42 AM, DLC wrote:
 
 ...which is a good one, but I started a new thread just to keep things
 clean.
 I like to BK my working OS (on my G5) using SuperDuper, which I've
 done. However, I had a spare external FW drive that I tried Time
 Machine on. It's been a little while, so tonight I may do it again.
 However... the drive is only 200 Gig in size (remember the days when
 that spec was regarded as incredible?), so I am wondering what to
 expect, i.e.
 
 * does TM make a completely new duplicate image of your drive, or
 * does it make refresher tags, updating the prior image to a more
 contemporaneous state, and marking the changes?
 
 Thanks in advance for any illumination.
 Regards, and Happy New Year,
 Dana
 
 -- 
 
 
 Complete copy and incremental there after, Very nice tool to have.
 
 
 John Carmonne
 Yorba Linda USA
 
 My backup scenario is as follows:
 Powermac G5 2.3 dual, 5gb ram w/Seritek1V4  G5 Jive and  Leopard.
 Main boot drive in the 'built-in drive bay (A) 500gb
 Misc. storage in built-in drive bay (B) 500gb
 Boot drive clone in G5 Jive 500gb (seperate drive)
 Time machine volume in G5 Jive 500gb (seperate drive)
 Misc. storage clone in G5 Jive 500gb (Seperate drive)
 
 I know there are downsides to this setup, but can't really think of any at 
 the moment. Jeff
 

I too have a G5 dual 2.7 I have the Jive 5 stuff and am awaiting the dough for 
the Seritek 1V4 card
I assume your TimeMachine is only backing up your A drive ( the top slot.)? The 
2TB drives are coming 
down in price so I guess I'l bend over for a 10 TB  8 GB super box. However I 
have found I like Tiger
 better on the PPCs Except for watching DVDs. So I use a 250GB partition with 
Leopard and CCC for
backups. Each day at 3:00 pm.
 
John Carmonne
Yorba Linda USA



-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Happy New Year!

2010-01-01 Thread Ricardo Sevilla
 BACK UP YOUR DATA 
Decided today was going to be the day that I start my back up  
procedure for my G4 IM so excited





 Do it TODAY.
 Don't Delay!
 JUST DO IT.

I just did. Kind of. I am in the process of copying over the files.  
1,212,803 files


 I'm really hating computers and computer stuff these days, but I feel
 like a heroin addict -- gotta quit but...can't.

Thats how I feel sometimes but like a heroin addict we just cant stop!!!


 Happy new year, all, and I hope yours will be better than mine.

Happy New Years to all!!!

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Dan's suggestion on backing up-Time Machine Query

2010-01-01 Thread Jeffrey Engle

On Jan 1, 2010, at 1:29 PM, John Carmonne wrote:

 My backup scenario is as follows:
 Powermac G5 2.3 dual, 5gb ram w/Seritek1V4  G5 Jive and  Leopard.
 Main boot drive in the 'built-in drive bay (A) 500gb
 Misc. storage in built-in drive bay (B) 500gb
 Boot drive clone in G5 Jive 500gb (seperate drive)
 Time machine volume in G5 Jive 500gb (seperate drive)
 Misc. storage clone in G5 Jive 500gb (Seperate drive)

 I know there are downsides to this setup, but can't really think of  
 any at the moment. Jeff


 I too have a G5 dual 2.7 I have the Jive 5 stuff and am awaiting the  
 dough for the Seritek 1V4 card
 I assume your TimeMachine is only backing up your A drive ( the top  
 slot.)? The 2TB drives are coming
 down in price so I guess I'l bend over for a 10 TB  8 GB super box.  
 However I have found I like Tiger
 better on the PPCs Except for watching DVDs. So I use a 250GB  
 partition with Leopard and CCC for
 backups. Each day at 3:00 pm.

