[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #21 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:43 --- Subject: Bug 30510 Author: mueller Date: Mon Feb 5 12:43:17 2007 New Revision: 121596 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121596 Log: 2007-02-05 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR bootstrap/30510 * parser.c (cp_parser_class_specifier): Always initialize bases. Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #22 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:43 --- Fixed in 4.3. -- mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #20 from mtrudel at gmx dot ch 2007-01-31 16:19 --- In case it helps; I use this configuration on my 32bit Linux box to configure: /usr/local/src/gcc/configure --prefix=/home/Marco/Desktop/gcc --build=`/usr/local/src/gcc/config.guess` --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c,c++,java --enable-libgcj --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --disable-nls --disable-debug --disable-checking --enable-threads=posix --disable-win32-registry --with-gmp=/home/Marco/Desktop/gmp-out --with-mpfr=/home/Marco/Desktop/mpfr-out -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #17 from mtrudel at gmx dot ch 2007-01-30 10:52 --- Has there been any progress with this bug? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #18 from mtrudel at gmx dot ch 2007-01-30 11:00 --- Sorry, the previous message has been truncated: Has there been any progress with this bug? I can confirm it and I need the mentioned patch to be able to compile the current trunk: - tree bases; + tree bases = NULL_TREE; I understand that some configurations work and some fail. Also I cannot confirm the depency of bug 30549 since 30549 was fixed and this one still occurs... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #19 from abugger at littlepinkcloud dot com 2007-01-30 16:05 --- testing -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #15 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-27 00:02 --- Created an attachment (id=12967) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12967action=view) Part of cp/parser.c without --enable-checking=assert This is the part of cp/parser.c configured without --enable-checking=assert. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #16 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-27 00:06 --- Created an attachment (id=12968) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12968action=view) Part of cp/parser.c with --enable-checking=assert This is the part of cp/parser.c configured with --enable-checking=assert. Because different -enable-checking settings effectively create slightly different gcc source codes seen by gcc, gcc may or may not be determine bases will be initialized or not. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
-- mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-01-23 13:29:26 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #3 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 13:33 --- ah, no, this doesn't seem to be the same thing. -- mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- | |patches/2007- | |01/msg01731.html| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-23 14:00 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01654.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-23 14:03 --- An updated patch is at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01882.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 15:32 --- These issues have already been fixed as I can bootstrap now. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 15:47 --- which revision is that? -r121081 fails here -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
Re: [Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 15:47 --- which revision is that? -r121081 fails here revision 121050, and 121076. -- Pinski
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2007-01-23 15:50 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap --- Comment #7 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 15:47 --- which revision is that? -r121081 fails here revision 121050, and 121076. -- Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #9 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-23 16:00 --- -r121081 fails here too. -- hjl at lucon dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-23 16:02 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01882.html works for me with revision 121081. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 16:04 --- For one your resolve.c patch is incorrect, see PR 30549. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||30549 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 16:06 --- Two, I don't see any warning from cp/parser.c at all. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #13 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2007-01-23 16:53 --- Could this be an enable-checking issue? I'm only seeing the problem when configuring with --enable-checking=release, otherwise the compiler bootstraps fine. This is on i686-pc-linux-gnu. (I also have export BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 export CFLAGS=-O2 if that makes a difference.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
--- Comment #14 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-23 17:22 --- With revision 121082, I still got cc1: warning/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-ia64-linux/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-ia64-linux/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/gcc-4.3/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -c -DUSE_LIBUNWIND_EXCEPTIONS -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -Werror -Wc++-compat-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Icp -I/net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc -I/net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp -I/net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/../include -I/net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I/net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber /net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c -o cp/parser.o s being treated as errors /net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c: In function cp_parser_type_specifier: /net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:13206: warning: bases may be used uninitialized in this function /net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:13206: note: bases was declared here I used --enable-checking=assert to configure gcc. -- hjl at lucon dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
[Bug bootstrap/30510] [4.3 Regression] Gcc failed to bootstrap
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Summary|Gcc failed to bootstrap |[4.3 Regression] Gcc failed ||to bootstrap Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30510
