[Bug c++/88528] [7 Regression] ICE with templated operator bool() in gcc 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|7.5 |8.0 Known to fail||7.5.0 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Fixed in GCC 8.
[Bug c++/88528] [7 Regression] ICE with templated operator bool() in gcc 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88528 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Roskin --- The trivial backport of PR c++/85032 fixes both my testcase and the original issue with my code. Please include the fix in gcc 7.5.
[Bug c++/88528] [7 Regression] ICE with templated operator bool() in gcc 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88528 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Roskin --- I ran "git bisect" between gcc 7.1.0 (affected) and gcc 8.1.0 (unaffected). Following commit fixed the issue: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/e0ccd4807edc919735b4d86590b5a9def529f91c 2018-04-11 Marek Polacek PR c++/85032 * constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): Consider conversions from classes to literal types potentially constant. The original issue: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85032 It's a short fix that also adds a similar testcase. The fix can be applied to gcc-7-branch. Let's see if it fixes my testcase and also my "real world" issue.
[Bug c++/88528] [7 Regression] ICE with templated operator bool() in gcc 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work||6.5.0, 8.1.0 Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed||2018-12-17 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|ICE with templated operator |[7 Regression] ICE with |bool() in gcc 7 |templated operator bool() ||in gcc 7 Target Milestone|--- |7.5 Known to fail||7.1.0, 7.4.0 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed.
