[Bug c/40641] gcc-4.4.0 does not honor the alway_inline attribute when using -Os
--- Comment #6 from florian at openwrt dot org 2009-08-04 08:58 --- Created an attachment (id=18295) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18295action=view) ldso.Os.i preprocessed file with non-inlined syscalls -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40641
[Bug target/40956] GCSE opportunity in if statement
--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 09:05 --- Hoisting *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23286 *** -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40956
[Bug tree-optimization/23286] missed fully redundant expression
--- Comment #25 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 09:05 --- *** Bug 40956 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carrot at google dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23286
[Bug fortran/40958] module files too large
--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 09:10 --- Yup -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-08-04 09:10:35 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
[Bug c/40959] New: build fails - No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'. Stop.
building gcc4.3.4 from ports on FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2 ia64 I get this error: [skip] gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc' gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/gcc' gmake[4]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'. Stop. gmake[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/gcc' gmake[3]: *** [gcc-extra-parts] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc' gmake[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build' gmake[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build' gmake: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc43. *** Error code 1 -- Summary: build fails - No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld- freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'. Stop. Product: gcc Version: 4.3.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mexas at bristol dot ac dot uk GCC build triplet: 4.3.4.20090726 GCC host triplet: FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2 ia64 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40959
[Bug c++/15179] bad parse error recovery with missing typename
--- Comment #15 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 09:22 --- Testcase in comment #9 does not produce any output anymore. Testcase in comment #10 produces: /home/manuel/src/pr15179.C:8:18: error: type Ayn is not derived from type Byn /home/manuel/src/pr15179.C:8:23: error: expected ; before Type Testcase in comment #14 produces: /home/manuel/src/pr15179-3.C: At global scope: /home/manuel/src/pr15179-3.C:22:23: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before token It seems to me that there is a tentative parse of a type in cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq, that fails, and then we end up trying to parse something else until it fails completely. For the typedef testcases, the code in cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq could just directly parse the complete typedef and return, because only a type can follow typedef. For the non-typedef testcase, it is less clear how to handle a failure to parse a type, since that may actually mean we are looking at something else. I don't really know where the failure happens. That would need more debugging that I have time to do now. Any help appreciated. -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.4.0 Last reconfirmed|2005-05-08 17:34:10 |2009-08-04 09:22:11 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15179
[Bug fortran/40955] STDCALL attributes are not saved in the .MOD files
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 09:34 ---
The following patch is also missing. Probably appears when using abstract
interfaces. One needs to check the proc pointer machinery as well as there one
might also miss such an option - there, one might also need to add options.
e.g. the interface name points to a STDCALL function while one adds a DLLEXPORT
(or something like that - I cannot come up with an example which makes sense).
Index: gcc/fortran/symbol.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/symbol.c(revision 150396)
+++ gcc/fortran/symbol.c(working copy)
@@ -1641,6 +1641,8 @@ gfc_copy_attr (symbol_attribute *dest, s
{
int is_proc_lang_bind_spec;
+ dest-ext_attr = src-ext_attr;
+
if (src-allocatable gfc_add_allocatable (dest, where) == FAILURE)
goto fail;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40955
[Bug c++/15766] bad parse error recovery (2 bugs)
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 09:34 --- For the first testcase, A could well be defined without type, so const A would be valid. So we definitely need to emit another error before '' but the current one is misleading. Perhaps parse error before '' is a solution. The alternative is to parse tentatively everything up to a comma or closing parenthesis and then find out what went wrong. That way, perhaps we can tell that A was meant to be a type but it is not declared. I wonder what comeau, clang and other c++ compilers report here. -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-06-20 04:13:50 |2009-08-04 09:34:58 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15766
[Bug c/40959] build fails - No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'. Stop.
