[Bug target/34653] operation performed unnecessarily in 64-bit mode
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-09-24 06:06 --- Not a dup, since this is about shortening the mode, rather than about eliminating zero extensions. -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Keywords||missed-optimization Resolution|DUPLICATE | Summary|unnecessary REX prefix |operation performed ||unnecessarily in 64-bit mode http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34653
[Bug rtl-optimization/41455] memcpy not tail called if it's a struct assignment
--- Comment #1 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 06:29 --- Confirmed with trunk Because Tail calling is now done at the tree level. I remember me or someone fixing this by detecting block moves in tree-tail-call.c and then set up the flags accordingly. IIRC the same problem applied to builtins earlier. Let me take a look. -- ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-09-24 06:29:30 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41455
[Bug middle-end/41435] GCC doesn't fold complex int division
--- Comment #2 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 07:08 --- Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01685.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41435
[Bug target/41456] New: unrecognized R constraint: R13
note on version: the source suggests this bug even exists in trunk as of rev 151996 while compiling: asm volatile (\ mov.w %1,r0\n\t\ mulu.w %2,r0\n\t\ snip adc.w #0,r2\n\t \ :=R13 (yyl), =R02 (yyh) \ :o(xxa),o(xxb) \ :a0 ); i get: unrecognized R constraint: R13 src/libc.c: In function myfunc: src/libc.c:955: internal compiler error: in m32c_reg_class_from_constraint, at config/m32c/m32c.c:699 http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Machine-Constraints.html#Machine-Constraints says: R02 $r0 or $r2, or $r2r0 for 32 bit values. R13 $r1 or $r3, or $r3r1 for 32 bit values. while http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/gcc/config/m32c/m32c.h?view=markup suggests R02 R03 R23 are supported but R13 is nowhere in the file (R03 and R23 are there but not documented in the doc above?) -- Summary: unrecognized R constraint: R13 Product: gcc Version: 4.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: eightdot at hotmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: m32c-unknown-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41456
[Bug other/39888] TLS emutls not linked to automatically on Darwin
--- Comment #26 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-24 07:46 --- (In reply to comment #24) I am confused why libgcc_ext needs to be built as 10.4/10.5 versions. Aren't the _ext is versioned - precisely because the symbols included in the OS version changes between OS revisions. No only that, but there are different symbol sets between 32 and 64 bit libs. As far as darwin8 and darwin9 are concerned - I have no better offer than the _ext as formulated above (I will try and update the patches in the next couple of weeks). As far as darwin10 is concerned Mike's solution needs implementation and evaluation, if we are to adopt it. I'll try and find a free machine to put darwin10 on. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888
[Bug bootstrap/41457] New: [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 152100
On powerpc-apple-darwin9 with the changes I will post on pr41405, bootstrap fails with: ... /opt/gcc/darwin_buildw/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/darwin_buildw/./prev-gcc/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.5w/powerpc-apple-darwin9/bin/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.5w/powerpc-apple-darwin9/bin/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.5w/powerpc-apple-darwin9/lib/ -isystem /opt/gcc/gcc4.5w/powerpc-apple-darwin9/include -isystem /opt/gcc/gcc4.5w/powerpc-apple-darwin9/sys-include-c -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -gstrict-dwarf -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Werror -Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../gcc-4.5-work/gcc -I../../gcc-4.5-work/gcc/. -I../../gcc-4.5-work/gcc/../include -I../../gcc-4.5-work/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/opt/mpc/build//include -I/sw/include -I../../gcc-4.5-work/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc-4.5-work/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I/sw/include -I/sw/include -DCLOOG_PPL_BACKEND ../../gcc-4.5-work/gcc/c-format.c -o c-format.o ../../gcc-4.5-work/gcc/c-format.c: In function 'check_format_info_main': ../../gcc-4.5-work/gcc/c-format.c:2125:1: internal compiler error: in add_const_value_attribute, at dwarf2out.c:13478 The file compiles if I remove '-gstrict-dwarf' and '-g' (currently building libjava at -m64, allow for a couple more hours for bootstrap to complete). With the similar changes bootstrapping revision 152076 on i686-apple-darwin9. -- Summary: [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 152100 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr GCC build triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin9 GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin9 GCC target triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin9 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41457
