[Bug c++/28513] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] QOI: Diagnostic missing since 3.3.x when naming rule is violated

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.2.5   |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28513

[Bug c++/28513] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] QOI: Diagnostic missing since 3.3.x when naming rule is violated

[jason at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
   |dot org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2007-08-06 14:41:06 |2008-11-20 19:34:25
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28513

[Bug c++/28513] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] QOI: Diagnostic missing since 3.3.x when naming rule is violated

[jason at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-20 20:24 ---
Subject: Bug 28513

Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 20 20:23:32 2008
New Revision: 142056

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142056
Log:
PR c++/28513
* parser.c (cp_parser_class_name): Call maybe_note_name_used_in_class.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lookup/name-clash7.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28513

[Bug c++/28513] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] QOI: Diagnostic missing since 3.3.x when naming rule is violated

[jason at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-20 20:27 ---
Fixed for 4.4.  Reopen if you'd like to see it fixed in 4.3 or 4.2.


-- 

jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
  Known to work|3.2.3 3.3.3 |3.2.3 3.3.3 4.4.0
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28513

[Bug c++/28513] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] QOI: Diagnostic missing since 3.3.x when naming rule is violated

[manu at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-03 10:43 ---
Is this really accepts-invalid? 

As the original description says, a diagnostic is not even required by the
standard...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28513

[Bug c++/28513] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] QOI: Diagnostic missing since 3.3.x when naming rule is violated

[jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-07-04 21:26 ---
Closing 4.1 branch.


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
   |QOI: Diagnostic missing |QOI: Diagnostic missing
   |since 3.3.x when naming rule|since 3.3.x when naming rule
   |is violated |is violated
   Target Milestone|4.1.3   |4.2.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28513