--- Comment #1 from mexas at bristol dot ac dot uk 2009-08-04 10:00 --- the same happens for gcc4.4.2: [skip] gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc44/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc' gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc44/work/build/gcc' gmake[4]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc44/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'. Stop. gmake[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc44/work/build/gcc' gmake[3]: *** [gcc-extra-parts] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc44/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc' gmake[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc44/work/build' gmake[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc44/work/build' gmake: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc44. *** Error code 1 -- mexas at bristol dot ac dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.3.4 |4.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40959
[Bug target/40954] gcc-4.4.1/s390: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 10:04 --- Can't reproduce, at least not with a x86_64-linux - s390x-linux cross. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40954
[Bug middle-end/13757] -fstack-check causes segfaults
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 10:09 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 10127 *** -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13757
[Bug target/10127] -fstack-check let's program crash
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 10:09 --- *** Bug 13757 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||duncan_roe at acslink dot ||net dot au http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10127
[Bug fortran/40958] module files too large
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-04 10:13 --- It looks like also module.c contains minit calls that need to be modified. But for a 50% savings in module size, that seems still a localized effort -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
[Bug c/40959] build fails - No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'. Stop.
--- Comment #2 from mexas at bristol dot ac dot uk 2009-08-04 10:16 --- and the same error happens with gcc4.5.0: gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc45/work/build/gcc' gmake[4]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc45/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'. Stop. gmake[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc45/work/build/gcc' gmake[3]: *** [gcc-extra-parts] Error 2 gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc45/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc' gmake[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc45/work/build' gmake[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc45/work/build' gmake: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc45. *** Error code 1 -- mexas at bristol dot ac dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mexas at bristol dot ac dot ||uk Version|4.4.2 |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40959
[Bug rtl-optimization/40924] [4.4 Regression] miscompiles with -03 (seemingly related to attribute may_alias)
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 10:27 ---
On the 4.4 branch/x86_64-linux, I can reproduce even with -O1 on:
extern C void abort (void);
#define _MAY_ALIAS __attribute__((__may_alias__))
typedef struct { float v[2]; } _float_v;
typedef struct { int v[2]; } _int_v;
typedef unsigned int _UInt _MAY_ALIAS;
typedef signed int _Int _MAY_ALIAS;
typedef float _Float _MAY_ALIAS;
static inline unsigned short less_than (_int_v a, _int_v b)
{
unsigned short r = 0;
const _UInt *p1 = (const _UInt *) a;
const _UInt *p2 = (const _UInt *) b;
for (int i=0; i 2; i++)
if (p1[i] p2[i]) r |= (1 i);
return r;
}
static inline _int_v multiply (_int_v b, _int_v c)
{
_int_v r;
_Int *p3 = (_Int *) c;
for (int i=0; i 2; i++)
r.v[i] = (int) (b.v[i] * p3[i] 0x);
return r;
}
static inline _float_v gather (_int_v indexes, const void *baseAddr)
{
_float_v r;
_Int *idx = (_Int *) indexes;
_Float *src = (_Float *) baseAddr;
for (int i=0; i 2; i++)
r.v[i] = *(src + idx[i]);
return r;
}
static inline _int_v add (const _int_v b, const _int_v c)
{
_int_v result;
_Int *r = (_Int *) result;
for (int i=0; i 2; i++)
r[i] = b.v[i] + c.v[i];
return result;
}
struct uint_v
{
_int_v data;
inline uint_v () { data.v[0] = 0; data.v[1] = 1; }
inline uint_v (unsigned int a) {
for (int i=0; i 2; i++)
*(_UInt *) data.v[i] = a;
}
inline uint_v (_int_v x) : data (x) {}
inline uint_v operator* (const uint_v x) const { return multiply (data,
x.data); }
inline uint_v operator+ (const uint_v x) const { return uint_v (add (data,