[Bug bootstrap/41457] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 152100
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-24 08:56 --- Created an attachment (id=18643) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18643action=view) c-format.i -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41457
[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815
--- Comment #61 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-24 09:05 --- I have followed a path different from the one in comment #58, trying to use -gstrict-dwarf during bootstrap. For that I have made the following changes: diff -uN ../_gcc_clean/config/mh-intel-darwin config/mh-intel-darwin --- ../_gcc_clean/config/mh-intel-darwin1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ config/mh-intel-darwin 2009-09-23 23:02:59.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# Set strict-dwarf for Darwin + +BOOT_CFLAGS += -gstrict-dwarf +CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET += -gstrict-dwarf +CFLAGS += -gstrict-dwarf diff -uN ../_gcc_clean/config/mh-ppc-darwin config/mh-ppc-darwin --- ../_gcc_clean/config/mh-ppc-darwin 2008-02-25 11:00:23.0 +0100 +++ config/mh-ppc-darwin2009-09-23 23:56:42.0 +0200 @@ -2,4 +2,6 @@ # position-independent-code -- the usual default on Darwin. This fix speeds # compiles by 3-5%. -BOOT_CFLAGS += -mdynamic-no-pic +BOOT_CFLAGS += -mdynamic-no-pic -gstrict-dwarf +CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET += -gstrict-dwarf +CFLAGS += -gstrict-dwarf --- ../_gcc_clean/configure 2009-09-22 20:04:27.0 +0200 +++ configure 2009-09-23 13:50:29.0 +0200 @@ -3655,6 +3655,12 @@ powerpc-*-darwin*) host_makefile_frag=config/mh-ppc-darwin ;; + i[3456789]86-*-darwin*) +host_makefile_frag=config/mh-intel-darwin +;; + x86_64-*-darwin[912]*) +host_makefile_frag=config/mh-intel-darwin +;; powerpc-*-aix*) host_makefile_frag=config/mh-ppc-aix ;; With these changes I have successfully bootstrapped revision 152076 on i686-apple-darwin9 and I am currently bootstrapping revision 152100 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (modulo pr41457). I have found that the change 'CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET += -gstrict-dwarf' is needed to bootstrap, while the change 'CFLAGS += -gstrict-dwarf' (nor the others) does not allow to propagate -gstrict-dwarf for the libraries, hence Assertion failed: (!Unknown one-operand)... for them. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41405
[Bug testsuite/41444] Typo in gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/guality.h
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-24 09:10 --- Patches should be posted to gcc-patches. This is not a patch, it is the best way I have found to describe the PR. Would have it be better to report gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/example.c fails on Darwin with In file included from example.c:10:0: guality.h: In function 'main': guality.h:190:24: error: expected ';' before 'GUALITY_GDB_REDIRECT' guality.h:193:53: error: expected ')' before 'GUALITY_GDB_REDIRECT' guality.h:196:17: error: expected ')' before 'GUALITY_GDB_REDIRECT' ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41444
[Bug tree-optimization/41428] CCP doesn't fold all comparisons it could
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 09:16 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41428
[Bug c/41458] New: Inefficient write of 32 bit value to 16 bit volatile on ARM
GCC from at least 4.1.1, up to and including 4.4.1 generates two redundant bit
shift operations when writing a 32 bit value to a 16 bit variable. Example:
volatile unsigned short v1;
void test1(unsigned x) { v1 = x; }
This code generates the following when compiled with arm-elf-gcc -O2 -S -o-
tmp.c:
mov r0, r0, asl #16
ldr r3, .L3
mov r0, r0, lsr #16
strhr0, [r3, #0]@ movhi
If compiled with GCC 3.4.4, or if the volatile is removed, the expected code is
generated:
ldr r3, .L7
strhr0, [r3, #0]@ movhi
This also does not happen with GCC 4.4.1 for i586-redhat-linux. It generates
identical code whether the volatile is there or not.
