[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 Bug 81298 depends on bug 81295, which changed state. Bug 81295 Summary: bootstrap broken on powerpc-linux-gnu with --enable-default-pie https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295 What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to tkoe...@netcologne.de from comment #8) > > I understand that desire, but autoconf 2.69 has been around since 2012. > It is hardly a fast-moving target. > > I think it would be better to make a change towards 2.69. The fewer > versions of extra software we have to use to compile gcc, the better. Seconded; I have local versions of override.m4 patched to say 2.69 instead of 2.64 for this reason
[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 --- Comment #8 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de --- Am 03.07.2017 um 23:40 schrieb ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > > What|Removed |Added > > CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- >> Why do we depend on exactly this version? *sigh* > > I think we don't want a minor change to configure.ac to result in a upheaval > in > the generated configure script. We have dozens of configure scripts and > dozens > of developers, this would be a mess if everyone was free to use his pet > version. I understand that desire, but autoconf 2.69 has been around since 2012. It is hardly a fast-moving target. I think it would be better to make a change towards 2.69. The fewer versions of extra software we have to use to compile gcc, the better.
[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- > Why do we depend on exactly this version? *sigh* I think we don't want a minor change to configure.ac to result in a upheaval in the generated configure script. We have dozens of configure scripts and dozens of developers, this would be a mess if everyone was free to use his pet version.
[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Ah, IC. Trying not to use the pre-built gcc resulted in using the wrong version of autconf, apparently. Why do we depend on exactly this version? *sigh*
[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab--- configure.ac:33: error: Please use exactly Autoconf 2.64 instead of 2.69. ../config/override.m4:12: _GCC_AUTOCONF_VERSION_CHECK is expanded from... configure.ac:33: the top level autom4te: m4 failed with exit status: 1 aclocal-1.11: autom4te failed with exit status: 1 make[3]: *** [Makefile:406: ../../trunk/libbacktrace/aclocal.m4] Fehler 1
[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||81295 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- I mean PR 81295 . Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81295 [Bug 81295] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on powerpc-linux-gnu
[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Could be a duplicate of PR 81298.
[Bug bootstrap/81298] [7 Regression] Bootstrapping trunk fails during stage1-bubble on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with --enable-maintainer-mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81298 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 Summary|Bootstrap fails during |[7 Regression] |stage1-bubble on|Bootstrapping trunk fails |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with|during stage1-bubble on |--enable-maintainer-mode|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with ||--enable-maintainer-mode --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Boostrapping with current trunk appears to go much further, so it seems to be a problem with the gcc7 snapshot used for bootstrapping.