[Bug bootstrap/32835] [4.3 regression] Bootstrap failure under SGI Irix

2007-08-07 Thread P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de 


--- Comment #3 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de  
2007-08-07 06:45 ---

Hi!

Fixed: revision 127237 builds smoothly

Thanks!

Philippe
=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes43910
# of unexpected failures33
# of unexpected successes   2
# of expected failures  97
# of unresolved testcases   9
# of untested testcases 35
# of unsupported tests  398
/usr/local_people/Philippe/Compilation/gcc/xgcc  version 4.3.0 20070806
(experimental)

=== gfortran Summary ===

# of expected passes19925
# of unexpected failures93
# of unexpected successes   7
# of expected failures  9
# of unsupported tests  28
/usr/local_people/Philippe/Compilation/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran 
version 4.3.0 20070806 (experimental)


-- 

P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32835

[Bug bootstrap/32835] [4.3 regression] Bootstrap failure under SGI Irix

2007-07-20 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #1 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-07-20 10:28 ---
As of r126744, I observe the same problem.  With ada included, I get two
additional differences:

./ada/b_gnat1.o differs
./ada/b_gnatb.o differs

My last successful mainline bootstrap was on 20070622, on 20070702 it already 
failed in stage 1 or 2 (I don't recall the exact circumstances and the tree
is gone).


-- 

ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-07-20 10:28:29
   date||
Summary|Bootstrap failure under SGI |[4.3 regression] Bootstrap
   |Irix|failure under SGI Irix


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32835

[Bug bootstrap/32835] [4.3 regression] Bootstrap failure under SGI Irix

2007-07-20 Thread P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de 


--- Comment #2 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de  
2007-07-20 10:55 ---

This is actually known (I missed it...): see Richard Sandiford's answer at

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-07/msg00389.html

Philippe


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32835