 John Carmonne
 Yorba Linda USA


Just be careful those TB drives have low power consumption? of course  
you've got a 600w power supply...
and yes, time machine is only on the A slot (upper). If it wasn't for  
screen sharing I'd go back to tiger. I bought a 1TB drive last year  
and all was good till I needed to wipe the hummer with zeroes.. took a  
long time... also if one goes down, that's a lot of info to retrieve.  
I guess if the price drops, I'll reconsider my options.
Then again, maybe it'll be mac pro time! J

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: ACARD AEC-6280M Adaptor

2010-01-01 Thread Kasey Smith

On Jan 1, 2010, at 3:30 PM, themargate...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
  I made some modifications in
 Open firmware, allowing the onboard ATA controller to access the full
 320gb hard drive and using carbon copy cloner replicated my OS X hard
 drive and booted from it using the onboard ATA to make sure the hard
 drive wasn't a dud, the drive worked brilliantly.

 Can anyone out there help me out in my situation?

 Many thanks
 Sam Walker

 PowerMac G4 Quicksilver, Powerbook G4 Al, and iMac Intel user

What modifications did you do? I want to do this... (:


-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Dan's suggestion on backing up-Time Machine Query

2010-01-01 Thread Kasey Smith

On Jan 1, 2010, at 4:11 PM, John Carmonne wrote:

  Only have a
 500 GB drive on it not much room for dual boot.

I did dual boot on a 40 GB o.o

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: ACARD AEC-6280M Adaptor

2010-01-01 Thread themargate...@tiscali.co.uk
Followed the instructions here, it says its for a G4 cube but worked
just fine for my Quicksilver

http://nanchatte.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/128gb-large-hdd-lba48-support-on-the-g4-cube-with-leopard/

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: ACARD AEC-6280M Adaptor

2010-01-01 Thread John Carmonne

On Jan 1, 2010, at 3:13 PM, themargate...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:

 Followed the instructions here, it says its for a G4 cube but worked
 just fine for my Quicksilver
 
 http://nanchatte.wordpress.com/2008/04/27/128gb-large-hdd-lba48-support-on-the-g4-cube-with-leopard/


Glad it worked for you I tried it on two TiBook 500s and no dice. 160 drive 
only read 128.
I must have typed those strings 20 times before I gave up and installed a 120GB 
drive.

John Carmonne
Yorba Linda USA



-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Dan's suggestion on backing up-Time Machine Query

2010-01-01 Thread Dana Collins
On 1/1/10 3:29 PM, Dan of dantear...@gmail.com sent

 At 11:42 AM -0800 1/1/2010, DLC wrote:
 I like to BK my working OS (on my G5) using SuperDuper, which I've
 done. However, I had a spare external FW drive that I tried Time
 Machine on. It's been a little while, so tonight I may do it again.
 However... the drive is only 200 Gig in size
 
 * does TM make a completely new duplicate image of your drive, or
 * does it make refresher tags, updating the prior image to a more
 contemporaneous state, and marking the changes?
 
 Time Machine adds your changed files to its database on that drive,
 and makes note of which files you've deleted; essentially an
 incremental save set.  It does not update the previously stored
 data directly, like SuperDuper or CCC would.  Remember - TM does NOT
 produce a bootable system (clone).
 
 (remember the days when that spec was regarded as incredible?)
 
 $999 for a 200 MB HD for my Mac IIci.
 
 And a few years later, $550 for a 2 GB HD.
 
 - Dan.

Thanks, Dan, and thanks to Jeffrey and John for chiming in also - most
helpful, thanks!

 $999 for a 200 MB HD for my Mac IIci.
 
 And a few years later, $550 for a 2 GB HD

I remember feeling real good about *only* spending approx. $300 for a 12 Mb
RAM upgrade for my IIvx :-)

-Dana


-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


RE: ACARD AEC-6280M Adaptojavascript:;r

2010-01-01 Thread Stewie de Young

Sam , you have to make sure you are using the correct Acard firmware and driver 
to match your operating system.
If you go here...
http://www.acard.com/english/fc0101.jsp?prodno=AEC-6280M
and look at that list you will see that for 10.4 you need driver vers. 2.0.6 
and firmware 2.16.
Thats if you are using 10.4. 
I'm unsure whether you are intending to use 10.5.8 as you say that is on one of 
the other drives.
I didn't see anything about using this card with 10.5 so you may be out of luck.
Also if you expand the  more option from the driver description , point d) 
may help.

