[Bug c++/40918] uncaught_exception() returns wrong (inverted) value if some exception have crossed a DLL boundary before

2009-08-04 Thread andriys at gmail dot com


--- Comment #6 from andriys at gmail dot com  2009-08-04 13:41 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 I cannot comment on the build of libsdc++.dll in the mingw 4.4.0 release since
 I have not looked at that source. 
There is a patch file that is shipped along with the mingw 4.4.0 build
instructions/script. The patch adds most of the essential things that the Dave
Korn's patch does (i.e. __attribute__((dllimport)) decorations and
-no-undefined linker option.) I believe the official MinGW binaries were built
with that patch applied. Well, there are your E-mail at the top of that patch
file...

 Applying Dave Korn's patch mentioned in Comment #2, and linking against
 libstdc++.dll, I get this with your original testcaase:
 
 Expecting 'true', got 'true'
 Expecting 'false', got 'false'
 
Where this patch is supposed to be applied to? trunk?
I have looked through the patches you are referring to and through the source
in repository. As far as I can see, libsupc++ is still static only, and
eh_globals.cc is a part of libsupc++, not libstdc++. The fact that test-case
works correctly for you could be just a coincidence. The more reliable way to
check for the problem would be to compare the value returned by the
__cxa_get_globals() when being from the main executable and from the dll
respectively. I'll prepare the new test case.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40918



[Bug c++/40918] uncaught_exception() returns wrong (inverted) value if some exception have crossed a DLL boundary before

2009-08-04 Thread andriys at gmail dot com


--- Comment #7 from andriys at gmail dot com  2009-08-04 13:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=18296)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18296action=view)
Yet another test case

This test checks whether main executable and dll share common
abi::__cxa_eh_globals structure.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40918



[Bug c++/40918] uncaught_exception() returns wrong (inverted) value if some exception have crossed a DLL boundary before

2009-08-04 Thread dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net


--- Comment #8 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net  2009-08-05 
04:55 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
 (In reply to comment #5)
 
  Applying Dave Korn's patch mentioned in Comment #2, and linking against
  libstdc++.dll, I get this with your original testcaase:
  
  Expecting 'true', got 'true'
  Expecting 'false', got 'false'
  
 Where this patch is supposed to be applied to? trunk?

Yes, it against trunk.

 I have looked through the patches you are referring to and through the source
 in repository. As far as I can see, libsupc++ is still static only, and
 eh_globals.cc is a part of libsupc++, not libstdc++.

libsupc++ is a convenience lib that is included in libstdc++


 The fact that test-case
 works correctly for you could be just a coincidence. The more reliable way to
 check for the problem would be to compare the value returned by the
 __cxa_get_globals() when being from the main executable and from the dll
 respectively. I'll prepare the new test case.

The new test case succeeds when I link against a shared libstdc++.

Danny


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40918



[Bug c++/40918] uncaught_exception() returns wrong (inverted) value if some exception have crossed a DLL boundary before

2009-08-02 Thread dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net


--- Comment #5 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net  2009-08-02 
08:57 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 I'm linking using g++ driver, so shared libgcc is enabled by default in 4.4.0.


 I've just tried to enabled shared libstdc++ as described in the Release Notes
 to the MinGW GCC 4.4.0 release, which made no difference.
 
 More over, I modified the test case the following way: I got rid of std::cout
 in favor of printf(), added -nodefaultlibs option to the linker and specified
 all the required libraries manually. Now libstdc++ is not linked at all
 (neither static nor dynamic), the bug is still here.
 

I cannot comment on the build of libsdc++.dll in the mingw 4.4.0 release since
I have not looked at that source. 

However, your revised testcase -- linking against a static libsupc++ -- would
be expected to fail.  We can have only one instance of the eh_globals structure
defined in libsupc++/eh_globals.cc. This is accomplished by linking both the
.exe  and the .dll against a shared libstdc++.

Applying Dave Korn's patch mentioned in Comment #2, and linking against
libstdc++.dll, I get this with your original testcaase:

Expecting 'true', got 'true'
Expecting 'false', got 'false'


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40918



[Bug c++/40918] uncaught_exception() returns wrong (inverted) value if some exception have crossed a DLL boundary before

2009-07-31 Thread andriys at gmail dot com


--- Comment #3 from andriys at gmail dot com  2009-07-31 06:56 ---
I'm linking using g++ driver, so shared libgcc is enabled by default in 4.4.0.
I've just tried to enabled shared libstdc++ as described in the Release Notes
to the MinGW GCC 4.4.0 release, which made no difference.

More over, I modified the test case the following way: I got rid of std::cout
in favor of printf(), added -nodefaultlibs option to the linker and specified
all the required libraries manually. Now libstdc++ is not linked at all
(neither static nor dynamic), the bug is still here.

I'll attach the modified test case shortly.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40918



[Bug c++/40918] uncaught_exception() returns wrong (inverted) value if some exception have crossed a DLL boundary before

2009-07-31 Thread andriys at gmail dot com


--- Comment #4 from andriys at gmail dot com  2009-07-31 06:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=18277)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18277action=view)
Modified test case (not dependent on libstdc++ at all)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40918



[Bug c++/40918] uncaught_exception() returns wrong (inverted) value if some exception have crossed a DLL boundary before

2009-07-30 Thread andriys at gmail dot com


--- Comment #1 from andriys at gmail dot com  2009-07-30 20:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=18275)
 -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18275action=view)
Test case


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40918



[Bug c++/40918] uncaught_exception() returns wrong (inverted) value if some exception have crossed a DLL boundary before

2009-07-30 Thread dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net


--- Comment #2 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net  2009-07-31 
04:18 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
 I was not able to reproduce the bug on Linux, so I assume this is a
 Windows-specific.
 
 If an exception is generated inside shared library (DLL), then crosses the
 DLL-boundary and gets caught in some other module, the std::uncaught_exception
 will always return wrong (inverted) value from now on. Here's a small test
 case.
 

You need to link against a shared libgcc and a shared libstdc++ for this to
work.  Shared libgcc is part of standard build now for mingw  Shared libstdc++
is close.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg01042.html

Danny


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40918