[Bug c++/51331] bad code generated when explicitly calling auto-generated constructor of virtual base

2011-11-29 Thread zhezherun at yandex dot ru 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51331

Andrew Zhezherun zhezherun at yandex dot ru changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||wrong-code
 Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
   See Also||http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
   ||/show_bug.cgi?id=50618
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |
  Known to fail||4.6.2, 4.6.3

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Zhezherun zhezherun at yandex dot ru 2011-11-29 
10:03:14 UTC ---
Reopened because this has not been fixed in latest gcc 4.6.x - I just tried
gcc-4.6-2025 and my test case still crashes. Either this is a new issue or
the previous one has not been fully addressed. Please feel free to reopen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50618 instead and attach this new
test case there if you prefer that.

[Bug c++/51331] bad code generated when explicitly calling auto-generated constructor of virtual base

2011-11-29 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51331

Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2011-11-29
 CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
  Known to fail||4.7.0

--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-11-29 
11:54:15 UTC ---
I can see the glibc errors with current mainline.

[Bug c++/51331] bad code generated when explicitly calling auto-generated constructor of virtual base

2011-11-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51331

Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-29 
05:01:12 UTC ---
This is a dup of bug 50618 which was fixed for 4.6.3 (and 4.4.7 and 4.5.5).

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 50618 ***