[Bug other/42980] GCC parallel make install failures

2011-06-22 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42980

--- Comment #15 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-22 
21:35:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
 Seems fixed.  If so, please close.  If not, please summarize remaining issues.

The patches in comments #8 and #10 are essentially unfixed, IIRC.  #10 needs an
update to Automake, that then needs propagated to GCC.  This update changes
multilib handling semantics slightly.

I'm not sure if there are other problems with parallel install, but at that
time I didn't see any others at least.


[Bug libstdc++/36231] ostream includes unistd.h outside namespace std, polluting

2011-04-20 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36231

--- Comment #17 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-20 
23:10:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
 The last time I checked, the problem boiled down to:
 
   typedef __gthread_mutex_t __c_lock;
 
 in c_io_stdio.h, which we cannot remove right away for ABI reasons, because we
 have a __c_lock data member in iostream classes. Of course the member is
 normally completely unused these days, thus a possible ABI-safe way to attack
 the problem would be replacing the data member with a dummy member of the same
 size and alignment, the equivalent of:
[...]

 In order to figure out those quantities, ie, sizeof(__gthread_mutex_t) and
 __alignof__(__gthread_mutex_t) we could probably use something like
 [GLIBCXX_COMPUTE_STDIO_INTEGER_CONSTANTS], Ralf, people, what do you think?

It is possible to compute size and alignment of types using Autoconf tests
(even when cross-compiling), yes, with AC_CHECK_SIZEOF and AC_CHECK_ALIGNOF. 
But you are in a much better position to decide whether that is really
sufficient here to solve all pending issues why the headers are dragged in. 
Thanks.


[Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'

2011-03-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-02 
05:49:25 UTC ---
dje, you marked this PR as NEW.  Why?  Michael didn't confirm it with pristine
GCC.  If you can reproduce it yourself, please reread and follow comment #1. 
Thanks.


[Bug regression/47836] Some Cross Compiler can't build target-libiberty or target-zlib

2011-03-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836

--- Comment #11 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-02 
05:57:38 UTC ---
The automatic enabling of zlib was turned on by revision 152434, a merge of the
lto branch.  It seems you can use --disable-lto or --with-system-zlib to
disable a target zlib from being built.

Haven't looked at libiberty yet.


[Bug other/42560] include-fixed incomplete when srcdir=builddir

2011-02-28 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42560

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed||2011.02.28 20:57:37
 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-28 
20:57:37 UTC ---
I think this bug is a duplicate of PR 35619, and thus fixed in trunk since
revision 151880.  If you could recheck, that would be lovely.  Thanks!


[Bug regression/47836] Some Cross Compiler can't build target-libiberty or target-zlib

2011-02-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836

--- Comment #7 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-26 
15:34:12 UTC ---
It should generally work to pass --disable-target-zlib, and similar for other
target directories, as workarounds.  If it doesn't work, that's worth a bug
report (please open a separate one in that case, and link from this one). 
Thanks.


[Bug other/47869] fatal error: build/gencondmd.c: No such file or directory

2011-02-25 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47869

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-25 
15:52:14 UTC ---
Which make version are you using?  How exactly did you invoke make (-jN)? 
Thanks.


[Bug web/47718] bugzilla: commit mails mentioning binutils PR wrongly linked to GCC bug

2011-02-19 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47718

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX

--- Comment #7 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 
15:12:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
 So if I understand correctly, this case is rare enough to not care?

Hmm, I guess so.  Bummer.  Anyway, thanks Andreas for proving me wrong in
thinking that this used to work.  Closing as wontfix.


[Bug target/40959] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] FreeBSD/ia64 build fails: No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'.

2011-02-19 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40959

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #23 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 
17:49:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
 The error for 46 is this:
 
 *skip*
[...]
 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/gcc46.
 *** Error code 1

Unfortunately, you skipped too much: the text you quoted does not contain an
error message.  Please go back and post the very first error message that shows
up in the output log.  Thanks.


[Bug web/47718] bugzilla: commit mails mentioning binutils PR wrongly linked to GCC bug

2011-02-17 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47718

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2011.02.18 07:52:04
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-18 
07:52:04 UTC ---
You don't see many complaints because it is rare that a patch mentions a
binutils (or gdb) PR and is committed to both the GCC and the src repository. 
Those are typically patches to toplevel or other synced files, IOW often build
system patches.

It is not a big problem (I mean, it's probably the most annoying for the people
involved in said old bug reports), but I'm pretty sure that this used to work.


[Bug web/47718] New: bugzilla: commit mails mentioning binutils PR wrongly linked to GCC bug

2011-02-13 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47718

   Summary: bugzilla: commit mails mentioning binutils PR wrongly
linked to GCC bug
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: web
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rw...@gcc.gnu.org


Version control commits that refer to PR's in binutils (or other components of
src for that matter) should not get auto-added to the bug with the same number
in the GCC bugzilla.  See here for an example:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12283#c6


[Bug rtl-optimization/12283] profiledbootstrap fails (file resource.gcda not found)

2011-02-13 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12283

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-13 
14:42:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
[...]
 PR binutils/12283
 * move-if-change: Import version from gnulib.

Sorry, this mail should not have been added to this PR.  See PR 47718.


[Bug rtl-optimization/12283] profiledbootstrap fails (file resource.gcda not found)

2011-02-12 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12283

--- Comment #6 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-12 
15:48:34 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Sat Feb 12 15:48:30 2011
New Revision: 170076

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170076
Log:
Import move-if-change script from gnulib.

/:
PR binutils/12283
* move-if-change: Import version from gnulib.

Modified:
trunk/ChangeLog
trunk/move-if-change


[Bug target/47032] libgfortran references complex long double functions missing on AIX

2011-02-03 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47032

--- Comment #7 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-04 
05:16:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 libgfortran/configure.ac has lines of the form (note I wrapped the line)
 
 AC_CHECK_LIB([m],[copysignl],[AC_DEFINE([HAVE_COPYSIGNL],[1],\
[libm includes copysignl])])
 
 So, configure is already checking if libm contains the
 the long double functions.  The problem appears to be
 that AC_CHECK_LIB is a compile only test, and these tests
 appear to pass on AIX.