--
Summary: Inefficient write of 32 bit value to 16 bit volatile on
ARM
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tobias at ringis dot se
GCC build triplet: i586-redhat-linux
GCC host triplet: i586-redhat-linux
GCC target triplet: arm-elf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41458
[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815
--- Comment #62 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-24 09:40 --- See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-09/msg00500.html . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41405
[Bug target/38085] gcc -m64 -pg generates invalid assembler code on Solaris 10/x86
--- Comment #4 from hailijuan at gmail dot com 2009-09-24 09:50 --- There is another problem with gcc -m64 -pg since 4.4.0, seen from below: # file /import/dr3/i386/gcc-4.4.0/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.4.0/amd64/gmon.o /import/dr3/i386/gcc-4.4.0/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.4.0/amd64/gmon.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable 80386 Version 1 Seen from gcc building log, gcc didn't build gmon.o with m64 as expected. Since 4.4, gcc/config/i386/t-sol2 has been moved to libgcc/config/i386/t-sol2. However the flags for gmon.o turned to be empty. Any comments on the issue? Thanks, -- Lijuan (In reply to comment #3) internal_mcount's from and self arguments were reversed from glibc's version. Here's the full diff of gmon-sol2.c that produces correct output: --- gcc/config/i386/gmon-sol2.c.origWed Jul 29 08:57:15 2009 +++ gcc/config/i386/gmon-sol2.c Thu Jul 30 07:53:16 2009 @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ extern void _mcleanup (void); extern void internal_mcount ( #ifdef __x86_64__ -char *, unsigned short * +unsigned short *, char * #else void #endif @@ -266,8 +266,8 @@ \tmovq\t%r9,0x30(%rsp)\n /* Get SELFPC (pushed by the call to this function) and FROMPCINDEX (via the frame pointer. */ -\tmovq\t0x38(%rsp),%rdi\n -\tmovq\t0x8(%rbp),%rsi\n +\tmovq\t0x38(%rsp),%rsi\n +\tmovq\t0x8(%rbp),%rdi\n \tcallq\tinternal_mcount\n /* Restore the saved registers. */ \tmovq\t0x30(%rsp),%r9\n @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ \tmovq\t0x20(%rsp),%rdi\n \tmovq\t0x18(%rsp),%rsi\n \tmovq\t0x10(%rsp),%rdx\n -\tmovq\t0x08(%rsp),%rdx\n +\tmovq\t0x08(%rsp),%rcx\n \tmovq\t(%rsp),%rax\n \taddq\t$0x38,%rsp\n \tretq\n @@ -290,8 +290,8 @@ void internal_mcount ( #ifdef __x86_64__ -char *selfpc, -unsigned short *frompcindex +unsigned short *frompcindex, +char *selfpc #else void #endif -- hailijuan at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hailijuan at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38085
[Bug debug/41065] DW_TAG_enumeration_type+DW_TAG_enumerator is sometimes missing
--- Comment #5 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 10:38 --- Fixed in 4_4 and 4_5. -- dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41065
[Bug fortran/41459] New: Error not printed with -Werror and -fmax-errors=1
When compiling the following test code: 100 end I get: [/tmp]# gfortran-dev test.f90 test.f90:1.4: 100 1 Warning: Ignoring statement label in empty statement at (1) But with -Werror and -fmax-errors=1: [/tmp]# gfortran-dev test.f90 -fmax-errors=1 -Werror Fatal Error: Error count reached limit of 1. Which is a bit misleading as it does no longer mention what the error itself is. -- Summary: Error not printed with -Werror and -fmax-errors=1 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: domob at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41459
[Bug middle-end/41357] libgomp build fail
--- Comment #30 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-09-24 11:10 --- Not sure about the status here... but, on this system: Windows XP Pro/SP3 cygwin Intel Core2 Duo t9...@2.80ghz system with packages: binutils 2.19.51-1 2.19.51.20090704 bison2.3-1 2.3 cloog-ppl0.15.3-1 cygwin 1.7.0-61 dejagnu 20021217-2 1.4.2.x expect 20030128-1 5.26 gcc-ada 3.4.4-999 gcc-core 3.4.4-999 gcc-g++ 3.4.4-999 gmp 4.3.1-3 libcloog-devel 0.15.3-1 libgmp-devel 4.3.1-3 libmpfr-devel2.4.1-4 libppl 0.10.2-1 make 3.81-2 mpfr 2.4.1-4 ppl 0.10.2-1 ppl-devel0.10.2-1 tcltk20080420-1 8.4 w32api 3.13-1 LAST_UPDATED: Thu Sep 24 09:42:02 UTC 2009 (revision 152114) configure: --prefix=/usr/local/gnu --enable-threads=posix --enable-libgcj --enable-libgomp --disable-sjlj-exceptions --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --enable-static --enable-shared --enable-shared-libgcc --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-libmudflap --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --without-included-gettext --with-dwarf2 --disable-symvers --enable-libssp --with-mpc --without-ppl --without-cloog --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,fortran,java,objc,obj-c++ I still get /bin/sh ./libtool --tag CC --mode=link /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/gnu/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ -B/usr/local/gnu/i686-pc-cygwin/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/gnu/i686-pc-cygwin/include -isystem /usr/local/gnu/i686-pc-cygwin/sys-include-Wall -Werror -Wc,-pthread -g -O2 -Wl,-O1 -o libgomp.la -version-info 1:0:0 -no-undefined -bindir /usr/local/gnu/bin -rpath /usr/local/gnu/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.0 alloc.lo barrier.lo critical.lo env.lo error.lo iter.lo iter_ull.lo loop.lo loop_ull.lo ordered.lo parallel.lo sections.lo single.lo task.lo team.lo work.lo lock.lo mutex.lo proc.lo sem.lo bar.lo ptrlock.lo time.lo fortran.lo affinity.lo libtool: link: rm -fr .libs/libgomp.dll.a libtool: link: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/gnu/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ -B/usr/local/gnu/i686-pc-cygwin/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/gnu/i686-pc-cygwin/include -isystem /usr/local/gnu/i686-pc-cygwin/sys-include-shared .libs/alloc.o .libs/barrier.o .libs/critical.o .libs/env.o .libs/error.o .libs/iter.o .libs/iter_ull.o .libs/loop.o .libs/loop_ull.o .libs/ordered.o .libs/parallel.o .libs/sections.o .libs/single.o .libs/task.o .libs/team.o .libs/work.o .libs/lock.o .libs/mutex.o .libs/proc.o .libs/sem.o .libs/bar.o .libs/ptrlock.o .libs/time.o .libs/fortran.o .libs/affinity.o-pthread -Wl,-O1 -o .libs/cyggomp-1.dll -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base -Xlinker --out-implib -Xlinker .libs/libgomp.dll.a xgcc: unrecognized option '-pthread' Creating library file: .libs/libgomp.dll.a.libs/team.o:team.c:(.debug_info+0x1084): undefined reference to `_gomp_tls_data' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [libgomp.la] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/i686-pc-cygwin/libgomp' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/i686-pc-cygwin/libgomp' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir/i686-pc-cygwin/libgomp' make[1]: *** [all-target-libgomp] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir' make: *** [all] Error 2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41357
