[Bug c++/64270] packed fields
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64270 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Actually this is invalid and here is the reason why: a packed reference is not going to bind to a reference by design. It is a copy of the array at this point. If you change from an array to a scalar it will also do the same behavior.
[Bug c++/64270] packed fields
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64270 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a3at.mail at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 64369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/64270] packed fields
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64270 Damien Ruscoe damien.ruscoe at imgtec dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damien.ruscoe at imgtec dot com --- Comment #1 from Damien Ruscoe damien.ruscoe at imgtec dot com --- Created attachment 34252 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34252action=edit testcase
[Bug c++/64270] packed fields
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64270 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2014-12-11 Version|4.1.2 |4.8.3 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail||4.1.2, 4.4.7, 4.8.3, 5.0 Severity|major |normal --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed.