[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9c80eb12c58126a94ad869380af5b88b752c06f commit r12-1822-gf9c80eb12c58126a94ad869380af5b88b752c06f Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tue Jun 8 17:44:13 2021 -0400 c++: Failure to delay noexcept parsing with ptr-operator [PR100752] We weren't passing 'flags' to the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator in the ptr-operator case and as an effect, delayed parsing of noexcept didn't work as advertised. The following change passes more than just CP_PARSER_FLAGS_DELAY_NOEXCEPT but that doesn't seem to break anything. I'm now also passing member_p and static_p, as a consequence, two tests needed small tweaks. PR c++/100752 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.c (cp_parser_declarator): Pass flags down to cp_parser_declarator. Also pass static_p/member_p. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept69.C: New test. * g++.dg/parse/saved1.C: Adjust dg-error. * g++.dg/template/crash50.C: Likewise.
[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- As I mentioned on IRC, it seems like this may just be a matter of properly passing down flags/member_p in the recursive call to cp_parser_declarator.
[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Duh, we don't defer parsing of noexcept for any ptr-operator, like
struct S {
int& f() noexcept(noexcept(i));
int i;
};
Awkward, but the fix should be simple.
[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Mine then.
[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- This is happening because we aren't deferring the parse of this noexcept the way we're supposed to. Marek?
[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2021-05-26
[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2
[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0 Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Known to fail||11.1.0, 12.0
