[Bug c++/36052] type qualifiers ignored warning

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-27 17:46 ---
*** Bug 36656 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sebor at roguewave dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36052

[Bug c++/36052] type qualifiers ignored warning

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-27 17:47 ---
Really I don't see any differences between this and PR 30601.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30601 ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36052

[Bug c++/36052] type qualifiers ignored warning

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-26 09:12 ---
I think we should restrict the warning to explicitly specified qualifiers, thus
move it completely under the control of the parser.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36052

[Bug c++/36052] type qualifiers ignored warning

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-04-26 09:12:16
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36052

[Bug c++/36052] type qualifiers ignored warning

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-25 23:55 ---
This warning is correct, and not really bogus as the qualification is ignored
on the return value here even though not explicitly written by the user in the
function declaration.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement
Summary|[4.3/4.4 regression] bogus  |type qualifiers ignored
   |type qualifiers ignored   |warning
   |warning |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36052

[Bug c++/36052] type qualifiers ignored warning

[bangerth at math dot tamu dot edu]

--- Comment #2 from bangerth at math dot tamu dot edu  2008-04-26 00:01 
---
Subject: Re:  type qualifiers ignored warning


 This warning is correct, and not really bogus as the qualification is ignored
 on the return value here even though not explicitly written by the user in the
 function declaration.

No, sure, I fully understand that the 'const' is ignored here. What I'm 
saying is that this just happens to be a harmless side effect of the way I 
write the template. The point is that I need to write it this way so I can 
use classes in place of S that define value_type not as PODs, but as 
references or similar things. 

This is one of those warnings that simply make no sense with templates. 

W.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36052