[Bug c++/66976] Compiler error for well-formed program with a definition of a constexpr function returning void

[trippels at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66976

Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
void became a literal type in C++14.

[Bug c++/66976] Compiler error for well-formed program with a definition of a constexpr function returning void

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66976

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Anders Granlund from comment #0)
 For comparison Clang accepts the program without errors.

Not if you use -std=c++11 it doesn't.

Both GCC and Clang reject it with -std=c++11 and accept it with -std=c++14, as
expected.

N.B. we don't need the full output of compiling with -v, just the output of
'gcc -v' is enough (and much less verbose).