[Bug tree-optimization/41460] New: value-numbering does not handle type-punning in a user-friendly way
value-numbering could turn certain invalid constructs like
int b;
void f(void)
{
float a;
a = 1;
b = *(int*)a;
}
into VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs of the loaded bit-pattern.
--
Summary: value-numbering does not handle type-punning in a user-
friendly way
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41460
[Bug c/41461] New: Regression between gcc 3.4.3 and gcc 3.4.6 for va_list
Problem with va_list argument returned by a fonction with 3.4.6 version of gcc.
Works fine with 3.4.3 version.
gcc version :
---
gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.6/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
--disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
--disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-java-awt=gtk --host=x86_64-redhat-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3)
System :
--
Linux 2.6.9-42.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 23:32:02 EDT 2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
GNU/Linux
Error :
-
toto.c:3: error: `test' declared as function returning an array
Source text :
---
#include stdarg.h
va_list test();
main ()
{
printf (Hello world\n);
}
Many thanks.
--
Summary: Regression between gcc 3.4.3 and gcc 3.4.6 for va_list
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: stephane dot herve at areva dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41461
[Bug tree-optimization/41454] [4.4/4.5 Regression] DOM miscompiles gcc.c-torture/execute/990513-1.c at -O2 -fno-tree-vrp
--- Comment #2 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 12:50 --- dom forgets update_stmt at strategic places. Mine. -- matz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |matz at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-09-24 12:50:53 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41454
[Bug c/41461] Regression between gcc 3.4.3 and gcc 3.4.6 for va_list
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 12:54 --- You can't return va_list by value portably. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41461
[Bug other/39888] TLS emutls not linked to automatically on Darwin
--- Comment #27 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-24 13:06 --- I don't see why your current patch should present a problem for darwin10. My understanding is that all of the symbols in libgcc-10.5 were moved into libSystem and they are ignored if present in libgcc regardless of linkage order. So if we move all post libgcc-10.5 symbols into libgcc-ext-10.5 that should be fine. I'll test your current patch on darwin10 tonight. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888
[Bug bootstrap/41457] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 152100
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 13:08 --- Subject: Bug 41457 Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 24 13:08:11 2009 New Revision: 152119 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152119 Log: PR bootstrap/41457 * dwarf2out.c (add_const_value_attribute): For HIGH and CONST_FIXED, return false instead of gcc_unreachable (). For CONST return the value returned by recursive call instead of always returning true. (tree_add_const_value_attribute): Return the value returned by add_const_value_attribute instead of always returning true if rtl is non-NULL. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41457
[Bug target/41424] Optimized x86_64-w64 -O1 -foptimize-sibling-calls binary produces negative effects
--- Comment #8 from xxcv07 at gmail dot com 2009-09-24 13:11 --- vlc's bug. -- xxcv07 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41424
[Bug other/39888] TLS emutls not linked to automatically on Darwin
--- Comment #28 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-24 13:15 --- Iain, You patch is showing some bit rot against current gcc trunk. Can you upload an updated version that applies cleanly against the current sources? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888
[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815
--- Comment #63 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-24 13:47 --- (In reply to comment #62) See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-09/msg00500.html . Dominique, Have you tried current gcc trunk with... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01686.html I'll try a build of i686-apple-darwin10 tonight to make sure that target is okay. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41405
[Bug middle-end/36143] [4.4/4.5 Regression]: FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19637.C
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 13:47 --- Subject: Bug 36143 Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 24 13:47:26 2009 New Revision: 152122 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152122 Log: 2009-09-24 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de PR tree-optimization/36143 PR tree-optimization/38747 * tree-ssa-forwprop.c (forward_propagate_addr_expr_1): Only create VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs for TBAA compatible accesses. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/fre-vce-1.c: XFAIL. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-6.c: Likewise. * g++.dg/torture/pr38747.C: New testcase. * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19637.C: Un-XFAIL. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr38747.C Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19637.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-6.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/fre-vce-1.c trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36143
