Re: [Ganglia-developers] nearly 3.3.5...

2012-03-30 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 30/03/12 01:40, Bernard Li wrote:
 Hi Daniel:

 We found a memory leak in gmond which is considered a showstopper:

 http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=327

 So I would recommend postponing release until we get this fixed.
   

a) it is not a regression bug (it exists in the last major release
3.3.1, so if we consider it serious, we should take down 3.3.1 too) -
looking at it another way, if someone is using 3.3.1, and they download
3.3.5, their system will not be any worse

b) there is a workaround (define an RX channel even if not needed)

Unless I have understood this incorrectly, I propose that (if no true
regressions are found) we should release 3.3.5 and then start the cycle
of 3.3.6



--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
___
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers


[Ganglia-developers] nearly 3.3.5...

2012-03-29 Thread Daniel Pocock


I haven't seen any further objections to 3.3.5

On Monday it can become the official download if everyone is happy

It would be useful to update the procedure with any final steps for the
official release - my current plan is for

- an email announcement,
- change the Sourceforge file location,
- push the OpenCSW packages from experimental to unstable

https://github.com/ganglia/monitor-core/wiki/BuildingARelease

--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
___
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers


Re: [Ganglia-developers] nearly 3.3.5...

2012-03-29 Thread Alex Dean
On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:40 PM, Bernard Li wrote:

 We found a memory leak in gmond which is considered a showstopper:
 
 http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=327

Off-topic, but I'm curious: Are gmond bugs being tracking in bugzilla, github, 
or both?

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure___
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers


Re: [Ganglia-developers] nearly 3.3.5...

2012-03-29 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Alex:

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Alex Dean a...@crackpot.org wrote:

 Off-topic, but I'm curious: Are gmond bugs being tracking in bugzilla, 
 github, or both?

I talked to Vladimir briefly about this on IRC.  Basically he is
suggesting we move to GitHub.  I'm okay with it as long as there is a
way to import the Bugzilla bugs into GitHub Issues.

I'd also like to hear comments regarding this move from other
developers/users, what do people think?

In the mean time though, my vote is to stick with Bugzilla since
that's where the bulk of our issue tickets are...

Thanks,

Bernard

--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
___
Ganglia-developers mailing list
Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers