Re: [gccsdk] killpg function not implemented
Hi Alan, In the short term is there a workaround I can use to provide the functionality? I assume I would need to use the kill function and somehow finding the processes in the same group. Perhaps the implementation of kill(2) has this already? Linux's killpg(2) says On Linux, killpg() is implemented as a library function that makes the call kill(-pgrp, sig). which is how I traditionally think it was done, pre-killpg(). Cheers, Ralph. ___ GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
Re: [gccsdk] killpg function not implemented
Ralph Corderoy wrote: In the short term is there a workaround I can use to provide the functionality? I assume I would need to use the kill function and somehow finding the processes in the same group. Perhaps the implementation of kill(2) has this already? Linux's killpg(2) says On Linux, killpg() is implemented as a library function that makes the call kill(-pgrp, sig). which is how I traditionally think it was done, pre-killpg(). Thanks for the suggestion, but looking at the gcc code it doesn't appear to implement this (though I could be misreading the code). Regards, Alan ___ GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
Re: [gccsdk] killpg function not implemented
In message snt136-ds18c294cb4183b2093de83cf0...@phx.gbl Alan Buckley alan_...@hotmail.com wrote: Ralph Corderoy wrote: In the short term is there a workaround I can use to provide the functionality? I assume I would need to use the kill function and somehow finding the processes in the same group. Perhaps the implementation of kill(2) has this already? Linux's killpg(2) says On Linux, killpg() is implemented as a library function that makes the call kill(-pgrp, sig). which is how I traditionally think it was done, pre-killpg(). Thanks for the suggestion, but looking at the gcc code it doesn't appear to implement this (though I could be misreading the code). I'm not sure what you mean with 'gcc code', you mean glibc ? killpg() can be easily be implemented in UnixLib but as the 'process group' concept is minimally supported, killpg() will just be kill(-pgrp, sig). I'm not sure if that's going sufficent for the program you're trying to port. John. -- John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home BASS john.tyt...@aaug.net ARM powered, RISC OS driven ___ GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
Re: [gccsdk] killpg function not implemented
In message c4d3dfad51...@hobbes.bass-software.com John Tytgat john.tyt...@aaug.net wrote: killpg() can be easily be implemented in UnixLib but as the 'process group' concept is minimally supported, killpg() will just be kill(-pgrp, sig). I'm not sure if that's going sufficent for the program you're trying to port. I've added a minimal implementation with r5064. John. -- John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home BASS john.tyt...@aaug.net ARM powered, RISC OS driven ___ GCCSDK mailing list gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