Version:2.0.6 
  

a. First release of Universal Binary driver for 

   Mac OS X 10.4

b. Supports hard disk drive capacity upto 2T 

   (1999G)

c. Supports AV-Optimizer utility

d. Supports firmware update under Mac OS X 10.4

   (must boot from the HDD which is not connected 

to AEC62x0M)


Stewie

 Subject: ACARD AEC-6280M Adaptor
 From: themargate...@tiscali.co.uk

 
 Many thanks
 Sam Walker

  
_
Use Messenger in your Hotmail inbox Find out how
http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hotmail-is-here

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Where OS 9 needs to be..?

2010-01-01 Thread Bruce Godfrey
I have a B/W, upgraded with an XLR8 G4 zif, which is running from an IDE 
drive that used to reside in my old Beige G3 desktop.  In that previous 
computer OS X had to be installed on the first drive partition and I had 
two smaller ones which each had a version of OS 9.  All those partitions 
were bootable in the Beige.  Now that this drive has moved to the B/W 
the OS 9 partitions are not bootable.  I have come across the 
information that the latter G3's require OS 9 to be on the first 
partition.  Luckily the B/W came with a 12Gb IDE drive and I put OS 9 on 
that, and it is bootable.
Recently I purchased a 1rpm scsi drive and ATTO card (you've read 
about that experience here ;-)  and I managed to get it working almost 
satisfactorily.  I made 2 partitions on the SCSI drive and put a copy of 
my OS 9.2.2 from the IDE drive there, and Tiger on the second 
partition.  This system 9 runs as Classic under Tiger just fine.

Tiger is bootable, but why this isn't OS 9?

Is the above information about which system has to be in the first 
partition different on IDE vs SCSI drives in the G3 line?  I did the 
boot up from the OS 9 installer disk and remove the system 9 from the 
system folder on the hard drive, than put it back in trick.  Didn't help. 

Broos

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Where OS 9 needs to be..?

2010-01-01 Thread Kasey Smith

On Jan 1, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Bruce Godfrey wrote:
 Is the above information about which system has to be in the first
 partition different on IDE vs SCSI drives in the G3 line?  I did the
 boot up from the OS 9 installer disk and remove the system 9 from the
 system folder on the hard drive, than put it back in trick.  Didn't  
 help.

The trick is to pull the system 'breifcase' out of the system folder  
and put it back

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Which G?

2010-01-01 Thread kimtoufectis
I'd like help in choosing an older Mac.  I entered Macdom six months
ago via an original blueberry clamshell iBook G3.  Beyond an iconic
product design, I've appreciated the simplicity and reliability of
freedom from Micro$oft (I use a PC at work).  I've enjoyed stretching
it about as far as a 300 MHz processor can go (maxed out RAM and
upgraded to OS X 10.2.8) but I'd like to be able to streaming low-fi
video and use current web browser features; seems like time for
something more.

A bit about my computer usage:  I am fairly non-tech; when my work
Wintel machine fails an expert comes to fix it.  At home I'm on my
own; I like simple.  My iBook serves mainly as a netbook: I use Gmail,
Google Docs, and Google Reader for productivity and news, and Pandora,
GrooveShark, LaLa, and Playlist to stream music.  I don't make much
use of social media, and real-time isn't a trend I have not had much
interest in or need for (so far).  I've tried Chrome with extensions
on a Windows machine and think it could meet virtually all my routine
computing needs. I even contemplate getting a netbook and migrating it
to ChromeOS as a next step (maybe using JoliCloud and EyeOS until
that's easy to do).

Searching online showed me that for the $250-500 cost of a netbook I
could step well forward in power with a used iMac (functioning
MacBooks seem out of that pricerange).  The architect in me
appreciates the compact, elegant designs of both the G4 and G5 iMacs,
and depending on age and screen size I find both in a tolerable
$250-500 price range.  Whatever I buy, I'd like to use it for a long,
long time (this iBook turned 10 recently, and as a complement to a
more capable desktop I want to continue to use it for light browsing
for more years).

With that as background:

(1) What should I expect as the performance delta between the G4 and
G5 in light usage, and does it justify the extra cost?  Is the G4
advanced enough to serve me for several years, or will I soon need to
step up again soon to keep up with internet trends?

(2) I find OS X 10.4 on most G4s and 10.5 on more G5s; any guidance on
which OS is most useable with each processor?

(3) I'll need wifi but it isn't always installed; is it hard for a non-
technical end user to install?  Is a USB wifi router worth considering
instead?

