[gcc r15-1004] testsuite: analyzer: Skip tests with non-numeric macros on Solaris [PR107750]

2024-06-04 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09ae36461ed34f343f2d8299bad7e394cccf996e

commit r15-1004-g09ae36461ed34f343f2d8299bad7e394cccf996e
Author: Rainer Orth 
Date:   Tue Jun 4 09:04:25 2024 +0200

testsuite: analyzer: Skip tests with non-numeric macros on Solaris 
[PR107750]

A couple of gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-*.c tests still FAIL on Solaris.  The
reason is always the same: they use macros that don't expand to simple
numbers, something which c/c-parser.cc
(ana::c_translation_unit::consider_macro) cannot handle:

* :

* :

To avoid the resulting noise, this patch skips the affected tests.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

2024-06-03  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR analyzer/107750
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c: Skip on *-*-solaris2*.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-connect.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-datagram-socket.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-listen.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-socket-misuse.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-active-open.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-passive-open.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket.c: Likewise.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c | 1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c | 1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-connect.c| 1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-datagram-socket.c| 1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-listen.c | 1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-socket-misuse.c  | 1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-active-open.c  | 1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-passive-open.c | 1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket.c  | 1 +
 9 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c
index d07ab154d0f..5724a389e2e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c
index 9fc32638a3d..1386ac2de1e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { { powerpc*-*-aix* avr-*-* *-*-vxworks* } || newlib } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-connect.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-connect.c
index 43e435eaf12..3fe99d9530c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-connect.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-connect.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-datagram-socket.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-datagram-socket.c
index 59e80c831e3..8d32e858111 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-datagram-socket.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-datagram-socket.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-listen.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-listen.c
index 3ac7a990042..1444af72e3a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-listen.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-listen.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-socket-misuse.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-socket-misuse.c
index 914948644bb..8771c0cbe03 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-socket-misuse.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-socket-misuse.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-active-open.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socke

[PATCH] testsuite: analyzer: Skip tests with non-numeric macros on Solaris [PR107750]

2024-06-03 Thread Rainer Orth
A couple of gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-*.c tests still FAIL on Solaris.  The
reason is always the same: they use macros that don't expand to simple
numbers, something which c/c-parser.cc
(ana::c_translation_unit::consider_macro) cannot handle:

* :

#define SOCK_STREAM NC_TPI_COTS /* stream socket */
#define SOCK_DGRAM  NC_TPI_CLTS /* datagram socket */

* :

#define O_ACCMODE   (O_SEARCH | O_EXEC | 0x3)

To avoid the resulting noise, this patch skips the affected tests.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

Ok for trunk?

Rainer

-- 
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-06-03  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR analyzer/107750
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c: Skip on *-*-solaris2*.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-connect.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-datagram-socket.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-listen.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-socket-misuse.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-active-open.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-passive-open.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket.c: Likewise.

# HG changeset patch
# Parent  dcf4ce6a5230564d3513bebe58ddb2863a7cf90e
testsuite: analyzer: Skip tests with non-numeric macros on Solaris [PR107750]

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-accept.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { { powerpc*-*-aix* avr-*-* *-*-vxworks* } || newlib } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-connect.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-connect.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-connect.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-connect.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-datagram-socket.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-datagram-socket.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-datagram-socket.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-datagram-socket.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-listen.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-listen.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-listen.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-listen.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-socket-misuse.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-socket-misuse.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-socket-misuse.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-socket-misuse.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-active-open.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-active-open.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-active-open.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-active-open.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "PR analyzer/107750" { *-*-solaris2* } } */
 
 #include 
 #include 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-passive-open.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-passive-open.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-passive-open.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-stream-socket-passive-open.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 
 /* { dg-require-effective-target sockets } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if &q

[COMMITTED] testsuite: Require vect_shift in gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c [PR115303]

2024-06-03 Thread Rainer Orth
The new gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c test FAILs on Solaris/SPARC:

FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump-times vect 
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

As analyzed in the PR, the test requires vect_shift, so this patch adds
that requirement.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and sparc-sun-solaris2.11.

Pre-approved by Richard in the PR, committed to trunk.

Rainer

-- 
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-06-03  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR tree-optimization/115303
* gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c: Require vect_shift.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O3 -funroll-loops -fdump-tree-vect-details" } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_shift } */
 /* { dg-additional-options "-mavx2" { target x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* } } */
 
 typedef unsigned short ggml_fp16_t;


[gcc r15-987] testsuite: Require vect_shift in gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c [PR115303]

2024-06-03 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a616df8260aeabe00a28ea3870dba5577dbbe66

commit r15-987-g2a616df8260aeabe00a28ea3870dba5577dbbe66
Author: Rainer Orth 
Date:   Mon Jun 3 10:39:34 2024 +0200

testsuite: Require vect_shift in gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c [PR115303]

The new gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c test FAILs on Solaris/SPARC:

FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump-times 
vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 
1

As analyzed in the PR, the test requires vect_shift, so this patch adds
that requirement.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and sparc-sun-solaris2.11.
    
    2024-06-03  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR tree-optimization/115303
* gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c: Require vect_shift.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c
index 71cf4099253..dea6cca3b86 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr112325.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O3 -funroll-loops -fdump-tree-vect-details" } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_shift } */
 /* { dg-additional-options "-mavx2" { target x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* } } */
 
 typedef unsigned short ggml_fp16_t;


Results for 13.3.1 20240531 [releases/gcc-13 173f8763a66622f2a70ad66f60573fcff7d6b49e] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 09:10:47 UTC 2024 (revision 
173f8763a66622f2a70ad66f60573fcff7d6b49e)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is 

Results for 14.1.1 20240531 [releases/gcc-14 36575f5fe491d86b6851ff3f47cbfb7dad0fc8ae] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 09:04:12 UTC 2024 (revision 
36575f5fe491d86b6851ff3f47cbfb7dad0fc8ae)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 13.3.1 20240531 [releases/gcc-13 173f8763a66622f2a70ad66f60573fcff7d6b49e] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 09:10:47 UTC 2024 (revision 
173f8763a66622f2a70ad66f60573fcff7d6b49e)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 14.1.1 20240531 [releases/gcc-14 36575f5fe491d86b6851ff3f47cbfb7dad0fc8ae] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 09:04:12 UTC 2024 (revision 
36575f5fe491d86b6851ff3f47cbfb7dad0fc8ae)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

Native configuration is x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

=== libatomic tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libatomic Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests  5

Running target unix

=== libatomic Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes54

=== libatomic Summary ===

# of expected passes98
# of unsupported tests  5
=== libffi tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libffi Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes3764

Running target unix

=== libffi Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes2304

=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes6068
=== libgo tests ===


Running target unix

=== libgo Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes196

Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: runtime

=== libgo Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes195
# of unexpected failures1

=== libgo Summary ===

# of expected passes391
# of unexpected failures1
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas-64/build/./gcc/gccgo version 15.0.0 
20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC)

=== libgomp tests ===


Running target unix
WARNING: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-10.C execution test program timed out.
FAIL: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-10.C execution test
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)

=== libgomp Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes16319
# of unexpected failures9
# of expected failures  287
# of unsupported tests  629

Running target unix/-m32
WARNING: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-10.C execution test program timed out.
FAIL: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-10.C execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: 

Results for 14.1.1 20240531 [releases/gcc-14 36575f5fe491d86b6851ff3f47cbfb7dad0fc8ae] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 09:04:12 UTC 2024 (revision 
36575f5fe491d86b6851ff3f47cbfb7dad0fc8ae)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 14.1.1 20240531 [releases/gcc-14 36575f5fe491d86b6851ff3f47cbfb7dad0fc8ae] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 09:04:12 UTC 2024 (revision 
36575f5fe491d86b6851ff3f47cbfb7dad0fc8ae)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 13.3.1 20240531 [releases/gcc-13 173f8763a66622f2a70ad66f60573fcff7d6b49e] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 09:10:47 UTC 2024 (revision 
173f8763a66622f2a70ad66f60573fcff7d6b49e)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

Native configuration is x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

=== libatomic tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libatomic Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests  5

Running target unix

=== libatomic Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes54

=== libatomic Summary ===

# of expected passes98
# of unsupported tests  5
=== libffi tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libffi Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes3764

Running target unix

=== libffi Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes2304

=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes6068
=== libgo tests ===


Running target unix

=== libgo Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes196

Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: runtime

=== libgo Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes195
# of unexpected failures1

=== libgo Summary ===

# of expected passes391
# of unexpected failures1
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-64/build/./gcc/gccgo version 15.0.0 
20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC)

=== libgomp tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)

=== libgomp Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes16194
# of unexpected failures8
# of expected failures  287
# of unsupported tests  690

Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)

=== libgomp Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes16190
# of 

Results for 13.3.1 20240531 [releases/gcc-13 173f8763a66622f2a70ad66f60573fcff7d6b49e] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-06-01 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 09:10:47 UTC 2024 (revision 
173f8763a66622f2a70ad66f60573fcff7d6b49e)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-31 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240531 (experimental) [master a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-31 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-testresults
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 31 08:54:42 UTC 2024 (revision 
a0d60660f2aae2d79685f73d568facb2397582d8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

[COMMITTED] build: Include minor version in config.gcc unsupported message

2024-05-31 Thread Rainer Orth
It has been pointed out to me that when moving Solaris 11.3 from
config.gcc's obsolete to unsupported list, I'd forgotten to also move
the minor version info, leading to confusing

*** Configuration i386-pc-solaris2.11 not supported

instead of the correct

*** Configuration i386-pc-solaris2.11.3 not supported

This patch fixes this oversight.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 (11.3 and 11.4).  Committed to trunk.

