[Bug c++/65198] [4.9 Regression] User-defined literal template inside generic lambda segfaults
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|4.9.4 |5.0 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Fixed in GCC 5+
[Bug c++/65198] [4.9 Regression] User-defined literal template inside generic lambda segfaults
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2015-12-01 CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work|5.0 |5.1.0 Version|5.0 |4.9.3 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail||4.9.3 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Both GCC 5.1.0 and 6.0 (today's trunk) compile the code without any errors. GCC 4.9.2 and 4.9.3 fail with the ICE in comment #3. Changing Version to reflect that.
[Bug c++/65198] [4.9 Regression] User-defined literal template inside generic lambda segfaults
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.4
[Bug c++/65198] [4.9 Regression] User-defined literal template inside generic lambda segfaults
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
[Bug c++/65198] [4.9 Regression] User-defined literal template inside generic lambda segfaults
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||5.0 Target Milestone|5.0 |4.9.3 Summary|[5 Regression] User-defined |[4.9 Regression] |literal template inside |User-defined literal |generic lambda segfaults|template inside generic |GCC 5.0 |lambda segfaults Known to fail||4.9.2
[Bug c++/65198] [4.9 regression] User-defined literal template inside generic lambda segfaults GCC 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65198 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Works for me with 20150220 (r220835).