Re: Fink

2010-12-16 Thread Joshua Juran

On Dec 11, 2010, at 7:49 AM, Tina K. wrote:

I've read the FAQ on the Fink project but I'm still not entirely  
clear on what exactly it is. Is it an operating environment a la  
Java, or an emulator like Virtual Box or Wine? Is it strictly a  
repository of ported apps with apt-get functionality, and if so why  
use apt-get instead of normal OS X installation? Or is it something  
else entirely?


The apt-get and underlying dpkg tools are taken from the Debian  
project.  I imagine they're used because they're the best tools  
available for managing package dependencies.  Open source Unix  
programs frequently rely on libraries shared with many other programs,  
and sophisticated dependency tracking is required to keep it all  
straight.  Mac OS X doesn't provide a means to list installed  
packages, check for new versions, select one to upgrade, or upgrade  
all at once, and keep dependencies up-to-date at the same time,  
whereas dpkg/apt-get do all of that.  The closest analogue is Software  
Update, which is a decent app but only works on system software.  So  
every other app either includes its own update mechanism (or shares  
one, like Sparkle) or doesn't provide one at all, requiring manual  
installation by the user.



Also has anyone had any positive or negative experiences with Fink?


I tried Fink on my first OS X installation (Panther).  Since Fink has  
a much smaller set of package maintainers than Debian, the available  
versions tend to lag behind.  These days, when I want to use a Unix  
program on OS X, I download the source code and build it myself.


Josh


--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


X11 (Re: Fink)

2010-12-16 Thread Joshua Juran

On Dec 11, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Tina K. wrote:


On 2010/12/11 13:42, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:

All applications installed in this fashion either run on the command
line or via X-Windows


That makes sense, thanks for the explination. When you say X- 
Windows, would that be X-11?



X11 is short for X Window System, Version 11.  Calling it X-Windows  
is discouraged.


In short:  Yes, they refer to the same thing -- but one more so than  
the other.


http://ftp.x.org/pub/X11R6.8.2/doc/X.7.html

Josh


--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


RE: Fink

2010-12-16 Thread John Ruschmeyer
 From: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:g3-5-l...@googlegroups.com] On
 Behalf Of Joshua Juran
 Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 1:17 PM
 To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
 Subject: Re: Fink
 
 I tried Fink on my first OS X installation (Panther).  Since Fink has
 a much smaller set of package maintainers than Debian, the available
 versions tend to lag behind.  These days, when I want to use a Unix
 program on OS X, I download the source code and build it myself.

Out of curiousity, have you ever tried the NetBSD pkgsrc system? It's a
cross-platform package system, similar to MacPorts (both derive from the
FreeBSD ports system originally).

I've used it with Tiger and Panther for ports which did not exist in Fink or
MacPorts.

John


-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Fink

2010-12-14 Thread Sri Gupta
On Dec 11, 2:42 pm, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
wrote:
 On Dec 11, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Tina K. wrote:

  I've read the FAQ on the Fink project but I'm still not entirely clear on 
  what exactly it is. Is it an operating environment a la Java, or an 
  emulator like Virtual Box or Wine? Is it strictly a repository of ported 
  apps with apt-get functionality, and if so why use apt-get instead of 
  normal OS X installation? Or is it something else entirely?

 It's a way of installing *nux-based applications easily, downloading source 
 code, managing prerequisites and dependencies, compiling and installing  all 
 the required libraries and dependent packages automatically, and doing it in 
 a way that Apple updates will not break the installed applications.

 It is identical to what MacPorts (aka Darwinports) does; I think most of the 
 up-to-date stuff has moved to the MacPorts project, but I could be wrong. 
 Fink and Macports happily co-exist on a Mac, but you'll end up with 
 duplicates of things like the Gnome libs because each installs in it's own 
 directory structure.

 All applications installed in this fashion either run on the command line or 
 via X-Windows; this is *not* a way of installing Mac-native ports of these 
 applications...if they have one of those, there should be standard Mac 
 installers for them.

It's not that the most up-to-date stuff has *moved* to macports,
rather, the fink devs are glacially slow at accepting updated
packages.  I submitted a package update to fink in january, and didn't
receive any comments on it until april.

I use and prefer fink because every time I switch to macports, after
about six weeks the ports database gets corrupted and forces a
reinstall of everything.  So far, haven't had a problem with the fink
backend voodoo (a custom perl script mixed with apt-get and dpkg).

-sri

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Fink

2010-12-12 Thread Bruce Johnson

On Dec 11, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Tina K. wrote:

 When you say X-Windows, would that be X-11?

Yes.

-- 
Bruce Johnson

Wherever you go, there you are B. Banzai,  PhD

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Fink

2010-12-11 Thread Clark Martin

On Dec 11, 2010, at 7:49 AM, Tina K. wrote:

 I've read the FAQ on the Fink project but I'm still not entirely clear on 
 what exactly it is. Is it an operating environment a la Java, or an emulator 
 like Virtual Box or Wine? Is it strictly a repository of ported apps with 
 apt-get functionality, and if so why use apt-get instead of normal OS X 
 installation? Or is it something else entirely?
 
 Also has anyone had any positive or negative experiences with Fink?