Rainer

-- 
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-05-30  Rainer Orth  

gcc:
* config.gcc: Move ${target_min} from obsolete to unsupported
message.

# HG changeset patch
# Parent  a457e38f3743f8fe1336d94b6d1a5f336057b128
build: Include minor version in config.gcc unsupported message

diff --git a/gcc/config.gcc b/gcc/config.gcc
--- a/gcc/config.gcc
+++ b/gcc/config.gcc
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ case ${target} in
| nios2*-*-*\
  )
 if test "x$enable_obsolete" != xyes; then
-  echo "*** Configuration ${target}${target_min} is obsolete." >&2
+  echo "*** Configuration ${target} is obsolete." >&2
   echo "*** Specify --enable-obsolete to build it anyway." >&2
   echo "*** Support will be REMOVED in the next major release of GCC," >&2
   echo "*** unless a maintainer comes forward." >&2
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ case ${target}${target_min} in
  | *-*-sysv*\
  | vax-*-vms*\
  )
-	echo "*** Configuration ${target} not supported" 1>&2
+	echo "*** Configuration ${target}${target_min} not supported" 1>&2
 	exit 1
 	;;
 esac


[gcc r15-939] build: Include minor version in config.gcc unsupported message

2024-05-31 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37fafc63e732c51900d2d998b6df6433d9ca6e2f

commit r15-939-g37fafc63e732c51900d2d998b6df6433d9ca6e2f
Author: Rainer Orth 
Date:   Fri May 31 11:29:19 2024 +0200

build: Include minor version in config.gcc unsupported message

It has been pointed out to me that when moving Solaris 11.3 from
config.gcc's obsolete to unsupported list, I'd forgotten to also move
the minor version info, leading to confusing

*** Configuration i386-pc-solaris2.11 not supported

instead of the correct

*** Configuration i386-pc-solaris2.11.3 not supported

This patch fixes this oversight.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 (11.3 and 11.4).

2024-05-30  Rainer Orth  

gcc:
* config.gcc: Move ${target_min} from obsolete to unsupported
message.

Diff:
---
 gcc/config.gcc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config.gcc b/gcc/config.gcc
index a37113bd00a..e500ba63e32 100644
--- a/gcc/config.gcc
+++ b/gcc/config.gcc
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ case ${target} in
| nios2*-*-*\
  )
 if test "x$enable_obsolete" != xyes; then
-  echo "*** Configuration ${target}${target_min} is obsolete." >&2
+  echo "*** Configuration ${target} is obsolete." >&2
   echo "*** Specify --enable-obsolete to build it anyway." >&2
   echo "*** Support will be REMOVED in the next major release of GCC," >&2
   echo "*** unless a maintainer comes forward." >&2
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ case ${target}${target_min} in
  | *-*-sysv*   \
  | vax-*-vms*  \
  )
-   echo "*** Configuration ${target} not supported" 1>&2
+   echo "*** Configuration ${target}${target_min} not supported" 1>&2
exit 1
;;
 esac


Re: [COMMITTED] ggc: Reduce GGC_QUIRE_SIZE on Solaris/SPARC [PR115031]

2024-05-31 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Eric,

>> It turns out that this exhaustion of the 32-bit address space happens
>> due to a combination of three issues:
>> 
>> * the SPARC pagesize of 8 kB,
>> 
>> * ggc-page.cc's chunk size of 512 * pagesize, i.e. 4 MB, and
>> 
>> * mmap adding two 8 kB unmapped red-zone pages to each mapping
>> 
>> which result in the 4 MB mappings to actually consume 4.5 MB of address
>> space.
>> 
>> To avoid this, this patch reduces the chunk size so it remains at 4 MB
>> even when combined with the red-zone pages, as recommended by mmap(2).
>
> Nice investigation!  This size is a host parameter rather than a target one 
> though, so config/sparc/sol2.h is probably not the most appropriate place to 
> override it, but I personally do not mind.

ah, I tend to forget, not having built a cross compiler in ages.  I'll
leave it as is for the moment, though, since there's no Solaris host
header ATM.

Thanks for the hint.

    Rainer

-- 
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


[COMMITTED] testsuite: Adjust several dg-additional-files-options calls [PR115294]

2024-05-31 Thread Rainer Orth
A recent patch

commit bdc264a16e327c63d133131a695a202fbbc0a6a0
Author: Alexandre Oliva 
Date:   Thu May 30 02:06:48 2024 -0300

[testsuite] conditionalize dg-additional-sources on target and type

added two additional args to dg-additional-files-options.
Unfortunately, this completely broke several testsuites like

ERROR: tcl error sourcing 
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libatomic/testsuite/../../gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp.
wrong # args: should be "dg-additional-files-options options source dest type"

since the patch forgot to adjust some of the callers.

This patch fixes that.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

Committed to trunk.

Rainer

-- 
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-05-31  Rainer Orth  

libatomic:
PR testsuite/115294
* testsuite/lib/libatomic.exp (libatomic_target_compile): Pass new
dg-additional-files-options args.

libgomp:
PR testsuite/115294
* testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp (libgomp_target_compile): Pass new
dg-additional-files-options args.

libitm:
PR testsuite/115294
* testsuite/lib/libitm.exp (libitm_target_compile): Pass new
dg-additional-files-options args.

libphobos:
PR testsuite/115294
* testsuite/lib/libphobos.exp (libphobos_target_compile): Pass new
dg-additional-files-options args.

libvtv:
PR testsuite/115294
* testsuite/lib/libvtv.exp (libvtv_target_compile): Pass new
dg-additional-files-options args.

# HG changeset patch
# Parent  83e1dad81f5eb46a0216b67de025afa9396cbbe3
testsuite: Adjust several dg-additional-files-options calls [PR115294]

diff --git a/libatomic/testsuite/lib/libatomic.exp b/libatomic/testsuite/lib/libatomic.exp
--- a/libatomic/testsuite/lib/libatomic.exp
+++ b/libatomic/testsuite/lib/libatomic.exp
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ proc libatomic_target_compile { source d
 	set options [concat "$ALWAYS_CFLAGS" $options]
 }
 
-set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source]
+set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source $dest $type]
 
 set result [target_compile $source $dest $type $options]
 
diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp b/libgomp/testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp
--- a/libgomp/testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp
+++ b/libgomp/testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ proc libgomp_target_compile { source des
 	set options [concat "$ALWAYS_CFLAGS" $options]
 }
 
-set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source]
+set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source $dest $type]
 
 set result [target_compile $source $dest $type $options]
 
diff --git a/libitm/testsuite/lib/libitm.exp b/libitm/testsuite/lib/libitm.exp
--- a/libitm/testsuite/lib/libitm.exp
+++ b/libitm/testsuite/lib/libitm.exp
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ proc libitm_target_compile { source dest
 	set options [concat "$ALWAYS_CFLAGS" $options]
 }
 
-set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source]
+set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source $dest $type]
 
 set result [target_compile $source $dest $type $options]
 
diff --git a/libphobos/testsuite/lib/libphobos.exp b/libphobos/testsuite/lib/libphobos.exp
--- a/libphobos/testsuite/lib/libphobos.exp
+++ b/libphobos/testsuite/lib/libphobos.exp
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ proc libphobos_target_compile { source d
 lappend options "compiler=$gdc_final"
 lappend options "timeout=[timeout_value]"
 
