[Bug c++/29593] Missing warning.

2006-10-26 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org 


--- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org  2006-10-26 06:34 ---
This is in fact a duplicate of PR 968.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 968 ***


-- 

bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29593

[Bug c++/29593] Missing warning.

2006-10-26 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org 


--- Comment #3 from bangerth at dealii dot org  2006-10-26 06:34 ---
Ah shoot...


-- 

bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29593

[Bug c++/29593] Missing warning.

2006-10-26 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org 


--- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org  2006-10-26 06:35 ---
I meant PR 986 :(

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 986 ***


-- 

bangerth at dealii dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29593

[Bug c++/29593] Missing warning.

2006-10-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-25 18:56 ---
This warning is hard to get right as there are many many pieces of code that
depends on binding an rvalue to an constant reference.

This bug is related to PR 986.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29593