[Bug c++/55275] abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15 14:48:41 UTC --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/55275] abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-15 01:53:34 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Nov 15 01:53:23 2012 New Revision: 193524 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193524 Log: PR c++/55275 * pt.c (maybe_process_partial_specialization): Update DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION for new specializations. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/abi-tag3.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr31439.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/crash98.C trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/type_traits/add_unsigned_integer_neg.cc trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/type_traits/remove_unsigned_integer_neg.cc
[Bug c++/55275] abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2012-11-12 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 17:28:59 UTC --- I agree this is a bug, but I still don't think you need to tag future, since it's new in C++11.
[Bug c++/55275] abi_tag attribute doesn't work on explicit specializations of class templates
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 18:04:53 UTC --- Yep, I filed this before your reply on the list. I'm happy to change future without using the tag, I was just being (maybe too) cautious about ABI changes. Thanks.