AC_CHECK_LIB uses a link test, not a compile test.


[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2011-02-03 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

--- Comment #24 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-04 
05:52:01 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Fri Feb  4 05:51:57 2011
New Revision: 169822

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169822
Log:
Fix PR java/21206: Unrecognized option '-Wl,-rpath' for jv-convert

libjava/:
PR java/21206
* configure.ac (LDLIBICONV): New substituted variable, with
instances of '-Wl,' removed from LIBICONV.
* configure: Regenerate.
* libgcj.spec.in: Use @LDLIBICONV@ not @LIBICONV@.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* gcj/Makefile.in: Likewise.
* include/Makefile.in: Likewise.
* testsuite/Makefile.in: Likewise.

Modified:
trunk/libjava/ChangeLog
trunk/libjava/Makefile.in
trunk/libjava/configure
trunk/libjava/configure.ac
trunk/libjava/gcj/Makefile.in
trunk/libjava/include/Makefile.in
trunk/libjava/libgcj.spec.in
trunk/libjava/testsuite/Makefile.in


[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2011-01-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot   |rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
   |gnu.org |

--- Comment #23 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29 
11:20:44 UTC ---
Proposed patch at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02172.html
Feedback appreciated.  Thanks.


[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

2011-01-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495

--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29 
11:48:04 UTC ---
For starters it would be nice if gfortran would even document its precise
semantics for when module files are created/updated/etc.  I'm sure these
semantics are not identical across Fortran compilers.  This is PR 42607.


[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

2011-01-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495

--- Comment #8 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29 
12:20:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
 b) A .mod file is read when a USE statement is encountered; the file must 
 exist
 and is searched for in the include search paths.

With any kind of module?  Even special-case ones like iso_c_binding?

 c) If a MODULE is compiled again, but an existing .mod file would not change,
 the file modification date is not modified.
 
 d) Module files (.mod) contain the public procedure interfaces, type
 declarations and module variables of the module, including those made
 accessible via USE statements within the module

And are not compatible across major/minor/any compiler release/version?

 I think it would be useful to give an example Makefile file in the manual.
 Joost's solution (comment 2) seems to work fine, though I am not sure how
 protable to non-Unix platforms the @true is.

The @ specifier is portable make, 'true' is Posix but ':' is better as it is a
shell builtin command that does not fork.  Pattern rules '%.foo: %.bar' however
are a GNU make feature not portable to Posix make, unlike inference rules
.bar.foo: which are portable but do not automatically chain (and have a couple
of other limitations).

Rules of the form
  a b : c
   commands ...

do *not* designate rules that update a and b at the same time.  Rather, they
designate two distinct rules, one for a, and one for b, that happen to have the
same prerequisites and commands.  If you want one rule to update multiple
outputs, see 
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Multiple-Outputs.html
(and no, that bit of the manual is *not* autotools-specific, so go somewhere
else with any flames please).  Unfortunately that chapter still lacks info how
to cope well in the presence of 'make -n', this is only fixed in git Automake.


[Bug fortran/47495] .mod files: File modification time - Makefile build issue

2011-01-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495

--- Comment #11 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-29 
13:28:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
  If you want one rule to update multiple outputs, see 
  http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Multiple-Outputs.html
 
 That sounds as if a huge number of lines is needed *per file* if one wants to
 be compatible with POSIX make and avoid compilation cascades. :-(

Which is one of the reasons I would like to see such rules be generated (e.g.,
by automake or your generator of choice).  In order to write a correct rule
generator the exact semantics must be known (and of course, we would like to
abstract away as much as possible the different semantics from different
Fortran compilers).


[Bug go/47515] Issues porting libgo to IRIX 6.5

2011-01-28 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47515

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-28 
18:53:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
 * Building libgo still depends on a linker supporting --whole-archive, but SGI
   ld doesn't and GNU ld doesn't work due to PR target/43533.

libtool abstracts --whole-archive when libtool convenience archives are used,
and it can create relocatable objects.  As a cheap way to exploit that you
could amend BUILDGOX to create a little convenience archive .la file.  Or let
BUILDARCHIVE build an actual .la convenience archive, that's even easier.  Hmm,
there is even a rule to create %.la from %.a, why all this going backwards
trying to hack around libtool when it can do the job?

libtool also has a pending patch abstracting -Bstatic/-Bdynamic by the way.


[Bug libfortran/46607] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran relocated install fails

2011-01-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607

--- Comment #7 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-25 
06:40:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
 I would note incidentally a suggestion (comment #3) to work around the 
 general libtool bug on MinGW by stopping it relinking on MinGW.  I don't 
 believe there's any good reason for it to be relinking for GCC builds to 
 ELF targets either, so perhaps stopping relinking there would help avoid 
 this problem in many more cases.

But there is a good reason to relink on ELF: uninstalled libraries and
executables get DT_RPATH entries against uninstalled libraries they depend on,
so that uninstalled programs can be executed in a test suite before installing
the libraries they depend on.  Removing (or replacing) those DT_RPATH entries
is the point of relinking.  That GCC takes care of the uninstalled paths in
some other way as well is something libtool cannot know.


[Bug bootstrap/45174] Make fails in zlib

2011-01-17 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45174

--- Comment #28 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 
07:10:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
 I'm seeing the same problem with gcc 4.6 trunk (r168937) for building a cross
 compiler with target arm-unknown-eabi configured with newlib in tree.  The
 crucial bit is --enable-multilib, without this option the problem is not
 reproducible.

You shouldn't ever need to pass --enable-multilib explicitly to toplevel
configure, as multilib is enabled by default.  On top of that, there is a bug
currently in that explicit --enable-multilib is handled wrongly, see PR 43328.


