[Bug c++/56709] Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56709 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2013-03-24 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-24 14:06:46 UTC --- What is the question? You've only shown one GCC command, what is the other one?
[Bug c++/56709] Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56709 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-24 14:08:53 UTC --- Bugzilla is not the right place for this, if you'd asked a real question and provided both commands when you sent it to gcc-help you might have got an answer. Please follow up on the mailing list.
[Bug c++/56709] Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56709 Markus Elfring Markus.Elfring at web dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #3 from Markus Elfring Markus.Elfring at web dot de 2013-03-24 14:48:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) What is the question? 1. Why do I get error messages about undefined references here? 2. Should the shown commands be equivalent? You've only shown one GCC command, what is the other one? From ~/Projekte/OpalVoip/OPAL/3.10.10/config.log: configure:6101: g++ -o conftest -Wall -Wextra -Wstrict-aliasing -Wfloat-equal -Wno-comment -Wno-unused -Winit-self -Wno-missing-field-initializers -DP_64BIT -DPTRACING=1 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -fexceptions -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/SDL -felide-constructors -Wreorder -fPIC -DP_64BIT -DPTRACING=1 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -fexceptions -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/SDL -felide-constructors -Wreorder -DP_64BIT -DPTRACING=1 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -fexceptions -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/SDL conftest.cpp -L/usr/local/lib64 -lpt_s -lrt -lsasl2 -lldap -llber -lldap_r -lssl -lcrypto -lexpat -llua -lSDL -lpthread -lodbc -lresolv -ldl 5 (In reply to comment #2) It seems that no other software developer was interested so far to add constructive feedback for this issue on the mailing list.
[Bug c++/56709] Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56709 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-24 14:59:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) It seems that no other software developer was interested so far to add constructive feedback for this issue on the mailing list. So ping the list again, bugzilla is not the right place to ask questions. As I said, your question was unclear, you asked why there's a difference between two commands and only show one command. Noone's going to waste their time trying to answer you if your question is unclear and can't be understood.
