[Bug c++/41153] [4.4 Regression] ICE in building Qt4 src/core
--- Comment #14 from t7 at gmail dot com 2009-09-21 11:05 --- I can confirm this is fixed in gcc-4_4-branch. Thank you. -- t7 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41153
[Bug c++/41153] [4.4 Regression] ICE in building Qt4 src/core
--- Comment #13 from t7 at gmail dot com 2009-09-18 09:11 --- Hmm I haven't noticed this bug has been fixed a week ago, since [Revision 151627], it was still reproducible at [Revision 151584] which was just a day before. Thanks!! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41153
[Bug c++/41153] [4.4 Regression] ICE in building Qt4 src/core
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 09:32 --- Mark, I don't think this should be P1, __optimize__ attribute is new in 4.4 (so considering it regression is already quite weird, though the attribute is ignored in older releases, so technically it is a regression, albeit one wouldn't use it with pre-4.4), but more importantly is known to be broken in many ways. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41153
[Bug c++/41153] [4.4 Regression] ICE in building Qt4 src/core
--- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 13:54 --- I think the question is whether the use of __optimize__ is in a standard Qt release. If it is, then I'm quite concerned; it's bad if GCC 4.4.2 can't build Qt/KDE. (TBH, I'm concerned anyhow; if __optimize__ is unreliable, then perhaps we should be ignoring/warning about it in 4.4.x until we get it solid...) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41153
[Bug c++/41153] [4.4 Regression] ICE in building Qt4 src/core
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 14:32 --- The problem is that the optimization saving/restoring infrastructure seems to ignore OVERRIDE_OPTIONS. i386 OPTIMIZATION_OPTIONS sets flag_pcc_struct_return to 2 and expects OVERRIDE_OPTIONS to set it to 0 resp. 1 if it is still 2, but as OVERRIDE_OPTIONS isn't called, it remains set to 2, which is treated as if it was 1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41153
[Bug c++/41153] [4.4 Regression] ICE in building Qt4 src/core
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41153