x.data)); }
inline unsigned short operator (const uint_v x) const { return less_than
(data, x.data); }
};
struct float_v
{
_float_v data;
explicit inline float_v (const uint_v x) {
_UInt *p2 = (_UInt *) x.data;
for (int i=0; i 2; i++)
data.v[i] = p2[i];
}
inline float_v (const float *array, const uint_v indexes) {
const uint_v offsets = indexes * uint_v (1);
data = gather (offsets.data, array);
}
__attribute__((noinline)) unsigned short operator== (const float_v x) const
{
unsigned short r = 0;
for (int i=0; i 2; i++)
if (data.v[i] == x.data.v[i]) r |= (1 i);
return r;
}
};
int main ()
{
const float array[2] = { 2, 3 };
unsigned short mask;
for (uint_v i; (mask = (i 2)) == 3; i = i + 2) {
const float_v ii (i + 2);
asm volatile (# Barrier 1 %0 %1 %2 : : r (ii), r (i), r (array) :
memory);
float_v a (array, i);
asm volatile (# Barrier 2 %0 %1 %2 %3 : : r (ii), r (i), r
(array), r (a) : memory);
if ((a == ii) != 3)
abort();
}
return 0;
}
Apparently there is some stack slot sharing and RTL DSE decides to remove a
store to stack related address as dead when that memory is later on read using
a non-%rsp related read.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40924
[Bug c/18624] GCC does not detect local variable set but never used
--- Comment #15 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 10:52 --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) We need someone to write the patch. Just that. I've got some spare time now, so I'd like to have a go. If you want your code to be useful, fill a copyright assignment: http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#legal I can see that used_flag bitfield can be expanded from 1 bit to 2 bits. I can see that TREE_USED macro can be reworked to match. Reworked how? What concerns me is all the different places (currently 170) that the text pattern TREE_USED.*= occurs. I suspect a manual review of each of those 170 places would be prone to failure. Even without considering the various languages in sub directories, there are still 84 uses of TREE_USED.*= left. Focus on the C front-end: the c-* files, fold* and tree.c gdb with 84 breakpoints doesn't sound feasible to me. I really do not see any alternative. For your test program, you shouldn't hit all breakpoints, so the only problem is setting them. First try with the ones more likely and extend. As I see this, you should just find those places where b is marked as used although it is only assigned. Then perhaps it will suffice to not mark it as used but as set, perhaps this is done already, so one does not need to mark it as set either. Then in pop_scope in c-decl.c check for this following the existing check for Wunused_variable in order to give the proper warning message. (BTW, this has nothing to do with Wuninitialized) -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|24639 | nThis|| Last reconfirmed|2006-02-01 04:34:36 |2009-08-04 10:52:25 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18624
[Bug fortran/40875] ICE with illegal type conversion
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 11:14 ---
I am going to apply this, together with testcase, as obvious:
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c (revision 150404)
+++ gcc/fortran/decl.c (working copy)
@@ -1256,6 +1256,9 @@
if (sym-ts.type == BT_CHARACTER sym-ts.cl)
{
/* Update symbol character length according initializer. */
+ if (gfc_check_assign_symbol (sym, init) == FAILURE)
+ return FAILURE;
+
if (sym-ts.cl-length == NULL)
{
int clen;
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2009-08-03 17:01:40 |2009-08-04 11:14:55
date||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40875
[Bug libstdc++/15523] [DR 408] Can't have vectors of vector::const_iterator
-- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |paolo dot carlini at oracle |dot org |dot com Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15523
[Bug c/40960] New: POSIX requires that option -D have a lower precedence than -U
[This concerns the POSIX c99 utility, but gcc should probably behave in the
same way, as on some platforms, c99 is gcc.]
In http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c99.html POSIX
specifies:
-D name[=value]
Define name as if by a C-language #define directive. If no = value
is given, a value of 1 shall be used. The -D option has lower
precedence than the -U option. That is, if name is used in both a
-U and a -D option, name shall be undefined regardless of the
order of the options.
However, gcc doesn't take the precedence rule into account:
$ cat tst.c
int main(void)
{
#ifdef FOO
return 1;
#else
return 0;
#endif
}
$ c99 tst.c -UFOO -DFOO=1
$ ./a.out
zsh: exit 1 ./a.out
whereas FOO should be undefined and the return value should be 0, not 1.
