[Bug target/113030] parsecpu.awk's chkarch/chkcpu commands is broken for aliases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113030 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/643549.html
[Bug c/109708] [c, doc] wdangling-pointer example broken
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109708 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed.
[Bug c/109708] [c, doc] wdangling-pointer example broken
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109708 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:29f931e39f2be86b454a8264b1cd42e4ca3cdcd7 commit r14-8314-g29f931e39f2be86b454a8264b1cd42e4ca3cdcd7 Author: Sandra Loosemore Date: Sun Jan 21 02:36:19 2024 + Clean up examples for -Wdangling-pointer [PR109708] gcc/ChangeLog PR c/109708 * doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Fix broken example and clean up/reorganize the others. Also describe what the short-form options mean.
[Bug ipa/109112] [[assume(...)]] is not taken into account for structs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109112 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric-bugs at omnifarious dot org --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 113527 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug ipa/113527] Missed optimization [[assume]] attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113527 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Dup of bug 109112, that is the problem is similar for many other things. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 109112 ***
[Bug tree-optimization/113527] Missed optimization [[assume]] attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113527 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|normal |enhancement Component|c++ |tree-optimization
[Bug c++/113527] New: Missed optimization [[assume]] attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113527
Bug ID: 113527
Summary: Missed optimization [[assume]] attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: eric-bugs at omnifarious dot org
Target Milestone: ---
This code https://godbolt.org/z/jeYGcr5sv still generates all the exception
handling code. It treats the assume attribute more like 'likely' than 'assume'.
It's supposed to be undefined behavior for the assumption to be false.
Here is the code replicated here:
#include
struct Potato
{
explicit Potato(int);
Potato(const Potato & other) noexcept;
};
using V = std::variant;
template
struct overloaded : Ts_... { using Ts_::operator()...; };
auto f(const V & v) -> int
{
[[assume(! v.valueless_by_exception())]];
return visit(overloaded{
[](int) { return 144; },
[](double) { return 27; },
[](const Potato &) { return 50; }
}, v);
}
You can make the exception handling code go away by simply using "if
(v.valueless_by_exception())" and returning some random value in the false
case. But, if the spirit of the keyword is to be observed, you should be fine
just doing a straight up table lookup and using the result without even
checking the type tag at all.
[Bug tree-optimization/110935] Missed BB reduction vectorization because of missed eliding of a permute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110935 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-21 Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed. I noticed the PERM issue when I was working on adding V4HI support to the aarch64 backend. I had to add PERM support for V4HI but it was not obvious at the time why. This explains it.
[Bug tree-optimization/113239] [13/14 regression] After 822a11a1e64, bogus -Warray-bounds warnings in std::vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113239 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Why the warning only happens with the 2 elements in frame_t, I have no idea really since there seems not to be any changes in the final IR (except for an extra load/store for those 2 elements).
[Bug tree-optimization/113239] [13/14 regression] After 822a11a1e64, bogus -Warray-bounds warnings in std::vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113239
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note the missed optimization was there in GCC 12, just the diagnostic was not.
We have:
```
_4 = MEM[(const unsigned char * const &)current_frame__2(D) + 24];
_7 = MEM[(const unsigned char * const &)current_frame__2(D) + 16];
if (_4 == _7)
goto ; [17.43%]
else
goto ; [82.57%]
[local count: 187153200]:
...
MEM [(unsigned char * *)_5(D) + 16B] = { 0, 0
};
MEM[(struct _Vector_base *)_5(D) + 16B]._M_impl.D.21112._M_end_of_storage =
0B;
_21 = MEM[(const unsigned char * const &)current_frame__2(D) + 24];
_22 = MEM[(const unsigned char * const &)current_frame__2(D) + 16];
_Num_23 = _21 - _22;
```
But based on the original condition (and the stores to offset of _5 [which
technically cannot alias current_frame__2]), _Num_23 will be 0.
