[Bug c++/86562] Missing warning (error in C++11) for passing nontrivial object to varargs function via function pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86562 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- I disagree. This report states "g++ accepts it, but clang++ rejects it" and that is not a bug, it's a feature. If a diagnostic is desired it can be requested with -Wconditionally-supported or -Werror-conditionally-supported 64867 says "It would be nice to have a distinct warning flag for this feature" which is different. This bug is invalid.
[Bug c++/86562] Missing warning (error in C++11) for passing nontrivial object to varargs function via function pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86562 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- I think this is actually a dup of bug 64867 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 64867 ***
[Bug c++/86562] Missing warning (error in C++11) for passing nontrivial object to varargs function via function pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86562 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Not a bug. The standard says passing non-trivial types through varargs is "conditionally-supported" so an implementation can either support it, or reject it with a diagnostic. GCC supports it, Clang doesn't.
