[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190
--- Comment #11 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 14:35 --- Reopening. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36466
[Bug target/36466] internal compiler error: in choose_reload_regs, at reload1.c:6190
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 14:34 --- Reopening since GCC should not ICE, even if the code is invalid. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tbm at cyrius dot com Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code Last reconfirmed|2009-01-02 11:50:37 |2010-08-16 14:34:29 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36466
[Bug regression/37456] [4.4 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: control flow in the middle of basic block
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-10 10:26 --- I get the same on x86_64. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|powerpc-linux | GCC target triplet|powerpc-linux | Summary|gcc4.4 ICE: verify_flow_info|[4.4 Regression] ICE: |failed |verify_flow_info failed: ||control flow in the middle ||of basic block http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37456
[Bug rtl-optimization/37333] [4.4 Regression] ICE in ira_flattening, at ira-build.c:2146
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 09:11 --- Confirmed. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-09-05 09:11:03 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37333
[Bug middle-end/37358] [4.4 Regression] IPA-CP generates duplicated symbols at -O3
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 06:56 --- Confirmed. This happens *a lot* when compiling Debian with -O3. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-09-04 06:56:58 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37358
[Bug middle-end/35964] ICE with -funroll-loops on arm/arm eabi
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-10 08:35 --- Also confirm the bug. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-05-10 08:35:25 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35964
[Bug middle-end/35964] ICE with -funroll-loops on arm/arm eabi
--- Comment #9 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-10 08:34 --- Seems like we should reopen this bug then. Aurelien, how big are those patches you're talking about? Are they aimed at 4.3 or only or 4.4? -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35964
[Bug c/34890] Error compiling global.c in 01/18/08 snapshot under Debian Linux 4.0 for mips
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 21:21 --- Fixed in SVN by Richard. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34890
[Bug tree-optimization/34179] [4.3 Regression] verify_ssa failed (found real variable when subvariables should have appeared)
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 07:32 --- It's the same. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34138 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34179
[Bug tree-optimization/34138] [4.3 Regression] verify_ssa failed (found real variable when subvariables should have appeared)
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-22 07:32 --- *** Bug 34179 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34138
[Bug tree-optimization/31037] [4.3 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed - definition in block 23 does not dominate use in block 32
--- Comment #14 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-16 19:16 --- *** Bug 31080 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31037
[Bug c++/31080] ice for legal code with -O2
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-16 19:16 --- Works for me with trunk. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31037 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31080
[Bug target/32889] [4.2 Regression] ICE in delete_output_reload, at reload1.c:7926
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 21:31 --- Confirmed. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-10-19 21:31:13 date|| Summary|ICE in delete_output_reload,|[4.2 Regression] ICE in |at reload1.c:7926 |delete_output_reload, at ||reload1.c:7926 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32889
[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:27 --- Created an attachment (id=14149) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14149&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256
[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:26 --- This happens with 4.0 - 4.3. gcc 3.4 didn't have the -msym32 option. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256
[Bug target/33256] internal compiler error: in print_operand_reloc, at config/mips/mips.c:5579
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 09:08 --- I can confirm this with FSF gcc 4.1.3 20070902 -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-09-02 09:08:07 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33256
[Bug tree-optimization/30840] [4.3 Regression] ice for legal code with flags -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing
--- Comment #15 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-25 09:37 --- *** Bug 31926 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30840
[Bug tree-optimization/31926] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:487
--- Comment #6 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-25 09:37 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30840 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31926
[Bug tree-optimization/30840] [4.3 Regression] ice for legal code with flags -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing
--- Comment #14 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-25 09:37 --- *** Bug 32607 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30840