[Bug bootstrap/42566] Bootstrap fails in stage3 building the libstdc++ PCH

2011-01-14 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42566

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed||2011.01.15 07:07:08
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #11 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-15 
07:07:08 UTC ---
Setting state to WAITING, as this PR lacks feedback for this:

 This looks like http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg00650.html.
 To confirm, please throw away your build tree once, build, then proceed as
 described in above mail (adjusting $target etc).


[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2011-01-10 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bjg at gnu dot org

--- Comment #21 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 
18:39:28 UTC ---
*** Bug 42524 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug java/42524] gcc-4.4.2 build fails on gcj with unrecognized option '-Wl,-rpath'

2011-01-10 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42524

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 
18:39:28 UTC ---
Wow, this is an old bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 21206 ***


[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2011-01-10 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Last reconfirmed|2005-07-26 23:31:49 |2011-01-10
 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  Known to fail||4.6.0

--- Comment #22 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 
18:45:30 UTC ---
Reconfirming based on http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-01/msg00094.html.


[Bug target/45258] linkage on -ldl, -lm and -lpthread should be purged from darwin build

2011-01-10 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45258

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||howarth at nitro dot
   ||med.uc.edu

--- Comment #11 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 
19:05:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
 Posted patches to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg00886.html and
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg00887.html.

Jack, based on the above, can this be closed now?  Thanks.


[Bug target/33637] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] checking for nm: test: too many arguments causes Undefined symbol: __gxx_personality_v0

2011-01-10 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33637

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ltg at zes dot
   ||uni-bremen.de

--- Comment #17 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 
19:08:09 UTC ---
*** Bug 38546 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug bootstrap/38546] configure: too many arguments

2011-01-10 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38546

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 
19:08:09 UTC ---
Yep, this is a dupe.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 33637 ***


[Bug objc/47229] New: Objective C and C++ compiler frontends

2011-01-09 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47229

   Summary: Objective C and C++ compiler frontends
   Product: gcc
   Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: P3
 Component: objc
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rw...@gcc.gnu.org


It would be nice to have gobjc and gobjc++ compiler driver binaries that would
only be installed if Objective C or C++, respectively, were enabled at build
time.  This would very much simplify configure tests addressing the question
do I have an Objective C(++) compiler, possibly cross-compiling, and possibly
not yet able to link successfully.

Thanks,
Ralf


[Bug fortran/47174] libquadmath: Build now depends on makeinfo

2011-01-06 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47174

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2011.01.06 19:15:08
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-06 
19:15:08 UTC ---
Confirmed.  Proposed patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00316.html.


[Bug fortran/47182] libquadmath.texi: undefined flag: BUGURL

2011-01-06 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47182

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-06 
19:38:41 UTC ---
The first patch looks wrong for multilib configurations.
The second patch looks ok to me, but I haven't tested it extensively.


[Bug bootstrap/47147] gcc 4.6 fails to compile on NetBSD

2011-01-06 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-06 
19:40:57 UTC ---
Can you attach output of the failing command when '-o FILE' is removed and -c
is replaced with -E?  And please post the full failing command, the one you
posted has '; else true; fi' but no 'if' part.  Thanks.


[Bug fortran/47174] libquadmath: Build now depends on makeinfo

2011-01-06 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47174

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-06 
22:09:44 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Thu Jan  6 22:09:41 2011
New Revision: 168555

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168555
Log:
Fix PR fortran/47174

libquadmath/:
PR fortran/47174
* Makefile.am (libquadmath.info): Unconditionally override
target, not only if BUILD_LIBQUADMATH.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* configure.ac (AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE): Add -Wno-override option to
avoid warning from automake.

Modified:
trunk/libquadmath/ChangeLog
trunk/libquadmath/Makefile.am
trunk/libquadmath/Makefile.in
trunk/libquadmath/configure.ac


[Bug fortran/47174] libquadmath: Build now depends on makeinfo

2011-01-06 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47174

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-06 
22:10:54 UTC ---
Fixed.


[Bug libstdc++/47052] make: *** [configure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1 Cross compile GCC for Alpha Architecture

2010-12-30 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47052

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-30 
17:03:57 UTC ---
GCC 4.0.2 is old and not actively maintained any more.  Can you reproduce the
problem with version 4.3.5 or newer, ideally with trunk?


[Bug bootstrap/47027] a-stwiun.ads:441:80: (style) this line is too long

2010-12-20 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47027

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot   |rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
   |gnu.org |

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-20 
17:25:39 UTC ---
I'll fix that presently.


[Bug bootstrap/47027] a-stwiun.ads:441:80: (style) this line is too long

2010-12-20 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47027

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-20 
17:32:17 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Mon Dec 20 17:32:06 2010
New Revision: 168089

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168089
Log:
Fix PR bootstrap/47027.

gcc/ada/:
PR bootstrap/47027
* a-stwiun-shared.ads: Rewrap overlong comment line.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/ada/a-stwiun-shared.ads


[Bug bootstrap/47027] a-stwiun.ads:441:80: (style) this line is too long

2010-12-20 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47027

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-20 
17:38:21 UTC ---
Fixed.  Sorry again for the breakage.


[Bug fortran/46797] libquadmath: make install relinks libgfortran

2010-12-19 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46797

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID

--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-19 
12:27:49 UTC ---
Closing as invalid.  Issues resulting from the relinking behavior are tracked
in PR 46607.

Thanks.


[Bug libgcj/40947] Invalid flag usage: Wl,-rpath, -Wx,-option must appear after -_SYSTYPE_SVR4

2010-12-15 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40947

--- Comment #5 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-15 
19:23:05 UTC ---
Can you attach alphaev68-dec-osf5.1a/libjava/config.log for this failure
please?
Thanks.


[Bug target/46891] Can't build libquadmath for i386-elf target

2010-12-14 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46891

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed||2010.12.14 20:08:17
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Severity|blocker |normal

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-14 
20:08:17 UTC ---
Marking as waiting, reducing severity as long as the PR lacks any details.


[Bug target/45084] configure: error: no 8-bit type

2010-12-13 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45084

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID

--- Comment #13 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 
16:41:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
 Created attachment 22743 [details]
 libstdc++-v3\config.log

There's your problem:

configure:4197: checking for /cygdrive/c/data/gcc/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/cygdrive/c/data/gcc/gcc-build/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/powerpc-ibm-eabi/bin/
-B/usr/local/powerpc-ibm-eabi/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/powerpc-ibm-eabi/include
-isystem /usr/local/powerpc-ibm-eabi/sys-includeoption to accept ISO C89
configure:4261: /cygdrive/c/data/gcc/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/cygdrive/c/data/gcc/gcc-build/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/powerpc-ibm-eabi/bin/
-B/usr/local/powerpc-ibm-eabi/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/powerpc-ibm-eabi/include
-isystem /usr/local/powerpc-ibm-eabi/sys-include -c -g -O2  conftest.c 5
conftest.c:10:19: fatal error: stdio.h: No such file or directory

Is there a stdio.h header file in /usr/local/powerpc-ibm-eabi/include or
/usr/local/powerpc-ibm-eabi/sys-include?  If not, please install the required C
library header files or package.

I'm marking this PR as invalid, as it is not a GCC bug.  Thanks.


[Bug target/46891] Can't build libquadmath for i386-elf target

2010-12-13 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46891

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 
16:43:21 UTC ---
You fail to describe what This issue is, including lots of details that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ would like you to provide.


[Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'

2010-12-13 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 
16:46:54 UTC ---
Does this actually hit you any time?  If yes, please post configure command
line, and cut and paste error and command(s) that caused it, and whether the
obvious fix lets the build succeed where it did not before.  Thanks.

The ltcf* and ltconfig stuff is so old and outdated, I didn't think it was used
anywhere in the tree any more.


[Bug fortran/46797] libquadmath: make install relinks libgfortran

2010-12-13 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46797

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 
16:53:41 UTC ---
Well, I'd say works as it should: relinking is used to avoid run paths to
in-tree directories.  What am I missing here?  Thanks.


[Bug libfortran/46607] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran relocated install fails

2010-12-13 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 
16:57:27 UTC ---
So is this only about the MinGW case?  Because there, we should just fix
libtool to not ever relink.

The more general issue described in comment #1 is a long-standing limitation of
libtool.


[Bug libfortran/46720] [4.6 Regression] missing quadmath_weak.h with --enable-maintainer-mode

2010-12-13 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46720

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 
17:17:08 UTC ---
Is this still an issue (with the correct Automake version installed)?  Thanks.


[Bug target/45084] configure: error: no 8-bit type

2010-12-09 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45084

--- Comment #10 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-09 
20:58:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
 ../gcc-4.5.0/configure --target=powerpc-ibm-eabi --with-newlib --disable-nls
 --disable-multilib i686-ibm-cygwin
 
 ...
 checking stdbool.h usability... no
 checking stdbool.h presence... yes
 configure: WARNING: stdbool.h: present but cannot be compiled

Please take a look at the config.log file that corresponds to the above output
(I suppose that is m68k-elf/libstdc++-v3/config.log ?) and find the compile
error caused by use of stdbool.h.  Cut'n'paste the compile command and error
here, please.  Maybe it's clear then how to proceed.  Thanks.


[Bug lto/45638] No rule to make target `check-lto', needed by `check'. Stop.

2010-12-03 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45638

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-03 
16:54:24 UTC ---
Fixed, as far as I can see.


[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

2010-11-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328

--- Comment #19 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-21 
08:28:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
 what's the current status of the --{dis/en}able-multilib switches?

As far as I know that of from before this PR: enabled multilib is the default
(if you don't pass any option), and you can disable that by passing
--disable-multilib.  So the only thing to remember is not to pass
--enable-multilib explicitly.

 afaics at least the --disable-multilib is ignored on 4.5/4.6 svn head.

That would seem to be a new regression; please open a new PR for it, including
full details as usual for a PR.  Thanks.


[Bug other/46202] Makefile doesn't support install-strip

2010-11-20 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46202

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-20 
19:37:12 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Sat Nov 20 19:37:08 2010
New Revision: 166980

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166980
Log:
PR other/46202: implement install-strip.

/:
PR other/46202
* configure.ac: Fix just-built in-tree STRIP name to be
binutils/strip-new.
* configure: Regenerate.
* Makefile.def (install-strip-gcc, install-strip-binutils)
(install-strip-opcodes, install-strip-ld, install-strip-itcl)
(install-strip-sid): Mirror dependencies on non-strip variants
of these targets on the respective -strip prerequisites.
* Makefile.tpl (install-strip, install-strip-host)
(install-strip-target): New targets.
(install-strip-[+module+], install-strip-target-[+module+]):
New targets.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.

gcc/:
PR other/46202
* Makefile.in (install_sh, INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM): New
variables.
(AR_FOR_TARGET, RANLIB_FOR_TARGET, STRIP_FOR_TARGET): Fix
shell quoting.
(STRIP_FOR_TARGET): Look for in-tree strip under name strip-new.
(install-strip): New target.
(STRIPPROG): New variable, exported if STRIP is set.
* doc/install.texi (Final install): Minor markup and code style
fixes.  Document install-strip target.

fixincludes/:
PR other/46202
* Makefile.in (install-strip): New phony target.
(all, check, install): Also mark as phony.

libgcc/:
PR other/46202
* Makefile.in (install-strip): New phony target.

libiberty/:
PR other/46202
* Makefile.in (install-strip): New phony target.
(install): Also mark as phony.

gnattools/:
PR other/46202
* Makefile.in (install-strip): New phony target.
(check, installcheck, info, dvi, pdf, html, install)
(install-info, install-pdf, install-html, mostlyclean)
(clean, distclean, maintainer-clean): Mark phony.

libada/:
PR other/46202
* Makefile.in (install-strip): New phony target.
(check, installcheck, info, dvi, pdf, html, install)
(install-info, install-pdf, install-html, mostlyclean)
(clean, distclean, maintainer-clean): Mark phony.

