[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #26 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-02-19 15:00 --- patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00775.html -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- ||patches/2008- ||02/msg00775.html Keywords||patch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #25 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-30 17:33 --- Bootstrap is unbroken, lowering severity. What did you mean exactly here? :-) Severity is still blocker. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #24 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-14 11:17 --- Bootstrap is unbroken, lowering severity. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #21 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-16 23:32 --- P1 blocker regression for GCC 4.3, and no activity for 3 months. PING! Either someone at Apple or Paolo should show some activity here. Otherwise we might as well close this as WONTFIX, assuming it is apparently not important enough for anyone to spend some time on. Mark, is there a policy to downgrade bug severities if something is marked as a P1 blocker bug, but apparently nobody thinks it is important enough to fix it quickly? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #22 from mrs at apple dot com 2007-12-17 04:10 --- :-( -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #23 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-12-17 06:14 --- You're perfectly right; OTOH if I hadn't meant to fix it, I would have unassigned it. Sometimes people are busy, and for a build patch I usually do more than bootstrap/regtest on one architecture. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #20 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-10 16:51 --- Next week has come and gone... News? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #19 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-09-21 07:50 --- I have a patch, I'll get around to testing it next week, promised. :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #18 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-09-02 11:29 --- *** Bug 32161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-29 18:31 --- Can this now be closed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #17 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-06-29 19:25 --- And that's why I left it assigned to me. I'll work on it next week. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #16 from echristo at apple dot com 2007-06-29 19:00 --- No, we shouldn't close it until we can get the compiler building on ppc with -mdynamic-no-pic. -- echristo at apple dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||echristo at apple dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #13 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-24 07:17 --- For me too. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-24 15:31 --- I have run what I can of the testsuite (gcc, g++, gfortran, and objc) without regression. I have also run my version of the polyhedron tests and got: with Makefile.*'s from revision 124627 1891.060u 84.040s 33:15.89 98.9% with original revision + all the patches 1933.980u 88.770s 34:23.23 98.0%0+0k 14+429io 0pf+0w so an average solwdown of ~2.4%. slightly below the estimate from the comment: This fix speeds compiles by 3-5%. This seems evenly distibuted between compile and execution times and between the different cases, though this is only a visual impression and not a careful check (I can do it if there is any interest). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #8 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-05-23 15:24 --- I have a Mac so I can fix this, but I'm not sure on the timing. I'm commenting out the BOOT_CFLAGS setting for a moment to unbreak bootstrap. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-05-23 15:26 --- Subject: Bug 32009 Author: bonzini Date: Wed May 23 14:26:31 2007 New Revision: 124990 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124990 Log: 2007-05-23 Paolo Bonzini [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR bootstrap/32009 * mh-ppc-darwin: Temporarily disable. Modified: trunk/config/ChangeLog trunk/config/mh-ppc-darwin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-23 15:39 --- I have a Mac so I can fix this, but I'm not sure on the timing. I'm commenting out the BOOT_CFLAGS setting for a moment to unbreak bootstrap. I'll give a try tonight, but it should work (I am not sure to believe the 3-5% on compile time, I'll see!-). Thanks -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-23 21:48 --- With the last patch the build passed the critical point!-) I'll have the full build tomorrow morning (Paris time). Thanks -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #12 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-24 06:21 --- build completed. As expected. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-05-22 10:33 --- Please try this patch on top of the previous one. Its purpose is just to validate the logic of the previous one, it's not meant to be committed. Index: libgcc/configure.ac === --- libgcc/configure.ac (revision 124764) +++ libgcc/configure.ac (working copy) @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES AC_PROG_CC AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR +CFLAGS=$LIBCFLAGS + # Check for decimal float support. AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether decimal floating point is supported], [libgcc_cv_dfp], [AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([_Decimal32 x;], [libgcc_cv_dfp=yes], -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-22 16:55 --- Please try this patch on top of the previous one. Sorry, bad news again: I got the same failure (still have -mdynamic-no-pic). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #1 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-05-21 08:19 --- I know what's going on :-) -- bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2007-05-20 21:26:42 |2007-05-21 08:19:46 date|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-05-21 08:21 --- Created an attachment (id=13593) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13593action=view) tentative patch? Please test this patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-05-21 13:04 --- Sorry about the bad news, but I still have the very same failure with the patch: # @multilib_dir@ is not really necessary, but sometimes it has # more uses than just a directory name. /bin/sh ../../../gcc-4.3-20070519/libgcc/../mkinstalldirs . /sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.3.0-20070519/darwin_objdir/./gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.3.0-20070519/darwin_objdir/./gcc/ -B/sw/lib/gcc4/powerpc-apple-darwin7/bin/ -B/sw/lib/gcc4/powerpc-apple-darwin7/lib/ -isystem /sw/lib/gcc4/powerpc-apple-darwin7/include -isystem /sw/lib/gcc4/powerpc-apple-darwin7/sys-include -O2 -O2 -g -O2 -DIN_GCC-W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -Wa,-force_cpusubtype_ALL -pipe -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -dynamiclib -nodefaultlibs -install_name /sw/lib/gcc4/lib/libgcc_s`if test . = ppc64 ; then echo _. ; fi`.1.dylib -single_module -o ./libgcc_s.1.dylib.tmp -Wl,-exported_symbols_list,libgcc.map -compatibility_version 1 -current_version 1.0 -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -B./ _muldi3_s.o _negdi2_s.o _lshrdi3_s.o _ashldi3_s.o _ashrdi3_s.o _cmpdi2_s.o _ucmpdi2_s.o _clear_cache_s.o _enable_execute_stack_s.o _trampoline_s.o __main_s.o _absvsi2_s.o _absvdi2_s.o _addvsi3_s.o _addvdi3_s.o _subvsi3_s.o _subvdi3_s.o _mulvsi3_s.o _mulvdi3_s.o _negvsi2_s.o _negvdi2_s.o _ctors_s.o _ffssi2_s.o _ffsdi2_s.o _clz_s.o _clzsi2_s.o _clzdi2_s.o _ctzsi2_s.o _ctzdi2_s.o _popcount_tab_s.o _popcountsi2_s.o _popcountdi2_s.o _paritysi2_s.o _paritydi2_s.o _powisf2_s.o _powidf2_s.o _powixf2_s.o _powitf2_s.o _mulsc3_s.o _muldc3_s.o _mulxc3_s.o _multc3_s.o _divsc3_s.o _divdc3_s.o _divxc3_s.o _divtc3_s.o _bswapsi2_s.o _bswapdi2_s.o _fixunssfsi_s.o _fixunsdfsi_s.o _fixunsxfsi_s.o _fixsfdi_s.o _fixdfdi_s.o _fixxfdi_s.o _fixtfdi_s.o _fixunssfdi_s.o _fixunsdfdi_s.o _fixunsxfdi_s.o _fixunstfdi_s.o _floatdisf_s.o _floatdidf_s.o _floatdixf_s.o _floatditf_s.o _floatundisf_s.o _floatundidf_s.o _floatundixf_s.o _floatunditf_s.o _divdi3_s.o _moddi3_s.o _udivdi3_s.o _umoddi3_s.o _udiv_w_sdiv_s.o _udivmoddi4_s.o darwin-tramp_s.o ppc64-fp_s.o darwin-64_s.o darwin-ldouble_s.o darwin-world_s.o unwind-dw2_s.o unwind-dw2-fde-darwin_s.o unwind-sjlj_s.o unwind-c_s.o darwin-fallback_s.o emutls_s.o -lc /sw/lib/odcctools/bin/ld: warning -dylib_install_name /sw/lib/gcc4/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib not found in segment address table LD_SEG_ADDR_TABLE /sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/seg_addr_table /sw/lib/odcctools/bin/ld: _enable_execute_stack_s.o has local relocation entries in non-writable section (__TEXT,__text) collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [libgcc_s.dylib] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-stage2-target-libgcc] Error 2 make[1]: *** [stage2-bubble] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 Apparently '-mdynamic-no-pic' is hiding somewhere it is not expected. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #4 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-21 13:06 --- Nope. It clinches somehow with this one: config/mh-ppc-darwin. Here the BOOT_CFLAGS is set to -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic. In the libgcc Makefile.in I see that MULTILIB_CFLAGS is set to CFLAGS + extra stuff. CFLAGS itself is BOOT_CFLAGS, so the -mdynamic-no-pic in a shared lib :) I'll see if I understand a bit more later. Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
--- Comment #5 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-21 22:39 --- Late night comment, Paolo, I think your patch is fine but it exposed an inconsitency in using CFLAGS/BOOT_CFLAGS in libgcc. I could work around the problem with filtering out the mdynamic-no-pic inside the libgcc Makefile.in.: Index: Makefile.in === --- Makefile.in (revision 124895) +++ Makefile.in (working copy) @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ # Forcibly remove any profiling-related flags. There is no point # in supporting profiled bootstrap in this library. -override CFLAGS := $(filter-out -fprofile-generate -fprofile-use,$(CFLAGS)) +override CFLAGS := $(filter-out -fprofile-generate -fprofile-use -mdynamic-no-pic,$(CFLAGS)) # CFLAGS first is not perfect; normally setting CFLAGS should override any # options in LIBGCC2_CFLAGS. But LIBGCC2_CFLAGS may contain -g0, and CFLAGS It's absolutely the wrong place with the wrong comment. But it's ok for a first trial. It smells for me to have an additional var and to pass this one correctly to all involved consumers. As said, late night. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
[Bug bootstrap/32009] [4.3 Regression] building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed on OSX 10.3.9
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|regression |bootstrap Keywords||build Summary|building gcc4-4.3.0-20070518|[4.3 Regression] building |failed on OSX 10.3.9|gcc4-4.3.0-20070518 failed ||on OSX 10.3.9 Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