It is a software repository with apt-get functionality, like MacPorts or 
DarwinPorts.  I think they do it this way for the *nix aficionados who like 
that way of installing software.

I haven't used fink but I have used MacPorts and it works okay.

Clark Martin
Redwood City, CA, USA
Macintosh / Internet Consulting

I'm a designated driver on the Information Super Highway

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Fink

2010-12-11 Thread Bruce Johnson

On Dec 11, 2010, at 8:49 AM, Tina K. wrote:

 I've read the FAQ on the Fink project but I'm still not entirely clear on 
 what exactly it is. Is it an operating environment a la Java, or an emulator 
 like Virtual Box or Wine? Is it strictly a repository of ported apps with 
 apt-get functionality, and if so why use apt-get instead of normal OS X 
 installation? Or is it something else entirely?


It's a way of installing *nux-based applications easily, downloading source 
code, managing prerequisites and dependencies, compiling and installing  all 
the required libraries and dependent packages automatically, and doing it in a 
way that Apple updates will not break the installed applications.

It is identical to what MacPorts (aka Darwinports) does; I think most of the 
up-to-date stuff has moved to the MacPorts project, but I could be wrong. Fink 
and Macports happily co-exist on a Mac, but you'll end up with duplicates of 
things like the Gnome libs because each installs in it's own directory 
structure.
 
All applications installed in this fashion either run on the command line or 
via X-Windows; this is *not* a way of installing Mac-native ports of these 
applications...if they have one of those, there should be standard Mac 
installers for them.

-- 
Bruce Johnson

Wherever you go, there you are B. Banzai,  PhD

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Fink

2010-12-11 Thread Tina K.

On 2010/12/11 13:42, Bruce Johnson so eloquently wrote:

All applications installed in this fashion either run on the command
line or via X-Windows


That makes sense, thanks for the explination. When you say X-Windows, 
would that be X-11?


Tina

--

iMac 20 USB 2 1.25GHz G4 2GB RAM GeForce FX 5200 Ultra 64MB DDR OS 10.4.11

Power Mac June 04 2GHz G5DP 8GB RAM GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL 256MB OS
10.5.8 23 CD

PowerBook G4 15 HiRes DLSD 1.67GHz G4 2GB RAM Radeon 9700 128MB DDR OS
10.5.8

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Fink

2010-12-11 Thread Kris Tilford
I believe MacPorts is preferable to Fink. You need to have X11 and the  
Developer Tools (Xcode) installed. Then install MacPorts. MacPorts is  
command line from Terminal. As a GUI similar to Software Update I've  
been using Porticus, which is really nice and very simple to use.  
Porticus is better than Software Update because it shows the entire  
available software repository of MacPorts and allows you to select any  
available software for installation or deletion. It would sure be nice  
if Apple would improve Software Update to have an uninstall/deletion  
feature.


The problem with Apple is that if they decide to make an OS X software  
repository they'll want to control it completely the way they try to  
control iPod, iPhone, iPad software in iOS. Without any control so- 
called bad-apples can introduce malware into the software  
repositories, but with control Apple acts both as a gatekeeper and a  
toll collector. How long before the OS X App Store arrives, it can't  
be too far off.


--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Fink

2010-12-11 Thread Tina K.

On 2010/12/11 15:26, Kris Tilford so eloquently wrote:

I believe MacPorts is preferable to Fink.


Fink wouldn't install, it didn't like my permissions even after repair.


You need to have X11 and the
Developer Tools (Xcode) installed. Then install MacPorts. MacPorts is
command line from Terminal.


I finally got it to work, apparently the postflight script wasn't 
creating a proper profile so I had to do it manually.



As a GUI similar to Software Update I've
been using Porticus, which is really nice and very simple to use.
Porticus is better than Software Update because it shows the entire
available software repository of MacPorts and allows you to select any
available software for installation or deletion.


My primary purpose for installing Macports was to get kTorrent but thank 
you for suggesting Porticus, I will give it a look.



It would sure be nice
if Apple would improve Software Update to have an uninstall/deletion
feature.


I have mixed feelings about that. I like the idea in concept but it 
would need to be implemented better than MS did in XP.



The problem with Apple is that if they decide to make an OS X software
repository they'll want to control it completely the way they try to
control iPod, iPhone, iPad software in iOS. Without any control
so-called bad-apples can introduce malware into the software
repositories, but with control Apple acts both as a gatekeeper and a
toll collector.


Yes I like the current setup just fine. I have a pretty good idea what 
apps I can trust and it's not too hard to get references on those that I 
don't know. I don't want an app nanny to decide what I can and can't 
install on MY Mac.


How long before the OS X App Store arrives, it can't be

too far off.


I seem to remember seeing somewhere (Macworld?) that they were looking 
at January 2011, but that seems pretty fast. Needless to say I am not 
eagerly anticipating it!


Tina

--

iMac 20 USB 2 1.25GHz G4 2GB RAM GeForce FX 5200 Ultra 64MB DDR OS 10.4.11

Power Mac June 04 2GHz G5DP 8GB RAM GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL 256MB OS 
10.5.8 23 CD


PowerBook G4 15 HiRes DLSD 1.67GHz G4 2GB RAM Radeon 9700 128MB DDR OS 
10.5.8


--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list