Modified:
trunk/ChangeLog
trunk/Makefile.def
trunk/Makefile.in
trunk/Makefile.tpl
trunk/configure
trunk/configure.ac
trunk/fixincludes/ChangeLog
trunk/fixincludes/Makefile.in
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/Makefile.in
trunk/gcc/config/i386/t-cygming
trunk/gcc/doc/install.texi
trunk/gnattools/ChangeLog
trunk/gnattools/Makefile.in
trunk/libada/ChangeLog
trunk/libada/Makefile.in
trunk/libgcc/ChangeLog
trunk/libgcc/Makefile.in
trunk/libiberty/ChangeLog
trunk/libiberty/Makefile.in


[Bug other/46202] Makefile doesn't support install-strip

2010-11-20 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46202

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-20 
19:40:13 UTC ---
Fixed in GCC trunk and src CVS.


[Bug bootstrap/46549] MinGW bootstrap failure regarding texi GFPL license

2010-11-19 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46549

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution||DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-19 
15:50:33 UTC ---
.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 45888 ***


[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

2010-11-19 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||anhvofrcaus at gmail dot
   ||com

--- Comment #9 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-19 
15:50:33 UTC ---
*** Bug 46549 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug bootstrap/46541] libquadmath: No way to disable it

2010-11-18 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46541

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution||DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-18 
17:34:33 UTC ---
Duplicate of bug 46540.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 46540 ***


[Bug fortran/46540] libquadmath: Implement --disable-libquadmath

2010-11-18 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46540

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-18 
17:34:33 UTC ---
*** Bug 46541 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


[Bug bootstrap/41337] [LTO] Parallel build failure

2010-11-17 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 
16:52:03 UTC ---
If you encounter parallel build failures, please post exact revision that was
built, configure command line, build system type, number of processors on the
box, N argument in 'make -jN', and ideally also the likelihood (in precent)
that the build fails, if it is not deterministic.  Please also post the last
300 or so lines of build output, and maybe check whether it always fails in the
same spot.

It is not too hard to pinpoint parallel build failures but only if there is
enough data available.


[Bug libstdc++/45711] Building with --enable-libstdcxx-debug fails during install

2010-11-15 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45711

--- Comment #16 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-15 
21:39:15 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Mon Nov 15 21:39:09 2010
New Revision: 166772

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166772
Log:
PR libstdc++/45711 cleanup.

libstdc++-v3/:
PR libstdc++/45711
* src/Makefile.am (stamp-debug): Also adjust VPATH.
* src/Makefile.in: Regenerate.

Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am
trunk/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.in


[Bug driver/45703] [4.6 regression] --help -v no longer shows linker help

2010-11-04 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45703

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-04 
19:57:22 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Thu Nov  4 19:57:17 2010
New Revision: 166327

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166327
Log:
Fix PR driver/45703: let --help -v show linker help.

gcc/:
PR driver/45703
* collect2.c (main): Print --help output to stdout.  Do not
exit right away, so ld --help is appended.  Add empty lines
to separate output suitably.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/collect2.c


[Bug libobjc/39465] libobjc does not find classes of DLLs

2010-11-03 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39465

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #17 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-03 
17:11:18 UTC ---
JFTR, libtool will not create a shared library on w32 systems unless you pass
the -no-undefined flag at link time.  That seems to me the reason why libobjc
is created as static only.

Whether you need to make other adjustments for shared libobjc to actually work,
I cannot tell without more details.


[Bug other/46202] Makefile doesn't support install-strip

2010-11-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46202

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-02 
21:44:12 UTC ---
Proposed patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg00192.html.


[Bug other/46202] Makefile doesn't support install-strip

2010-11-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46202

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2010.11.01 16:41:30
 CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot   |rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
   |gnu.org |
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1


[Bug bootstrap/35855] build locale not properly handled with awk scripts

2010-10-11 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35855

--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-11 
17:58:56 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Mon Oct 11 17:58:53 2010
New Revision: 165322

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165322
Log:
Fix PR bootstrap/35855: awk character classes.

gcc/:
PR bootstrap/35855
* opt-functions.awk (BEGIN): New section.
(lower, upper, digit, alnum): New variables.
(static_var, opt_sanitized_name): Use alnum instead of character
classes, for non-C locale.
* optc-gen.awk: Likewise.
* opth-gen.awk: Likewise.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/opt-functions.awk
trunk/gcc/optc-gen.awk
trunk/gcc/opth-gen.awk


[Bug libstdc++/45711] Building with --enable-libstdcxx-debug fails during install

2010-10-11 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45711

--- Comment #14 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-11 
18:08:43 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Mon Oct 11 18:08:36 2010
New Revision: 165325

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165325
Log:
Fix PR libstdc++/45711.

libstdc++-v3/:
PR libstdc++/45711
* src/Makefile.am (stamp-debug): Also adjust possibly-relative
file names in MKDIR_P, and, for consistency, also top_build_prefix.
* src/Makefile.in: Regenerate.

Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.am
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libstdc++-v3/src/Makefile.in


[Bug libstdc++/45711] Building with --enable-libstdcxx-debug fails during install

2010-10-11 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45711

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #15 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-11 
18:09:50 UTC ---
Fixed.


[Bug bootstrap/35855] build locale not properly handled with awk scripts

2010-10-11 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35855

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
  Known to work||4.6.0
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-11 
18:58:27 UTC ---
Fixed in trunk.


