[Bug bootstrap/56656] Suffix or operands invalid for 'movq'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p ||atches/2013-03/msg00789.htm ||l --- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-03-21 09:39:40 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Thu Mar 21 09:31:52 2013 New Revision: 196861 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=196861root=gccview=rev Log: PR bootstrap/56656 * configure.ac (HAVE_AS_IX86_INTERUNIT_MOVQ): New test. * configure: Regenerate. * config.in: Regenerate. * config/i386/i386.md (*movdf_internal): Use HAVE_AS_IX86_INTERUNIT_MOVQ to handle broken assemblers that require movd instead of movq mnemonic for interunit moves. (*movdi_internal): Ditto. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config.in trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.md trunk/gcc/configure trunk/gcc/configure.ac
[Bug bootstrap/56656] Suffix or operands invalid for 'movq'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656 --- Comment #14 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-03-21 09:40:13 UTC --- Fixed for good.
[Bug bootstrap/56656] Suffix or operands invalid for 'movq'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Component|libgcc |bootstrap Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-03-20 09:30:30 UTC --- Fixed. BTW: The change was applied to trunk only. 4.8 branch is not affected.
[Bug bootstrap/56656] Suffix or operands invalid for 'movq'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.8.0 |4.9.0 Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
[Bug bootstrap/56656] Suffix or operands invalid for 'movq'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56656 --- Comment #12 from Rich Townsend townsend at astro dot wisc.edu 2013-03-20 12:56:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) So I guess an important question is if the svn-fetched 4.8.0 wasn't actually svn-fetched trunk instead, Uros' changes have been committed only for 4.9 and not on the 4.8 branch. It was indeed trunk. I wasn't aware that 4.8 is now a proper branch, so I was still fetching the trunk.