[Bug tree-optimization/38747] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Wrong code due to VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 13:47 --- Subject: Bug 38747 Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 24 13:47:26 2009 New Revision: 152122 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152122 Log: 2009-09-24 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de PR tree-optimization/36143 PR tree-optimization/38747 * tree-ssa-forwprop.c (forward_propagate_addr_expr_1): Only create VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs for TBAA compatible accesses. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/fre-vce-1.c: XFAIL. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-6.c: Likewise. * g++.dg/torture/pr38747.C: New testcase. * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19637.C: Un-XFAIL. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr38747.C Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19637.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-6.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/fre-vce-1.c trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38747
[Bug tree-optimization/38747] [4.4 Regression] Wrong code due to VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 13:48 --- Fixed on trunk. Trunk doesn't necessarily handle testcases like this correctly anyway, so I am not considering in backporting the change ATM. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu |org |dot org Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Known to work|4.3.2 |4.3.2 4.5.0 Summary|[4.4/4.5 Regression] Wrong |[4.4 Regression] Wrong code |code due to |due to VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR |VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR | Target Milestone|4.4.0 |4.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38747
[Bug middle-end/36143] [4.4 Regression]: FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19637.C
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 13:49 --- Fixed on the trunk. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||38747 Known to work||4.5.0 Summary|[4.4/4.5 Regression]: FAIL: |[4.4 Regression]: FAIL: |g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19637.C |g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr19637.C http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36143
[Bug fortran/41459] Error not printed with -Werror and -fmax-errors=1
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 14:19 ---
This is probably related to a difference between gfc_warning and
gfc_warning_now. If you look in parse.c, you'll see free-form and
fixed-form code behave differently. For fixed-form, no warning is
issued. This patch fixes the fixed-form non-warning case. It
also gives a better locus.
Index: parse.c
===
--- parse.c (revision 151785)
+++ parse.c (working copy)
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ next_free (void)
if (gfc_match_eos () == MATCH_YES)
{
gfc_warning_now (Ignoring statement label in empty statement
- at %C);
+ at %L, label_locus);
gfc_free_st_label (gfc_statement_label);
gfc_statement_label = NULL;
return ST_NONE;
@@ -848,7 +848,8 @@ next_fixed (void)
blank_line:
if (digit_flag)
-gfc_warning (Ignoring statement label in empty statement at %C);
+gfc_warning_now (Ignoring statement label in empty statement at %L,
+label_locus);
gfc_current_locus.lb-truncated = 0;
gfc_advance_line ();
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41459
[Bug rtl-optimization/40987] Wrong optimization with if-conversion
--- Comment #10 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-09-24 14:38 --- Patch posted for review: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01655.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40987
[Bug bootstrap/41457] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 152100
--- Comment #3 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-24 15:17 --- (In reply to comment #2) Subject: Bug 41457 Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 24 13:08:11 2009 New Revision: 152119 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152119 Thanks Jakub! powerpc-apple-darwin8 bootstraps again with this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41457
[Bug ada/41100] [4.4 regression] Unchecked_Deallocation causes wrong free errors
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-24 15:51 --- It's not a double free: free is called once but not with the pointer returned by malloc, it is passed for some reason the pointer returned by malloc + 0x10. valgrind detects it when it reports: Address 0x5b3b040 is 16 bytes inside a block of size 136 (gdb) r The program being debugged has been started already. Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y Starting program: /home/guerby/pr41100/main Breakpoint 5, __gnat_malloc (size=136) at /opt/cfarm/release/4.4.1/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.4.1/adainclude/s-memory.adb:74 74Actual_Size : size_t := Size; (gdb) fin Run till exit from #0 __gnat_malloc (size=136) at /opt/cfarm/release/4.4.1/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.4.1/adainclude/s-memory.adb:74 0x0043fd5d in main () at main.adb.dg:22 22 P2b : constant double_free__test_class_access := new Value returned is $1 = (system.address) 0x563010 (gdb) c Continuing. Breakpoint 6, __gnat_free (ptr=(system.address) 0x563020) at /opt/cfarm/release/4.4.1/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.4.1/adainclude/s-memory.adb:114 114 Abort_Defer.all; (gdb) q The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) y I'm trying with trunk just to see if it's still there. -- laurent at guerby dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||laurent at guerby dot net Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail||4.4.1 Priority|P4 |P3 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-09-24 15:51:41 date|| Summary|[4.4 regression]|[4.4 regression] |Unchecked_Deallocation |Unchecked_Deallocation |causes double-free errors |causes wrong free errors http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41100
[Bug ada/41100] [4.4/4.5 regression] Unchecked_Deallocation causes wrong free errors
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-24 16:48 --- Same issue on x86_64-linux with gcc version 4.5.0 20090924 (experimental) [trunk revision 152124] (GCC) -- laurent at guerby dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to fail|4.4.1 |4.4.1 4.5.0 Summary|[4.4 regression]|[4.4/4.5 regression] |Unchecked_Deallocation |Unchecked_Deallocation |causes wrong free errors|causes wrong free errors http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41100