-set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source]
+set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source $dest $type]
 set comp_output [target_compile $source $dest $type $options]
 
 return $comp_output
diff --git a/libvtv/testsuite/lib/libvtv.exp b/libvtv/testsuite/lib/libvtv.exp
--- a/libvtv/testsuite/lib/libvtv.exp
+++ b/libvtv/testsuite/lib/libvtv.exp
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ proc libvtv_target_compile { source dest
 	set options [concat "$ALWAYS_CFLAGS" $options]
 }
 
-set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source]
+set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source $dest $type]
 
 set result [target_compile $source $dest $type $options]
 


[gcc r15-937] testsuite: Adjust several dg-additional-files-options calls [PR115294]

2024-05-31 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e322d576eb6a87607215196bec62d3348e65b0e

commit r15-937-g7e322d576eb6a87607215196bec62d3348e65b0e
Author: Rainer Orth 
Date:   Fri May 31 09:29:38 2024 +0200

testsuite: Adjust several dg-additional-files-options calls [PR115294]

A recent patch

commit bdc264a16e327c63d133131a695a202fbbc0a6a0
Author: Alexandre Oliva 
Date:   Thu May 30 02:06:48 2024 -0300

[testsuite] conditionalize dg-additional-sources on target and type

added two additional args to dg-additional-files-options.
Unfortunately, this completely broke several testsuites like

ERROR: tcl error sourcing 
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libatomic/testsuite/../../gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp.
wrong # args: should be "dg-additional-files-options options source dest 
type"

since the patch forgot to adjust some of the callers.

This patch fixes that.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

2024-05-31  Rainer Orth  

libatomic:
PR testsuite/115294
* testsuite/lib/libatomic.exp (libatomic_target_compile): Pass new
dg-additional-files-options args.

libgomp:
PR testsuite/115294
* testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp (libgomp_target_compile): Pass new
dg-additional-files-options args.

libitm:
PR testsuite/115294
* testsuite/lib/libitm.exp (libitm_target_compile): Pass new
dg-additional-files-options args.

libphobos:
PR testsuite/115294
* testsuite/lib/libphobos.exp (libphobos_target_compile): Pass new
dg-additional-files-options args.

libvtv:
PR testsuite/115294
* testsuite/lib/libvtv.exp (libvtv_target_compile): Pass new
dg-additional-files-options args.

Diff:
---
 libatomic/testsuite/lib/libatomic.exp | 2 +-
 libgomp/testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp | 2 +-
 libitm/testsuite/lib/libitm.exp   | 2 +-
 libphobos/testsuite/lib/libphobos.exp | 2 +-
 libvtv/testsuite/lib/libvtv.exp   | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libatomic/testsuite/lib/libatomic.exp 
b/libatomic/testsuite/lib/libatomic.exp
index 432a67e12e9..ed6ba806732 100644
--- a/libatomic/testsuite/lib/libatomic.exp
+++ b/libatomic/testsuite/lib/libatomic.exp
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ proc libatomic_target_compile { source dest type options } {
set options [concat "$ALWAYS_CFLAGS" $options]
 }
 
-set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source]
+set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source $dest $type]
 
 set result [target_compile $source $dest $type $options]
 
diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp 
b/libgomp/testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp
index cab926a798b..7c109262916 100644
--- a/libgomp/testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp
+++ b/libgomp/testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ proc libgomp_target_compile { source dest type options } {
set options [concat "$ALWAYS_CFLAGS" $options]
 }
 
-set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source]
+set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source $dest $type]
 
 set result [target_compile $source $dest $type $options]
 
diff --git a/libitm/testsuite/lib/libitm.exp b/libitm/testsuite/lib/libitm.exp
index 61bbfa0c923..3e60797c3e3 100644
--- a/libitm/testsuite/lib/libitm.exp
+++ b/libitm/testsuite/lib/libitm.exp
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ proc libitm_target_compile { source dest type options } {
set options [concat "$ALWAYS_CFLAGS" $options]
 }
 
-set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source]
+set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source $dest $type]
 
 set result [target_compile $source $dest $type $options]
 
diff --git a/libphobos/testsuite/lib/libphobos.exp 
b/libphobos/testsuite/lib/libphobos.exp
index d4aa433ddc1..a4a2fe3d56d 100644
--- a/libphobos/testsuite/lib/libphobos.exp
+++ b/libphobos/testsuite/lib/libphobos.exp
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ proc libphobos_target_compile { source dest type options } {
 lappend options "compiler=$gdc_final"
 lappend options "timeout=[timeout_value]"
 
-set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source]
+set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source $dest $type]
 set comp_output [target_compile $source $dest $type $options]
 
 return $comp_output
diff --git a/libvtv/testsuite/lib/libvtv.exp b/libvtv/testsuite/lib/libvtv.exp
index 4b71c9ce7bc..bfd03d7d258 100644
--- a/libvtv/testsuite/lib/libvtv.exp
+++ b/libvtv/testsuite/lib/libvtv.exp
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ proc libvtv_target_compile { source dest type options } {
set options [concat "$ALWAYS_CFLAGS" $options]
 }
 
-set options [dg-additional-files-options $options $source

[COMMITTED] ggc: Reduce GGC_QUIRE_SIZE on Solaris/SPARC [PR115031]

2024-05-30 Thread Rainer Orth
g++.dg/modules/pr99023_b.X currently FAILs on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC:

FAIL: g++.dg/modules/pr99023_b.X -std=c++2a  1 blank line(s) in output
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/pr99023_b.X -std=c++2a (test for excess errors)

Excess errors:
cc1plus: out of memory allocating 1048344 bytes after a total of 7913472 bytes

It turns out that this exhaustion of the 32-bit address space happens
due to a combination of three issues:

* the SPARC pagesize of 8 kB,

* ggc-page.cc's chunk size of 512 * pagesize, i.e. 4 MB, and

* mmap adding two 8 kB unmapped red-zone pages to each mapping

which result in the 4 MB mappings to actually consume 4.5 MB of address
space.

To avoid this, this patch reduces the chunk size so it remains at 4 MB
even when combined with the red-zone pages, as recommended by mmap(2).

Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11, committed
to trunk.

Rainer

-- 
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-05-29  Rainer Orth  

gcc:
PR c++/115031
* config/sparc/sol2.h (GGC_QUIRE_SIZE): Define as 510.

# HG changeset patch
# Parent  5c140588dce73c5358387df3bb9597de45fa5524
ggc: Reduce GGC_QUIRE_SIZE on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC [PR115031]

diff --git a/gcc/config/sparc/sol2.h b/gcc/config/sparc/sol2.h
--- a/gcc/config/sparc/sol2.h
+++ b/gcc/config/sparc/sol2.h
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  
 #undef SPARC_DEFAULT_CMODEL
 #define SPARC_DEFAULT_CMODEL CM_MEDMID
 
+/* Redue ggc-page.cc's chunk size to account for mmap red-zone pages.  */
+#define GGC_QUIRE_SIZE 510
+
 /* Select a format to encode pointers in exception handling data.  CODE
is 0 for data, 1 for code labels, 2 for function pointers.  GLOBAL is
true if the symbol may be affected by dynamic relocations.


[gcc r15-927] ggc: Reduce GGC_QUIRE_SIZE on Solaris/SPARC [PR115031]

2024-05-30 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32f99225bcaae9b792aec143239d17f2b7e2c54b

commit r15-927-g32f99225bcaae9b792aec143239d17f2b7e2c54b
Author: Rainer Orth 
Date:   Thu May 30 15:00:59 2024 +0200

ggc: Reduce GGC_QUIRE_SIZE on Solaris/SPARC [PR115031]

g++.dg/modules/pr99023_b.X currently FAILs on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC:

FAIL: g++.dg/modules/pr99023_b.X -std=c++2a  1 blank line(s) in output
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/pr99023_b.X -std=c++2a (test for excess errors)

Excess errors:
cc1plus: out of memory allocating 1048344 bytes after a total of 7913472 
bytes

It turns out that this exhaustion of the 32-bit address space happens
due to a combination of three issues:

* the SPARC pagesize of 8 kB,

* ggc-page.cc's chunk size of 512 * pagesize, i.e. 4 MB, and

* mmap adding two 8 kB unmapped red-zone pages to each mapping

which result in the 4 MB mappings to actually consume 4.5 MB of address
space.

To avoid this, this patch reduces the chunk size so it remains at 4 MB
even when combined with the red-zone pages, as recommended by mmap(2).

Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11.

2024-05-29  Rainer Orth  

gcc:
PR c++/115031
* config/sparc/sol2.h (GGC_QUIRE_SIZE): Define as 510.