[Bug tree-optimization/32607] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:487
--- Comment #6 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-25 09:37 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30840 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32607
[Bug fortran/32357] bad result from mvbits in mips version of gfortran with -fdefault-integer-8
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 GCC target triplet||mips-* Known to fail||4.1.0 4.2.0 4.3.0 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-06-15 19:19:03 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32357
[Bug tree-optimization/30840] [4.3 Regression] ice for legal code with flags -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing
--- Comment #6 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-19 09:07 --- *** Bug 31926 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jojelino at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30840
[Bug tree-optimization/31926] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:487
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-19 09:07 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30840 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31926
[Bug target/31733] [4.3 Regression] ICE in rtl_verify_flow_info, at cfgrtl.c:2050: {return_internal} (nil)
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-17 11:37 --- I just saw this again with 20070515 r124745. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31733
[Bug middle-end/31947] [4.2 Regression] ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:374
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |middle-end Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target Milestone|--- |4.2.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31947
[Bug target/30472] [4.1 Regression] -gstabs, ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-22 18:27 --- isn't this a duplicate of 29443? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
[Bug target/30472] [4.1 Regression] -gstabs, ICE in output_operand: invalid expression as operand
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-22 18:23 --- Confirmed, still there as of 4.1.3 20070420. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-04-22 18:23:26 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30472
[Bug c++/31411] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:4519
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 18:09 --- This also happens with 4.3. I cannot check 4.0. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|x86_64-linux-gnu| GCC host triplet|x86_64-linux-gnu| GCC target triplet|x86_64-linux-gnu| Summary|internal compiler error: in |[4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] |gimplify_expr, at |ICE: in gimplify_expr, at |gimplify.c:4519 |gimplify.c:4519 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31411
[Bug c++/31411] internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:4519
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 18:09 --- Testcase: namespace std { template < class T > class allocator { public:typedef T value_type; typedef long unsigned int size_type; ~allocator () { } }; template < class charT > struct char_traits { }; template < class T, class Allocator > class vector { }; template < class Ch, class Tr = char_traits < Ch >, class A = allocator < Ch > >class basic_string; typedef basic_string < char >string; template < class Ch, class Tr, class A > class basic_string:public std::vector < Ch, A > { public:typedef Tr traits_type; typedef typename A::size_type size_type; static const size_type npos = (size_type) - 1; basic_string (const basic_string & str, size_type pos = 0, size_type n = npos, const A & al = A ()); }; } using namespace std; main () { try { } catch (string smess) { } } -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31411
[Bug c++/31411] internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:4519
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 17:59 --- Confirmed. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-03-31 17:59:17 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31411
[Bug debug/31391] [4.3 Regression] undefined label with -O -g
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-30 15:29 --- I've seen it on x86_64 and ia64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31391
[Bug c++/31138] [4.3 regression] ICE with ellipsis
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 15:18 --- *** Bug 31372 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tbm at cyrius dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31138
[Bug c++/31372] [4.3 Regression] Segfault in cp/parser.c: cp_parser_parameter_declaration
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 15:18 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31138 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31372
[Bug target/31364] [4.3 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2119 during bootstrap
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 10:56 --- *** Bug 31371 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debian-gcc at lists dot ||debian dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31364
[Bug bootstrap/31371] [4.3 regression] bootstrap error in libgcc, ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2119
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-27 10:56 --- Sorry for the bad communication. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31364 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31371
[Bug tree-optimization/31254] [4.3 Regression] verify_ssa failed: type mismatch between an SSA_NAME and its symbol