[Bug fortran/41459] Error not printed with -Werror and -fmax-errors=1
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 16:49 --- I have a patch. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-09-24 16:49:38 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41459
[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815
--- Comment #64 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 17:02 --- Subject: Bug 41405 Author: rth Date: Thu Sep 24 17:02:29 2009 New Revision: 152127 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152127 Log: PR bootstrap/41405 * common.opt: Initialize dwarf_strict to -1. * toplev.c (process_options): Catch unset dwarf_strict and set to 0 for all targets not overriding. * config/darwin.c (darwin_override_options): Catch unset dwarf_strict and override to 1. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/common.opt trunk/gcc/config/darwin.c trunk/gcc/toplev.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41405
[Bug c/41462] New: redundant instructions with long double returned value
When I compile this function:
double f(long double i) {return (i);}
with gcc flags -S -O3, I get the assembly below.
There are two redundant FPU instructions there. double value is already in FPU
after fldt. No need to store it and load it back since difference between
double and long double is only in memory representation, and in FPU registers
they are the same.
asm output (relevant part)
f:
pushl %ebp
movl%esp, %ebp
subl$8, %esp redundant related stack adjustment
fldt8(%ebp)
fstpl -8(%ebp) redundant STORE
fldl-8(%ebp) redundant LOAD
leave
ret
--
Summary: redundant instructions with long double returned value
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: yuri at tsoft dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41462
[Bug c/41462] redundant instructions with long double returned value
--- Comment #1 from yuri at tsoft dot com 2009-09-24 17:25 --- Forgot to mention: 32-bit mode on i586 CPU. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41462
[Bug ada/41100] [4.4/4.5 regression] Unchecked_Deallocation causes wrong free errors
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-09-24 17:44 --- Eric, do you have an idea on what could be wrong here? -gnatDG output looks fine, the bug is present at all optimization level so may be it's gigi? -- laurent at guerby dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41100
[Bug fortran/41459] Error not printed with -Werror and -fmax-errors=1
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 18:35 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01739.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41459
[Bug libstdc++/41448] std::sort on std::vectorfloat with certain values leads to segfault in the vector destructor
--- Comment #7 from 4ernov at gmail dot com 2009-09-24 18:39 --- Is there anything in C++ Standard concerning this case? Maybe it's more preferrable to throw exception or something like this.. Now it seems to make memory leak in the operated vector. The output is like this: *** glibc detected *** /usr/local/share/workspace/playground/gcc_sort: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x01d2c550 *** *** glibc detected *** /usr/local/share/workspace/playground/gcc_sort: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x01d2bca0 *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41448
[Bug target/41456] unrecognized R constraint: R13
--- Comment #1 from dj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 20:40 --- Subject: Bug 41456 Author: dj Date: Thu Sep 24 20:40:36 2009 New Revision: 152144 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152144 Log: PR target/41456 * config/m32c/m32c.h (REG_CLASS_CONTENTS): Add R13. (reg_class): Likewise. (REG_CLASS_NAMES): Likewise. * config/m32c/m32c.c (m32c_reg_class_from_constraint): Likewise. * config/m32c/m32c.c (m32c_override_options): Disable -fivopts for M32C. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/m32c/m32c.c trunk/gcc/config/m32c/m32c.h -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41456
[Bug target/41456] unrecognized R constraint: R13
-- dj at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dj at redhat dot com |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-09-24 20:42:26 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41456
[Bug middle-end/41435] GCC doesn't fold complex int division
--- Comment #3 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 20:45 --- Subject: Bug 41435 Author: ghazi Date: Thu Sep 24 20:44:55 2009 New Revision: 152145 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152145 Log: PR middle-end/41435 * fold-const.c (const_binop): Handle complex int division. * tree-complex.c (expand_complex_div_straight, expand_complex_div_wide): Update comments. testsuite: * gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-7.c: Test complex int division at compile-time. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fold-const.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-7.c trunk/gcc/tree-complex.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41435
[Bug other/39888] TLS emutls not linked to automatically on Darwin
--- Comment #29 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-24 20:55 --- Created an attachment (id=18644) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18644action=view) updated patch for 4-5 trunk (i) the added .ver files are (as yet) unchanged - so some newer (last few months) symbols would be missing. (ii) I seem to do = 1.5 so the thing should also work out of the box on 10.6 ***providing*** none of the newer symbols have been already added to 10.6 libSystem.dylib. From comments here: libSystem only subsumes the symbols from 10.5's libgcc_s so we should be good to go. (iii) it's hidden behind the -muse-shared-libgcc-ext for test purposes. (iv) you will need to add DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH entries pointing to gcc and gcc/64bit if you want to play with it uninstalled. (v) I'm about to regtest with 152135 with this patch applied and -muse- but that's tomorrow for a result. (vi) good luck ;) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888
[Bug middle-end/41463] New: Another get_ref_base_and_extent problem
The testcase below aborts when compiled with -O2.