[Bug testsuite/45974] [4.6 Regression] make check RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board 'unix{-m32,}' doesn't check -m32

2010-10-11 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45974

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12 
05:03:56 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Tue Oct 12 05:03:52 2010
New Revision: 165350

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165350
Log:
Fix PR testsuite/45974 by reverting r165323 for now.

gcc/:
PR testsuite/45974
Revert:
* Makefile.in ($(lang_checks_parallel))
($(lang_checks_parallelized)): Use single quotes for
$(RUNTESTFLAGS), to allow passing quoted content.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/Makefile.in


[Bug testsuite/45974] [4.6 Regression] make check RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board 'unix{-m32,}' doesn't check -m32

2010-10-11 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45974

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-12 
05:05:36 UTC ---
Ouch.  What is SHELL set to in gcc/Makefile?  Does it work on your system to
use this instead (in a tree with the patch not reverted):
  make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix{-m32,-m64}'

Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience.

I'm reverting the patch for now, but would like to fix this in the long run
nevertheless.  The quoting style needs to be uniform, so that the user can
still provide his own.  (It might be sufficient to document a quoting style
that works portably, however.)


[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

2010-10-06 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888

--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-07 
04:57:28 UTC ---
 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org 
 2010-10-05 23:39:37 UTC ---
  The output produced by genhooks is not portable (newline encoding), so it
  should either produce binary output, or diff should be used to compare for
  changes.
 
 Sigh.  What was supposed to give C programs more portability works against
 us here.
 
 Using diff to ignore line-end space change would not really be satisfactory,
 because then you'd get gratuitous changes in the checked in tm.texi whenever
 there is a change in the newline encoding in effect when autogenerating a
 changed tm.texi.

Good point.  Let's kill \r then.  It should be possible to use
  tr -d '\015'

on ASCII systems (\r is not portable to Solaris tr).  So for
portability you could pipe through this I guess:

case `echo X|tr X '\101'` in
 A) # ASCII based system
  tr -d '\015'
  ;;
 *) # EBCDIC based system
  tr -d '\r'
  ;;
esac

 Unless we make the copy step do newline translation, that is.
 So, what is the lesser evil in maintainability and portability?
 Generating binary output with unix-style newlines (as we generally have
 in our repository), or compare ignoring newline style and translating
 while copying?

 If we go for translating copying, do we make autoconf fail if no suitable
 tool is found?

There should always exist a suitable tool on systems where it is needed.
FWIW, I would just use the above in the Makefile though (after removing
the comments).

 I've found a problem with a circular dependency, but the patch for
 that didn't get reviewed:
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg03046.html

The hunk in that changing TEXI_GCCINT_FILES seems wrong, at least
gcc/doc/gccint.texi still has '@include tm.texi' so that's what the
dependency should be.

 If references to source / build trees are 'messed up' in other ways too,
 could you please be a bit more specific?

I think that should be it.  I was a bit confused when writing the
message.  Thanks.


[Bug bootstrap/45888] New: tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

2010-10-04 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888

   Summary: tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rw...@gcc.gnu.org


The thread starting at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-10/msg00020.html
lists a number of issues around tm.texi:

The output produced by genhooks is not portable (newline encoding), so it
should either produce binary output, or diff should be used to compare for
changes.

The tm.texi rule is broken because it references non-existing
$(srcdir)/doc/target.def.  Also, it seems references to source and build tree
are a bit messed up.  The logic to trigger a warning for updating the wrong
file could need a look-over, too.


[Bug libmudflap/38339] libtool: compile: not configured to build any kind of library

2010-10-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38339

--- Comment #23 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 
07:13:39 UTC ---
The 'make configure-target-libmudflap' log you just sent does not show the
'expr syntax error' failures from the log.make in comment 1 any more.  Can you
please verify that your build error is gone now also?  Should be sufficient to
  make all-target-libmudflap

Thanks.


[Bug java/45322] libjava error: libtool: compile: libobj name `ltdl.lo' may not contain shell special

2010-10-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45322

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WORKSFORME

--- Comment #8 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 
10:47:00 UTC ---
Closing as worksforme.  If you (or anybody else) can reproduce this issue
elsewhere, feel free to reopen.  Thanks.


[Bug bootstrap/38339] libtool: compile: not configured to build any kind of library

2010-10-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38339

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
  Component|libmudflap  |bootstrap
 Resolution||INVALID

--- Comment #25 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 
11:09:14 UTC ---
We hashed this out a bit off-list, to avoid filling the audit trail with more
bad guessing of mine.

Anyway, turned out the exposer for this issue was the passing of a number of
configure command lines that conflicted:
  --enable-shared --disable-static --enable-shared=libstdc++ --enable-static

I told Gabor to rebuild with
  --disable-shared --enable-static --enable-shared=libstdc++-v3

intending to create a shared C++ library but everything else static.  The build
finished successfully, but without creating a shared C++ library.  I now
checked the libstdc++-v3/configure code, and sorry to say so, but I was wrong,
libstdc++-v3/configure defines $PACKAGE as libstdc++, so that the right set
of args would have been
--disable-shared --enable-static --enable-shared=libstdc++

instead.  Gabor, can I ask you to retry with these argumenst one more time?  If
that fails to produce a shared C++ library, then please open a new PR building
only some GCC libraries shared against component bootstrap, point to this PR,
Cc: me, and attach the build log, gzip'ed.  Thank you.

I'm closing this PR as invalid.  (I don't want to retitle it because the old
name should remain searchable.)


[Bug bootstrap/44621] syntax error in gcc-4.5.0/configure for ksh

2010-10-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44621

--- Comment #6 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 
11:39:45 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Sat Oct  2 11:39:41 2010
New Revision: 164902

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164902
Log:
Fix unportable shell quoting.

/:
PR bootstrap/44621
* configure.ac: Fix unportable shell quoting.
* configure: Regenerate.

config/:
* po.m4 (AM_PO_SUBDIRS): Fix unportable shell quoting.

intl/:
PR bootstrap/44621
* configure: Regenerate.

Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/config/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/config/po.m4
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/configure
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/configure.ac
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/intl/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/intl/configure


[Bug bootstrap/44621] syntax error in gcc-4.5.0/configure for ksh

2010-10-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44621

--- Comment #7 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 
11:40:35 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Sat Oct  2 11:40:32 2010
New Revision: 164903

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164903
Log:
Fix unportable shell quoting.

