Re: Ping (c,c++): Handling of main() function for freestanding
On 10/23/22 07:54, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: On Friday, 21 October 2022 23:02:02 CEST Joseph Myers wrote: I have no objections to the C changes. Great! Thanks for the review. I don't have push rights currently, so I must ask that someone else pushes this patch for me. Have a great day! Done, thanks. Jason
Re: Ping (c,c++): Handling of main() function for freestanding
On 10/23/22 07:54, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: On Friday, 21 October 2022 23:02:02 CEST Joseph Myers wrote: I have no objections to the C changes. Great! Thanks for the review. I don't have push rights currently, so I must ask that someone else pushes this patch for me. Have a great day! Done, thanks. Jason
Re: Ping (c,c++): Handling of main() function for freestanding
On Friday, 21 October 2022 23:02:02 CEST Joseph Myers wrote: > I have no objections to the C changes. Great! Thanks for the review. I don't have push rights currently, so I must ask that someone else pushes this patch for me. Have a great day! -- Arsen Arsenović signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Ping (c,c++): Handling of main() function for freestanding
On Friday, 21 October 2022 23:02:02 CEST Joseph Myers wrote: > I have no objections to the C changes. Great! Thanks for the review. I don't have push rights currently, so I must ask that someone else pushes this patch for me. Have a great day! -- Arsen Arsenović signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Ping (c,c++): Handling of main() function for freestanding
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote: > Ping on this patch. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603574.html > > For context, see the rest of this thread. TL;DR is that `int main' > should implicitly return 0 on freestanding, without the other burdens of > main (hosted should remain unchanged, as well as non-int `main's). This > applies to both the C and C++ frontends. I have no objections to the C changes. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
Re: Ping (c,c++): Handling of main() function for freestanding
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc wrote: > Ping on this patch. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603574.html > > For context, see the rest of this thread. TL;DR is that `int main' > should implicitly return 0 on freestanding, without the other burdens of > main (hosted should remain unchanged, as well as non-int `main's). This > applies to both the C and C++ frontends. I have no objections to the C changes. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
Ping (c,c++): Handling of main() function for freestanding
Ping on this patch. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603574.html For context, see the rest of this thread. TL;DR is that `int main' should implicitly return 0 on freestanding, without the other burdens of main (hosted should remain unchanged, as well as non-int `main's). This applies to both the C and C++ frontends. -- Arsen Arsenović signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Ping (c,c++): Handling of main() function for freestanding
Ping on this patch. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603574.html For context, see the rest of this thread. TL;DR is that `int main' should implicitly return 0 on freestanding, without the other burdens of main (hosted should remain unchanged, as well as non-int `main's). This applies to both the C and C++ frontends. -- Arsen Arsenović signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