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/sparc/sol2.h | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/config/sparc/sol2.h b/gcc/config/sparc/sol2.h
index 552f58b2cc8..530e681aaee 100644
--- a/gcc/config/sparc/sol2.h
+++ b/gcc/config/sparc/sol2.h
@@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
 #undef SPARC_DEFAULT_CMODEL
 #define SPARC_DEFAULT_CMODEL CM_MEDMID
 
+/* Redue ggc-page.cc's chunk size to account for mmap red-zone pages.  */
+#define GGC_QUIRE_SIZE 510
+
 /* Select a format to encode pointers in exception handling data.  CODE
is 0 for data, 1 for code labels, 2 for function pointers.  GLOBAL is
true if the symbol may be affected by dynamic relocations.


[gcc r15-890] libstdc++: Build libbacktrace and 19_diagnostics/stacktrace with -funwind-tables [PR111641]

2024-05-29 Thread Rainer Orth via Libstdc++-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a99ebb88f8f25e76ebed5afc22e64fa77a2f0d3f

commit r15-890-ga99ebb88f8f25e76ebed5afc22e64fa77a2f0d3f
Author: Rainer Orth 
Date:   Wed May 29 10:08:07 2024 +0200

libstdc++: Build libbacktrace and 19_diagnostics/stacktrace with 
-funwind-tables [PR111641]

Several of the 19_diagnostics/stacktrace tests FAIL on Solaris/SPARC (32
and 64-bit), Solaris/x86 (32-bit only), and several other targets:

FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc  -std=gnu++23 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc  -std=gnu++26 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc  -std=gnu++23 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc  -std=gnu++26 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc  -std=gnu++23 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc  -std=gnu++26 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/stacktrace.cc  -std=gnu++23 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/stacktrace.cc  -std=gnu++26 execution test

As it turns out, both the copy of libbacktrace in libstdc++ and the
testcases proper need to compiled with -funwind-tables, as is done for
libbacktrace itself.

This isn't an issue on Linux/x86_64 and Solaris/amd64 since 64-bit x86
always defaults to -funwind-tables.  32-bit x86 does, too, when
-fomit-frame-pointer is enabled as on Linux/i686, but unlike
Solaris/i386.

So this patch always enables the option both for the libbacktrace copy
and the testcases.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

2024-05-23  Rainer Orth  

libstdc++-v3:
PR libstdc++/111641
* src/libbacktrace/Makefile.am (AM_CFLAGS): Add -funwind-tables.
* src/libbacktrace/Makefile.in: Regenerate.

* testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc (dg-options): Add
-funwind-tables.
* testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/hash.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/stacktrace.cc: Likewise.

Diff:
---
 libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.am  | 2 +-
 libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.in  | 2 +-
 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc| 2 +-
 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc  | 2 +-
 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/hash.cc   | 2 +-
 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc | 2 +-
 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/stacktrace.cc | 2 +-
 7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.am 
b/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.am
index a2e78671259..82205db46de 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.am
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.am
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ C_WARN_FLAGS = $(WARN_FLAGS) -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-styl
 CXX_WARN_FLAGS = $(WARN_FLAGS) -Wno-unused-parameter
 AM_CFLAGS = \
$(glibcxx_lt_pic_flag) $(glibcxx_compiler_shared_flag) \
-   $(C_WARN_FLAGS)
+   $(C_WARN_FLAGS) -funwind-tables
 AM_CFLAGS += $(EXTRA_CFLAGS)
 AM_CXXFLAGS = \
$(glibcxx_lt_pic_flag) $(glibcxx_compiler_shared_flag) \
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.in 
b/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.in
index b5713b0c616..51c8092335a 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.in
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.in
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ libstdc___libbacktrace_la_CPPFLAGS = \
 C_WARN_FLAGS = $(WARN_FLAGS) -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wold-style-definition -Wno-unused-but-set-variable
 CXX_WARN_FLAGS = $(WARN_FLAGS) -Wno-unused-parameter
 AM_CFLAGS = $(glibcxx_lt_pic_flag) $(glibcxx_compiler_shared_flag) \
-   $(C_WARN_FLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS)
+   $(C_WARN_FLAGS) -funwind-tables $(EXTRA_CFLAGS)
 AM_CXXFLAGS = $(glibcxx_lt_pic_flag) $(glibcxx_compiler_shared_flag) \
$(CXX_WARN_FLAGS) -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions $(EXTRA_CXXFLAGS)
 obj_prefix = std_stacktrace
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc
index b1af5f74fb2..cdebd5f1daa 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// { dg-options "-lstdc++exp" }
+// { dg-options "-funwind-tables -lstdc++exp" }
 // { dg-do run { target c++23 } }
 // { dg-require-cpp-feature-test __cpp_lib_stacktrace }
 
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc 
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc
index bb348ebef8f..90671e68f8b 100644
--- a/li

[PATCH] libstdc++: Build libbacktrace and 19_diagnostics/stacktrace with -funwind-tables [PR111641]

2024-05-28 Thread Rainer Orth
Several of the 19_diagnostics/stacktrace tests FAIL on Solaris/SPARC (32
and 64-bit), Solaris/x86 (32-bit only), and several other targets:

FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc  -std=gnu++23 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc  -std=gnu++26 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc  -std=gnu++23 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc  -std=gnu++26 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc  -std=gnu++23 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc  -std=gnu++26 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/stacktrace.cc  -std=gnu++23 execution test
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/stacktrace.cc  -std=gnu++26 execution test

As it turns out, both the copy of libbacktrace in libstdc++ and the
testcases proper need to compiled with -funwind-tables, as is done for
libbacktrace itself.

This isn't an issue on Linux/x86_64 and Solaris/amd64 since 64-bit x86
always defaults to -funwind-tables.  32-bit x86 does, too, when
-fomit-frame-pointer is enabled as on Linux/i686, but unlike
Solaris/i386.

So this patch always enables the option both for the libbacktrace copy
and the testcases.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

Ok for trunk?

Rainer

-- 
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-05-23  Rainer Orth  

libstdc++-v3:
PR libstdc++/111641
* src/libbacktrace/Makefile.am (AM_CFLAGS): Add -funwind-tables.
* src/libbacktrace/Makefile.in: Regenerate.

* testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc (dg-options): Add
-funwind-tables.
* testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/hash.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/stacktrace.cc: Likewise.

# HG changeset patch
# Parent  a0526be1377da6b48eacbdd53f1d0e0b02ddb731
libstdc++: Build libbacktrace and 19_diagnostics/stacktrace with -funwind-tables [PR111641]

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.am b/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.am
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.am
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.am
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ C_WARN_FLAGS = $(WARN_FLAGS) -Wstrict-pr
 CXX_WARN_FLAGS = $(WARN_FLAGS) -Wno-unused-parameter
 AM_CFLAGS = \
 	$(glibcxx_lt_pic_flag) $(glibcxx_compiler_shared_flag) \
-	$(C_WARN_FLAGS)
+	$(C_WARN_FLAGS) -funwind-tables
 AM_CFLAGS += $(EXTRA_CFLAGS)
 AM_CXXFLAGS = \
 	$(glibcxx_lt_pic_flag) $(glibcxx_compiler_shared_flag) \
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.in b/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.in
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.in
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/libbacktrace/Makefile.in
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ libstdc___libbacktrace_la_CPPFLAGS = \
 C_WARN_FLAGS = $(WARN_FLAGS) -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wno-unused-but-set-variable
 CXX_WARN_FLAGS = $(WARN_FLAGS) -Wno-unused-parameter
 AM_CFLAGS = $(glibcxx_lt_pic_flag) $(glibcxx_compiler_shared_flag) \
-	$(C_WARN_FLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS)
+	$(C_WARN_FLAGS) -funwind-tables $(EXTRA_CFLAGS)
 AM_CXXFLAGS = $(glibcxx_lt_pic_flag) $(glibcxx_compiler_shared_flag) \
 	$(CXX_WARN_FLAGS) -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions $(EXTRA_CXXFLAGS)
 obj_prefix = std_stacktrace
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/current.cc
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// { dg-options "-lstdc++exp" }
+// { dg-options "-funwind-tables -lstdc++exp" }
 // { dg-do run { target c++23 } }
 // { dg-require-cpp-feature-test __cpp_lib_stacktrace }
 
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// { dg-options "-lstdc++exp" }
+// { dg-options "-funwind-tables -lstdc++exp" }
 // { dg-do run { target c++23 } }
 // { dg-require-cpp-feature-test __cpp_lib_stacktrace }
 
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/hash.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/hash.cc
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/hash.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/hash.cc
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// { dg-options "-lstdc++exp" }
+// { dg-options "-funwind-tables -lstdc++exp" }
 // { dg-do run { target c++23 } }
 // { dg-require-cpp-feature-test __cpp_lib_stacktrace }
 
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stac

Re: [RFC 0/2] libbacktrace: add FDPIC support

2024-05-27 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Max,

> This is an RFC series that adds FDPIC ELF target support to
> libbacktrace.
>
> While debugging this I've noticed that there's no unwinding info for the
> libstdc++ version of libbacktrace, which made backtraces empty for me,
> both on xtensa-linux-uclibcfdpic and on regular xtensa-linux-uclibc.
> Adding -funwind-tables to the libstdc++ version of libbacktrace fixed
> that. Which makes me wonder how it works for other architectures?

it doesn't ;-(  See PR libstdc++/111641 for details.  There's a patch in
there, too.