union tree_node;
struct tree_common
{
int a;
long b;
long c;
void *p;
int d;
};
struct other_tree
{
struct tree_common common;
int arr[14];
};
struct tree_vec
{
struct tree_common common;
int length;
union tree_node *a[1];
};
union tree_node
{
struct other_tree othr;
struct tree_vec vec;
};
union tree_node global;
union tree_node * __attribute__((noinline))
foo (union tree_node *p, int i)
{
union tree_node **q;
p-vec.a[i] = (union tree_node *) 0;
q = p-vec.a[1];
*q = global;
return p-vec.a[i];
}
extern void abort (void);
extern void *malloc (__SIZE_TYPE__);
int
main()
{
union tree_node *p = malloc (sizeof (union tree_node));
if (foo (p, 1) != global)
abort ();
return 0;
}
foo() is optimized to return NULL, most probably because
get_ref_base_and_extent does not recognize that accesses to a do not
necessarily have to have constant max_size.
I have tried with trunk revision 152041 and 152147. The latter
specifically is:
jamb...@gcc16:~/gcc/test$ ~/gcc/inst/trunk/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/jamborm/gcc/trunk/configure
--prefix=/home/jamborm/gcc/inst/trunk/ --enable-checking=release
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-bootstrap --with-mpfr=/opt/cfarm/mpfr-2.3.2/
--disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.5.0 20090924 (experimental) (GCC)
--
Summary: Another get_ref_base_and_extent problem
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41463
[Bug bootstrap/41395] [4.5 regression] Revision 151800 failed bootstrap
--- Comment #31 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-24 22:53 --- (In reply to comment #29) Thanks. With the patch fixing the problem described in #24, we get further when compiling with release checking but run into syntax errors when compiling stage3 libstc++. This problem with a reduced testcase is PR 41463. And the debug info is still corrupted. So I am going to investigate further. The debug info may not necessarily be corrupted, it's probably that the old gdb cannot handle it. I will try with a new gdb. -- jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||41463 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41395
[Bug tree-optimization/41464] New: vector loads are unnecessarily split into high and low loads
gcc (GCC) 4.4.1 20090725 (Red Hat 4.4.1-2)
The testcase (built with -Wall -O3):
#include math.h
void MulPi(float * __attribute__((aligned(16))) i, float *
__attribute__((aligned(16))) f, int n)
{
for (int j = 0; j n; j++)
f[j] = (float) M_PI * i[j];
}
produces the following for the vectorized version of the loop:
.L7:
movaps %xmm1, %xmm0# zero XMM0
incl%ecx
movlps (%rdi,%rax), %xmm0 # load the low half into XMM0
movhps 8(%rdi,%rax), %xmm0 # load the high half into XMM0
mulps %xmm2, %xmm0# multiply by pi
movaps %xmm0, (%rsi,%rax) # store to memory
addq$16, %rax
cmpl%r8d, %ecx
jb .L7
--
Summary: vector loads are unnecessarily split into high and low
loads
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nmiell at comcast dot net
GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41464
[Bug other/39888] TLS emutls not linked to automatically on Darwin
--- Comment #32 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-24 23:47 --- Created an attachment (id=18645) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18645action=view) build failure on x86_64-apple-darwin10 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888
[Bug bootstrap/41465] bootstrap failed - ../libdecnumber/gstdint.h:80: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers
--- Comment #1 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-09-24 23:51 --- int64_t and uint64_t are both already defined in /usr/include/inttypes.h - it appears that intmax_t and uintmax_t may also be defined elsewhere as well, although I couldn't locate it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41465
[Bug bootstrap/41465] bootstrap failed - ../libdecnumber/gstdint.h:80: error: two or more data types in declaration specifiers
--- Comment #2 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-09-24 23:56 --- (In reply to comment #1) int64_t and uint64_t are both already defined in /usr/include/inttypes.h - it appears that intmax_t and uintmax_t may also be defined elsewhere as well, although I couldn't locate it. I thought I should explain the 2nd sentence a bit - I tried cleaning the relevant bit out and leaving just these two: typedef long intmax_t; typedef unsigned long uintmax_t; and compilation failed with a message about 'long long long' and 'unsigned long long long'. So it appears that intmax_t was expanded to 'long long' along the way. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41465
[Bug rtl-optimization/40838] gcc shouldn't assume that the stack is aligned
--- Comment #46 from mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz 2009-09-25 00:56 --- Created an attachment (id=18646) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18646action=view) A patch for gcc 4.4.1 I decided to make a patch on my own. Seamonkey works with it. It sometimes aligns unnecessarily but it should never miss an alignment. (someone with more knowledge about gcc than me could refine the patch to make fewer unneeded alignments) I searching the generated seamonkey code for 'movaps.*esp' and it shows that all the functions that store xmm on the stack use stack alignment. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838
[Bug other/39888] TLS emutls not linked to automatically on Darwin
--- Comment #34 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-25 01:20 --- Iain, The build on i686-apple-darwin10 is going better but has a glitch. A no time during the different stages of the bootstrap are libgcc_s.10.4.dylib and libgcc_s.10.5.dylib created. For example, in stage1-gcc I have... libgcc_ext.10.4.dylib libgcc_ext.10.5.dylib libgcc_s.1.dylib libgcc_s_ppc64.1.dylib libgcc_s_x86_64.1.dylib whereas a build without the libgcc-ext patch shows libgcc_s.1.dyliblibgcc_s.10.4.dylib libgcc_s.10.5.dylib libgcc_s_ppc64.1.dylib libgcc_s_x86_64.1.dylib I'll attach a compressed build log once the bootstrap is complete. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888
[Bug other/39888] TLS emutls not linked to automatically on Darwin
--- Comment #35 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-25 02:19 --- Created an attachment (id=18647) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18647action=view) i686-apple-darwin10 build log with patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888
[Bug rtl-optimization/40838] gcc shouldn't assume that the stack is aligned
--- Comment #47 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-25 02:31 --- (In reply to comment #46) Created an attachment (id=18646) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18646action=view) [edit] A patch for gcc 4.4.1 I decided to make a patch on my own. Seamonkey works with it. It sometimes aligns unnecessarily but it should never miss an alignment. (someone with more knowledge about gcc than me could refine the patch to make fewer unneeded alignments) I searching the generated seamonkey code for 'movaps.*esp' and it shows that all the functions that store xmm on the stack use stack alignment. You can find a testcase as the first step. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838
[Bug bootstrap/40894] [4.4/4.5 Regression] bootstrap4-lean failed crtfastmath.o comparision
--- Comment #4 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-09-25 04:33 --- situation gone worse: make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/htl10/tmp-build/ob-dir' Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/java/win32-host.o differs gcc/build/min-insn-modes.o differs gcc/dummy-checksum.o differs gcc/insn-peep.o differs gcc/graphite-blocking.o differs gcc/graphite-clast-to-gimple.o differs gcc/graphite-dependences.o differs gcc/graphite-interchange.o differs gcc/graphite-poly.o differs gcc/graphite-ppl.o differs gcc/graphite-scop-detection.o differs gcc/graphite-sese-to-poly.o differs gcc/loop-doloop.o differs gcc/version.o differs gcc/vmsdbgout.o differs gcc/xcoffout.o differs gcc/host-default.o differs gcc/gcc-options.o differs gcc/collect2-aix.o differs intl/osdep.o differs libiberty/safe-ctype.o differs make[2]: *** [compare] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/htl10/tmp-build/ob-dir' make[1]: *** [stage3-bubble] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/htl10/tmp-build/ob-dir' make: *** [bootstrap4-lean] Error 2 bash-2.05a# -- htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.4 Regression] bootstrap4-|[4.4/4.5 Regression] |lean failed crtfastmath.o |bootstrap4-lean failed |comparision |crtfastmath.o comparision http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40894
[Bug bootstrap/40894] [4.4/4.5 Regression] bootstrap4-lean failed crtfastmath.o comparision
--- Comment #5 from htl10 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-09-25 04:40 --- latest run was with svn-r152154 . also filed new bug 41465 , I just noticed I wrote 'bootstrap-lean' in comment 2 instead of 'bootstrap4-lean' - it is probably not important in light of the new bug and more extensive failures. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40894
[Bug c++/41437] No access control for classes in template functions
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-25 04:44 --- I think this is a duplicate of bug 40843. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
