[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-13 22:31 ---
Subject: Bug 35138

Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 13 22:30:43 2008
New Revision: 132298

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132298
Log:
PR c++/35138
* parser.c (cp_parser_pseudo_destructor_name): If next tokens
are not identifier :: ~, return before calling cp_parser_type_name.

* g++.dg/template/member8.C: New test.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/member8.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138

[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-13 22:32 ---
Fixed.


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138

[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-12 20:14 ---
Posted 3 alternative patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00410.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00418.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00422.html


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
   |dot org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2008-02-08 16:11:14 |2008-02-12 20:14:24
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138

[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-11 23:11 ---
cp_parser_class_name since PR20293 errors unconditionally even during tentative
parse.  Mark, is there a way to get a silent tentative parse of the optional
nested name specifier plus typename?  Or is trying to parse it tentatively
as pseudo-dtor followed by parsing it as id-expression/member access if the
former just never going to work?


-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mark at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138

[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-08 16:11 ---
Confirmed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords||rejects-valid
  Known to fail||4.3.0
  Known to work||4.1.2 4.2.2
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-02-08 16:11:14
   date||
Summary|g++ rejects valid code  |[4.3 Regression] g++ rejects
   ||valid code
   Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138

[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-08 22:15 ---
This is worse than PR32384, so either we have a fix for it or we should revert
the fix for PR32384 before 4.3.0.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

OtherBugsDependingO||32384
  nThis||
   Priority|P3  |P1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138

[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-08 17:58 ---
Caused by my http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129836
This is during tentative parse, so I guess the errors should be suppressed.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138

[Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code

[bangerth at dealii dot org]

--- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org  2008-02-08 21:51 ---
This should get higher priority than P3...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138