[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2008-02-05 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org


--- Comment #13 from bangerth at dealii dot org  2008-02-06 01:19 ---
Re-confirmed here:
  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-02/msg00066.html


-- 

bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bangerth at dealii dot org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-02-06 01:19:36
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2008-02-04 Thread dirtyepic at gentoo dot org


--- Comment #12 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org  2008-02-04 20:30 ---
no one cares that make profiledbootstrap on 64bit targets miscompiles the
preprocessor when BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 ?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2008-01-21 Thread stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com


--- Comment #11 from stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com  2008-01-21 20:18 
---
I can reproduce with gcc 4.3 snapshot 20080118


-- 

stefaan dot deroeck at gmail dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||stefaan dot deroeck at gmail
   ||dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2007-12-05 Thread h dot mth at web dot de


--- Comment #10 from h dot mth at web dot de  2007-12-05 13:01 ---
Replacing -O2 with -O1 in BOOT_CFLAGS hides the error here. At least one can
install gcc 4.3 again. :)

Gentoo users would edit toolchain.eclass:

--- /usr/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass.orig   2007-12-05 13:58:52.0
+0100
+++ /usr/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass2007-12-05 13:58:59.0
+0100
@@ -1467,7 +1467,7 @@

# In general gcc does not like optimization, and add -O2 where
# it is safe.  This is especially true for gcc 3.3 + 3.4
-   replace-flags -O? -O2
+   replace-flags -O? -O1

# ... sure, why not?
strip-unsupported-flags


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2007-12-04 Thread h dot mth at web dot de


--- Comment #9 from h dot mth at web dot de  2007-12-04 17:43 ---
I wonder what goes wrong with building cpp at stage 3(?). :)

ana build # for f in $(find ./ -type f -name cpp); do ls -l $f; PATH=$(dirname
$f) $f -dM /dev/null | grep __DBL_MAX__; done
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 279196  4. Dez 18:20 ./gcc/cpp
#define __DBL_MAX__ ½.3200111555710001e+310
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 258066  4. Dez 17:47 ./stage1-gcc/cpp
#define __DBL_MAX__ 1.7976931348623157e+308
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 389702  4. Dez 18:09 ./prev-gcc/cpp
#define __DBL_MAX__ 1.7976931348623157e+308

LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--sort-common
STAGE1_CFLAGS=-O2
BOOT_CFLAGS= -O2 -mtune=nocona -march=nocona -pipe


(Hint for bad defines from:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4569014.html#4569014)


-- 

h dot mth at web dot de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||h dot mth at web dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2007-11-10 Thread dirtyepic at gentoo dot org


--- Comment #7 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org  2007-11-10 15:56 ---
looks like this only occurs with profiledbootstrap.  i'll test a vanilla build
to see if this is Gentoo specific.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2007-11-10 Thread dirtyepic at gentoo dot org


--- Comment #8 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org  2007-11-11 02:42 ---
reproduced with gcc-4.3-20071109 snapshot.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/tmp/gccbuild $ ../gcc-4.3-20071109/configure --disable-nls
--with-system-zlib --disable-checking --disable-werror --enable-secureplt
--disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/tmp/gccbuild $ make profiledbootstrap -j1


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2007-11-09 Thread lindevel at gmx dot net


--- Comment #5 from lindevel at gmx dot net  2007-11-09 09:50 ---
The problem (stray characters in include/limits) persists after I rebuilt the
whole system to wipe out any leftovers from previous attempts at vectorisation
and hidden inlines. Setting LANG and LC_ALL also didn't help. It seems as if
the file itself is wrong...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2007-11-09 Thread dirtyepic at gentoo dot org


--- Comment #6 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org  2007-11-10 06:42 ---
this error doesn't happen on x86 but i did reproduce it w/ make
profiledbootstrap using today's trunk on x86_64.  if no one else is hitting
this it points to a problem on our end, but i'll look further into it soon.


-- 

dirtyepic at gentoo dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dirtyepic at gentoo dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2007-11-04 Thread lindevel at gmx dot net


--- Comment #4 from lindevel at gmx dot net  2007-11-04 11:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=14482)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14482action=view)
build.log ICE

Building without setting CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS results in an ICE:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.3.0_pre20071103/work/gcc-4.3.0-20071103/libiberty/hashtab.c:
In function #8216;htab_expand#8217;:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.3.0_pre20071103/work/gcc-4.3.0-20071103/libiberty/hashtab.c:554:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2007-11-03 Thread lindevel at gmx dot net


--- Comment #1 from lindevel at gmx dot net  2007-11-04 01:38 ---
(Make summary less cryptic)


-- 

lindevel at gmx dot net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Building libstdc++-v3:  |Building libstdc++-v3:
   |include/limits: stray   |include/limits: stray '\275'
   |#8216;\275#8217; in   |in program
   |program |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2007-11-03 Thread lindevel at gmx dot net


--- Comment #2 from lindevel at gmx dot net  2007-11-04 02:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=14481)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14481action=view)
build.log


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992



[Bug bootstrap/33992] Building libstdc++-v3: include/limits: stray '\275' in program

2007-11-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-11-04 06:31 ---
first don't use  -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, it changes the ABI.
Second  what happens if unset CFLAGS?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33992