[Bug c++/83429] Incorrect line number reported by -Wformat-truncation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83429 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- GCC 11 and 12 print the following for the test case in comment #0. I believe the problem has been resolved (the %G format is gone now from 12). pr83429.c: In function ‘void test(S*)’: pr83429.c:12:42: warning: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing up to 9 bytes into a region of size between 5 and 14 [-Wformat-truncation=] 12 | snprintf(s->out, sizeof(s->out), "%s.%s", s->str1, s->str2); // line 12 | ^~ pr83429.c:12:13: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 2 and 20 bytes into a destination of size 15 12 | snprintf(s->out, sizeof(s->out), "%s.%s", s->str1, s->str2); // line 12 | ^~~
[Bug c++/83429] Incorrect line number reported by -Wformat-truncation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83429 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sylvestre at debian dot org --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 83586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/83429] Incorrect line number reported by -Wformat-truncation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83429 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
[Bug c++/83429] Incorrect line number reported by -Wformat-truncation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83429 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2017-12-15 CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=83369, ||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=83336 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Confirmed. The whole sprintf pass is missing the %G directive in warning_at() calls to print the inlining context. With it added the warning for the test case from comment #2 looks like this: d.c: In function ‘void test(S*)’: d.c:16:17: warning: ‘%s’ directive argument is null [-Wformat-truncation=] snprintf(s->out, sizeof(s->out), ".%s", s->str); ^~~ This should be easy to fix. It's been in the back of my mind to do this but it hasn't risen up to the top of the priority list. With a bug reported for it I have more of an incentive -- thanks :) For reference, pr83369 and pr83336 point out similar or related problems with the inlining context.
[Bug c++/83429] Incorrect line number reported by -Wformat-truncation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83429 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Fruzynski--- Sometimes actual location is not reported at all: [code] #include #include struct S { char* str; int n; char out[10]; }; void test(S* s) { if (s->str) snprintf(s->out, sizeof(s->out), "%d", s->n); else snprintf(s->out, sizeof(s->out), ".%s", s->str); } [/code] [out] test.cc: In function ‘void test(S*)’: test.cc:11:6: warning: ‘%s’ directive argument is null [-Wformat-truncation=] void test(S* s) ^~~~ [/out]
[Bug c++/83429] Incorrect line number reported by -Wformat-truncation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83429 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Fruzynski--- Another test case, this time "note:" with argument range also points to incorrect line: [code] #include struct S { unsigned char n; char out[2]; }; void test(S* s) // line 9 { snprintf(s->out, sizeof(s->out), "%d", s->n); // line 11 } [/code] [out] test.cc: In function ‘void test(S*)’: test.cc:9:6: warning: ‘%d’ directive output may be truncated writing between 1 and 3 bytes into a region of size 2 [-Wformat-truncation=] void test(S* s) // line 9 ^~~~ test.cc:9:6: note: directive argument in the range [0, 255] test.cc:11:13: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 2 and 4 bytes into a destination of size 2 snprintf(s->out, sizeof(s->out), "%d", s->n); // line 11 ^~~~ [/out]