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-18 12:47 --- Confirmed. 20070303 works. 20070318 fails. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-03-18 12:47:35 date|| Summary|ice for legal code with -O2 |[4.3 Regression] verify_ssa ||failed: type mismatch ||between an SSA_NAME and its ||symbol Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31254
[Bug c++/31049] G++ 4.1.1 forgets to allocate memory (skips part of user code)
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-05 17:51 --- *** Bug 31048 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31049
[Bug c++/31048] G++ 4.1.1 forgets to allocate memory (skips part of user code)
--- Comment #1 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-05 17:51 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31049 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31048
[Bug c/31041] [4.3 Regression] ice (verify_stmts failed: invalid operand to binary operator) with -O2 -ftree-vectorize
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-05 13:11 --- confirmed with GCC 4.3.0 20070303. 4.2.0 works. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to work||4.2.0 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-03-05 13:11:16 date|| Summary|ice for legal code with -O2 |[4.3 Regression] ice |-ftree-vectorize|(verify_stmts failed: ||invalid operand to binary ||operator) with -O2 -ftree- ||vectorize Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31041
[Bug rtl-optimization/30815] [4.3 Regression] pr29965.c fails on the mainline, switches and __builtin_trap
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-04 01:35 --- I see this on x86_64 and ia64 too. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tbm at cyrius dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 GCC target triplet|powerpc*-*-*| Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-03-04 01:35:05 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30815
[Bug target/26560] [4.1 regression] mips: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 17:17 --- Janis, do you think you could check what fixed this on the 4.2 branch? -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janis at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26560
[Bug target/26560] [4.1 regression] mips: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'
--- Comment #9 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 17:12 --- Reopen -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26560
[Bug target/26560] [4.1 regression] mips: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'
--- Comment #8 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 17:11 --- I just verified that this is still there in 4.1 so I'm reopening the bug. I know that no progress has been made but it _is_ still a bug in 4.1, which unlike 4.0 is still supported. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED Summary|[4.0/4.1 regression] mips: |[4.1 regression] mips: |unable to find a register to|unable to find a register to |spill in class 'FP_REGS'|spill in class 'FP_REGS' Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26560
[Bug rtl-optimization/27883] [4.0/4.1 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips
--- Comment #19 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-24 12:01 --- (In reply to comment #18) > Given that this is not user-visible in released compilers and won't very > likely lead to wrong code, I propose to mark it WONTFIX for 4.0 and 4.1. Speaking as the submitter, I don't mind if this is done. BTW, we should not forget Jim's Comment #11: the patch should be backed out from 4.3 when the dataflow branch is merged. Which I believe is going to happen soon? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883
[Bug target/30486] segfault in aggregate_value_p while bootstrapping fortran
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 GCC build triplet|x86_64-linux-gnu| GCC host triplet|arm-linux-uclibcgnueabi | GCC target triplet|arm-linux-uclibcgnueabi |arm-linux-uclibcgnueabi,arm- ||linux-gnueabi Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Known to fail||4.1.0 4.2.0 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-01-23 17:53:28 date|| Summary|ICE in aggregate_value_p|segfault in ||aggregate_value_p while ||bootstrapping fortran http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30486
[Bug middle-end/29584] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error on optimization
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-24 19:02 --- (gdb) where #0 expand_case (exp=Variable "exp" is not available. ) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/stmt.c:2106 #1 0x00533ee7 in expand_expr_real_1 (exp=Variable "exp" is not available. ) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/expr.c:8491 #2 0x005377b9 in expand_expr_real (exp=0x2b984c15, target=0x2b984bf72400, tmode=VOIDmode, modifier=EXPAND_NORMAL, alt_rtl=0x0) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/expr.c:6530 #3 0x006c3e49 in expand_expr_stmt (exp=0x2b984c15) at expr.h:493 #4 0x006e9d80 in expand_gimple_basic_block (bb=0x2b984c140280, dump_file=Variable "dump_file" is not available. ) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/cfgexpand.c:1367 #5 0x006eac8d in tree_expand_cfg () at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/cfgexpand.c:1626 #6 0x006e7516 in execute_one_pass (pass=0xa31780) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/passes.c:827 #7 0x006e760c in execute_pass_list (pass=0xa31780) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/passes.c:859 #8 0x0045d77a in tree_rest_of_compilation (fndecl=0x2b984c120e00) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/tree-optimize.c:419 #9 0x0040a628 in c_expand_body (fndecl=0x2b984c120e00) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/c-decl.c:6692 #10 0x007249c2 in cgraph_expand_function (node=0x2b984c1394d0) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1058 #11 0x007257ac in cgraph_optimize () at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1124 #12 0x004100d2 in c_write_global_declarations () at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc-4.1/gcc/c-decl.c:7700 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29584
[Bug middle-end/29584] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error on optimization
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-24 18:56 --- Created an attachment (id=12486) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12486&action=view) reduced testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29584
[Bug middle-end/29584] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error on optimization
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-24 18:56 --- This also happens on amd64. Segfaults with 4.0 and 4.1, works with 3.4 and 4.2. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 GCC build triplet|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu | GCC host triplet|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu | GCC target triplet|arm-linux-uclibcgnueabi | Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-10-24 18:56:28 date|| Summary|internal compiler error on |[4.0/4.1 Regression] |optimization|internal compiler error on ||optimization http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29584
[Bug target/26560] [4.0/4.1 regression] mips: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-09 11:46 --- Confirmed. gcc 3.4 and 4.2 work, 4.0 and 4.1 fail. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail||4.0.2 4.1.0 Known to work||3.4.6 4.2.0 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-10-09 11:46:07 date|| Summary|mips: unable to find a |[4.0/4.1 regression] mips: |register to spill in class |unable to find a register to |'FP_REGS' |spill in class 'FP_REGS' http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26560
[Bug target/29230] [4.1 regression] gcc-4.1 generates faulty asm on ARM when compiling openmsx 0.6.1 with -O3
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-26 13:37 --- This doesn't happen with gcc 4.2, nor, apparently, with 4.0. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-09-26 13:37:26 date|| Summary|gcc-4.1 generates faulty asm|[4.1 regression] gcc-4.1 |on ARM when compiling |generates faulty asm on ARM |openmsx 0.6.1 with -O3 |when compiling openmsx 0.6.1 ||with -O3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29230
[Bug target/29230] [4.1 regression] gcc-4.1 generates faulty asm on ARM when compiling openmsx 0.6.1 with -O3
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|2006-09-26 13:37:26 |2006-09-26 13:37:44 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29230
[Bug c++/29059] New: [4.2 regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed (invalid operand to unary operator ""[0];)
Compiling as C works, C++ fails. This worked with 20060823. (sid)118:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c -O re-ru32un.c re-ru32un.c: In function 'void LoadUserAlph(char*)': re-ru32un.c:4: error: invalid operand to unary operator ""[0]; re-ru32un.c:4: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see . zsh: exit 1 /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c -O re-ru32un.c (sid)119:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -c re-ru32un.c (sid)120:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -c -O re-ru32un.c (sid)121:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] cat re-ru32un.c extern char *strcpy (char *__restrict __dest, __const char *__restrict __src); char wrkstr_un[270]; extern void LoadUserAlph (char *s) { s = wrkstr_un; strcpy (s, ""); }; -- Summary: [4.2 regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed (invalid operand to unary operator ""[0];) Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29059
[Bug c++/29016] tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 11:59 --- (sid)451:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-g++ -c pr29016.cc (sid)452:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-g++ -c -O pr29016.cc pr29016.cc:16: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'expression', have 'exceptional' (baselink) in get_base_var, at ipa-utils.c:224 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. zsh: exit 1 x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-g++ -c -O pr29016.cc (sid)453:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] cat pr29016.cc typedef unsigned long int Mword; class Kern_cnt { private:enum { Max_slot = 2, }; static Mword (*read_kcnt_fn[Max_slot]) (); private:static Mword read_kcnt1 (); static Mword read_kcnt2 (); } __attribute__ ((packed)); Mword (*Kern_cnt::read_kcnt_fn[Max_slot]) () = { read_kcnt1, read_kcnt2}; (sid)454:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 GCC build triplet|i486-slackware-linux| GCC host triplet|i486-slackware-linux| GCC target triplet|i486-slackware-linux| Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-09-11 11:59:48 date|| Summary|ICE when compiling with -Os |tree check: expected class ||'expression', have ||'exceptional' (baselink) in ||get_base_var, at ipa- ||utils.c:224 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29016
[Bug target/27883] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] in schedule_insns, at sched-rgn.c:3038 on mips
--- Comment #10 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 18:56 --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Jim, were you going to check this in or did you need some more testing on > > it? > > I haven't had time to test it yet. Any update on this, Jim? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27883
[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared
--- Comment #17 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 18:53 --- (In reply to comment #16) > Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' > undeclared > > I'll try to get around it as soon as I can. Thanks. It has been a month... would be nice if you could look at it soon. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-23 18:53:11 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102
[Bug tree-optimization/28814] [4.1/4.2 regression] in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:415
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 09:38 --- Reduced testcase: struct w49 { union { } value; }; f9887 (struct w49 a23040) { unsigned r9887; if (((struct structure_type24753 *) (r9887 - 1)) == ((void *) 0)) { backtrace ("stalin.sc", 7222, 248274); } } -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28814
[Bug tree-optimization/28814] [4.1/4.2 regression] in compare_values, at tree-vrp.c:415
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 07:05 --- Confirmed. Also happens with 4.2. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tbm at cyrius dot com Severity|critical|normal Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to work||4.0.3 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-23 07:05:53 date|| Summary|ICE when compiling Stalin |[4.1/4.2 regression] in |under 4.1 but not 4.0 |compare_values, at tree- ||vrp.c:415 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28814
[Bug c/28815] gcc-4.2-20060819 failed to compile Linux kernel 2.6.18-rc4-git1
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 05:56 --- And please consult http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28815
[Bug c/28815] gcc-4.2-20060819 failed to compile Linux kernel 2.6.18-rc4-git1
--- Comment #1 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-23 05:42 --- What error did you get? Can you please paste the error message. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28815
[Bug tree-optimization/27474] [4.2 regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have struct_field_tag in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:776
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 23:05 --- Created an attachment (id=12100) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12100&action=view) test case Testcase from application "ser". Fails on x86_64 with: gcc -ftree-vectorize -O -c Fails on x86 with: gcc -ftree-vectorize -O -msse2 -c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27474
[Bug other/28781] [4.2 regression] -fPIC generates non-PIC code
--- Comment #1 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 23:01 --- This works for me with gcc 4.2.0 20060810 or 4.2.0 20060819 and binutils 2.17-2. Can you try to downgrade binutils to see if it works then? -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tbm at cyrius dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28781
[Bug tree-optimization/28780] [4.2 regression] internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:108
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-19 18:56:16 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28780
[Bug target/24367] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] unrecognizable insn with -fPIC -O2 -funroll-loops
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-15 12:05:42 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24367
[Bug target/24367] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] unrecognizable insn with -fPIC -O2 -funroll-loops
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 12:05 --- *** Bug 28717 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tbm at cyrius dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24367
[Bug target/28717] [4.2 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2077 on s390
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-15 12:05 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24367 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE Target Milestone|4.2.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28717
[Bug c++/28677] [4.0/4.1 regression] Function prototype in function body crashes compilation
--- Comment #8 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 20:51 --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > I bet this was fixed by the patch which fixed PR 26757 finnally (comment > > #28). > > I can confirm this. Jakub, can you apply your patch for PR 26757 to 4.0 and 4.1? -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28677
[Bug c++/28677] [4.0/4.1 regression] Function prototype in function body crashes compilation
--- Comment #7 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 20:44 --- (In reply to comment #6) > I bet this was fixed by the patch which fixed PR 26757 finnally (comment #28). I can confirm this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28677
[Bug c++/28677] [4.0/4.1 regression] Function prototype in function body crashes compilation
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 20:18 --- Further reduced: double fabs (double __x) { } extern void exit (int __status); void nrerror (void) { exit(0); } float betacf (float x) { void nrerror (void); float d, h; d = 1.0 - x; if (fabs (d) < 1.0e-30) h = d; return h; } void betai (void) { void nrerror (void); nrerror (); } -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28677
[Bug c++/28677] [4.0/4.1 regression] Function prototype in function body crashes compilation
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 19:49 --- { __inline double fabs (double __x) throw () { } typedef struct { } *__locale_t; extern void exit (int __status) throw () __attribute__ ((__noreturn__)); } void nrerror (char error_text[]) { exit (1); } float betacf (float a, float b, float x) { void nrerror (char error_text[]); float aa, c, d, del, h, qab, qam, qap; d = 1.0 - qab * x / qap; if (fabs (d) < 1.0e-30) h = d; { if (fabs (d) < 1.0e-30) d = 1.0e-30; } return h; } float betai (float a, float b, float x) { void nrerror (char error_text[]); nrerror ("Bad x in routine betai"); } -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28677