What g:822a11a1e642e0abe92a996e7033a5066905a447 does is just add an extra if
statement where we get:
```
if (_Num_24 > 1)
goto ; [90.00%]
else
goto ; [10.00%]
[local count: 156478790]:
_Num.5_28 = (long unsigned int) _Num_24;
__builtin_memmove (0B, _22, _Num.5_28);
goto ; [100.00%]
[local count: 17386533]:
if (_Num_24 == 1)
goto ; [34.00%]
else
goto ; [66.00%]
[local count: 5911421]:
MEM[(unsigned char *)0B] ={v} 0; /// << This is causing the warning
__builtin_trap ();
```
Instead of just:
```
if (_Num_23 != 0)
goto ; [33.00%]
else
goto ; [67.00%]
[local count: 57375556]:
_Num.4_24 = (long unsigned int) _Num_23;
__builtin_memmove (0B, _22, _Num.4_24);
```
[Bug target/113526] [14 Regression] gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c fails since gcc-14-7248-g76bc70387d9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113526 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||inline-asm, ra, ||rejects-valid Summary|[14 Regression ARM] |[14 Regression] |gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c |gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c |fails since |fails since |gcc-14-7248-g76bc70387d9|gcc-14-7248-g76bc70387d9 Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/113526] New: [14 Regression ARM] gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c fails since gcc-14-7248-g76bc70387d9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113526
Bug ID: 113526
Summary: [14 Regression ARM] gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c fails
since gcc-14-7248-g76bc70387d9
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: thiago.bauermann at linaro dot org
CC: vmakarov at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: arm-none-eabi
Created attachment 57180
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57180=edit
gcc.log showing failures in gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c
After commit 76bc70387d93 ("[PR113354][LRA]: Fixing LRA failure on building
MIPS GCC"), the following failures started appearing on --target=arm-none-eabi:
=== gcc tests ===
Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movcc
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movcs
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler moveq
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movge
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movgt
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movhi
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movle
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movls
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movmi
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movne
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movpl
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movvc
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movvs
The test fails because GCC can't compile asm-flag-1.c anymore:
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /tmp/arm-none-eabi/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc
/tmp/combined-tree-src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -O -ffat-lto-objects -fno-ident -S -o asm-flag-1.s
/tmp/combined-tree-src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: In function
'f':
/tmp/combined-tree-src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c:12:3: error:
'asm' operand has impossible constraints or there are not enough registers
compiler exited with status 1
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/tmp/combined-tree-src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c:12:3: error:
'asm' operand has impossible constraints or there are not enough registers
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movne
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler moveq
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movcs
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movcc
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movmi
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movpl
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movvs
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movvc
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movhi
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movls
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movge
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movls
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movgt
gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c: output file does not exist
UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/arm/asm-flag-1.c scan-assembler movle
I tested on today's trunk (commit 036623196777) and the failures are still
present. I'm attaching the gcc.log file.
Here's how to reproduce on an x86_64-linux machine:
1. First, create a combined tree:
$ mkdir /tmp/combined-tree-src /tmp/combined-tree-build
$ cd ~/src/newlib-cygwin && find . -print | cpio -pdlm /tmp/combined-tree-src
$ cd ~/src/binutils-gdb && find . -print | cpio -pdlmu /tmp/combined-tree-src
$ cd ~/src/gcc && find . -print | cpio -pdlmu /tmp/combined-tree-src
2. Then build and install the cross GCC:
$ cd /tmp/combined-tree-build
$ /tmp/combined-tree-src/configure \
SHELL=/bin/bash \
--with-gnu-as \
--with-gnu-ld \
--disable-libmudflap \
--enable-lto \
--enable-shared \
--without-included-gettext \
--enable-nls \
--with-system-zlib
[Bug c/109708] [c, doc] wdangling-pointer example broken
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109708 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I was wondering if some subsequent patch might have caused the first example to regress rather than this being a documentation bug, but it did not give a diagnostic at the time the -Wdangling-pointer support was committed, either. I'll fiddle with the example a bit to make it better illustrate the difference between level 1 and level 2, as well as making it work.
[Bug fortran/82943] [F03] Error with type-bound procedure of parametrized derived type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943 --- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl --- On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 09:37:17PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943 > > --- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle --- > (In reply to Alexander Westbrooks from comment #15) > > Created attachment 57176 [details] > > Proposed Patch to fix PR82943, PR86148, PR86268 > > I am attempting to roll with this. Steve, do you know where the copyright > assignment forms are? I a,m hunting for them and I asked on the gcc IRC > channel > as well. > I beleive that FSF assignments are not public. It's been along since I dealt with someone getting an assignment. I recall asking someone on the GCC steering committee for confirmation. I haven't dealt with the DCO method.
[Bug web/113525] [11/12/13/14 Regression] GCC does not recognize "-fdump-rtl-sibling" command line option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113525 Mikołaj Piróg changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |web --- Comment #3 from Mikołaj Piróg --- I understand, this explains a lot
[Bug middle-end/113525] [11/12/13/14 Regression] GCC does not recognize "-fdump-rtl-sibling" command line option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113525 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.8.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2024-01-20 Component|other |middle-end Summary|GCC does not recognize |[11/12/13/14 Regression] |"-fdump-rtl-sibling"|GCC does not recognize |command line option |"-fdump-rtl-sibling" ||command line option Target Milestone|--- |11.5 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- It was removed in r0-115834-gbe147e848b387d for GCC 4.8.0 . unshare was also removed at the same time too. Confirmed. Just a documentation not being in sync with the source. Note seqabstr was also removed at r0-92254-g824523999285e7 (for 4.5.0).
[Bug other/113525] GCC does not recognize "-fdump-rtl-sibling" command line option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113525 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The pass named sibling was removed a long time ago but the documentation was not updated ...
[Bug fortran/57360] Implement a warning for implied save
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With this patch,
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
index 503ecb8d9b5..abb3579893f 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
@@ -2278,7 +2278,12 @@ add_init_expr_to_sym (const char *name, gfc_expr
**initp, locus *var_locus)
sym->value = init;
if (sym->attr.save == SAVE_NONE)
- sym->attr.save = SAVE_IMPLICIT;
+ {
+ sym->attr.save = SAVE_IMPLICIT;
+ if (warn_surprising)
+ gfc_warning (OPT_Wsurprising, "Entity %qs at %L has an implicit "
+ "SAVE attribute", sym->name, >declared_at);
+ }
*initp = NULL;
}
I see
% gfcx -o z a.f90 -Wsurprising && ./z
a.f90:2:13:
2 | integer :: i=1
| 1
Warning: Entity ‘i’ at (1) has an implicit SAVE attribute [-Wsurprising]
1
[Bug other/113525] New: GCC does not recognize "-fdump-rtl-sibling" command line option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113525 Bug ID: 113525 Summary: GCC does not recognize "-fdump-rtl-sibling" command line option Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mikolajpirog at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- My GCC config: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13.2.1/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: /build/gcc/src/gcc/configure --enable-languages=ada,c,c++,d,fortran,go,lto,objc,obj-c++ --enable-bootstrap --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-bugurl=https://bugs.archlinux.org/ --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-cet=auto --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-default-ssp --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace --enable-link-serialization=1 --enable-linker-build-id --enable-lto --enable-multilib --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-libssp --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-werror Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 13.2.1 20230801 (GCC) Per section 3.18 of GCC manual, GCC should recognize the "-fdump-rtl-sibling" option. When I try to invoke this option, GCC gives my following error: " g++ -fdump-rtl-sibling test.cc cc1plus: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-fdump-rtl-sibling’ " I am unsure to which component this sort of bugs should go, so I file this under "other" category.
[Bug fortran/82943] [F03] Error with type-bound procedure of parametrized derived type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943 --- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Alexander Westbrooks from comment #15) > Created attachment 57176 [details] > Proposed Patch to fix PR82943, PR86148, PR86268 I am attempting to roll with this. Steve, do you know where the copyright assignment forms are? I a,m hunting for them and I asked on the gcc IRC channel as well.
[Bug other/86656] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=address
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656 Bug 86656 depends on bug 111291, which changed state. Bug 111291 Summary: ASAN error: heap-use-after-free gcc/fortran/parse.cc:359 in decode_statement https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111291 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug fortran/111291] ASAN error: heap-use-after-free gcc/fortran/parse.cc:359 in decode_statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111291 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin --- Fixed for gfortran 14. Closing.
[Bug ipa/113490] [14 Regression] ICE: in propagate_vals_across_arith_jfunc, at ipa-cp.cc:2425 at -O3 since r14-285
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113490 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a fix on the mailing list: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/ri6cytv3eyy.fsf@/T/#u
[Bug other/94629] 10 issues located by the PVS-studio static analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629 --- Comment #28 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #27) > The original article checked gcc-10. > gcc-13 is checked in the following article: > > https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1067/ > > I suspect it would be most unwise if any release of gcc after 13 > introduced new bugs that were known to pvs-studio. And is there already a bugzilla bug about these (or should I create one)? I believe a new one would be better than re-using this one.
[Bug c++/111410] Bogus Wdangling-reference warning with ranges pipe expression in for loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111410 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed for 14.
[Bug c++/111410] Bogus Wdangling-reference warning with ranges pipe expression in for loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111410 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7db802d972e622242d015ecd5a8cecf63e69a45a commit r14-8307-g7db802d972e622242d015ecd5a8cecf63e69a45a Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fri Jan 19 15:27:51 2024 -0500 libstdc++: suppress -Wdangling-reference with operator| [PR111410] It seems to me that we should exclude std::ranges::views::__adaptor::operator| from the -Wdangling-reference warning. It's commonly used when handling ranges. PR c++/111410 libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/std/ranges: Add #pragma to disable -Wdangling-reference with std::ranges::views::__adaptor::operator|. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference17.C: New test.
[Bug c++/104094] Alias template shown in diagnostic with wrong template parameter name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104094 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yeah, maybe this is just a dup of my older bug report. It's been frustrating me for years. And obviously I meant "hash collision" above not "has collision" :-)
[Bug other/94629] 10 issues located by the PVS-studio static analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629 --- Comment #27 from David Binderman --- The original article checked gcc-10. gcc-13 is checked in the following article: https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1067/ I suspect it would be most unwise if any release of gcc after 13 introduced new bugs that were known to pvs-studio.
[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 109744, which changed state. Bug 109744 Summary: mesa/panvk: bogus Warray-bounds on gcc 12.2, fixed in 13 branch https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109744 What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug tree-optimization/109744] mesa/panvk: bogus Warray-bounds on gcc 12.2, fixed in 13 branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109744 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- There is not much to handle here really since the warning is heavily dependent on optimizing including sometimes optimizing out unreachable code. In this case it is now optimized better for GCC 13 getting rid of unreachable code which GCC is warning about.
[Bug ipa/110705] [11/12 Regression] ICE at -O2 and above: in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.cc:6255 (on GCC-12.x)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110705 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17473a93cff5340acfc293299a2f9a5857a50909 commit r14-8306-g17473a93cff5340acfc293299a2f9a5857a50909 Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Sat Jan 20 11:39:11 2024 -0800 ipa: Add testcase for already fixed case [PR110705] This testcase was fixed with r13-1695-gb0f02eeb906b63 which added an Ada testcase for the issue but adding a C testcase is a good idea and that is what this does. Committed after making sure it passes on x86_64-linux-gnu. PR ipa/110705 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr110705-1.c: New test. Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski
[Bug c++/113306] constexpr cast from void* fails with typeid result target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113306 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed||2024-01-20 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Confirmed.
[Bug libgomp/113448] libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c etc. XPASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113448 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- The tests fail on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu: FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-1.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-2.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-3.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/alloc-pinned-4.c execution test
[Bug fortran/113152] Fortran 2023 half-cycle trigonometric functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113152 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56949|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #56950|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #56951|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #56952|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #56956|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 57179 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57179=edit Patch Here is a new patch. It includes an implementation for the half-cycle trigonometric functions as well as fixes for PR113412 -- better error message for atan(y,x) PR113413 -- implement atand(y,x) Here's text that may be suitable formatted for a ChangeLog. gfortran: * gfortran.h (gfc_isym_id): Add GFC_ISYM_ACOSPI, GFC_ISYM_ASINPI, GFC_ISYM_ATANPI, GFC_ISYM_ATAN2PI, GFC_ISYM_COSPI, GFC_ISYM_SINPI, and GFC_ISYM_TANPI * intrinsic.cc (do_check): Whitespace and typo in comments. (add_functions): Add two-argument form of ATAND. Add half-cycle trigonometric functions ACOSPI, ASINPI, ATANPI, ATAN2PI, COSPI, SINPI, and TANPI. (sort_actual): Generate sensible error messages for two argument versions of ATAN, ATAND, and ATANPI. * intrinsic.h: New prototypes for gfc_simplify_acospi, gfc_simplify_asinpi, gfc_simplify_atanpi, gfc_simplify_atan2pi, gfc_simplify_cospi, gfc_simplify_sinpi, gfc_simplify_tanpi, gfc_resolve_acospi, gfc_resolve_asinpi, gfc_resolve_atanpi, gfc_resolve_atan2pi, gfc_resolve_cospi, gfc_resolve_sinpi, and gfc_resolve_tanpi * intrinsic.texi: Document new functions ACOSPI, ASINPI, ATANPI, ATAN2PI, COSPI, SINPI, and TANPI. Put the ATAN* family of functions in lexigraphical order. * iresolve.cc (gfc_resolve_acospi, gfc_resolve_asinpi, gfc_resolve_atanpi, gfc_resolve_atan2pi, gfc_resolve_cospi, gfc_resolve_sinpi, gfc_resolve_tanpi): New functions. * simplify.cc (gfc_simplify_acospi, gfc_simplify_asinpi, gfc_simplify_atanpi, gfc_simplify_atan2pi, gfc_simplify_cospi, gfc_simplify_sinpi, gfc_simplify_tanpi): New functions. Introduce MPFR_HALF_CYCLE macros to use MPFR half-cycle functions if available. * trans-intrinsic.cc: Declare asinpi, acospi, atanpi, atan2pi, sinpi, cospi, and tanpi as LIB_FUNCTION's. libgfortran *Makefile.am: New files trigpi.c, trigpi_fallback1.c, and trigpi_fallback2.F90 * configure.ac: Check libm for float, double, and long double functions for asinpi, acospi, atanpi, atan2pi, sinpi, cospi, and tanpi * Makefile.in: Regenerated. * config.h.in: Ditto. * configure: Ditto. * gfortran.map: Add GFORTRAN_14 section to expose the library symbols. * trigpi.c: Fallback implementations of the half-cycle trigonometric functions. * trigpi_fallback1.c: Fallback functions for float, double, and long double routines if libm does provide them. * trigpi_fallback2.F90: REAL(16)/REAL(17) fallback implementations of the half-cycle trigonometric functions.
[Bug fortran/86268] [9.0] Error on correct code with PDTs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86268 Alexander Westbrooks changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ctechnodev at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from Alexander Westbrooks --- Created attachment 57178 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57178=edit Proposed Patch to fix PR82943, PR86148, PR86268
[Bug fortran/86148] parameterized type compile time error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86148 Alexander Westbrooks changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ctechnodev at gmail dot com --- Comment #6 from Alexander Westbrooks --- Created attachment 57177 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57177=edit Proposed Patch to fix PR82943, PR86148, PR86268
[Bug fortran/57360] Implement a warning for implied save
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360 --- Comment #5 from Walter Spector --- IMHO this should be a "surprising" warning when -Wsurprising is specified. The message should suggest adding an explicit SAVE attribute to make the code clear.
[Bug fortran/82943] [F03] Error with type-bound procedure of parametrized derived type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943 --- Comment #15 from Alexander Westbrooks --- Created attachment 57176 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57176=edit Proposed Patch to fix PR82943, PR86148, PR86268
[Bug c++/104094] Alias template shown in diagnostic with wrong template parameter name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104094 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > _Pattern is used in lazy_split_view, split_view and join_view, none of which > are used at all by `ranges::to`. Is there some has collision going on here > when the pretty printer finds names? Does it need an additional > disambiguation step if more than one name is found? Maybe that is PR 66968 (or PR 99) which I see are already linked here?
[Bug tree-optimization/113026] Bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning on simple memcpy type loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113026 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug c/113524] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for bogus messages, line 10)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113524 Bug ID: 113524 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for bogus messages, line 10) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Host: hppa*-*-linux* Target: hppa*-*-linux* Build: hppa*-*-linux* spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/home/dave/gnu/gcc/obj dir/gcc/ /home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c -fdiag nostics-plain-output -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions -Wall -S -o pr113026-1.s /home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c: In function 'foo': /home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c:10:12: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=] /home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c:4:6: note: at offset 16 into destination object 'dst' of size 16 FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for bogus messages, line 10) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr113026-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (test for excess errors) Only occurs at -O3.
[Bug c/111693] -Wuse-after-free is documented in the wrong location
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111693 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/112804] ICE in aarch64 crosscompiler in plus_constant, at explow.cc:102 with -mabi=ilp32 and -finline-stringops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112804 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/112734] ICE verify_gimple failed since r14-3751-g8c984a1c3693df - BitInt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/110265] RISC-V: ICE when build RVV intrinsic integer reduction with "-march=rv32gc_zve64d -mabi=ilp32d", both GCC 14 and 13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110265 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug other/110205] Some new warnings from clang for the range code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110205 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/109811] libjxl 0.7 is a lot slower in GCC 13.1 vs Clang 16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109811 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug c/110029] more precise documentation for cleanup attribute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110029 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/109615] Redundant VSETVL after optimized code of RVV
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109615 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/109253] libbpf: failed to find BTF info for global/extern symbol '__divdi3'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109253 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/108640] ICE compiling busybox for m68k in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.cc:2283
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108640 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/108521] gcc/doc/invoke.texi contains remnants of Cygwin options removed in 2010-10-07
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108521 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug ipa/108470] Missing documentation for alternate uses of __attribute__((noinline))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108470 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/107839] spurious "may be used uninitialized" warning while all uses are under "if (c)"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107839 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3
[Bug testsuite/106682] Powerpc test gcc.target/powerpc/pr86731-fwrapv-longlong.c fails on power8, passes on power9/power10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106682 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0
[Bug testsuite/106516] New test case gcc.dg/pr104992.c fails on power 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106516 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0
[Bug analyzer/106229] False positives from -Wanalyzer-tainted-array-index with unsigned char index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106229 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Keywords||diagnostic
[Bug rtl-optimization/106187] armhf: Miscompilation at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.4
[Bug analyzer/106147] RFE: -fanalyzer could complain about some cases of infinite loops and infinite recursion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106147 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Keywords||diagnostic
[Bug target/105525] some targets don't define __INTPTR_TYPE__ breaking libgcov-driver.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105525 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/104401] [x86] Failure to recognize min/max pattern using pcmp+pblendv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104401 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug c/102998] Wrong documentation for -Warray-parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102998 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug middle-end/104355] Misleading -Warray-bounds documentation says "always out of bounds"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104355 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0
[Bug target/99888] Add powerpc ELFv2 support for -fpatchable-function-entry*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99888 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0
[Bug c++/99701] std::nullptr_t can be compared with relational ops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99701 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0
[Bug rtl-optimization/96388] scheduling takes forever with -fPIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96388 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/96176] Failure to omit extraneous movzx in atomic compare exchange with unsigned char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96176 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0
[Bug tree-optimization/95424] Failure to optimize division with numerator of 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0
[Bug other/94629] 10 issues located by the PVS-studio static analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94629 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug testsuite/94253] FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_coms.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94253 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/86724] Compilation error with new isl 0.20 (missing includes)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86724 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4
[Bug debug/84645] -flto -g0 at compile-time vs. -flto -g at link time ICEs in add_dwarf_attr, at dwarf2out.c:4353
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0
[Bug c++/87699] Implement CWG 1512
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87699 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113463] ICE: in extended_tree, at tree.h:6449 with _BitInt() used as offset
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113463 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113102] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: SIGSEGV with _BitInt() at -O1 or -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113102 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/30271] -mstrict-align can add an store extra for struct argument passing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30271 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113491] ICE: SIGSEGV in make_ssa_name_fn (tree-ssanames.cc:354) at -Os with _BitInt() used as switch control expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113491 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113462] ICE: in handle_cast, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:1539 at -O with _BitInt() in a struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113462 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113464] ICE: in lower_asm, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5200 with invalid __asm__ on _BitInt() at -O1 and above
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113464 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113421] wrong code with -O -fno-tree-fre and _BitInt() multiplication
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113421 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug middle-end/113410] ICE: in maybe_check_access_sizes, at gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc:3423 with _BitInt() used as array length
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113410 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug middle-end/113409] ICE: in omp_extract_for_data, at omp-general.cc:411 with -fopenmp-simd and _BitInt()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113409 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113408] ICE: in handle_cast, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:1539 at -O with _BitInt()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113408 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug middle-end/113406] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:85 with -fstrub=internal and _BitInt() (and __GIMPLE wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113406 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113372] wrong code with _BitInt() arithmetics at -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113372 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/113393] RISC-V: Full coverage test bugs for upstream 20240112
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113393 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113361] wrong code with __builtin_mul_overflow_p() and _BitInt() at -O0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113361 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug c++/113389] ICE when explicit object parameter is not declared as the first parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113389 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113330] ICE: verify_gimple failed: conversion of register to a different size in 'view_convert_expr' with -O -fstack-check=generic and _BitInt()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113330 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug target/113324] internal compiler error: in reload_combine_note_use, at postreload.c:1534
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113324 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113323] ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113323 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113316] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: SIGSEGV in var_to_partition (tree-ssa-live.h:163) at -O with uninitialized _BitInt() function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113316 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug c/113315] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower0 ICE: in lower_mergeable_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2310 with _BitInt() used as array index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113315 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug tree-optimization/113459] ICE: in as_a, at machmode.h:381 with memset() on a _BitInt() at -O1 and above
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113459 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0
[Bug c/102998] Wrong documentation for -Warray-parameter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102998 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed.
[Bug fortran/111291] ASAN error: heap-use-after-free gcc/fortran/parse.cc:359 in decode_statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111291 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6930e1f1055c39bea170c25f694f7301989e5d1d commit r14-8305-g6930e1f1055c39bea170c25f694f7301989e5d1d Author: Mikael Morin Date: Fri Jan 19 18:47:36 2024 +0100 fortran: Restore current interface info on error [PR111291] This change is a followup to the fix for PR48776 (namely r14-3572-gd58150452976c4ca65ddc811fac78ef956fa96b0 AKA fortran: Restore interface to its previous state on error [PR48776]), which cleaned up new changes from interfaces upon error. Unfortunately, there is one case in that fix that is mishandled, visible on unexpected_interface.f90 with valgrind or an asan-instrumented gfortran. when an interface statement is found while parsing an interface body (which is invalid), the current interface is replaced by the one from the new statement, and as parsing continues, new procedures are added to the new interface, which has been rejected and freed, instead of the original one. This change restores the current interface pointer to its previous value on each rejected statement. PR fortran/48776 PR fortran/111291 gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * parse.cc: Restore current interface to its previous value on error.
[Bug fortran/48776] ICE(segfault) after -std=f95 diagnostic error involving PROCEDURE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48776 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6930e1f1055c39bea170c25f694f7301989e5d1d commit r14-8305-g6930e1f1055c39bea170c25f694f7301989e5d1d Author: Mikael Morin Date: Fri Jan 19 18:47:36 2024 +0100 fortran: Restore current interface info on error [PR111291] This change is a followup to the fix for PR48776 (namely r14-3572-gd58150452976c4ca65ddc811fac78ef956fa96b0 AKA fortran: Restore interface to its previous state on error [PR48776]), which cleaned up new changes from interfaces upon error. Unfortunately, there is one case in that fix that is mishandled, visible on unexpected_interface.f90 with valgrind or an asan-instrumented gfortran. when an interface statement is found while parsing an interface body (which is invalid), the current interface is replaced by the one from the new statement, and as parsing continues, new procedures are added to the new interface, which has been rejected and freed, instead of the original one. This change restores the current interface pointer to its previous value on each rejected statement. PR fortran/48776 PR fortran/111291 gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * parse.cc: Restore current interface to its previous value on error.
[Bug c/113438] ICE (segfault) in dwarf2out_decl with -g -std=c23 on c23-tag-composite-2.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113438 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-*-* | --- Comment #3 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Not aarch64 specific.
[Bug c/113492] ICE: in composite_type_internal, at c/c-typeck.cc:557 with -std=c2x -funsigned-bitfields since r14-6808
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113492 --- Comment #11 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 57175 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57175=edit patch Untested patch.