(4) Given that I'm mostly okay with the 12 inch iBook screen, a 17
inch screen seems adequate; any great reason to go larger?

(5) Wikipedia tells me there's variation in processor speed and
features even within the G4 and G5 lines; faster and newer generally
cost more.  How important are the upgrades (700 v. 800 v. 1250  v.
1600 v 1800 v 2000 MHz?  webcam?  ambient light sensor?  iSight?) and
are they significant in choosing a machine I can use for the next
several years?

(6) Are there other Macs I should consider, (I don't want a CRT eMac,
but maybe a Mini?) and if so why?

I'm eager for your feedback--
--

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Which G?

2010-01-01 Thread Kasey Smith

On Jan 1, 2010, at 9:59 PM, kimtoufectis wrote:

 I'd like help in choosing an older Mac.  I entered Macdom six months
 ago via an original blueberry clamshell iBook G3.  Beyond an iconic
 product design, I've appreciated the simplicity and reliability of
 freedom from Micro$oft (I use a PC at work).  I've enjoyed stretching
 it about as far as a 300 MHz processor can go (maxed out RAM and
 upgraded to OS X 10.2.8) but I'd like to be able to streaming low-fi
 video and use current web browser features; seems like time for
 something more.

 A bit about my computer usage:  I am fairly non-tech; when my work
 Wintel machine fails an expert comes to fix it.  At home I'm on my
 own; I like simple.  My iBook serves mainly as a netbook: I use Gmail,
 Google Docs, and Google Reader for productivity and news, and Pandora,
 GrooveShark, LaLa, and Playlist to stream music.  I don't make much
 use of social media, and real-time isn't a trend I have not had much
 interest in or need for (so far).  I've tried Chrome with extensions
 on a Windows machine and think it could meet virtually all my routine
 computing needs. I even contemplate getting a netbook and migrating it
 to ChromeOS as a next step (maybe using JoliCloud and EyeOS until
 that's easy to do).

 Searching online showed me that for the $250-500 cost of a netbook I
 could step well forward in power with a used iMac (functioning
 MacBooks seem out of that pricerange).  The architect in me
 appreciates the compact, elegant designs of both the G4 and G5 iMacs,
 and depending on age and screen size I find both in a tolerable
 $250-500 price range.  Whatever I buy, I'd like to use it for a long,
 long time (this iBook turned 10 recently, and as a complement to a
 more capable desktop I want to continue to use it for light browsing
 for more years).

 With that as background:

 (1) What should I expect as the performance delta between the G4 and
 G5 in light usage, and does it justify the extra cost?  Is the G4
 advanced enough to serve me for several years, or will I soon need to
 step up again soon to keep up with internet trends?

 (2) I find OS X 10.4 on most G4s and 10.5 on more G5s; any guidance on
 which OS is most useable with each processor?

 (3) I'll need wifi but it isn't always installed; is it hard for a  
 non-
 technical end user to install?  Is a USB wifi router worth considering
 instead?

 (4) Given that I'm mostly okay with the 12 inch iBook screen, a 17
 inch screen seems adequate; any great reason to go larger?

 (5) Wikipedia tells me there's variation in processor speed and
 features even within the G4 and G5 lines; faster and newer generally
 cost more.  How important are the upgrades (700 v. 800 v. 1250  v.
 1600 v 1800 v 2000 MHz?  webcam?  ambient light sensor?  iSight?) and
 are they significant in choosing a machine I can use for the next
 several years?

 (6) Are there other Macs I should consider, (I don't want a CRT eMac,
 but maybe a Mini?) and if so why?

 I'm eager for your feedback--

I recommend an iMac G4 or a Mac Mini. I wouldnt go with an iMac G5  
because of how inefficient the G5 chip is.  A G3 900MHz iBook  
wouldn't be too bad either if you can find one for a good price. My  
first Mac was a 333MHz iMac G3 (a little older then your iBook  
actually.)

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Which G?