[Bug c++/28677] [4.0/4.1 regression] Function prototype in function body crashes compilation
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 19:42 --- Fails with 4.0 and 4.1, works with 3.4 and 4.2. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail||4.0.4 4.1.1 Known to work||3.4.6 4.2.0 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-10 19:42:05 date|| Summary|Function prototype in |[4.0/4.1 regression] |function body crashes |Function prototype in |compilation |function body crashes ||compilation http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28677
[Bug c++/28683] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE (segfault in add_reg_br_prob_note) when comparing pointers with -O (and higher)
--- Comment #1 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 19:37 --- (gdb) run -O2 tt.cc Starting program: /usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.0/cc1plus -O2 tt.cc bar* testcase() Analyzing compilation unitPerforming intraprocedural optimizations Assembling functions: bar* testcase() Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x08517abc in add_reg_br_prob_note (last=, probability=5347) at gcc/cfgexpand.c:58 58 if (!any_condjump_p (last) (gdb) where #0 0x08517abc in add_reg_br_prob_note (last=, probability=5347) at gcc/cfgexpand.c:58 #1 0x08517fd0 in expand_gimple_basic_block (bb=0x40362900) at gcc/cfgexpand.c:1128 #2 0x0851938c in tree_expand_cfg () at gcc/cfgexpand.c:1634 #3 0x08514c86 in execute_one_pass (pass=0x872e320) at gcc/passes.c:864 #4 0x08514e57 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x872e320) at gcc/passes.c:911 #5 0x081cc676 in tree_rest_of_compilation (fndecl=0x4040fe70) at gcc/tree-optimize.c:418 #6 0x08131c7d in expand_body (fn=0x4040fe70) at gcc/cp/semantics.c:3072 #7 0x08566564 in cgraph_expand_function (node=0x403e2bc8) at gcc/cgraphunit.c:1194 #8 0x0856954a in cgraph_optimize () at gcc/cgraphunit.c:1259 #9 0x080d6aba in cp_finish_file () at gcc/cp/decl2.c:3341 #10 0x0819abef in c_common_parse_file (set_yydebug=0) at gcc/c-opts.c:1165 #11 0x084e0a0d in toplev_main (argc=3, argv=0xb9f4) at gcc/toplev.c:999 #12 0x081a9972 in main (argc=Cannot access memory at address 0x29 ) at gcc/main.c:35 (gdb) -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to fail||4.0.3 4.1.1 4.2.0 Known to work||3.3.6 3.4.6 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-10 19:37:19 date|| Summary|ICE (segfault) when |[4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE |comparing pointers with -O |(segfault in |(and higher)|add_reg_br_prob_note) when ||comparing pointers with -O ||(and higher) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28683
[Bug c/28675] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 (unrecognizable insn) [arm]
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 12:02 --- I was on gcc 4.2 btw. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in extract_insn, at |[4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in |recog.c:2084 (unrecognizable|extract_insn, at |insn) [arm] |recog.c:2084 (unrecognizable ||insn) [arm] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28675
[Bug c/28675] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084 (unrecognizable insn) [arm]
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 12:00 --- -O3 works here while -O2 fails - but, in any case, confirmed. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-10 12:00:52 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28675
[Bug target/28672] [4.2 Regression]: Gcc went into infinite loop when building libstdc++
-- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28672
[Bug target/28672] [4.2 Regression]: Gcc went into infinite loop when building libstdc++
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 11:53 --- *** Bug 28676 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schwab at suse dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28672
[Bug target/28676] [4.2 regression] infinite loop in vt_find_locations
--- Comment #1 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 11:53 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28672 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28676
[Bug c++/28659] [4.2 regression] ICE (segfault) while compiling kdelibs 4.0 snapshot
--- Comment #4 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-08 20:50 --- Confirmed. test::TestDescription& test::TestDescription::operator=(const test::TestDescription&) Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00477cd3 in min_vis_r (tp=, walk_subtrees=0x7fffcc62fa84, data=0x7fffcc62fc24) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c:1550 1550 if (!TREE_PUBLIC (TYPE_MAIN_DECL (*tp))) (gdb) where #0 0x00477cd3 in min_vis_r (tp=, walk_subtrees=0x7fffcc62fa84, data=0x7fffcc62fc24) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c:1550 #1 0x0086e318 in walk_tree (tp=0x2aaedebb40b8, func=0x477c90 , data=0x7fffcc62fc24, pset=0xd517b0) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/tree.c:7427 #2 0x0086ed3e in walk_tree (tp=0x2aaedebb4218, func=0x477c90 , data=0x7fffcc62fc24, pset=0xd517b0) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/tree.c:7652 #3 0x0086f211 in walk_type_fields (type=0x2aaedebb4210, func=0x477c90 , data=0x7fffcc62fc24, pset=dwarf2_read_address: Corrupted DWARF expression. ) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/tree.c:7355 #4 0x0086ed3e in walk_tree (tp=0x7fffcc62fc10, func=0x477c90 , data=0x7fffcc62fc24, pset=0xd517b0) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/tree.c:7652 #5 0x0086f11a in walk_tree_without_duplicates (tp=0x7fffcc62fc10, func=0x477c90 , data=0x7fffcc62fc24) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/tree.c:7672 #6 0x004793f2 in type_visibility (type=0x2aaedebb4210) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c:1568 #7 0x00479bb7 in determine_visibility (decl=0x2aaedeba9ee0) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c:1782 #8 0x00413914 in start_preparsed_function (decl1=0x2aaedeba9ee0, attrs=, flags=) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c:10644 #9 0x0042cfaf in start_function (declspecs=, declarator=, attrs=0x0) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/decl.c:10690 #10 0x004942c7 in cp_parser_init_declarator (parser=0x2aaedea23500, decl_specifiers=0x7fffcc62fdb0, checks=0x0, function_definition_allowed_p=1 '\001', member_p=0 '\0', declares_class_or_enum=, function_definition_p=0x7fffcc62fe0f "\001") at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:15374 #11 0x004947dd in cp_parser_single_declaration (parser=0x2aaedea23500, checks=0x0, member_p=0 '\0', friend_p=) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:15684 #12 0x004a2404 in cp_parser_template_declaration_after_export (parser=0x2aaedea23500, member_p=0 '\0') at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:15543 #13 0x004a41f7 in cp_parser_declaration (parser=0x2aaedea23500) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:7108 #14 0x004a475a in cp_parser_declaration_seq_opt (parser=0x2aaedea23500) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:7031 #15 0x004a4195 in cp_parser_declaration (parser=0x2aaedea23500) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:10559 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #16 0x004a475a in cp_parser_declaration_seq_opt (parser=0x2aaedea23500) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:7031 #17 0x004a4e49 in c_parse_file () at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:2755 #18 0x005331b5 in c_common_parse_file (set_yydebug=) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/c-opts.c:1164 #19 0x00866f33 in toplev_main (argc=, argv=) at /home/tbm/scratch/gcc/gcc/toplev.c:999 #20 0x2aaede5ab4ca in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 #21 0x0040273a in _start () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/elf/start.S:113 (gdb) -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-08 20:50:40 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28659
[Bug debug/26827] "GNAT BUG DETECTED" on compile GPS 1.3.1/gtkada
--- Comment #5 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 14:23 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Subject: Bug 26827 > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115969 > Log: > 2006-08-06 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PR target/26827 > * config/i386/i386.md: Add peephole2 to avoid "fld %st" > instructions. This should have been 27827. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26827
[Bug c++/28016] [4.1 Regression] emitting template constant
--- Comment #16 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 13:41 --- *** Bug 28620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tausq at debian dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016
[Bug c++/28620] [4.1 regression] static const member in template class leads to multiple definitions at linktime
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-06 13:41 --- This has been fixed already, both in GCC's SVN and in Debian's gcc-4.1 package. The reason you see it on HPPA is that recent version of gcc-4.1 in Debian don't build. This bug was fixed in -9 but hppa still has -8. Can you investigate why recent gcc-4.1 in Debian doesn't compile on HPPA? gcc-4.1 (4.1.1-9) unstable; urgency=low * Update to SVN 20060715. - Fix PR c++/28016, do not emit uninstantiated static data members. Closes: #373895, #376871. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28016 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28620
[Bug c++/28016] [4.1 Regression] emitting template constant
--- Comment #15 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 15:10 --- *** Bug 28599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter dot soetens at fmtc ||dot be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28016
[Bug c++/28599] multiple definitions of static const member of template class
--- Comment #3 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 15:10 --- Has been fixed in Debian and upstream already. Please talk to your vendor. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28016 *** -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28599
[Bug c++/28599] multiple definitions of static const member of template class
--- Comment #1 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 13:50 --- This is a duplicate of PR28016, which has been fixed already. What version of the compiler are you using exactly? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28599
[Bug c/28592] [4.0 regression] Segmentation Fault running -O2 on file with deep nesting
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 11:34 --- I can confirm this on i386 with 4.0.4 20060804. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-04 11:34:25 date|| Summary|Segmentation Fault running -|[4.0 regression] |O2 on file with deep nesting|Segmentation Fault running - ||O2 on file with deep nesting Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28592
[Bug target/28583] [4.2 regression] ICE in default_secondary_reload, at targhooks.c:532 when building libgcc2.c as _divsc3.o
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 08:36 --- Confirmed. -- tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-04 08:36:24 date|| Summary|ICE in |[4.2 regression] ICE in |default_secondary_reload, at|default_secondary_reload, at |targhooks.c:532 when|targhooks.c:532 when |building libgcc2.c as |building libgcc2.c as |_divsc3.o |_divsc3.o Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28583