/:
PR bootstrap/44621
* configure.ac: Fix unportable shell quoting.
* configure: Regenerate.

config/:
* po.m4 (AM_PO_SUBDIRS): Fix unportable shell quoting.

intl/:
PR bootstrap/44621
* configure: Regenerate.

Modified:
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/config/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/config/po.m4
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/configure
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/configure.ac
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/intl/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_4-branch/intl/configure


[Bug bootstrap/44621] syntax error in gcc-4.5.0/configure for ksh

2010-10-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44621

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #8 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 
11:41:25 UTC ---
Fixed.


[Bug bootstrap/45174] Make fails in zlib

2010-10-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45174

--- Comment #25 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 
14:52:12 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Sat Oct  2 14:52:07 2010
New Revision: 164904

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164904
Log:
Allow to pass separate configure arguments for build, host and target.

/:
PR bootstrap/45326
PR bootstrap/45174
* configure.ac: Honor initial values of $build_configargs,
$host_configargs, $target_configargs.  Mark the precious, so
environment settings get recorded.
* configure: Regenerate.

gcc/:
* doc/install.texi (Configuration): Document build_configargs,
host_configargs, target_configargs.

Modified:
trunk/ChangeLog
trunk/configure
trunk/configure.ac
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/doc/install.texi


[Bug bootstrap/45326] gmp's use of C99 keeps breaking my compiles, suggest set autoconf variables to avoid inttypes/stdint

2010-10-02 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45326

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 
14:52:12 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Sat Oct  2 14:52:07 2010
New Revision: 164904

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164904
Log:
Allow to pass separate configure arguments for build, host and target.

/:
PR bootstrap/45326
PR bootstrap/45174
* configure.ac: Honor initial values of $build_configargs,
$host_configargs, $target_configargs.  Mark the precious, so
environment settings get recorded.
* configure: Regenerate.

gcc/:
* doc/install.texi (Configuration): Document build_configargs,
host_configargs, target_configargs.

Modified:
trunk/ChangeLog
trunk/configure
trunk/configure.ac
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/doc/install.texi


[Bug libmudflap/38339] libtool: compile: not configured to build any kind of library

2010-10-01 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38339

--- Comment #18 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-02 
05:34:16 UTC ---
Ah, sorry.  The sed script was meant for the toplevel source directory.

Your .../libmudflap/config.log however looks like configure did compute the
maximum command line length correctly.  Let's hope the shell trace log will
provide more clues.  Thanks.


[Bug bootstrap/45796] [4.6 regression] make targets info-gcc, dvi-gcc etc. should work from unbuilt configured tree

2010-09-30 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45796

--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-30 
19:16:25 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Thu Sep 30 19:16:14 2010
New Revision: 164759

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164759
Log:
build: more correct build rules for build/gen% programs.

gcc/:
PR bootstrap/45796
* Makefile.in (build/gen%$(build_exeext)): Move rule after all
special-casing for generators and turn into ...
((genprog:%=build/gen%$(build_exeext))): ... this static pattern
rule, for better error messages in case of toplevel dependency
errors.
(genprog): Add hooks, rename to ...
(genprogerr): ... this, and let genprog also contain check,
checksum, condmd.
((genprog:%=build/gen%$(build_exeext))): Rename to ...
((genprogerr:%=build/gen%$(build_exeext))): ... this.
(build/genhooks$(build_exeext)): Remove now-unneeded dependency.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/Makefile.in


[Bug bootstrap/45796] [4.6 regression] make targets info-gcc, dvi-gcc etc. should work from unbuilt configured tree

2010-09-30 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45796

--- Comment #5 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-30 
19:16:43 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Thu Sep 30 19:16:34 2010
New Revision: 164760

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164760
Log:
build: info-gcc, dvi-gcc etc work from unbuilt configured tree.

/:
PR bootstrap/45796
* Makefile.def (info-gcc, dvi-gcc, pdf-gcc, html-gcc):
Depend on all-build-libiberty.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.

Modified:
trunk/ChangeLog
trunk/Makefile.def
trunk/Makefile.in


[Bug bootstrap/45796] [4.6 regression] make targets info-gcc, dvi-gcc etc. should work from unbuilt configured tree

2010-09-30 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45796

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-30 
19:23:55 UTC ---
Yes, this used to work.  The difference between the 4.5 branch and trunk is
that now we have a generated gcc/doc/tm.texi from its .in file, and that
creating/updating tm.texi requires build/genhooks to be present.

Anyway, fixed.


[Bug bootstrap/45796] [4.6 regression] make targets info-gcc, dvi-gcc etc. should work from unbuilt configured tree

2010-09-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45796

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2010.09.29 18:04:49
   date||
 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot   |rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
   |gnu.org |
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1


[Bug libmudflap/38339] libtool: compile: not configured to build any kind of library

2010-09-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38339

--- Comment #15 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-29 
19:33:50 UTC ---
Please attach i686-pc-linux-gnu/libmudflap/config.log

Please post the output of the following commands (modifying the configure
script to post verbose output, and rerunning it):

sed -i '/checking the maximum length/a\
set -x
' libmudflap/configure
rm -f i686-pc-linux-gnu/libmudflap/Makefile
make configure-target-libmudflap

Thanks.


[Bug bootstrap/45796] [4.6 regression] make targets info-gcc, dvi-gcc etc. should work from unbuilt configured tree

2010-09-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45796

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-29 
20:50:16 UTC ---
Patches posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg02312.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg02313.html

I don't see where this would be a recent regression though. FWIW,
maintainer-scripts/update_web_docs_svn does not use 'make' for anything.


[Bug bootstrap/44621] syntax error in gcc-4.5.0/configure for ksh

2010-09-27 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44621

--- Comment #5 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-27 
20:19:48 UTC ---
Author: rwild
Date: Mon Sep 27 20:19:41 2010
New Revision: 164668

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164668
Log:
Fix unportable shell quoting.

