[Bug c++/43075] 20_util/bind/ref2.cc FAILs

2010-02-17 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-17 17:51 
---
IIUC, this is not a regression.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4
Summary|[4.5 Regression]|20_util/bind/ref2.cc FAILs
   |20_util/bind/ref2.cc FAILs  |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43075

[Bug c++/43075] 20_util/bind/ref2.cc FAILs

2010-02-17 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 


--- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2010-02-17 17:57 
---
Mark, with your permission, I'm restoring P3: indeed, strictly speaking the
failure of that specific testcase isn't a regression, because it didn't exist
in gcc4.4.x, but I understand it uncovered a rather subtle problem in the C++
front-end. Anyway, I agree that we should figure out a plain C++ testcase,
outside the libstdc++ testsuite, which fails only in 4.5, otherwise, I will
understand if you release managers eventually decide to xfail the library
testcase. But Jason is on it already... ;)


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P4  |P3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43075