[Bug c++/53164] Undefined reference to template function instantiation

2023-04-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53164

--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b5e38b1c166357e2a63d38ae6da7ae5d68fc115b

commit r13-6970-gb5e38b1c166357e2a63d38ae6da7ae5d68fc115b
Author: Patrick Palka 
Date:   Sat Apr 1 10:19:08 2023 -0400

c++: improve "NTTP argument considered unused" fix [PR53164, PR105848]

r13-995-g733a792a2b2e16 worked around the problem of (pointer to)
function NTTP arguments not always getting marked as odr-used, by
redundantly calling mark_used on the substituted ADDR_EXPR callee of a
CALL_EXPR.  That is just a narrow workaround however, since it assumes
the function is later called, but the use as a template argument alone
should constitute an odr-use of the function (since template arguments
are an evaluated context, and we're really passing its address); we
shouldn't need to subsequently call or otherwise use the function NTTP
argument.

This patch fixes this in a more general way by walking the template
arguments of each specialization that's about to be instantiated and
redundantly calling mark_used on all entities used within.  As before,
the call to mark_used as it worst a no-op, but it compensates for the
situation where the specialization was first formed in a template context
in which mark_used is inhibited.

Another approach would be to call mark_used whenever we substitute a
TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX, but that would result in many more redundant calls
to mark_used compared to this approach.  And as the second testcase
below illustrates, we also need to walk C++20 class NTTP arguments which
can be large and thus expensive to walk repeatedly.  The change to
invalid_tparm_referent_p is needed to avoid incorrectly rejecting class
NTTP arguments containing function pointers as in the testcase.

(The third testcase is unrelated to this fix, but it helped rule out an
earlier approach I was considering and it seems we don't have existing
test coverage for this situation.)

PR c++/53164
PR c++/105848

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

* pt.cc (invalid_tparm_referent_p): Accept ADDR_EXPR of
FUNCTION_DECL.
(instantiate_class_template): Call mark_template_arguments_used.
(tsubst_copy_and_build) : Revert r13-995 change.
(mark_template_arguments_used): Define.
(instantiate_body): Call mark_template_arguments_used.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3a.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3b.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/fn-ptr4.C: New test.

[Bug c++/53164] Undefined reference to template function instantiation

2022-08-11 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53164

Patrick Palka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |12.2

--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka  ---
Fixed for GCC 12.2/13

[Bug c++/53164] Undefined reference to template function instantiation

2022-07-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53164

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits  ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:670ef5b108d0acfbde96f44b064079f2fa0c92d4

commit r12-8604-g670ef5b108d0acfbde96f44b064079f2fa0c92d4
Author: Patrick Palka 
Date:   Mon Jun 6 14:29:12 2022 -0400

c++: function NTTP argument considered unused [PR53164, PR105848]

Here at parse time the template argument f (an OVERLOAD) in A gets
resolved ahead of time to the FUNCTION_DECL f, and we defer marking
f as used until instantiation (of g) as usual.

Later when instantiating g the type A (where f has already been
resolved) is non-dependent, so tsubst_aggr_type avoids re-processing its
template arguments, and we end up never actually marking f as used
(which means we never instantiate it) even though A::h() later calls
it, leading to a link error.

This patch works around this issue by looking through ADDR_EXPR when
calling mark_used on the substituted callee of a CALL_EXPR.

PR c++/53164
PR c++/105848

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

* pt.cc (tsubst_copy_and_build) : Look through an
ADDR_EXPR callee when calling mark_used.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3.C: New test.

(cherry picked from commit 733a792a2b2e1662e738fa358b45a2720a8618a7)

[Bug c++/53164] Undefined reference to template function instantiation

2022-06-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53164

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:733a792a2b2e1662e738fa358b45a2720a8618a7

commit r13-995-g733a792a2b2e1662e738fa358b45a2720a8618a7
Author: Patrick Palka 
Date:   Mon Jun 6 14:29:12 2022 -0400

c++: function NTTP argument considered unused [PR53164, PR105848]

Here at parse time the template argument f (an OVERLOAD) in A gets
resolved ahead of time to the FUNCTION_DECL f, and we defer marking
f as used until instantiation (of g) as usual.

Later when instantiating g the type A (where f has already been
resolved) is non-dependent, so tsubst_aggr_type avoids re-processing its
template arguments, and we end up never actually marking f as used
(which means we never instantiate it) even though A::h() later calls
it, leading to a link error.

This patch works around this issue by looking through ADDR_EXPR when
calling mark_used on the substituted callee of a CALL_EXPR.

PR c++/53164
PR c++/105848

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

* pt.cc (tsubst_copy_and_build) : Look through an
ADDR_EXPR callee when calling mark_used.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

* g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3.C: New test.

[Bug c++/53164] Undefined reference to template function instantiation

2021-10-05 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53164

Patrick Palka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |ppalka at gcc dot 
gnu.org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka  ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Looks as though we need to call mark_used for function templates used as
> non-type template parameters

Yep :)

[Bug c++/53164] Undefined reference to template function instantiation

2021-08-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53164

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||niqiuha at gmail dot com

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski  ---
*** Bug 82657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/53164] Undefined reference to template function instantiation

2012-04-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53164

Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2012-04-30
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Severity|major   |normal

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-30 
10:46:39 UTC ---
Looks as though we need to call mark_used for function templates used as
non-type template parameters