Rainer

-- 
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 14.1.1 20240524 [releases/gcc-14 5429e6a6467951e3ffc626e6aa40fb32fcc43681] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:54:19 UTC 2024 (revision 
5429e6a6467951e3ffc626e6aa40fb32fcc43681)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 14.1.1 20240524 [releases/gcc-14 5429e6a6467951e3ffc626e6aa40fb32fcc43681] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:54:19 UTC 2024 (revision 
5429e6a6467951e3ffc626e6aa40fb32fcc43681)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 13.3.1 20240524 [releases/gcc-13 cf76815d93f065a48c06963b396e2d543e75b7a3] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 09:05:37 UTC 2024 (revision 
cf76815d93f065a48c06963b396e2d543e75b7a3)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is 

Results for 13.3.1 20240524 [releases/gcc-13 cf76815d93f065a48c06963b396e2d543e75b7a3] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 09:05:37 UTC 2024 (revision 
cf76815d93f065a48c06963b396e2d543e75b7a3)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

Native configuration is x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

=== libatomic tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libatomic Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests  5

Running target unix

=== libatomic Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes54

=== libatomic Summary ===

# of expected passes98
# of unsupported tests  5
=== libffi tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libffi Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes3764

Running target unix

=== libffi Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes2304

=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes6068
=== libgo tests ===


Running target unix

=== libgo Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes196

Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: runtime

=== libgo Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes195
# of unexpected failures1

=== libgo Summary ===

# of expected passes391
# of unexpected failures1
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas-64/build/./gcc/gccgo version 15.0.0 
20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC)

=== libgomp tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)

=== libgomp Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes16320
# of unexpected failures8
# of expected failures  287
# of unsupported tests  629

Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)

=== libgomp Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes16316
# of 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 14.1.1 20240524 [releases/gcc-14 5429e6a6467951e3ffc626e6aa40fb32fcc43681] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:54:19 UTC 2024 (revision 
5429e6a6467951e3ffc626e6aa40fb32fcc43681)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 14.1.1 20240524 [releases/gcc-14 5429e6a6467951e3ffc626e6aa40fb32fcc43681] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:54:19 UTC 2024 (revision 
5429e6a6467951e3ffc626e6aa40fb32fcc43681)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 13.3.1 20240524 [releases/gcc-13 cf76815d93f065a48c06963b396e2d543e75b7a3] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 09:05:37 UTC 2024 (revision 
cf76815d93f065a48c06963b396e2d543e75b7a3)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 13.3.1 20240524 [releases/gcc-13 cf76815d93f065a48c06963b396e2d543e75b7a3] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 09:05:37 UTC 2024 (revision 
cf76815d93f065a48c06963b396e2d543e75b7a3)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

Native configuration is x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

=== libatomic tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libatomic Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests  5

Running target unix

=== libatomic Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes54

=== libatomic Summary ===

# of expected passes98
# of unsupported tests  5
=== libffi tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libffi Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes3764

Running target unix

=== libffi Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes2304

=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes6068
=== libgo tests ===


Running target unix

=== libgo Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes196

Running target unix/-m32

=== libgo Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes196

=== libgo Summary ===

# of expected passes392
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-64/build/./gcc/gccgo version 15.0.0 
20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC)

=== libgomp tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)

=== libgomp Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes16194
# of unexpected failures8
# of expected failures  287
# of unsupported tests  690

Running target unix/-m32
WARNING: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-10.C execution test program timed out.
FAIL: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-10.C execution test
WARNING: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-8.C execution test program timed out.
FAIL: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-8.C execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 

Results for 15.0.0 20240523 (experimental) [master 51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-25 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 24 08:46:33 UTC 2024 (revision 
51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

[COMMITTED] testsuite: vect: Fix gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c on SPARC [PR114072]

2024-05-23 Thread Rainer Orth
gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c FAILs on 32 and 64-bit Solaris/SPARC:

FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump vect 
"LOOP VECTORIZED"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"

This patch implements Richard's analysis from the PR, skipping the
scan-tree-dump part for big-endian targets without vect_shift_char
support.

Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11 (32 and 64-bit each).

Committed to trunk as pre-approved in the PR.

Rainer

-- 
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-05-22  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR tree-optimization/114072
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c (scan-tree-dump): Require
vect_shift_char on big-endian targets.

# HG changeset patch
# Parent  1f3d09b9a831993fdfb155ebf7a4e540201d9f76
testsuite: vect: Fix gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c on SPARC [PR114072]

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c
@@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ main ()
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "LOOP VECTORIZED" "vect" { target vect_int } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "LOOP VECTORIZED" "vect" { target { vect_int && { le || { be && vect_shift_char } } } } } } */


[gcc r15-789] testsuite: vect: Fix gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c on SPARC [PR114072]

2024-05-23 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc5e109272977f0242a2ceee3a85765cdbed1993

commit r15-789-gfc5e109272977f0242a2ceee3a85765cdbed1993
Author: Rainer Orth 
Date:   Thu May 23 09:53:45 2024 +0200

testsuite: vect: Fix gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c on SPARC [PR114072]

gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c FAILs on 32 and 64-bit Solaris/SPARC:

FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump 
vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c scan-tree-dump vect "LOOP VECTORIZED"

This patch implements Richard's analysis from the PR, skipping the
scan-tree-dump part for big-endian targets without vect_shift_char
support.

Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11 (32 and 64-bit 
each).
    
    2024-05-22  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR tree-optimization/114072
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c (scan-tree-dump): Require
vect_shift_char on big-endian targets.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c
index 79b72aebc78..2400de10590 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c
@@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ main ()
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "LOOP VECTORIZED" "vect" { target vect_int } } 
} */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "LOOP VECTORIZED" "vect" { target { vect_int && 
{ le || { be && vect_shift_char } } } } } } */


[gcc r15-767] testsuite: Allow for non-SECTION_MERGE systems in gcc.dg/pr115066.c [PR115066]

2024-05-22 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c97934fde7caf483ffc5079eb8ca4af04354a2c

commit r15-767-g6c97934fde7caf483ffc5079eb8ca4af04354a2c
Author: Tom de Vries 
Date:   Wed May 22 10:06:10 2024 +0200

testsuite: Allow for non-SECTION_MERGE systems in gcc.dg/pr115066.c 
[PR115066]

gcc.dg/pr115066.c currently FAILs on Solaris/SPARC with the native as:

FAIL: gcc.dg/pr115066.c scan-assembler .bytet0xbt# Define macro 
strx

Instead of the expected

.byte   0xb ! Define macro strx

the assembler output contains

.byte   0x1 ! Define macro

Apparently this happens because the Solaris as/ld combo doesn't support
SHF_MERGE.

While I initially meant to just skip the test on sparc*-*-solaris2* && !gas,
Tom suggested to allow for both forms instead, which is what his patch
does.

Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11 (as and gas
each) and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

2024-05-21  Tom de Vries  

gcc/testsuite:
PR debug/115066
* gcc.dg/pr115066.c (scan-assembler): Allow for alternative form
of Define macro.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr115066.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr115066.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr115066.c
index 780767ac295..aadc4900467 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr115066.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr115066.c
@@ -3,6 +3,6 @@
 /* { dg-options "-gsplit-dwarf -g3 -dA -gdwarf-4" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\.section\t"?\.debug_macro} 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\.byte\t0x5\t[^\n\r]* Define macro strp} } 
} */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\.byte\t0xb\t[^\n\r]* Define macro strx} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\.byte\t0xb\t[^\n\r]* Define macro 
strx|\.byte\t0x1\t[^\n\r]* Define macro} } } */
 
 #define foo 1


[PATCH] testsuite: Allow for non-SECTION_MERGE systems in gcc.dg/pr115066.c [PR115066]

2024-05-21 Thread Rainer Orth
gcc.dg/pr115066.c currently FAILs on Solaris/SPARC with the native as:

FAIL: gcc.dg/pr115066.c scan-assembler .bytet0xbt# Define macro strx

Instead of the expected

.byte   0xb ! Define macro strx

the assembler output contains

.byte   0x1 ! Define macro

Apparently this happens because the Solaris as/ld combo doesn't support
SHF_MERGE.

While I initially meant to just skip the test on sparc*-*-solaris2* && !gas,
Tom suggested to allow for both forms instead, which is what his patch
does.

Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11 (as and gas
each) and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

Ok for trunk?

Rainer

-- 
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-05-21  Tom de Vries  

gcc/testsuite:
PR debug/115066
* gcc.dg/pr115066.c (scan-assembler): Allow for alternative form
of Define macro.

# HG changeset patch
# Parent  630ea4594490d9bd4911b95d13eaca62a8cd4dba
testsuite: Allow for non-SECTION_MERGE systems in gcc.dg/pr115066.c [PR115066]

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr115066.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr115066.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr115066.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr115066.c
@@ -3,6 +3,6 @@
 /* { dg-options "-gsplit-dwarf -g3 -dA -gdwarf-4" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\.section\t"?\.debug_macro} 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\.byte\t0x5\t[^\n\r]* Define macro strp} } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\.byte\t0xb\t[^\n\r]* Define macro strx} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\.byte\t0xb\t[^\n\r]* Define macro strx|\.byte\t0x1\t[^\n\r]* Define macro} } } */
 
 #define foo 1


Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

Native configuration is x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

=== libatomic tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libatomic Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests  5

Running target unix

=== libatomic Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes54

=== libatomic Summary ===

# of expected passes98
# of unsupported tests  5
=== libffi tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libffi Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes3764

Running target unix

=== libffi Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes2304

=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes6068
=== libgo tests ===


Running target unix

=== libgo Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes196

Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: runtime
FAIL: runtime/pprof

=== libgo Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes194
# of unexpected failures2

=== libgo Summary ===

# of expected passes390
# of unexpected failures2
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas-64/build/./gcc/gccgo version 15.0.0 
20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC)

=== libgomp tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)

=== libgomp Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes16320
# of unexpected failures8
# of expected failures  287
# of unsupported tests  629

Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)

=== libgomp Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 13.2.1 20240516 [releases/gcc-13 5b5342e6a38d4b28fdf4e607d30ca6bde87ba010] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 09:19:01 UTC 2024 (revision 
5b5342e6a38d4b28fdf4e607d30ca6bde87ba010)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 13.2.1 20240516 [releases/gcc-13 5b5342e6a38d4b28fdf4e607d30ca6bde87ba010] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 09:19:01 UTC 2024 (revision 
5b5342e6a38d4b28fdf4e607d30ca6bde87ba010)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 13.2.1 20240516 [releases/gcc-13 5b5342e6a38d4b28fdf4e607d30ca6bde87ba010] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 09:19:01 UTC 2024 (revision 
5b5342e6a38d4b28fdf4e607d30ca6bde87ba010)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

=== acats tests ===
FAIL:   cxa4001

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should 

Results for 15.0.0 20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC) testsuite on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-18 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 08:59:50 UTC 2024 (revision 
9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979)

Native configuration is x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

=== libatomic tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libatomic Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests  5

Running target unix

=== libatomic Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes54

=== libatomic Summary ===

# of expected passes98
# of unsupported tests  5
=== libffi tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libffi Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes3764

Running target unix

=== libffi Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes2304

=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes6068
=== libgo tests ===


Running target unix

=== libgo Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes196

Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: runtime

=== libgo Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes195
# of unexpected failures1

=== libgo Summary ===

# of expected passes391
# of unexpected failures1
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-64/build/./gcc/gccgo version 15.0.0 
20240517 (experimental) [master 9bd0b709ddb70589436c326142b1566f49f5e979] (GCC)

=== libgomp tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)

=== libgomp Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes16194
# of unexpected failures8
# of expected failures  287
# of unsupported tests  690

Running target unix/-m32
WARNING: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-11.C execution test program timed out.
FAIL: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-11.C execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  (test for 
excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
190 (test for warnings, line 185)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
221 (test for warnings, line 214)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2   at line 
252 (test for warnings, line 245)
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c 
-DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable  -O2  

Results for 14.1.1 20240516 [releases/gcc-14 81c627d47c2063b7f143c974e9733ce43c0d142e] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-17 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 09:11:13 UTC 2024 (revision 
81c627d47c2063b7f143c974e9733ce43c0d142e)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 14.1.1 20240516 [releases/gcc-14 81c627d47c2063b7f143c974e9733ce43c0d142e] (GCC) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.11

2024-05-17 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 09:11:13 UTC 2024 (revision 
81c627d47c2063b7f143c974e9733ce43c0d142e)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 13.2.1 20240516 [releases/gcc-13 5b5342e6a38d4b28fdf4e607d30ca6bde87ba010] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-17 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 09:19:01 UTC 2024 (revision 
5b5342e6a38d4b28fdf4e607d30ca6bde87ba010)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O0  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O1  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  
execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/default-options-1.C   -Os  execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++14  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++17  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++20  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c  -std=gnu++98  scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate 
format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is 

Results for 14.1.1 20240516 [releases/gcc-14 81c627d47c2063b7f143c974e9733ce43c0d142e] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-17 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 09:11:13 UTC 2024 (revision 
81c627d47c2063b7f143c974e9733ce43c0d142e)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 14.1.1 20240516 [releases/gcc-14 81c627d47c2063b7f143c974e9733ce43c0d142e] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-17 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 17 09:11:13 UTC 2024 (revision 
81c627d47c2063b7f143c974e9733ce43c0d142e)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

[gcc r15-511] testsuite: Require lto-plugin in gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c [PR85656]

2024-05-15 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff105c39bde43bdb57615e3a4c7af71fbef5f26e

commit r15-511-gff105c39bde43bdb57615e3a4c7af71fbef5f26e
Author: Rainer Orth 
Date:   Wed May 15 13:23:08 2024 +0200

testsuite: Require lto-plugin in gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c [PR85656]

gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c currently FAILs on Solaris (SPARC and x86, 32
and 64-bit):

FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c scan-ltrans-tree-dump-not optimized "Function 
bar"

As it turns out, this only happens when the Solaris linker is used; with
GNU ld the test PASSes just fine.  In fact, that happens because gld
supports the lto-plugin while ld does not: in a Solaris build with gld,
the test FAILs the same way as with ld when -fno-use-linker-plugin is
passed, so this patch requires linker_plugin.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 (ld and gld) and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

2024-05-15  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR ipa/85656
* gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c: Require linker_plugin.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c
index a8824d040e52..74b5e56f9180 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 /* { dg-require-alias "" } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-ipa-icf-optimized -flto -fdump-tree-optimized 
-fno-ipa-vrp" } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target lto } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target linker_plugin } */
 /* { dg-additional-sources "ipa-icf-38a.c" }*/
 
 /* Based on ipa-icf-3.c.  */


[COMMITTED] testsuite: Require lto-plugin in gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c [PR85656]

2024-05-15 Thread Rainer Orth
gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c currently FAILs on Solaris (SPARC and x86, 32
and 64-bit):

FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c scan-ltrans-tree-dump-not optimized "Function bar"

As it turns out, this only happens when the Solaris linker is used; with
GNU ld the test PASSes just fine.  In fact, that happens because gld
supports the lto-plugin while ld does not: in a Solaris build with gld,
the test FAILs the same way as with ld when -fno-use-linker-plugin is
passed, so this patch requires linker_plugin.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 (ld and gld) and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

Committed to trunk.

Rainer

-- 
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-05-15  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR ipa/85656
* gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c: Require linker_plugin.

# HG changeset patch
# Parent  e546887285f7d120135d24bedb991846e571a536
testsuite: Require lto-plugin in gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c [PR85656]

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-38.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 /* { dg-require-alias "" } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-ipa-icf-optimized -flto -fdump-tree-optimized -fno-ipa-vrp" } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target lto } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target linker_plugin } */
 /* { dg-additional-sources "ipa-icf-38a.c" }*/
 
 /* Based on ipa-icf-3.c.  */


[COMMITTED] testsuite: i386: Fix g++.target/i386/pr97054.C on Solaris

2024-05-15 Thread Rainer Orth
g++.target/i386/pr97054.C currently FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86:

FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++14 compilation failed to 
produce executable
FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++17 compilation failed to 
produce executable
FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++2a (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++2a compilation failed to 
produce executable
FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++98 compilation failed to 
produce executable

Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr97054.C:49:20: 
error: frame pointer required, but reserved

Since Solaris/x86 defaults to -fno-omit-frame-pointer, this patch
explicitly builds with -fomit-frame-pointer as is the default on other
x86 targets.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 (32 and 64-bit) and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

Committed to trunk.