/:
PR bootstrap/44621
* configure.ac: Fix unportable shell quoting.
* configure: Regenerate.

config/:
* po.m4 (AM_PO_SUBDIRS): Fix unportable shell quoting.

contrib/reghunt/:
* bin/gcc-svn-ids: Fix unportable shell quoting.
* date_based/reg_periodic: Likewise.
* date_based/reg_search: Likewise.

intl/:
PR bootstrap/44621
* configure: Regenerate.

Modified:
trunk/ChangeLog
trunk/config/ChangeLog
trunk/config/po.m4
trunk/configure
trunk/configure.ac
trunk/contrib/reghunt/ChangeLog
trunk/contrib/reghunt/bin/gcc-svn-ids
trunk/contrib/reghunt/date_based/reg_periodic
trunk/contrib/reghunt/date_based/reg_search
trunk/intl/ChangeLog
trunk/intl/configure


[Bug bootstrap/45796] New: make targets info-gcc, dvi-gcc etc. should work from unbuilt configured tree

2010-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45796

   Summary: make targets info-gcc, dvi-gcc etc. should work from
unbuilt configured tree
   Product: gcc
   Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rw...@gcc.gnu.org


Running configure and then 'make info-gcc' currently fails with:

make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/build/gcc'
make[1]: Circular s-tm-texi - ../../gcc/gcc/doc/tm.texi dependency dropped.
build/genhooks \
../../gcc/gcc/doc/tm.texi.in  tmp-tm.texi
/bin/sh: line 1: build/genhooks: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [s-tm-texi] Error 127


It should not be necessary to 'make all' before this.  Likewise for the other
toplevel doc targets.


[Bug bootstrap/35855] build locale not properly handled with awk scripts

2010-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35855

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-26 
06:07:56 UTC ---
Proposed patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg02027.html.

You don't state how exactly the build fails, and what locale you needed to set
for the failure to become apparent.  That makes it harder to find out whether a
patch fixes it.  Please state so, and also please try out the patch.  Thanks.


[Bug bootstrap/44621] syntax error in gcc-4.5.0/configure for ksh

2010-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44621

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2010.09.26 13:18:34
   date||
 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot   |rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
   |gnu.org |
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-26 
13:18:34 UTC ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg02031.html.

The failure shown in comment #3 is either a followup error, or should have been
fixed in the binutils tree on Mar 5 2010, by including libiberty.h in
incremental.cc.


[Bug web/45798] New: bugzilla: line-wrapping issues with description and comments.

2010-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45798

   Summary: bugzilla: line-wrapping issues with description and
comments.
   Product: gcc
   Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: web
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rw...@gcc.gnu.org


When I type text into a bug description or a comment, I usually make sure to
not enter hard newlines within a paragraph.  Nevertheless, the comments are
shown with newlines where they appeared in my typed text, in addition to
automatic wrapping done by the browser.

This leads to ugly display like
this
where you have one or two words
and then
another newline.

IIRC the old bugzilla did not do this.  How can I avoid it/can it be fixed?

Thanks!


[Bug bootstrap/37888] make install fails attempting to build gcc/intl.c

2010-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37888

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed||2010.09.26 13:29:43
   date||
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-26 
13:29:43 UTC ---
Can you reconfirm whether this still happens for you with current sources?

The weird thing about this is that 'make install' should not cause any
recompilations nor relinking at all, at least not after a successful 'make'. 
Did you maybe not run 'make' or 'make all' beforehand?

If this still happens for you, my next best bet would be timing issues, such as
your build system and the AFS server not having synchronized clocks.


[Bug other/37210] Prohibit Default Builds in the GCC Source Tree

2010-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37210

--- Comment #5 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-26 
13:44:43 UTC ---
status update: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg02033.html.


[Bug web/45798] bugzilla: line-wrapping issues with description and comments.

2010-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45798

--- Comment #2 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-26 
17:59:13 UTC ---
Surely possible, but I'd wonder if I'm the only one seeing that then. Running
Debian's iceweasel 3.0.6, Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.0.19)
Gecko/2010091807 Iceweasel/3.0.6 (Debian-3.0.6-3).


[Bug web/45798] bugzilla: line-wrapping issues with description and comments.

2010-09-26 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45798

--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-26 
18:31:50 UTC ---
Hmm, that's not what I meant though.  I see e.g., in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37888#c1
the word as being wrapped to a line of its own.  Hmm, larger or smaller text
sizes do not show that particular issue though, so I guess you're right that
what I'm seeing is a browser issue.


[Bug lto/43575] lto: ICE upon incompatible type declarations in different TUs

2010-09-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43575

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
  Known to work||4.6.0
 Resolution||WORKSFORME

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-24 
18:10:22 UTC ---
This works for me now.  Maybe fixed by the fix for bug 42451.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug java/45322] libjava error: libtool: compile: libobj name `ltdl.lo' may not contain shell special

2010-09-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45322

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed||2010.09.24 18:33:22
   date||
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #4 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-24 
18:33:22 UTC ---
Waiting for feedback asked for in comment #1.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug other/45782] New: bugzilla internal error trying to update existing PR

2010-09-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45782

   Summary: bugzilla internal error trying to update existing PR
   Product: gcc
   Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P3
 Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: rw...@gcc.gnu.org


I tried to update bug 45322 and got an Internal error from bugzilla:

There was an error sending mail from 'rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org' to 'java-...@gcc.gnu.org':Can't send data 

What other information do you need?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug driver/45703] [4.6 regression] --help -v no longer shows linker help

2010-09-24 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45703

Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed||2010.09.24 19:16:21
   date||
 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot   |rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
   |gnu.org |
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-24 
19:16:21 UTC ---
Seems to have been introduced by r158908.  Anyway, confirmed, proposed patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-09/msg01901.html.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.