Re: MicroBlaze symver attribute support

[Vincent Fazio via Gcc]

All

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 7:35 PM Michael Eager  wrote:

> On 2/20/23 06:54, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 7:56 AM Vincent Fazio via Gcc  > > wrote:
> >
> > Michael, all,
> >
> > Regarding:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766
> > 
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102110
> > 
> >
> > If I understand correctly, since the GCC MicroBlaze targets generate
> ELF
> > images, it would seem there's no technical reason why `__attribute__
> > ((symver ...))` cannot be supported?
> >
> > The issue seems to be that the MicroBlaze targets in config.gcc do
> not
> > include elfos.h
> > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config.gcc#L2369
> > 
> >
> > Which defines `ASM_OUTPUT_SYMVER_DIRECTIVE`
> >
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/elfos.h#L259 <
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/elfos.h#L259>
> >
> > Which is necessary for
> > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/varasm.cc#L6260
> > 
> >
> > Changing the targets to include elfos.h leads to a number of
> > conflicts with
> > the target specific header (config/microblaze/microblaze.h).
> >
> > Should `ASM_OUTPUT_SYMVER_DIRECTIVE` be copied into
> > config/microblaze/microblaze.h or should the MicroBlaze targets and
> > header
> > be reworked to support elfos.h?
> >
> >
> > IMO reworked to include elfos.h. During the RTEMS port, we noticed that
> > some quirks on the microblaze gcc because it isn't using elfos.h. This
> > likely
> > will mean it will be updated as a side-effect of normal GCC maintenance
> > instead of being an odd singleton which doesn't share.
> >
> >
> > I'm asking because I've seen a number of projects run into this
> > issue (xz,
> > elfutils, libfuse, libkcapi, cryptsetup).
> >
> >
> > And RTEMS.
> >
> > --joel
>
>
> Joel -- do you have a patch to add elfos.h to MicroBlaze?
>
>

I have a very crude commit here off of 11.3.0:

https://github.com/vfazio/gcc/commit/e65fea47b881b136f6753001791ebf68a4874dd6

I've tested it as a patch on Buildroot's toolchain and dropped the patch we
used to hack
around the previous lack of symver support for XZ. I was able to boot the
resultant kernel
and rootfs via qemu-system-microblaze and the symbol versions XZ expects
are included
based on discussions with the maintainer
https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz/pull/32#issuecomment-1424531920

I doubt the work is "complete" but it's a starting point.

-- 
> Michael Eager
>

Re: MicroBlaze symver attribute support

[Michael Eager]

On 2/20/23 06:54, Joel Sherrill wrote:



On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 7:56 AM Vincent Fazio via Gcc > wrote:


Michael, all,

Regarding:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102110


If I understand correctly, since the GCC MicroBlaze targets generate ELF
images, it would seem there's no technical reason why `__attribute__
((symver ...))` cannot be supported?

The issue seems to be that the MicroBlaze targets in config.gcc do not
include elfos.h
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config.gcc#L2369


Which defines `ASM_OUTPUT_SYMVER_DIRECTIVE`
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/elfos.h#L259 


Which is necessary for
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/varasm.cc#L6260


Changing the targets to include elfos.h leads to a number of
conflicts with
the target specific header (config/microblaze/microblaze.h).

Should `ASM_OUTPUT_SYMVER_DIRECTIVE` be copied into
config/microblaze/microblaze.h or should the MicroBlaze targets and
header
be reworked to support elfos.h?


IMO reworked to include elfos.h. During the RTEMS port, we noticed that
some quirks on the microblaze gcc because it isn't using elfos.h. This 
likely

will mean it will be updated as a side-effect of normal GCC maintenance
instead of being an odd singleton which doesn't share.


I'm asking because I've seen a number of projects run into this
issue (xz,
elfutils, libfuse, libkcapi, cryptsetup).


And RTEMS.

--joel



Joel -- do you have a patch to add elfos.h to MicroBlaze?

--
Michael Eager

Re: MicroBlaze symver attribute support

[Joel Sherrill]

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 7:56 AM Vincent Fazio via Gcc 
wrote:

> Michael, all,
>
> Regarding:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102110
>
> If I understand correctly, since the GCC MicroBlaze targets generate ELF
> images, it would seem there's no technical reason why `__attribute__
> ((symver ...))` cannot be supported?
>
> The issue seems to be that the MicroBlaze targets in config.gcc do not
> include elfos.h
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config.gcc#L2369
>
> Which defines `ASM_OUTPUT_SYMVER_DIRECTIVE`
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/elfos.h#L259
>
> Which is necessary for
> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/varasm.cc#L6260
>
> Changing the targets to include elfos.h leads to a number of conflicts with
> the target specific header (config/microblaze/microblaze.h).
>
> Should `ASM_OUTPUT_SYMVER_DIRECTIVE` be copied into
> config/microblaze/microblaze.h or should the MicroBlaze targets and header
> be reworked to support elfos.h?
>

IMO reworked to include elfos.h. During the RTEMS port, we noticed that
some quirks on the microblaze gcc because it isn't using elfos.h. This
likely
will mean it will be updated as a side-effect of normal GCC maintenance
instead of being an odd singleton which doesn't share.

>
> I'm asking because I've seen a number of projects run into this issue (xz,
> elfutils, libfuse, libkcapi, cryptsetup).
>

And RTEMS.

--joel

>
> Thanks,
> -Vincent
>

MicroBlaze symver attribute support

[Vincent Fazio via Gcc]

Michael, all,

Regarding:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102110

If I understand correctly, since the GCC MicroBlaze targets generate ELF
images, it would seem there's no technical reason why `__attribute__
((symver ...))` cannot be supported?

The issue seems to be that the MicroBlaze targets in config.gcc do not
include elfos.h
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config.gcc#L2369

Which defines `ASM_OUTPUT_SYMVER_DIRECTIVE`
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/elfos.h#L259

Which is necessary for
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/varasm.cc#L6260

Changing the targets to include elfos.h leads to a number of conflicts with
the target specific header (config/microblaze/microblaze.h).

Should `ASM_OUTPUT_SYMVER_DIRECTIVE` be copied into
config/microblaze/microblaze.h or should the MicroBlaze targets and header
be reworked to support elfos.h?

I'm asking because I've seen a number of projects run into this issue (xz,
elfutils, libfuse, libkcapi, cryptsetup).

Thanks,
-Vincent