2010-01-01 Thread JOHN CARMONNE

On Jan 1, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Kasey Smith wrote:


 On Jan 1, 2010, at 9:59 PM, kimtoufectis wrote:

 I'd like help in choosing an older Mac.  I entered Macdom six months
 ago via an original blueberry clamshell iBook G3.  Beyond an iconic
 product design, I've appreciated the simplicity and reliability of
 freedom from Micro$oft (I use a PC at work).  I've enjoyed stretching
 it about as far as a 300 MHz processor can go (maxed out RAM and
 upgraded to OS X 10.2.8) but I'd like to be able to streaming low-fi
 video and use current web browser features; seems like time for
 something more.

 A bit about my computer usage:  I am fairly non-tech; when my work
 Wintel machine fails an expert comes to fix it.  At home I'm on my
 own; I like simple.  My iBook serves mainly as a netbook: I use  
 Gmail,
 Google Docs, and Google Reader for productivity and news, and  
 Pandora,
 GrooveShark, LaLa, and Playlist to stream music.  I don't make much
 use of social media, and real-time isn't a trend I have not had much
 interest in or need for (so far).  I've tried Chrome with extensions
 on a Windows machine and think it could meet virtually all my routine
 computing needs. I even contemplate getting a netbook and  
 migrating it
 to ChromeOS as a next step (maybe using JoliCloud and EyeOS until
 that's easy to do).

 Searching online showed me that for the $250-500 cost of a netbook I
 could step well forward in power with a used iMac (functioning
 MacBooks seem out of that pricerange).  The architect in me
 appreciates the compact, elegant designs of both the G4 and G5 iMacs,
 and depending on age and screen size I find both in a tolerable
 $250-500 price range.  Whatever I buy, I'd like to use it for a long,
 long time (this iBook turned 10 recently, and as a complement to a
 more capable desktop I want to continue to use it for light browsing
 for more years).

 With that as background:

 (1) What should I expect as the performance delta between the G4 and
 G5 in light usage, and does it justify the extra cost?  Is the G4
 advanced enough to serve me for several years, or will I soon need to
 step up again soon to keep up with internet trends?

 (2) I find OS X 10.4 on most G4s and 10.5 on more G5s; any  
 guidance on
 which OS is most useable with each processor?

 (3) I'll need wifi but it isn't always installed; is it hard for a
 non-
 technical end user to install?  Is a USB wifi router worth  
 considering
 instead?

 (4) Given that I'm mostly okay with the 12 inch iBook screen, a 17
 inch screen seems adequate; any great reason to go larger?

 (5) Wikipedia tells me there's variation in processor speed and
 features even within the G4 and G5 lines; faster and newer generally
 cost more.  How important are the upgrades (700 v. 800 v. 1250  v.
 1600 v 1800 v 2000 MHz?  webcam?  ambient light sensor?  iSight?) and
 are they significant in choosing a machine I can use for the next
 several years?

 (6) Are there other Macs I should consider, (I don't want a CRT eMac,
 but maybe a Mini?) and if so why?

 I'm eager for your feedback--

 I recommend an iMac G4 or a Mac Mini. I wouldnt go with an iMac G5
 because of how inefficient the G5 chip is.  A G3 900MHz iBook
 wouldn't be too bad either if you can find one for a good price. My
 first Mac was a 333MHz iMac G3 (a little older then your iBook
 actually.)

I own about one of every model made and if I could only have one it  
would be my G4 MDD dual 1.0 2GB 10.4.11 with a Cinema display and  
iSight cam. And for a PowerBook my MBP 2.4 4GB  10.5.8
but that's just me.

John  wtmm 

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Which G?

2010-01-01 Thread Jonas Ulrich
I completely agree with John! My MDD DP 1GHZ is fantastic! I wouldn't go
with a G3 ibook any newer than the clamshell. After that they had bad video
chips and all sorts of stuff that will go wrong. I've had two G3 iBooks go
bad: a G3/700MHZ 14 and a G3/800 12. Both went with Motherboard and video
issues, and eventually DEATH.

-Jonas

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:40 PM, JOHN CARMONNE carmo...@aol.com wrote:


 On Jan 1, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Kasey Smith wrote:

 
  On Jan 1, 2010, at 9:59 PM, kimtoufectis wrote:
 
  I'd like help in choosing an older Mac.  I entered Macdom six months
  ago via an original blueberry clamshell iBook G3.  Beyond an iconic
  product design, I've appreciated the simplicity and reliability of
  freedom from Micro$oft (I use a PC at work).  I've enjoyed stretching
  it about as far as a 300 MHz processor can go (maxed out RAM and
  upgraded to OS X 10.2.8) but I'd like to be able to streaming low-fi
  video and use current web browser features; seems like time for
  something more.
 
