[Bug c++/90664] [9/10 regression] noexcept confuses template argument deduction

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90664

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.

[Bug c++/90664] [9/10 regression] noexcept confuses template argument deduction

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90664

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits  ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b13ac26df5e401ce5914b8ec0c862d56edd57913

commit r10-9842-gb13ac26df5e401ce5914b8ec0c862d56edd57913
Author: Jason Merrill 
Date:   Fri Apr 2 17:07:12 2021 -0400

c++: PMF template parm and noexcept [PR90664]

The constexpr code only wants to preserve PTRMEM_CST in conversions if the
conversions are only qualification conversions; dropping noexcept counts as
a qualification adjustment in overload resolution, so let's include it
here.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

PR c++/90664
* cvt.c (can_convert_qual): Check fnptr_conv_p.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

PR c++/90664
* g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type24.C: New test.

[Bug c++/90664] [9/10 regression] noexcept confuses template argument deduction

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90664

Jason Merrill  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[9/10/11 regression]|[9/10 regression] noexcept
   |noexcept confuses template  |confuses template argument
   |argument deduction  |deduction
  Known to work||11.0
  Known to fail|11.0|

--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill  ---
Fixed for GCC 11 so far.