Rainer

-- 
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-05-15  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
* g++.target/i386/pr97054.C (dg-options): Add -fomit-frame-pointer.

# HG changeset patch
# Parent  4a47ed944a7c277f84f13551c7413f481a71877e
testsuite: i386: Fix g++.target/i386/pr97054.C on Solaris

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr97054.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr97054.C
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr97054.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr97054.C
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // { dg-do run { target { ! ia32 } } }
 // { dg-require-effective-target fstack_protector }
-// { dg-options "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -msse4.2 -mfpmath=sse -fPIC -fstack-protector-strong -O2" }
+// { dg-options "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -msse4.2 -mfpmath=sse -fPIC -fstack-protector-strong -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer" }
 
 struct p2_icode *ipc;
 register int pars asm("r13");


[gcc r15-509] testsuite: i386: Fix g++.target/i386/pr97054.C on Solaris

2024-05-15 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0e9fde8766a5b5a28a76c3a6fb0276efa47cd6d

commit r15-509-ga0e9fde8766a5b5a28a76c3a6fb0276efa47cd6d
Author: Rainer Orth 
Date:   Wed May 15 13:13:48 2024 +0200

testsuite: i386: Fix g++.target/i386/pr97054.C on Solaris

g++.target/i386/pr97054.C currently FAILs on 64-bit Solaris/x86:

FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++14 compilation failed to 
produce executable
FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++17 compilation failed to 
produce executable
FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++2a (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++2a compilation failed to 
produce executable
FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: g++.target/i386/pr97054.C  -std=gnu++98 compilation failed to 
produce executable

Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr97054.C:49:20: 
error: frame pointer required, but reserved

Since Solaris/x86 defaults to -fno-omit-frame-pointer, this patch
explicitly builds with -fomit-frame-pointer as is the default on other
x86 targets.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 (32 and 64-bit) and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

2024-05-15  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
* g++.target/i386/pr97054.C (dg-options): Add -fomit-frame-pointer.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr97054.C | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr97054.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr97054.C
index d0693af2a42c..b18ef2e46cae 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr97054.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr97054.C
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // { dg-do run { target { ! ia32 } } }
 // { dg-require-effective-target fstack_protector }
-// { dg-options "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -msse4.2 -mfpmath=sse -fPIC 
-fstack-protector-strong -O2" }
+// { dg-options "-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -msse4.2 -mfpmath=sse -fPIC 
-fstack-protector-strong -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer" }
 
 struct p2_icode *ipc;
 register int pars asm("r13");


[gcc r15-486] testsuite: analyzer: Fix fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c on Solaris [PR107750]

2024-05-14 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f97d86f897bcf0ffda4d8d2e5b78a160e9ece140

commit r15-486-gf97d86f897bcf0ffda4d8d2e5b78a160e9ece140
Author: Rainer Orth 
Date:   Tue May 14 16:23:14 2024 +0200

testsuite: analyzer: Fix fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c on 
Solaris [PR107750]

gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c currently FAILs
on Solaris:

FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c (test for
excess errors)

Excess errors:

/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c:91:3:
error: implicit declaration of function 'memset'
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

Solaris  has

but no declaration of memset.  While one can argue that this should be
fixed, it's easy enough to just include  instead, which is
what this patch does.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and i686-pc-linux-gnu.

2024-05-14  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR analyzer/107750
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c:
Include .

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git 
a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c
index f922a52238f9..71dbef6d6e77 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #if __has_include()


[PATCH] testsuite: analyzer: Fix fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c on Solaris [PR107750]

2024-05-14 Thread Rainer Orth
gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c currently FAILs
on Solaris:

FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c (test for excess 
errors)

Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c:91:3:
 error: implicit declaration of function 'memset' 
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

Solaris  has

#define FD_ZERO(__p)(void) memset((__p), 0, sizeof (*(__p))) 

but no declaration of memset.  While one can argue that this should be
fixed, it's easy enough to just include  instead, which is
what this patch does.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and i686-pc-linux-gnu.

Ok for trunk?

Rainer

-- 
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-05-14  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR analyzer/107750
* gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c:
Include .

# HG changeset patch
# Parent  4d8ceef2997b0a0ff7a4b4df140f9f864e923eb4
testsuite: analyzer: Fix fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c on Solaris [PR107750]

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-connection-server.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #if __has_include()


Re: [PATCH] testsuite: c++: Allow for std::printf in g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H [PR98529]

2024-05-13 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Nathaniel,

>> > There are a couple of other tests that appear to potentially have a
>> > similar issue:
>> >
>> > global-2_a.C
>> > 21:// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump-not {Reachable GMF '::printf[^\n']*'
>> > added} module } }
>> >
>> > global-3_a.C
>> > 15:// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump-not {Reachable GMF '::printf[^'\n]*'
>> > added} module } }
>> 
>> neither module file contains "Reachable GMF" at all, with ::printf or
>> otherwise.
>> 
>
> Yes, I think the test is aiming to check that such a declaration is not
> added at all, and so that's correct. But if for some reason on some
> system it did add "::std::printf" that would be a bug that would not be
> caught by this test.

understood.  However, the question about global-3_a.C remains which
contains no printf at all.

>> > Which I suppose maybe also should be updated in the same way; I guess
>> > they don't fail on Solaris because they aren't actually correctly
>> > testing what they think they are.
>> 
>> Perhaps, but it would be useful to first understand what those tests are
>> supposed to look like.  WRT global-3_a.C, printf doesn't occur at all,
>> so this may just be a case of copy-and-paste.
>> 
>> Maybe Nathan, who authored the tests, can shed some light.
>> 
>> > Otherwise LGTM.
>> 
>> Thanks.  I'll go ahead and commit the patch as is, asjusting the other
>> two once it's become clear what they should look like.
>> 
>
> Ah, I should have been clearer: I'm not sure I can approve, but I've
> CC'd Jason in.

Sorry, I already committed the patch.  I can revert, of course, if
that's inappropriate.  OTOH, it could be considered obvious ;-)

Rainer

-- 
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


[gcc r15-430] testsuite: c++: Allow for std::printf in g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H [PR98529]

2024-05-13 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4af8ebdb0318b5e9ed3dfdea5501a3260f3acea

commit r15-430-gc4af8ebdb0318b5e9ed3dfdea5501a3260f3acea
Author: Rainer Orth 
Date:   Mon May 13 14:02:46 2024 +0200

testsuite: c++: Allow for std::printf in g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H 
[PR98529]

g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H currently FAILs on Solaris:

FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++17  scan-lang-dump module 
"Depset:0 decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++2a  scan-lang-dump module 
"Depset:0 decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++2b  scan-lang-dump module 
"Depset:0 decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"

The problem is that the module file doesn't contain

 Depset:0 decl entity:95 function_decl:'::printf'

as expected by the test, but

 Depset:0 decl entity:26 function_decl:'::std::printf'

This happens because Solaris  declares printf in namespace std
as allowed by C++11, Annex D, D.5.

This patch allows for both forms.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
    
2024-05-13  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR c++/98529
* g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H (scan-lang-dump): Allow for
::std::printf.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H
index 9eda2331dd90..3089efdb28f1 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H
@@ -10,5 +10,5 @@
 #endif
 // There should be *lots* of depsets (209 for glibc today)
 // { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Writing section:60 } module } }
-// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Depset:0 decl entity:[0-9]* 
function_decl:'::printf'} module } }
+// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Depset:0 decl entity:[0-9]* 
function_decl:'(::std)?::printf'} module } }
 // { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Depset:1 binding namespace_decl:'::printf'} 
module } }


Re: [PATCH] testsuite: c++: Allow for std::printf in g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H [PR98529]

2024-05-13 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Nathaniel,

> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 10:40:30AM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H currently FAILs on Solaris:
>> 
>> FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++17  scan-lang-dump module "Depset:0 
>> decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++2a  scan-lang-dump module "Depset:0 
>> decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
>> FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++2b  scan-lang-dump module "Depset:0 
>> decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
>> 
>> The problem is that the module file doesn't contain
>> 
>>  Depset:0 decl entity:95 function_decl:'::printf'
>> 
>> as expected by the test, but
>> 
>>  Depset:0 decl entity:26 function_decl:'::std::printf'
>> 
>> This happens because Solaris  declares printf in namespace std
>> as allowed by C++11, Annex D, D.5.
>> 
>> This patch allows for both forms.
>> 
>> Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
>> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>> 
>> Ok for trunk?
>> 
>>  Rainer
>
> There are a couple of other tests that appear to potentially have a
> similar issue:
>
> global-2_a.C
> 21:// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump-not {Reachable GMF '::printf[^\n']*'
> added} module } }
>
> global-3_a.C
> 15:// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump-not {Reachable GMF '::printf[^'\n]*'
> added} module } }

neither module file contains "Reachable GMF" at all, with ::printf or
otherwise.