I could reproduce this with various GCC versions, including:
gcc-snapshot (Debian 20090718-1) 4.5.0 20090718 (experimental) [trunk revision
149777]
--
Summary: POSIX requires that option -D have a lower precedence
than -U
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vincent at vinc17 dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40960
[Bug c++/39987] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Rejects default argument that is a template via access failure
-- dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-08-04 12:03:16 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39987
[Bug c/40960] POSIX requires that option -D have a lower precedence than -U
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:19 --- Hm, I wonder how many makefiles we'd break with changing that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40960
[Bug target/15184] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Direct access to byte inside word not working with -march=pentiumpro
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15184
[Bug target/15065] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] bootstrap fails during bulding libstdc++-v3 on Tru64 V5.0
--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15065
[Bug driver/14435] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] gnatchop cannot use the compiled compiler in Ada's testsuite because of changed GCC_EXEC_PREFIX semantics
--- Comment #30 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:25 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14435
[Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596
[Bug c++/14179] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
--- Comment #56 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:25 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
[Bug c++/17729] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Duplicate __attribute__((deprecated)) warning
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17729
[Bug c++/11987] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] Accepts-invalid with inherited nested type
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:25 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11987
[Bug preprocessor/8270] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] back-slash white space newline with comments, no warning
--- Comment #41 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:25 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8270
[Bug bootstrap/15212] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] bootstrap fails on interix3
--- Comment #40 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15212
[Bug c/12245] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] Uses lots of memory when compiling large initialized arrays
--- Comment #47 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:25 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12245
[Bug tree-optimization/17863] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] performance loss (TER register presure and inlining limits problems)
--- Comment #48 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17863
[Bug c++/14777] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] typedef doesn't fully expose base class type
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14777
[Bug java/18190] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] primitive array optimization is gone
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18190
[Bug target/18335] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/debug/debug-1.c and debug-2 xyzzy
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18335
[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] bloats code by 31%
--- Comment #29 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219
[Bug tree-optimization/19097] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] Quadratic behavior with many sets for the same register in VRP
--- Comment #52 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
[Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
--- Comment #37 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
[Bug target/18346] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware testsuite failure: gcc.dg/trampoline-1.c
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18346
[Bug debug/19192] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Current development gcc generates inaccurate line info for example code
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19192
[Bug c++/19159] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
--- Comment #44 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159
[Bug tree-optimization/18687] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ~50% compile time regression
--- Comment #43 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687
[Bug debug/19523] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] DBX_USE_BINCL support broken in the C++ compiler
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19523
[Bug middle-end/19988] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] pessimizes fp multiply-add/subtract combo
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19988
[Bug preprocessor/20285] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc -E - . gives a misleading error message
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20285
[Bug c++/19185] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE: cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-lang.c:308
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19185
[Bug target/20528] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20528
[Bug middle-end/20548] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ACATS c52103x c52104x c52104y segfault
--- Comment #37 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20548
[Bug c++/20681] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] wrong control reaches warning with switches
--- Comment #25 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681
[Bug c++/21008] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] [DR515] Access failure in accessing data member of base class from derived template class
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21008
[Bug target/20617] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] shared SH libgcc is exporting too many symbols
--- Comment #29 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20617
[Bug c/22297] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] missing uninitialized warning (builtin functions)
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297
[Bug libstdc++/21321] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/12790-3.cc execution test
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21321
[Bug c/21659] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] weak declaration must precede definition error missing at = O1
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21659
[Bug middle-end/21953] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Many tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1 tests fail on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21953
[Bug middle-end/21374] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with nested function
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21374
[Bug c/21343] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] incompatible internal linkage declarations in different scopes not diagnosed
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21343
[Bug libgcj/21714] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] libjava bootstrap failure in java/lang/natConcreteProcess.cc
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21714
[Bug middle-end/22141] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Missing optimization when storing structures
--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22141
[Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
[Bug tree-optimization/21485] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] missed load PRE, PRE makes i?86 suck
--- Comment #42 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
[Bug c/23144] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] invalid parameter forward declarations not diagnosed
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23144
[Bug target/22553] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE building libstdc++
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553
[Bug inline-asm/23200] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] rejects i(var + 1)
--- Comment #42 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200
[Bug objc/23709] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] error recovery is not smart enough
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23709
[Bug tree-optimization/23835] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] -O3 compile takes two times longer
--- Comment #31 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23835
[Bug tree-optimization/23821] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] DOM and VRP creating harder to optimize code
--- Comment #23 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23821
[Bug middle-end/23868] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] builtin_apply uses wrong mode for multi-hard-register return values
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868
[Bug target/24012] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE breaks #include iostream
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012
[Bug preprocessor/24024] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc -E -C processes \ incorrectly inside C comments
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24024
[Bug rtl-optimization/24319] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] amd64 register spill error with -fschedule-insns
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24319
[Bug target/24334] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure with SGI 7.4.3/4.4/4.5m ld: GOT overflow
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24334
[Bug objc/24393] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] fatal error when missing closing paren in method argument type
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24393
[Bug middle-end/24434] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] get_varargs_alias_set returns 0 always
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24434
[Bug preprocessor/24976] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] simple hexadecimal number and plus/minus and no space
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24976
[Bug java/24698] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] SIGABRT when using ResourceBundle.getBundle with a nonexistant key
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24698
[Bug middle-end/24998] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Build failure: undefined symbol __floatunsitf
--- Comment #41 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24998
[Bug c/25314] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Unreachable code at beginning of switch statement is not reported anymore
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314
[Bug driver/25208] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] two outputs and -MMD
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25208
[Bug debug/39706] namespaces represented incorrectly in debug_pubnames
--- Comment #4 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- Subject: Bug 39706 Author: dodji Date: Tue Aug 4 12:26:01 2009 New Revision: 150452 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=150452 Log: 2009-08-04 Dodji Seketeli do...@redhat.com gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR debug/39706 * error.c (lang_decl_name): Print qualified names for decls in namespace scope. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR debug/39706 * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/pubnames-1.C: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/pubnames-1.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/error.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39706
[Bug bootstrap/25438] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] make: *** No rule to make target `bubblestrap'. Stop.
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438
[Bug bootstrap/25470] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] fixincludes/ subdirectory not cleaned by make distclean
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25470
[Bug ada/25844] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE on overloaded renames
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25844
[Bug bootstrap/25672] [4.3 regression] cross build's libgcc picks up CFLAGS
--- Comment #24 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25672
[Bug tree-optimization/26069] [4.3 Regression] Runtime endian-ness check is no longer optimized out.
--- Comment #30 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26069
[Bug objc/25965] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Allows duplicate member names in objc subclasses
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25965
[Bug c++/25973] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Wrong warning: control reaches end of non-void function
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25973
[Bug c/26154] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] OpenMP extensions to the C language is not documented or doumented in the wrong spot
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
[Bug middle-end/26241] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] None of the IPA passes are documented in passes.texi
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241
[Bug target/26415] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] m68k-linux bootstrap error during stage2
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26415
[Bug tree-optimization/26854] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Inordinate compile times on large routines
--- Comment #110 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
[Bug tree-optimization/27004] [4.3 Regression] Insane amount of memory needed at -O1 and above because of salias and large switch
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27004
[Bug other/26966] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] linking of C++/ObjC app fail on OpenBSD 3.9 due POSIX threading unresolved symbols
--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26966
[Bug c++/26965] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Unnecessary debug info for unused consts in C++
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26965
[Bug debug/27017] [4.3 Regression] Debug information for static local class members are not emitted
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27017
[Bug c++/27078] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Duplicate error message for ambiguous enum
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27078
[Bug target/27880] [4.3 regression] undefined reference to `_Unwind_GetIPInfo'
--- Comment #37 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27880
[Bug target/27855] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused
--- Comment #32 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27855
[Bug c++/27425] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with invalid template-template-parameter
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27425
[Bug target/27440] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] code quality regression due to ivopts
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:27 --- GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27440