  A bit about my computer usage:  I am fairly non-tech; when my work
  Wintel machine fails an expert comes to fix it.  At home I'm on my
  own; I like simple.  My iBook serves mainly as a netbook: I use
  Gmail,
  Google Docs, and Google Reader for productivity and news, and
  Pandora,
  GrooveShark, LaLa, and Playlist to stream music.  I don't make much
  use of social media, and real-time isn't a trend I have not had much
  interest in or need for (so far).  I've tried Chrome with extensions
  on a Windows machine and think it could meet virtually all my routine
  computing needs. I even contemplate getting a netbook and
  migrating it
  to ChromeOS as a next step (maybe using JoliCloud and EyeOS until
  that's easy to do).
 
  Searching online showed me that for the $250-500 cost of a netbook I
  could step well forward in power with a used iMac (functioning
  MacBooks seem out of that pricerange).  The architect in me
  appreciates the compact, elegant designs of both the G4 and G5 iMacs,
  and depending on age and screen size I find both in a tolerable
  $250-500 price range.  Whatever I buy, I'd like to use it for a long,
  long time (this iBook turned 10 recently, and as a complement to a
  more capable desktop I want to continue to use it for light browsing
  for more years).
 
  With that as background:
 
  (1) What should I expect as the performance delta between the G4 and
  G5 in light usage, and does it justify the extra cost?  Is the G4
  advanced enough to serve me for several years, or will I soon need to
  step up again soon to keep up with internet trends?
 
  (2) I find OS X 10.4 on most G4s and 10.5 on more G5s; any
  guidance on
  which OS is most useable with each processor?
 
  (3) I'll need wifi but it isn't always installed; is it hard for a
  non-
  technical end user to install?  Is a USB wifi router worth
  considering
  instead?
 
  (4) Given that I'm mostly okay with the 12 inch iBook screen, a 17
  inch screen seems adequate; any great reason to go larger?
 
  (5) Wikipedia tells me there's variation in processor speed and
  features even within the G4 and G5 lines; faster and newer generally
  cost more.  How important are the upgrades (700 v. 800 v. 1250  v.
  1600 v 1800 v 2000 MHz?  webcam?  ambient light sensor?  iSight?) and
  are they significant in choosing a machine I can use for the next
  several years?
 
  (6) Are there other Macs I should consider, (I don't want a CRT eMac,
  but maybe a Mini?) and if so why?
 
  I'm eager for your feedback--
 
  I recommend an iMac G4 or a Mac Mini. I wouldnt go with an iMac G5
  because of how inefficient the G5 chip is.  A G3 900MHz iBook
  wouldn't be too bad either if you can find one for a good price. My
  first Mac was a 333MHz iMac G3 (a little older then your iBook
  actually.)
 
 I own about one of every model made and if I could only have one it
 would be my G4 MDD dual 1.0 2GB 10.4.11 with a Cinema display and
 iSight cam. And for a PowerBook my MBP 2.4 4GB  10.5.8
 but that's just me.

 John  wtmm

 --
 You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
 those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power
 Macs.
 The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our
 netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
 To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list

Re: Where OS 9 needs to be..?

2010-01-01 Thread Bruce Godfrey

Kasey Smith wrote:
 On Jan 1, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Bruce Godfrey wrote:
   
 Is the above information about which system has to be in the first
 partition different on IDE vs SCSI drives in the G3 line?  I did the
 boot up from the OS 9 installer disk and remove the system 9 from the
 system folder on the hard drive, than put it back in trick.  Didn't  
 help.
 

 The trick is to pull the system 'breifcase' out of the system folder  
 and put it back

   
I said it did that, or at least I tried to.  Didn't work.

Broos

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Which G?

2010-01-01 Thread Kris Tilford
On Jan 2, 2010, at 1:17 AM, John Carmonne wrote:

 The only thing I really miss on those is Skype

You can use Skype on these old G3 Macs.

The final G3 version was 2.6.0.148

You can download it at:

http://mac.oldapps.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list