> Which I suppose maybe also should be updated in the same way; I guess
> they don't fail on Solaris because they aren't actually correctly
> testing what they think they are.

Perhaps, but it would be useful to first understand what those tests are
supposed to look like.  WRT global-3_a.C, printf doesn't occur at all,
so this may just be a case of copy-and-paste.

Maybe Nathan, who authored the tests, can shed some light.

> Otherwise LGTM.

Thanks.  I'll go ahead and commit the patch as is, asjusting the other
two once it's become clear what they should look like.

Rainer

-- 
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


[PATCH] testsuite: c++: Allow for std::printf in g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H [PR98529]

2024-05-13 Thread Rainer Orth
g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H currently FAILs on Solaris:

FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++17  scan-lang-dump module "Depset:0 
decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++2a  scan-lang-dump module "Depset:0 
decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"
FAIL: g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H -std=c++2b  scan-lang-dump module "Depset:0 
decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'"

The problem is that the module file doesn't contain

 Depset:0 decl entity:95 function_decl:'::printf'

as expected by the test, but

 Depset:0 decl entity:26 function_decl:'::std::printf'

This happens because Solaris  declares printf in namespace std
as allowed by C++11, Annex D, D.5.

This patch allows for both forms.

Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, and
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

Ok for trunk?

Rainer

-- 
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


2024-05-13  Rainer Orth  

gcc/testsuite:
PR c++/98529
* g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H (scan-lang-dump): Allow for
::std::printf.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/stdio-1_a.H
@@ -10,5 +10,5 @@
 #endif
 // There should be *lots* of depsets (209 for glibc today)
 // { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Writing section:60 } module } }
-// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Depset:0 decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'::printf'} module } }
+// { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Depset:0 decl entity:[0-9]* function_decl:'(::std)?::printf'} module } }
 // { dg-final { scan-lang-dump {Depset:1 binding namespace_decl:'::printf'} module } }


Re: gcc/DATESTAMP wasn't updated since 20240507

2024-05-13 Thread Rainer Orth
Richard Biener  writes:

> On Thu, 9 May 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:14:43PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:04:38PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> > > I just noticed that gcc/DATESTAMP wasn't updated yesterday and today,
>> > > staying at 20240507.
>> > 
>> > I think it is because of the r15-268 commit, we do support
>> > This reverts commit ...
>> > when the referenced commit contains a ChangeLog message, but here
>> > it doesn't, as it is a revert commit.
>> 
>> Indeed and also the r15-311 commit.
>> Please don't Revert Revert, we don't really support that, had to fix it all
>> by hand.
>
> I do wonder if we can run the ChangeLog processing checks as part of
> the pre-commit hook and reject such pushes.  It seems we have two
> implementations, one in the pre-commit hook and the processing itself
> rather than having a single implementation that can run in two modes?

Unfortunately, the datestamp is again stuck at 20240509.

Rainer

-- 
-
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


Results for 15.0.0 20240510 (experimental) [master bb5f619a938567b316306bdc46f0efb8d18ddc59] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-12 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 10 08:54:29 UTC 2024 (revision 
bb5f619a938567b316306bdc46f0efb8d18ddc59)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 15.0.0 20240510 (experimental) [master bb5f619a938567b316306bdc46f0efb8d18ddc59] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-12 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 10 08:54:29 UTC 2024 (revision 
bb5f619a938567b316306bdc46f0efb8d18ddc59)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 15.0.0 20240510 (experimental) [master bb5f619a938567b316306bdc46f0efb8d18ddc59] (GCC) testsuite on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-12 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 10 08:54:29 UTC 2024 (revision 
bb5f619a938567b316306bdc46f0efb8d18ddc59)

Native configuration is x86_64-pc-solaris2.11

=== libatomic tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libatomic Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes44
# of unsupported tests  5

Running target unix

=== libatomic Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes54

=== libatomic Summary ===

# of expected passes98
# of unsupported tests  5
=== libffi tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libffi Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes3764

Running target unix

=== libffi Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes2304

=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes6068
=== libgo tests ===


Running target unix

=== libgo Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes196

Running target unix/-m32

=== libgo Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes196

=== libgo Summary ===

# of expected passes392
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas-64/build/./gcc/gccgo version 15.0.0 
20240510 (experimental) [master bb5f619a938567b316306bdc46f0efb8d18ddc59] (GCC)

=== libgomp tests ===


Running target unix

=== libgomp Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes16328
# of expected failures  287
# of unsupported tests  629

Running target unix/-m32
WARNING: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-13.C execution test program timed out.
FAIL: libgomp.c++/task-reduction-13.C execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
-fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pointer2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test

=== libgomp Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes16323
# of unexpected failures4
# of expected failures  287
# of unsupported tests  630

=== libgomp Summary ===

# of expected passes32651
# of unexpected failures4
# of expected failures  574
# of unsupported tests  1259
=== libitm tests ===


Running target unix/-m32

=== libitm Summary for unix/-m32 ===

# of expected passes44
# of expected failures  3
# of unsupported tests  1

Running target unix

=== libitm Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes44
# of expected failures  3
# of unsupported tests  1

=== libitm Summary ===

# of expected passes88
# of expected failures  6
# of unsupported tests  2
=== libphobos tests ===


Running target unix
WARNING: libphobos.gc/startbackgc.d execution test program timed out.
FAIL: libphobos.gc/startbackgc.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/complex.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/conv.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/datetime/date.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/datetime/interval.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/datetime/systime.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/datetime/timezone.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/experimental/allocator/building_blocks/region.d 
execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/file.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/format/internal/floats.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/format/internal/write.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/format/package.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/format/write.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/math/hardware.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/parallelism.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/typecons.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos/std/variant.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/complex.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/conv.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/datetime/date.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/datetime/interval.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/datetime/systime.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/datetime/timezone.d execution test
FAIL: 
libphobos.phobos_shared/std/experimental/allocator/building_blocks/region.d 
execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/file.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/format/internal/floats.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/format/internal/write.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/format/package.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/format/write.d execution test
FAIL: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/math/hardware.d execution test
FAIL: 

Results for 15.0.0 20240510 (experimental) [master bb5f619a938567b316306bdc46f0efb8d18ddc59] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-12 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 10 08:54:29 UTC 2024 (revision 
bb5f619a938567b316306bdc46f0efb8d18ddc59)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 15.0.0 20240510 (experimental) [master bb5f619a938567b316306bdc46f0efb8d18ddc59] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-12 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 10 08:54:29 UTC 2024 (revision 
bb5f619a938567b316306bdc46f0efb8d18ddc59)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 78: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  gcov: 1 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++98  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 15: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 22: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 38: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 44: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++14  line 49: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 6 failures in line counts, 0 
in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return percentages, 0 in 
intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 15: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 22: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855.C  -std=gnu++17  line 24: is #:should be 1
FAIL: 

Results for 14.1.1 20240509 [releases/gcc-14 21051de4bed3d541804bf965cbdc3e8047698777] (GCC) testsuite on i386-pc-solaris2.11

2024-05-12 Thread Rainer Orth
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 10 09:04:52 UTC 2024 (revision 
21051de4bed3d541804bf965cbdc3e8047698777)

=== acats tests ===

=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is i386-pc-solaris2.11

=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++14  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++17  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 41)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 42)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp26/literals2.C  -std=gnu++20  (test for errors, line 44)
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 14: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 21: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 37: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 43: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 48: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 53: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 58: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 63: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 68: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 73: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++14  line 78: is 2:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 14: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 21: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 37: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 43: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 48: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 53: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 58: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 63: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 68: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 73: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++17  line 78: is 3:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  gcov: 12 failures in line 
counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 0 in return 
percentages, 0 in intermediate format
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 14: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 21: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 23: is #:should be 
1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 37: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 43: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 48: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 53: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 58: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 63: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 68: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/pr16855-priority.C  -std=gnu++20  line 73: is 4:should be 1
FAIL: 

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >