[Bug c/99127] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8026 (during RTL pass: expand) at -O1 or higher on hppa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99127
--- Comment #6 from Kurt Miller ---
For clarity, I see now there are two reduced test cases. My test patch fixed
the initial reduced test case but not the second one.
apoc$ cat pr99127.i
int c_pow_r_1, c_pow_r_0, c_pow_phase;
void
c_pow() {
c_pow_r_0 = __builtin_cos(c_pow_phase);
c_pow_r_1 = __builtin_sin(c_pow_phase);
}
apoc$ egcc -c -O1 -o pr99127.o pr99127.i
apoc$
apoc$ cat pr99127a.i
int c_pow_r_1, c_pow_r_0, c_pow_phase;
void
c_pow() {
_Complex double r = __builtin_cexpi(c_pow_phase);
c_pow_r_0 = __real__ r;
c_pow_r_1 = __imag__ r;
}
apoc$ egcc -c -O1 -o pr99127a.o pr99127a.i
during RTL pass: expand
pr99127a.i: In function 'c_pow':
pr99127a.i:5:23: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at
expr.c:8026
_Complex double r = __builtin_cexpi(c_pow_phase);
^~~~
libbacktrace could not find executable to open
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See
[Bug c/99127] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8026 (during RTL pass: expand) at -O1 or higher on hppa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99127
--- Comment #5 from Kurt Miller ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> So, do you get the ICE with
> int c_pow_r_1, c_pow_r_0, c_pow_phase;
>
> void
> c_pow() {
> _Complex double r = __builtin_cexpi(c_pow_phase);
> c_pow_r_0 = __real__ r;
> c_pow_r_1 = __imag__ r;
> }
> too?
I made the following change to the 8.4.0 port:
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c
--- gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c.orig
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c
@@ -1922,7 +1922,11 @@ class pass_cse_sincos : public gimple_opt_pass (public
{
/* We no longer require either sincos or cexp, since powi expansion
piggybacks on this pass. */
+#if defined(__hppa__)
+ return false;
+#else
return optimize;
+#endif
}
virtual unsigned int execute (function *);
I know this is not correct for cross compiling but I'm building native on hppa.
That change fixed the python builds but does not fix the reduced test case
above.
apoc$ egcc -c -O1 -o hppatest.o hppatest.c
apoc$
apoc$ egcc -c -O1 -o pr99127.o pr99127.i
during RTL pass: expand
pr99127.i: In function 'c_pow':
pr99127.i:5:23: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at
expr.c:8026
_Complex double r = __builtin_cexpi(c_pow_phase);
^~~~
libbacktrace could not find executable to open
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See
[Bug c/99127] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8026 (during RTL pass: expand) at -O1 or higher on hppa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99127 --- Comment #3 from Kurt Miller --- Changing the gate function to return false does work-around the python ICEs.
[Bug c/99127] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8026 (during RTL pass: expand) at -O1 or higher on hppa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99127 Kurt Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kurt at intricatesoftware dot com --- Comment #1 from Kurt Miller --- Created attachment 50208 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50208=edit testcase preprocessed
[Bug c/99127] New: ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8026 (during RTL pass: expand) at -O1 or higher on hppa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99127 Bug ID: 99127 Summary: ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8026 (during RTL pass: expand) at -O1 or higher on hppa Product: gcc Version: 8.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kurt at intricatesoftware dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50207 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50207=edit testcase gcc-8.4.0-hppa-unknown-openbsd6.8 ICEs when compiling Python 2.7, 3.8 & 3.9 on hppa. I've partially reduced one example in the attachments. Reducing optimization level to -O0 does not hit the ICE. egcc -c -O1 -o hppatest.o hppatest.c during RTL pass: expand hppatest.c: In function 'c_pow': hppatest.c:12:1: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:8026 c_pow(Py_complex a, Py_complex b) ^ libbacktrace could not find executable to open
[Bug c++/99115] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2309 on alpha (error: unrecognizable insn) with -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99115 Kurt Miller changed: What|Removed |Added Target||alpha-unknown-openbsd6.8 CC||kurt at intricatesoftware dot com --- Comment #2 from Kurt Miller --- This ICE is on alpha (not hppa).
[Bug c++/99115] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2309 on hppa (error: unrecognizable insn) with -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99115 --- Comment #1 from Kurt Miller --- Created attachment 50192 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50192=edit testcase preprocessed
[Bug c++/99115] New: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2309 on hppa (error: unrecognizable insn) with -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99115 Bug ID: 99115 Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2309 on hppa (error: unrecognizable insn) with -O2 Product: gcc Version: 8.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kurt at intricatesoftware dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50191 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50191=edit testcase Noticed while compiling src/deps_log.cc ninja 1.10.2 on hppa. I trimmed down the file to test.cc. g++ -O2 -c ./test.cc -o test.o ./test.cc: In member function 'LoadStatus DepsLog::Load(const string&, State*, std::__cxx11::string*)': ./test.cc:176:1: error: unrecognizable insn: } ^ (insn 218 217 219 25 (set (reg:DI 217) (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 65 virtual-stack-vars) (const_int -524292 [0xfff7fffc]))) "./test.cc":122 -1 (nil)) during RTL pass: vregs ./test.cc:176:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2309
